Big Stone (MN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Big Stone (MN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Big Stone (MN)
1,893
Total Investors in Big Stone (MN)
760
Investor Owned SFR in Big Stone (MN)
626(33.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
717
SFR Owned
576
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
43
SFR Owned
61
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 626 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Big Stone County, Owning 33% of Homes and Paying Premiums
Investors own 626 SFR properties in Big Stone County (33.1% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 98.9% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, investors were aggressive net buyers, paying 91.6% more than traditional homeowners, a sharp reversal of typical discount-buying strategies. Institutional investors have zero presence, making this a purely grassroots market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 626 SFRs in Big Stone County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 92.0%.
Cash purchases heavily outweigh financing, with 510 properties owned outright compared to 116 financed. A significant 617 properties (98.6%) are classified as rented, confirming a strong rental focus across the portfolio.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 91.6% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, a reversal of typical market trends.
This premium is a consistent trend, with landlords also paying 126.4% more in Q3 2025 and a staggering 248.4% more in Q2 2025. This suggests investors are targeting different, higher-value properties than typical homeowners in this county.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 2025, purchasing 7 of 13 homes sold for a 53.8% market share.
Mom-and-pop landlords accounted for 100% of investor acquisitions, with no purchases from institutional investors. All 7 properties were bought by new single-property landlords, signaling strong grassroots interest.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.9% of investor-owned homes, with institutional investors having no presence.
Single-property landlords are the market's backbone, owning 517 properties, an 81.0% share. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero holdings in the county, showing a complete absence of large-scale corporate ownership.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual landlords dominate smaller portfolios, owning 93.9% of single-property holdings.
Company ownership share increases with portfolio size, from 6.1% in Tier 01 to 33.3% in the 6-10 property tier. A crossover point where companies become the majority is not reached, as no large tiers with significant company presence exist.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 56278 with 260 properties owned.
Zip codes 56225 and 56211 show extremely high investor penetration, with 58.3% and 52.5% of all SFRs being investor-owned, respectively. This indicates certain neighborhoods are majority-renter communities.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are consistently strong net buyers, acquiring 11 properties and selling only 2 in Q1 2026.
This net buying trend is consistent, with a net acquisition of 87 properties in 2025 and 83 in 2024. The buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 stands at a high 5.5-to-1.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 61.1% of all Q1 2026 property transactions in Big Stone County.
Mom-and-pop investors drove 100% of this activity, paying an average of $222,273 per property. Only 9.1% of their purchases were from other landlords, indicating they primarily buy from homeowners.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 626 SFRs in Big Stone County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 92.0%.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a substantial presence in Big Stone County, owning 626 single-family properties, which represents 33.1% of the total 1,893 SFRs in the market.

The market is defined by small, individual real estate investors, who own 576 properties, a commanding 92.0% share of the investor-owned housing stock, compared to just 61 properties (9.7%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, with 717 individual landlords far outnumbering the 43 company landlords operating in the county.

Investors in this market prefer to operate with low leverage, as a remarkable 81.5% of their holdings (510 properties) are owned free-and-clear with cash. Only 116 properties are currently financed.

The portfolio is almost exclusively geared toward generating rental income, with 617 of the 626 properties (98.6%) classified as rented, indicating a clear business focus rather than speculative holding.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 91.6% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, a reversal of typical market trends.
Detailed Findings

In a striking departure from national trends, landlords in Big Stone County paid significantly more than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026. Their average acquisition price of $222,273 was $106,293 higher than the homeowner average of $115,980, a 91.6% premium.

This isn't an isolated event; it's part of a continuing trend of investors paying top dollar. In Q3 2025, they paid a 126.4% premium ($192,451 vs $85,000), and in Q2 2025, the premium was a colossal 248.4% ($216,800 vs $62,225).

The market dynamic appears to have completely inverted within the last year. The first quarter of 2025 was the last period where investors secured a discount, paying 66.0% less than homeowners ($68,500 vs $201,654).

Overall acquisition prices have been rising sharply, indicating investors are buying into an appreciating market. The average price jumped from $92,653 during the 2020-2023 period to $178,159 for the full year 2025.

This pattern of paying a premium suggests investors are not competing for starter homes but are likely targeting higher-quality, larger, or better-located properties with stronger rental potential than the average home being purchased by owner-occupiers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 2025, purchasing 7 of 13 homes sold for a 53.8% market share.
Detailed Findings

Investors were the primary buyers in Big Stone County's housing market in Q4 2025, acquiring 7 of the 13 total SFRs sold, which translates to a controlling 53.8% market share.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of acquisitions, with zero activity from larger players.

A wave of new landlords entered the market, as all 7 investor-bought properties were acquired by single-property (Tier 01) landlords. These purchases were made by 11 distinct new entities.

The data confirms a complete absence of institutional capital in recent purchasing activity. No properties were bought by mid-size (11-1,000 properties) or institutional (1,000+) investors.

The fact that 11 new entities purchased just 7 properties suggests some were acquired through partnerships or co-ownership, further highlighting the small-scale, collaborative nature of the local investment scene.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.9% of investor-owned homes, with institutional investors having no presence.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Big Stone County is unequivocally controlled by small operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, hold a combined 98.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Market ownership is highly fragmented, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone accounting for 517 properties. This single tier represents a massive 81.0% of the entire investor portfolio.

Beyond the first tier, ownership concentration declines rapidly. Two-property landlords hold an 8.5% share, while those with 3-5 properties control just 5.6% of the rental housing stock.

Contrary to common narratives about corporate landlords, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have absolutely no footprint in this county, holding a 0.0% market share.

Even mid-size investors are exceedingly rare. The data shows only one property held in the 11-20 property tier and six in the 101-1,000 tier, solidifying the county's status as a market driven by small, local capital.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual landlords dominate smaller portfolios, owning 93.9% of single-property holdings.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of the rental market in Big Stone County, owning 493 of the 517 single-property landlord holdings, a 93.9% share.

A clear pattern emerges as portfolios grow: the likelihood of company ownership increases. The company-owned share rises from just 6.1% in the single-property tier to 19.4% in the 3-5 property tier and reaches 33.3% in the 6-10 property tier.

This trend suggests that as landlords scale, they are more likely to formalize their operations under a corporate entity for liability and financial purposes, typically after acquiring their first few properties.

Despite this trend, there is no portfolio size in Big Stone County where companies become the majority owner. Individual ownership remains dominant across all observed tiers.

The data underscores a market structure built on personal ownership rather than corporate consolidation, even within the small segment of landlords who own multiple properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 56278 with 260 properties owned.
Detailed Findings

Investor holdings are highly concentrated within specific zip codes in Big Stone County. The 56278 zip code is the largest hub for investor activity by volume, with 260 landlord-owned properties.

Several areas exhibit investor ownership rates that far exceed the county average. In zip code 56225, an astonishing 58.3% of all single-family homes are owned by investors, making it a majority-rental area.

This pattern of hyper-concentration continues in zip code 56211, where landlords own 52.5% of the housing stock, and in 56208, where the rate is exactly 50.0%.

Interestingly, the area with the highest count of investor properties (56278) is not the one with the highest penetration rate. Its 25.8% rate, while significant, is less than half that of 56225, indicating a larger overall housing market.

This geographic analysis reveals a targeted investment strategy, where landlords focus on specific micro-markets, creating pockets of extremely high rental density within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are consistently strong net buyers, acquiring 11 properties and selling only 2 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Big Stone County are in a phase of aggressive portfolio expansion. In the first quarter of 2026, they acted as strong net buyers, purchasing 11 properties while selling only 2, a net gain of 9 homes.

This is not a new phenomenon but a continuation of a multi-year trend. In 2025, investors achieved a net gain of 87 properties (88 buys vs. 1 sell), which was slightly higher than the net gain of 83 properties in 2024 (86 buys vs. 3 sells).

The buy-to-sell ratio highlights this accumulation-focused strategy. For Q1 2026, the ratio was 5.5 purchases for every sale. For the full year 2025, the ratio was an overwhelming 88-to-1.

Acquisition volume has remained remarkably stable and robust, with 86 properties purchased in 2024 and 88 in 2025, signaling sustained investor demand and confidence in the local market.

All of this transaction activity is driven by small investors, as the data shows zero buy or sell transactions from institutional landlords over this period.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 61.1% of all Q1 2026 property transactions in Big Stone County.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a pivotal role in the Q1 2026 real estate market, participating in 11 of the 18 total SFR transactions, which represents a significant 61.1% share of all activity.

The market's momentum is entirely fueled by its smallest participants. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were responsible for 100% of the 11 investor-led transactions in the quarter.

These new and aspiring landlords paid an average purchase price of $222,273. This is consistent with pricing data showing investors paying a premium over traditional homebuyers in the same period.

Investors are primarily acquiring properties from the traditional market, not from each other. Just one of the 11 acquisitions (9.1%) was a landlord-to-landlord transaction, with the vast majority sourced from homeowners.

The lack of significant inter-landlord trading and the complete absence of institutional activity reinforces the grassroots, acquisition-focused nature of the Big Stone County investment market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, individual investors dominate Big Stone County's market, controlling 98.9% of rentals and driving high market penetration.
Holdings
Landlords own 626 SFR properties, representing a high 33.1% of Big Stone County's market. Individual investors hold a commanding 576 of these properties (92.0%), with companies owning the remaining 61 (9.7%).
Pricing
In a striking market reversal, landlords paid 91.6% more than homeowners in Q1 2026, averaging $222,273 per property compared to the homeowner price of $115,980.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 53.8% of all homes sold (7 properties), with 100% of this activity from 11 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 98.9% of all investor housing in the county, while institutional investors (1000+) have no presence at all (0.0% share).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every portfolio tier, owning 93.9% of single-property rentals. While company ownership share grows with portfolio size, it never surpasses individual ownership at any level.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 5.5x buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (11 buys vs 2 sells), and institutional investors are completely inactive with zero transactions.
Market Narrative

In Big Stone County, Minnesota, real estate investors have a significant footprint, owning 626 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 33.1% of the total market. The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by small, individual operators, who hold 92.0% of the investor-owned housing (576 properties). This grassroots characteristic is further defined by the near-total control of mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own 98.9% of the rental stock, while large institutional investors have zero presence.

Investor behavior in the county defies national trends. In Q1 2026, they paid a 91.6% premium over traditional homeowners, signaling a focus on higher-value assets. Activity is driven by new entrants, with 11 new single-property landlords accounting for all 7 investor purchases in the last quarter of 2025. These investors are also aggressive accumulators, maintaining a 5.5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in early 2026 and consistently acting as net buyers over the past two years.

The key takeaway for Big Stone County is a highly localized and saturated rental market driven by an expanding base of small, individual landlords. With investor ownership rates exceeding 50% in some zip codes like 56225 (58.3%), the market dynamic is heavily influenced by rental demand and small-scale capital. The absence of institutional players and the unusual trend of investors paying premiums suggests a unique market where individuals are competing for a limited supply of desirable rental-grade properties, shaping a landscape distinct from major metropolitan areas often covered in national market reports.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 08:30 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Big Stone (MN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Big Stone (MN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mn-big_stone/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.