Allen (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Allen (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Allen (KS)
4,255
Total Investors in Allen (KS)
1,098
Investor Owned SFR in Allen (KS)
1,165(27.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,013
SFR Owned
931
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
85
SFR Owned
240
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,165 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Individual Investors Dominate Allen County, Owning 27.4% of SFR Market with No Institutional Presence
Investors own 1,165 single-family properties in Allen County, KS, representing a high 27.4% market penetration. The market is defined by small, individual investors who control 87.4% of the rental stock and secured properties at a 49.7% discount compared to homeowners in Q1. Landlords remain net buyers, though institutions are entirely absent from this market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,165 SFRs in Allen County, with individuals holding 79.9% of the portfolio.
The majority of investor properties are owned outright, with 988 held in cash versus only 177 financed. Of the total portfolio, 1,128 properties are classified as rentals. Individual landlords (1,013) vastly outnumber company landlords (85), a ratio of nearly 12 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired Q1 properties at a staggering 49.7% discount, paying $82,500 versus homeowners at $164,090.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners is highly volatile, swinging from a 27.0% premium paid by landlords in Q3 2025 to a 49.7% discount in Q1 2026. This indicates an opportunistic and deal-driven market rather than a consistent pricing advantage. The provided data does not differentiate pricing between individual and company investors.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for 20.7% of all SFR purchases in the last quarter, acquiring 6 of the 29 homes sold.
All landlord purchase activity came from 'mom-and-pop' investors (Tiers 01-04), who captured 100% of the investor market share. Institutional investors (Tier 09) made zero acquisitions. Three new landlords entered the market, each buying a single property.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 87.4% of investor-owned homes in Allen County.
There is zero ownership by institutional investors (Tier 09) in this market. The single-property landlord tier is the largest segment, alone accounting for 58.0% of all investor-held SFRs. No pricing data by tier was available.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate smaller tiers, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11 properties or more.
Individuals own 93.0% of single-property portfolios and 90.0% of portfolios with 3-5 properties. The crossover occurs in the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 62.5% of the homes. No tier-specific pricing data for owner types was available.
Geographic Distribution
The 66749 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 739 investor-owned properties.
While 66749 has the highest volume, the 66742 zip code has the highest concentration, with an investor ownership rate of 69.5%. In contrast, the 66749 zip code has an investor ownership rate of 27.8%, indicating a larger but less saturated market.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Allen County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 53 more properties than they sold in 2024 and 21 more in 2025.
This trend of accumulation continued into the new year, with landlords buying 6 properties and selling only 3 in Q1 2026. Institutional activity is negligible, with only one purchase and one sale recorded in 2025, resulting in a neutral position.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 20.7% of all single-family transactions in Q1, purchasing 6 of the 29 homes sold.
New landlords (Tier 01) paid a significant premium, averaging $123,750 per property, compared to smaller established landlords (Tier 3-5) who paid only $68,750. One-third (33.3%) of properties bought by new investors were acquired from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,165 SFRs in Allen County, with individuals holding 79.9% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 27.4% of the 4,255 single-family residential properties in Allen County, KS, totaling 1,165 homes.

Individual investors are the overwhelming majority, owning 931 properties (79.9%) compared to just 240 (20.6%) owned by companies. This individual dominance extends to entity counts, with 1,013 individual landlords compared to only 85 company entities.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for cash transactions. Investors own 988 properties with cash, far outweighing the 177 properties that are financed, indicating a low reliance on leverage among local landlords.

The portfolio is heavily focused on rental income, with 1,128 properties identified as rented. This demonstrates a clear strategy of buy-and-hold for rental yield rather than short-term speculation.

The composition of the landlord base, dominated by 1,013 individuals, suggests a market driven by local, small-scale real estate investing rather than large, out-of-state corporate interests.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired Q1 properties at a staggering 49.7% discount, paying $82,500 versus homeowners at $164,090.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, investors demonstrated a remarkable ability to secure deals, paying an average of just $82,500 per property. This was $81,590 less than the average traditional homeowner price of $164,090, representing a massive 49.7% discount.

Pricing dynamics in this market are extremely volatile, swinging dramatically quarter over quarter. After paying a 27.0% premium ($42,689 more than homeowners) in Q3 2025, investors reverted to securing deep discounts in the most recent quarter.

This volatility suggests that investors in Allen County are not operating with a consistent, market-wide pricing advantage. Instead, the averages are likely skewed by a small number of deeply discounted, possibly off-market, acquisitions in a low-volume environment.

Overall acquisition prices have fluctuated, with the average price in 2024 at $88,589 and the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average at $112,371, showing recent purchases are well below historical highs.

The complete lack of purchase activity in several recent quarters signals a market with very low liquidity, where transaction timing and individual deal quality have an outsized impact on price trends.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 20.7% of all SFR purchases in the last quarter, acquiring 6 of the 29 homes sold.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a significant role in the Allen County market's most recent quarter, purchasing 6 of the 29 total SFR properties sold, a market share of 20.7%.

The entirety of this activity was driven by small-scale landlords. 'Mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of these purchases, reinforcing the grassroots nature of the local investment scene.

Market entry remains active for new investors. Three of the six properties were purchased by single-property landlords, indicating a healthy influx of new participants into the rental market.

The remaining 50% of investor activity came from a single entity in the 3-5 property tier, which acquired 3 properties, showcasing how a single active investor can influence market dynamics in a low-volume area.

Institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000+ properties had no presence, making zero acquisitions and holding 0.0% of the market's purchase volume.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 87.4% of investor-owned homes in Allen County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Allen County is defined by small, local landlords. The 'mom-and-pop' segment, owning 1-10 properties, controls a dominant 87.4% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

First-time or single-property investors form the bedrock of the market. This tier alone holds 691 properties, which constitutes 58.0% of the entire investor portfolio.

In a stark contrast to national narratives, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have absolutely no footprint in Allen County, with 0.0% ownership.

While dominated by the smallest players, there is a notable concentration in the small-to-medium enterprise segment. Landlords owning 21-50 properties control 126 homes, representing 10.6% of the investor market.

The ownership structure is highly fragmented. The 1,165 investor properties are spread across 1,098 distinct landlord entities, highlighting the lack of consolidation in the market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate smaller tiers, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11 properties or more.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by portfolio size: individuals control smaller portfolios, while companies are used to structure larger ones. Individual investors own 93.0% of all single-property landlord holdings.

The transition to corporate ownership begins as portfolios grow. While individuals still hold a slight majority in the 6-10 property tier (52.3%), the definitive crossover point is the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 15 of the 24 properties (62.5%).

This trend continues up the scale, with companies owning 73.0% of properties in the largest local tier (21-50 properties). This suggests that as investors scale, they adopt corporate structures for liability protection and operational efficiency.

Even within company-dominated tiers, individual ownership persists. For example, individuals still own 34 properties (27.0%) in the 21-50 property tier, showing that personal ownership of larger portfolios is not uncommon in this market.

The smallest tiers are almost exclusively the domain of individual investors. In the 1-5 property range, individuals own a combined 856 properties compared to just 64 for companies.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 66749 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 739 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Allen County is highly concentrated geographically. The zip code 66749 is the clear leader by volume, containing 739 of the 1,165 investor-owned properties in the county.

The highest rate of investor penetration occurs in the 66742 zip code, where investors own a staggering 69.5% of the 95 total SFR properties. This level of concentration suggests a market dominated by rental housing.

A notable distinction exists between volume and rate. The area with the most investor properties (66749) has a high but more moderate ownership rate of 27.8%, while the area with the highest rate (66742) is a much smaller market overall with only 66 investor-owned homes.

Other areas of significant investor presence include 66748 with 183 properties (21.6% rate) and 66755 with 75 properties (27.8% rate), showing a consistent pattern of high investor ownership across several zip codes.

The zip code 66039 also stands out for its high penetration rate, with investors owning 50.0% of the properties, despite it being a very small sub-market.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Allen County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 53 more properties than they sold in 2024 and 21 more in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Allen County have been consistently accumulating properties over the past several years. Landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, with 75 purchases against 22 sales for a net gain of 53 properties.

The pace of acquisitions slowed in 2025 but the trend continued, with 37 buys versus 16 sells, resulting in a net increase of 21 properties to their portfolios.

The net buying pattern has extended into the current year. In Q1 2026, landlords acquired 6 SFRs while only selling 3, further expanding their collective holdings in the county.

Quarterly data shows a persistent buy-side pressure, with positive net acquisitions in every recent period, including a net of 8 properties in Q3 2025 and 3 in Q2 2025.

Institutional investors are not a factor in transaction flows. Their only recorded activity was a single purchase and a single sale during 2025, leaving them with a neutral net position and signaling no strategic accumulation or divestment.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 20.7% of all single-family transactions in Q1, purchasing 6 of the 29 homes sold.
Detailed Findings

Landlords captured a 20.7% share of the transaction market in Q1, acquiring 6 of the 29 total SFR properties that changed hands.

All Q1 investor transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop landlords, with zero activity from institutional-scale buyers, reflecting the overall ownership structure of the county.

A notable price disparity emerged between investor tiers. New, single-property landlords paid an average of $123,750, while the more experienced small landlord in the 3-5 property tier acquired homes for an average of just $68,750.

This $55,000 price gap suggests that new market entrants may be competing for higher-quality, move-in-ready assets, whereas established investors could be targeting value-add opportunities at lower price points.

The market shows signs of internal churn, as 33.3% of the properties purchased by new Tier 1 landlords were sourced from other existing landlords, indicating a transfer of assets within the investor community.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Individual Investors Dominate Allen County, Owning 27.4% of SFR Market with No Institutional Presence
Holdings
Landlords own 1,165 SFR properties in Allen County, KS, representing a significant 27.4% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 931 properties (79.9%), compared to 240 (20.6%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q1, landlords secured properties for 49.7% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $81,590 per property ($82,500 vs. $164,090).
Activity
Landlords purchased 20.7% of all homes sold in Q1 (6 properties), with activity driven entirely by small investors, including 3 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 87.4% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence, owning 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly own smaller portfolios (79.9% of all holdings), but companies become the majority owners in portfolios sized at 11-20 properties and larger.
Transactions
Landlords remain net buyers, acquiring 6 properties while selling only 3 in Q1. Institutional investors are not a factor, with no net change in holdings over the past year.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Allen County, Kansas, is a textbook example of a market driven by 'Main Street' investors, not 'Wall Street' firms. Landlords have a substantial footprint, owning 1,165 single-family homes, which constitutes a high 27.4% of the county's total SFR inventory. This market is defined by its fragmentation and individual ownership. Individuals own nearly 80% of the investor portfolio (931 properties), and small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a dominant 87.4% of all investor-held housing. In stark contrast, institutional-scale investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence here.

Investor behavior in Allen County is characterized by consistent accumulation and opportunistic purchasing. Landlords have remained net buyers over the past two years and continued this trend in Q1 by acquiring twice as many properties as they sold (6 buys vs. 3 sells). Their purchasing strategy appears highly effective; in Q1, they acquired properties for an average of $82,500, a staggering 49.7% discount compared to the $164,090 paid by traditional homeowners. This deep discount, however, is volatile, suggesting a low-liquidity market where savvy investors can capitalize on specific deals rather than a consistent market-wide advantage.

The key takeaway from Allen County is the resilience and dominance of the local, individual investor. The complete absence of institutional capital, combined with a high penetration of small landlords who often use cash, creates a market insulated from many national trends. The market's health is tied to the financial stability of hundreds of local owners, not the strategies of a few large corporations. This structure suggests a stable rental market but also one where low transaction volumes can lead to significant price volatility based on the nature of a few deals each quarter.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 05:00 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Allen (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Allen (KS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ks-allen/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.