Crockett (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Crockett (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Crockett (TN)
4,491
Total Investors in Crockett (TN)
1,862
Investor Owned SFR in Crockett (TN)
1,525(34.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,761
SFR Owned
1,410
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
101
SFR Owned
133
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,525 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Crockett County with 98.5% Ownership, Driving Market as Net Buyers
Investors own 1,525 SFR properties in Crockett County (34.0% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 98.5% versus 0% for institutions. In Q1 2026, landlords were net buyers with a 3.2x buy/sell ratio and paid an unusual 33.5% premium over homeowners, signaling strong competition for limited inventory.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,525 SFR properties in Crockett County, with individuals holding a dominant 92.5% share.
Cash is the primary financing method, with 1,320 properties owned outright compared to just 205 financed properties. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 1,501 properties classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 33.5% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, averaging $260,651 per acquisition.
The Q1 2026 premium of $65,336 marks a sharp reversal from 2025, where landlords consistently paid steep discounts, including 49.5% less in Q3 and 45.9% less in Q2.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 27.3% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, purchasing a total of 12 homes.
Mom-and-pop investors drove 91.7% of landlord purchase activity, acquiring 11 properties. In contrast, institutional investors made zero acquisitions, highlighting the dominance of smaller players.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 98.5% of investor-owned SFRs in Crockett County.
Institutional investors have zero presence in Crockett County's SFR market. The most dominant segment is single-property landlords, who alone own 1,251 properties, or 79.0% of the entire investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
While individual investors dominate small portfolios, companies gain majority control in tiers with over 20 properties.
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios larger than 20 properties, controlling 90.0% of homes in the 21-50 property tier. Institutional companies own zero properties in this market.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 38001 (499 properties), 38006 (436 properties), and 38034 (331 properties).
The highest investor ownership rates are in smaller zip codes, with 38021 at 100.0% and 38050 at 85.7%. Zip code 38034 is notable for both high volume (331 properties) and a high ownership rate (46.1%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Crockett County are consistent net buyers, purchasing 16 properties and selling only 5 in Q1 2026.
This net buyer trend is long-standing, with a 3.2x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026. Transaction volume in 2025 (85 buys) was slightly lower than in 2024 (90 buys), but remained strong.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 23.5% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, totaling 16 transactions.
Mom-and-pop investors conducted 15 of the 16 transactions, with single-property landlords paying a high average price of $280,321. Institutional investors remained completely inactive. 16.7% of purchases by new landlords came from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,525 SFR properties in Crockett County, with individuals holding a dominant 92.5% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 34.0% of the Single-Family Residential market in Crockett County, owning 1,525 out of 4,491 total properties.

Ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among individuals rather than companies. Individual landlords own 1,410 properties, constituting 92.5% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own the remaining 133 properties (8.7%).

The entity count further underscores individual dominance, with 1,761 individual landlords compared to just 101 company landlords operating in the county.

Cash is the preferred acquisition method for investors in this market. A substantial 86.6% of the portfolio (1,320 properties) is owned free and clear, while only 205 properties are financed.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 1,501 of the 1,525 investor-owned properties being rented, indicating a strong focus on generating rental income.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 33.5% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, averaging $260,651 per acquisition.
Detailed Findings

In a striking reversal of typical patterns, landlords paid significantly more than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026. The average landlord acquisition price was $260,651, a 33.5% premium over the homeowner average of $195,315.

This $65,336 premium per property contrasts sharply with the deep discounts investors secured throughout most of 2025. For example, in Q3 2025, landlords paid 49.5% less than homeowners, a discount of $118,275 per property.

The pricing dynamic has been volatile over the past year. While landlords paid a smaller 13.9% premium in Q1 2025, they enjoyed substantial discounts of 49.5% and 45.9% in Q3 and Q2 2025, respectively, before the market flipped again in early 2026.

Overall acquisition prices for landlords have trended upward, rising from a yearly average of $109,095 in 2024 to $154,310 in 2025, signaling increasing competition and property values in the market.

The shift to a significant premium suggests that in Q1 2026, investors were competing aggressively for limited inventory, possibly targeting properties with specific features not pursued by typical homeowners.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 27.3% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, purchasing a total of 12 homes.
Detailed Findings

Landlords captured a significant portion of the market in Q4 2025, buying 12 of the 44 single-family homes sold, which translates to a 27.3% market share.

Purchase activity was highly concentrated among the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (those with 1-10 properties) accounted for 11 of the 12 purchases, representing 91.7% of all investor acquisitions.

New entrants were a primary driver of activity, with the single-property tier alone responsible for 9 purchases (75.0% of the total). This activity was driven by 12 distinct entities, indicating a fresh wave of first-time landlords entering the market.

Institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties were completely absent from the purchasing market in Q4, acquiring zero properties.

The data clearly shows a market fueled by small-scale, local investors rather than large corporations, with the smallest landlords being the most active buyers.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 98.5% of investor-owned SFRs in Crockett County.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Crockett County is defined by small-scale ownership. Mom-and-pop landlords, operating portfolios of 1-10 properties, control a staggering 98.5% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the backbone of this market, holding 1,251 properties. This single tier represents 79.0% of the entire investor portfolio, highlighting the highly decentralized nature of rental ownership in the area.

As portfolio size increases, the number of properties drops off dramatically. Landlords with two properties hold 6.8% of the market, while those with 3-5 properties hold 8.9%.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) have a minimal footprint, collectively owning just 24 properties, or 1.5% of the total investor-owned housing stock.

Confirming the local focus of the market, there is no institutional investor (1,000+ properties) presence in the county, with this tier holding 0.0% of properties. This structure defies the common narrative of large-scale corporate consolidation.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
While individual investors dominate small portfolios, companies gain majority control in tiers with over 20 properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the Crockett County market, comprising the vast majority of owners in smaller portfolio tiers. They own 94.8% of single-property portfolios and 91.7% of two-property portfolios.

A clear strategic shift from individual to corporate ownership occurs as portfolio sizes increase. While individuals still hold a slight majority (50.8%) in the 6-10 property tier, the balance tips towards corporate structures for larger holdings.

The primary crossover point appears in portfolios larger than 20 properties. In the 21-50 property tier, companies own 9 out of 10 properties, a 90.0% share, indicating a preference for corporate entities when managing more extensive assets.

This tiered structure reveals a common progression for investors: many start as individuals, and as their portfolios grow, they transition to a corporate structure for liability protection and operational efficiency.

Despite this trend, individuals are still present even in larger tiers. An individual owner holds one property in the 21-50 tier, demonstrating that personal ownership can scale, although it is less common.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 38001 (499 properties), 38006 (436 properties), and 38034 (331 properties).
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is geographically concentrated in Crockett County, with just three zip codes accounting for 83.0% of the entire investor portfolio: 38001 (499 properties), 38006 (436 properties), and 38034 (331 properties).

The areas with the highest percentage of investor ownership are often different from those with the highest raw counts. The small zip code of 38021 is 100.0% investor-owned, and 38050 has an 85.7% investor ownership rate, indicating pockets of extreme investor saturation.

The zip code 38034 stands out as a critical hub for real estate investing, demonstrating both high volume with 331 investor-owned properties and a high penetration rate of 46.1%.

In contrast, areas like 38343 have a lower concentration, with investors owning 74 properties, which represents a 24.3% ownership rate in that zip code.

This geographic analysis reveals distinct sub-markets within the county, with some areas serving as volume centers for investors while others are niche markets with very high investor saturation.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Crockett County are consistent net buyers, purchasing 16 properties and selling only 5 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Crockett County are firmly in an accumulation phase, consistently acting as net buyers across all observed timeframes. In Q1 2026, they demonstrated strong market confidence by purchasing 16 properties while selling only 5.

This aggressive buying behavior resulted in a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.2 in Q1 2026, meaning investors acquired more than three properties for every one they sold.

The pattern of net buying has been consistent over the past two years. In 2025, landlords added a net of 52 properties to their portfolios (85 buys vs. 33 sells), and in 2024, they added a net of 61 properties (90 buys vs. 29 sells).

While acquisition volume saw a slight dip from 90 purchases in 2024 to 85 in 2025, the overall transaction activity remains robust and heavily skewed towards buying.

Institutional investors have recorded no transactions in any period, reinforcing that all market dynamics are driven by smaller, non-institutional players who continue to expand their holdings.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 23.5% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, totaling 16 transactions.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were a significant force in the market, participating in 16 of the 68 total SFR transactions and thereby capturing a 23.5% share of all activity.

This activity was overwhelmingly driven by the smallest investors. Landlords in the single-property tier were the most active, accounting for 12 of the 16 investor transactions (75%).

Collectively, mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 15 of the 16 transactions, demonstrating that the market's liquidity is almost entirely sustained by small-scale investors.

Pricing data reveals that first-time or single-property investors paid the highest average price at $280,321 per property, notably more than the $262,500 average paid by slightly larger landlords in the 3-5 property tier.

A notable level of inter-investor trading occurs at the entry level. For single-property buyers, 16.7% of their acquisitions (2 of 12) came from other landlords, suggesting that a portion of new inventory is sourced from within the existing investor community.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small investors dominate Crockett County, controlling 98.5% of rental homes while landlords are active net buyers.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,525 SFR properties, representing 34.0% of Crockett County's market. Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate, holding 1,410 properties (92.5%) compared to just 133 (8.7%) for companies.
Pricing
Landlords paid a surprising 33.5% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, an average of $260,651 versus $195,315, reversing a previous trend of securing deep discounts.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 27.3% of all homes sold (12 properties), with activity driven by new market entrants; 12 new single-property landlord entities were formed.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 98.5% of all investor-owned housing in the county. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no market presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies take majority control in portfolios larger than 20 properties, owning 90.0% of homes in the 21-50 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers with a 3.2x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (16 buys vs 5 sells). Institutional investors were completely inactive, recording zero transactions.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Crockett County, TN is defined by a high concentration of small, individual operators rather than large corporations. Investors own 1,525 single-family homes, a significant 34.0% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold a 98.5% share, while institutional investors have no presence. Ownership is skewed heavily toward individuals (92.5%) over companies (8.7%), confirming that the local rental market is supported by a broad base of small-scale investors. Our property ownership by owner type report provides more detail on these trends.

Investor behavior reflects strong confidence and active participation in the market. In Q1 2026, landlords were involved in 23.5% of all transactions and continued their long-term trend of being net buyers, acquiring 3.2 properties for every one they sold. A notable shift occurred in pricing dynamics; after a year of securing discounts, landlords paid a 33.5% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1, suggesting intense competition for available properties. This activity is fueled by new entrants, with 12 new single-property landlords joining the market in the last quarter of 2025.

The key takeaway for Crockett County is that its housing market is heavily influenced by a large, decentralized base of local landlords. This structure creates a competitive acquisition environment and means the health of the rental market is directly tied to the financial stability and continued investment of these mom-and-pop operators. The absence of institutional players suggests a market that may favor local knowledge and smaller-scale operations, presenting both opportunities and challenges for homeowners and investors alike.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 02:40 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Crockett (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Crockett (TN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tn-crockett/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.