Graham (AZ) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Graham (AZ) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Graham (AZ)
5,392
Total Investors in Graham (AZ)
2,561
Investor Owned SFR in Graham (AZ)
1,883(34.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,284
SFR Owned
1,590
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
277
SFR Owned
336
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,883 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Graham County, Owning 95.1% of Rentals as Institutions Remain Absent
Investors own 34.9% of SFRs in Graham County (1,883 properties), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling an overwhelming 95.1% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords were net buyers with a 7.75x buy-to-sell ratio, purchasing 63.3% of all homes sold while securing a 2.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 1,883 SFR properties in Graham County, with individuals holding 84.4%.
The investor portfolio is almost evenly split between financed (929 properties) and cash-owned (954 properties). Nearly all investor-held properties (1,867 of 1,883) are designated as rentals, indicating a strong focus on generating income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid $285,836, a 2.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlords secured a $7,326 discount in Q1 2026. This reverses a volatile trend from 2025, where landlords paid significant premiums in Q1 (24.2%) and Q3 (33.0%).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, acquiring 49 of 72 properties, a 68.1% market share.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 98.0% of all investor purchases (48 properties). In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) made zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control Graham County's rental market, owning 95.1%.
Single-property landlords alone own 1,590 properties, representing 82.9% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible footprint, controlling just 0.1% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 3-5 property tier, holding 54.4% of properties.
Individual investors dominate the smallest tiers, owning 89.9% of single-property portfolios and 87.2% of two-property portfolios. The shift to company ownership happens abruptly at the 3-5 property level.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Graham County is concentrated in the 85546 zip code, which holds 913 properties.
The highest investor penetration is in the 85531 zip code, where landlords own 73.9% of SFRs. The 85543 zip code is notable for appearing in the top lists for both volume (397 properties) and rate (59.3%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Graham County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 62 properties while selling only 8 in Q1 2026.
The buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 was a strong 7.75-to-1. This continues a trend of heavy accumulation from 2025, when landlords bought 301 properties and sold only 14 all year. Institutional transaction data is not available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove the Q1 market, accounting for 62 of 98 total transactions, a 63.3% share.
Single-property investors paid the highest average price at $296,816. Landlords sourced few properties from other investors; only 7.3% of single-property landlord purchases were from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 1,883 SFR properties in Graham County, with individuals holding 84.4%.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a substantial footprint in Graham County, owning 1,883 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 34.9% of the total 5,392 SFRs in the market.

The market is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors rather than corporations. Individuals own 1,590 properties, accounting for 84.4% of the total investor portfolio, while companies own the remaining 336 properties (17.8%).

This composition challenges the common narrative of corporate dominance in real estate investing, showing a market built on smaller, independent ownership.

Acquisition financing strategies are balanced. The portfolio is nearly split between properties with active financing (929) and those owned outright with cash (954), suggesting diverse capitalization approaches among investors.

The portfolio is heavily focused on rental activity, with 1,867 of the 1,883 properties classified as rented. This near-universal application as rentals highlights the income-generating purpose of these holdings.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid $285,836, a 2.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, investors demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, paying an average of $285,836 per property. This represents a 2.5% discount compared to the $293,162 paid by traditional homeowners, saving them $7,326 on a typical purchase.

This pricing behavior marks a significant shift from 2025, which was characterized by extreme volatility. In Q3 2025, landlords paid a staggering 33.0% premium ($334,442 vs. $251,413), and in Q1 2025, they paid a 24.2% premium ($338,255 vs. $272,348).

The return to a discount in Q1 2026 suggests a normalization of the market and potentially more strategic acquisition tactics by investors.

Overall acquisition prices have cooled from 2025 highs, when the average price for investors peaked at $338,255 in the first quarter of that year.

Despite the recent cooling, current prices remain well above the pandemic-era average of $255,569 (2020-2023), reflecting significant long-term market appreciation in Graham County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, acquiring 49 of 72 properties, a 68.1% market share.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were the primary force in the most recent quarter's purchasing activity, acquiring 49 of the 72 total SFRs sold and capturing a commanding 68.1% of the market.

The activity was almost exclusively driven by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 48 of the 49 properties purchased by investors, representing 98.0% of landlord buying activity.

A significant wave of new investors entered the market. The single-property tier saw 55 new entities acquire 43 properties, signaling strong grassroots entry into the Graham County rental market.

Institutional investors were completely absent from the purchasing landscape. The 1,000+ property tier recorded zero acquisitions, reinforcing that market growth is not being driven by large corporations.

Beyond the smallest tiers, investor activity was minimal, with only one property purchased by a landlord with a portfolio larger than 10 units. This further highlights the fragmented, small-scale nature of the market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control Graham County's rental market, owning 95.1%.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Graham County is thoroughly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a staggering 95.1% of all investor-held SFRs.

First-time and single-property investors form the bedrock of the market. This tier alone accounts for 1,590 properties, which is 82.9% of the entire investor-owned portfolio, making it the most critical segment of the rental housing supply.

The influence of large institutional investors is practically nonexistent. Entities with over 1,000 properties own just a single property in the county, representing a minuscule 0.1% market share and defying the national narrative of institutional takeover.

Even mid-sized investors play a minor role. All landlords with portfolios ranging from 11 to 1,000 properties combined own only 4.8% of the investor-held housing stock.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market structure, composed of thousands of individual decisions rather than a consolidated corporate strategy. Such a market is typically more resilient and less prone to sudden shifts driven by a single large entity.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 3-5 property tier, holding 54.4% of properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear ownership pattern emerges as portfolios grow: individuals dominate initial investments, but companies take over for larger holdings. The crossover point occurs at the 3-5 property tier, where companies own a 54.4% majority of the properties.

Individuals are the driving force for market entry. They own 89.9% of single-property portfolios and 87.2% of two-property portfolios, confirming that new landlords are typically individuals, not LLCs.

The trend toward incorporation solidifies as portfolios expand. In the 6-10 property tier, companies continue to hold the majority at 51.7%, suggesting that forming a corporate entity is a standard strategy for landlords managing more than two properties.

This behavior indicates a strategic decision point for investors. The shift from individual to company ownership likely reflects a move to gain liability protection and financial advantages once an investor's portfolio reaches a certain scale.

The data strongly suggests that the path to becoming a landlord in Graham County begins with an individual purchase, with formal business structures being adopted later as part of a growth strategy.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Graham County is concentrated in the 85546 zip code, which holds 913 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is geographically concentrated by volume in a few key areas. The 85546 zip code is the clear epicenter with 913 investor-owned properties, followed at a distance by 85552 (519 properties) and 85543 (397 properties).

Certain zip codes have become dedicated rental markets with extremely high investor penetration. The 85531 zip code leads with a 73.9% investor ownership rate, followed by 85551 (70.6%) and 85536 (63.2%).

A key distinction exists between markets with high volume and high rates. The area with the most investor properties, 85546, has a relatively moderate ownership rate of 28.5%. In contrast, the areas with the highest rates are much smaller markets.

The 85543 zip code represents a potent combination of both volume and density. It ranks third for total investor-owned properties (397) and fourth for ownership percentage (59.3%), marking it as a critical submarket for rental activity.

This geographic distribution reveals distinct investor strategies: some target scale in larger population centers, while others focus on dominating smaller, high-yield rental enclaves.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Graham County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 62 properties while selling only 8 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Graham County are operating in a mode of aggressive accumulation. In Q1 2026, they were strong net buyers, purchasing 62 SFRs while selling only 8, resulting in a net portfolio expansion of 54 properties.

The buy-to-sell ratio of 7.75-to-1 in the first quarter highlights a market with strong demand from investors and very little selling pressure from existing landlords.

This behavior is part of a sustained trend. The full year 2025 saw an even more extreme ratio of 21.5-to-1, with 301 properties bought and only 14 sold by investors, indicating long-term confidence in the local market.

While the net buying trend remains strong, the pace of acquisitions has moderated from its peak. The 62 purchases in Q1 2026 are down from a high of 100 purchases in Q2 2025, suggesting the market is cooling but remains firmly in an expansionary phase.

In line with other findings, there was no transactional data for institutional-tier investors, confirming their lack of participation in the county's market dynamics.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove the Q1 market, accounting for 62 of 98 total transactions, a 63.3% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors were the primary drivers of market activity in Q1 2026, participating in 62 of the 98 total SFR transactions for a 63.3% share. This highlights their critical role in providing market liquidity.

The transactional volume was almost entirely attributable to mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who conducted 61 of the 62 investor-led transactions.

Pricing data by tier reveals that new entrants pay a premium. Single-property buyers paid the highest average price at $296,816, notably higher than more experienced investors in tiers like the 6-10 property group ($114,167).

Investors are primarily buying from the general market, not from each other. Inter-landlord transactions are rare, with only 7.3% of purchases by new landlords coming from an existing landlord, suggesting they are acquiring properties from traditional homeowners.

Institutional investors remained on the sidelines. The 1,000+ property tier recorded zero transactions in the first quarter, further cementing their status as a non-factor in Graham County's active market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Graham County, Owning 95.1% of Rentals as Institutions Remain Absent
Holdings
Investors own 1,883 SFR properties, 34.9% of Graham County's market. Individual investors hold a commanding 84.4% of this portfolio (1,590 properties), with companies owning the remaining 17.8% (336 properties).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties for 2.5% less than homeowners, paying an average of $285,836 compared to $293,162, a discount of $7,326 per property.
Activity
Landlords drove Q1 activity, purchasing 63.3% of all homes sold (62 of 98). The market saw an influx of 55 new single-property landlord entities, underscoring strong grassroots interest.
Market Share
The investor market is defined by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 95.1% of rental housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a mere 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the base of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 3-5 properties, indicating a clear trend of incorporation as holdings grow.
Transactions
Investors are aggressive net buyers with a 7.75-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (62 buys vs. 8 sells). Institutional investors were completely inactive, recording zero transactions.
Market Narrative

In Graham County, Arizona, the single-family rental market is fundamentally shaped by small, independent operators, not large corporations. Investors own 1,883 SFR properties, representing a significant 34.9% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 84.4% of these homes. The market structure analysis in this market report reveals that mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command a 95.1% share of investor-owned housing, while institutional firms (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence at just 0.1%.

Investor behavior in Q1 2026 points to a confident and active market. Landlords drove 63.3% of all transactions and demonstrated strong bullish sentiment as net buyers, acquiring 7.75 properties for every one they sold. They also showcased tactical purchasing, securing a 2.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This activity is fueled by new entrants, with 55 new single-property landlord entities joining the market in the last quarter, signaling robust, grassroots-level growth and investment.

The key takeaway for Graham County is that its housing market dynamics are defined by the collective actions of many small investors. This defies the widespread narrative of Wall Street consolidating residential housing. The growth engine is the individual buying their first or second rental property. High investor ownership rates in specific zip codes like 85531 (73.9%) and 85543 (59.3%) indicate the formation of distinct, high-density rental submarkets. The market's future will be dictated not by corporate boardroom decisions, but by the continued confidence and activity of these local, small-scale landlords.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 20, 2026 at 11:10 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Graham (AZ)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Graham (AZ) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-az-graham/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.