Todd (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Todd (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Todd (KY)
3,219
Total Investors in Todd (KY)
1,209
Investor Owned SFR in Todd (KY)
1,110(34.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,146
SFR Owned
992
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
63
SFR Owned
125
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,110 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small investors dominate Todd County's housing market, controlling 92% of rentals and driving 73% of Q1 transactions.
Investors own 34.5% of all SFR properties in Todd County, with individuals accounting for 89.4% of those holdings. In Q1 2026, landlords were aggressive net buyers (29 buys vs. 2 sells), paying a surprising 57.0% premium over homeowners and accounting for 72.5% of all market transactions.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 1,110 SFRs in Todd County, with individual investors holding a dominant 89.4% share.
Cash is king in this market, with 1,045 properties owned outright versus only 65 that are financed. The investor portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 97.7% of landlord-owned properties being rented (1,084 of 1,110).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In a sharp market reversal, Todd County investors paid a 57.0% premium in Q1, averaging $231,646 vs $147,543 for homeowners.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners is extremely volatile, swinging from a 38.0% investor discount in Q3 2025 to the 57.0% premium in Q1 2026. This signals unpredictable pricing dynamics, likely influenced by low transaction volumes in the rural market.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors dominated the Q1 market in Todd County, acquiring 74.1% of all homes sold with 20 purchases.
Mom-and-pop landlords accounted for 100% of these acquisitions, totaling 21 properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors made zero purchases, showing a complete absence from the local market activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 92.0% of all landlord-owned homes in Todd County.
Institutional investors have a negligible footprint, owning just 2 properties, or 0.2% of the investor-owned market. Single-property landlords form the market's foundation, alone accounting for 63.6% of all investor-owned housing.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners at the 11-20 property tier, holding 51.5% of homes in that segment.
Individual landlords overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, owning 95.4% of single-property holdings. As portfolios grow, company ownership increases, but in an unusual pattern, individuals re-assert dominance in the 21-50 property tier, owning 95.5% of properties in that bracket.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Todd County is highly concentrated, with zip code 42220 alone holding 49.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.
The 42216 zip code has the highest investor penetration at 50.0% of its housing stock, followed by 42234 at 47.2%. The top three zip codes by property count (42220, 42234, 42286) collectively contain 88.6% of all investor properties in the county.
Historical Transactions
Todd County landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 14.5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026, acquiring 29 properties while selling only 2.
This strong accumulation trend is not new; landlords were also significant net buyers in 2025 (116 buys vs 21 sells) and 2024 (93 buys vs 17 sells). Institutional investor transaction volume is negligible and shows no clear trend.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove market activity in Q1 2026, participating in 72.5% of all property transactions in Todd County.
A clear pricing pattern emerged, with new, single-property investors paying the highest average price at $278,095. More experienced small landlords in the 6-10 property tier paid just $30,000 on average and acquired 100% of their properties from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 1,110 SFRs in Todd County, with individual investors holding a dominant 89.4% share.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership has a significant footprint in Todd County, with landlords holding 1,110 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 34.5% of the county's total SFR market. This high penetration rate indicates that investor activity is a primary driver of the local housing landscape.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by individual, small-scale real estate investing. Individual landlords own 992 properties, making up 89.4% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 125 properties (11.3%) owned by companies. This dynamic is also reflected in the entity count, with 1,146 individual landlords versus only 63 company entities.

A defining feature of this market is the preference for cash transactions over financing. An astonishing 94.1% of investor-owned properties (1,045) are held free and clear, with only 65 properties (5.9%) carrying a mortgage. This suggests investors in this area operate with high liquidity and low leverage.

The portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to rentals. Of the 1,110 investor-owned properties, 1,084 are classified as rented, a rate of 97.7%. This confirms that the holdings are for investment income rather than for secondary or seasonal home use.

While individual investors dominate, company-owned portfolios are, on average, larger. Companies own an average of 2.0 properties per entity (125 properties / 63 entities), whereas individuals own approximately 0.9 properties per entity (992 properties / 1,146 landlords), suggesting a high degree of co-ownership or a broad base of single-property owners.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In a sharp market reversal, Todd County investors paid a 57.0% premium in Q1, averaging $231,646 vs $147,543 for homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition pricing in Todd County defied typical trends in the first quarter of 2026. Landlords paid an average price of $231,646, which was a staggering $84,103, or 57.0%, more than the average traditional homeowner paid ($147,543). This significant premium suggests investors may be targeting higher-value properties or competing fiercely for limited inventory.

The pricing relationship between investors and homeowners has been highly erratic over the past year. In Q3 2025, investors enjoyed a 38.0% discount, paying $120,486 compared to homeowners at $194,379. This flipped to an 11.8% premium in Q2 2025, highlighting extreme quarter-to-quarter volatility rather than a stable pricing advantage.

The recent surge in acquisition prices represents significant appreciation from the pandemic era. The Q1 2026 average price of $231,646 is 61.5% higher than the average price of $143,394 recorded between 2020 and 2023, signaling rapid value growth in properties targeted by investors.

This price volatility indicates that the Todd County market is thin, where a small number of transactions can dramatically skew quarterly averages. Unlike larger urban markets with consistent discounts, investor pricing strategy here appears highly opportunistic and deal-specific.

The dramatic shift from a deep discount to a steep premium within two quarters suggests that the types of properties being transacted may have changed, or that a few high-value investor purchases have heavily weighted the Q1 2026 average.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors dominated the Q1 market in Todd County, acquiring 74.1% of all homes sold with 20 purchases.
Detailed Findings

Investors were the primary force in Todd County's real estate market in the first quarter, purchasing 20 of the 27 total SFR properties sold, a commanding market share of 74.1%. This high level of activity underscores the crucial role investors play in local housing transactions.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who acquired 21 properties in total, according to tier-level data. This demonstrates that the market's growth is exclusively fueled by small-scale, local investors rather than large corporations.

New market entrants were particularly active, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) making up the largest group of buyers. This tier acquired 15 properties, representing 71.4% of all investor purchases and signaling a healthy influx of first-time investors into the rental market.

Institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties were completely inactive, recording zero purchases in Q1. Their absence reinforces the characterization of Todd County as a market driven by individuals and small businesses, not institutional capital.

The data shows a slight inconsistency between the total landlord purchases (20) and the sum of tier purchases (21). Regardless, the overwhelming conclusion is that small landlords are not just participants but the dominant players in the county's acquisition landscape.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 92.0% of all landlord-owned homes in Todd County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of rental properties in Todd County is thoroughly dominated by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, collectively hold 92.0% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a minimal presence, owning just two properties, which amounts to only 0.2% of the investor market. This finding dispels any narrative of a corporate takeover of housing in this county, showing the market remains in the hands of small operators.

The single-property landlord tier is the most significant segment, with 738 properties representing 63.6% of all investor holdings. This highlights that the typical investor in Todd County is an individual with one rental property, forming the bedrock of the local rental market.

There is a clear lack of mid-size and large-scale portfolio consolidation. After the mom-and-pop tiers, ownership percentages drop sharply, with investors holding 11-50 properties controlling only a combined 7.8% of the market. This indicates a barrier or lack of incentive for scaling portfolios locally.

The current ownership distribution mirrors recent purchasing trends, where 100% of Q1 acquisitions were made by mom-and-pop landlords. This alignment shows that the market's existing structure is being reinforced, not disrupted, by current buying activity.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners at the 11-20 property tier, holding 51.5% of homes in that segment.
Detailed Findings

In Todd County, the transition from individual to corporate ownership occurs as investors scale their portfolios. The clear crossover point is the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 35 properties (51.5%) compared to 33 owned by individuals (48.5%). This is the first tier where a corporate structure becomes the dominant ownership form.

Individual ownership is the standard for smaller portfolios. Individuals own 95.4% of single-property rentals and 94.5% of two-property portfolios. This dominance gradually wanes as portfolio size increases, with the individual share dropping to 70.6% in the 6-10 property tier.

An interesting anomaly appears in the 21-50 property tier, where individual ownership unexpectedly surges back to 95.5%. This disruption in the trend suggests the presence of one or more large, privately-held portfolios, and indicates that incorporation is not an inevitable outcome for larger investors in this market.

The 6-10 property range appears to be a key decision point for formalizing operations. Company ownership jumps from just 5.5% in the two-property tier to 29.4% in the 6-10 property tier, indicating this is when many investors choose to create a business entity.

Overall, while companies gain traction in mid-size tiers, the Todd County market demonstrates a strong and persistent preference for individual ownership across nearly all portfolio sizes, a key characteristic of its local investment scene.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Todd County is highly concentrated, with zip code 42220 alone holding 49.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration is a defining feature of investor ownership in Todd County. A single zip code, 42220, is the epicenter of activity, containing 554 properties, which accounts for nearly half (49.9%) of the entire investor portfolio in the county.

High investor penetration rates are widespread, signaling that this is a county-wide phenomenon. The 42216 zip code leads with a 50.0% investor ownership rate, meaning one in every two SFRs is investor-owned. Several other zip codes, including 42234 (47.2%) and 42286 (39.4%), also show extremely high concentrations.

The zip code with the highest number of investor properties is not the one with the highest ownership rate. While 42220 has the most properties (554), its ownership rate is a lower 31.3%. This common pattern suggests that the highest-rate areas are likely smaller housing markets where investor acquisitions have a greater proportional impact.

The overwhelming majority of investor activity is focused within just three zip codes. Together, 42220, 42234, and 42286 are home to 984 investor-owned properties, representing 88.6% of the county's total. This leaves other areas with comparatively little investor focus.

Data for zip code 42240 was unavailable, indicating a potential gap in coverage for that specific area within the county. However, the available data provides a clear picture of intense geographic clustering in a few key areas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Todd County landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 14.5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026, acquiring 29 properties while selling only 2.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Todd County are in a strong portfolio growth phase, demonstrated by their activity in the first quarter of 2026. They purchased 29 properties while selling only 2, resulting in a net gain of 27 properties and an exceptionally high buy-to-sell ratio of 14.5x. This indicates a strong incentive to buy and hold.

The trend of aggressive accumulation has been consistent for several years. In 2025, landlords maintained a buy/sell ratio of 5.5x (116 buys to 21 sells), and in 2024, the ratio was 5.4x (93 buys to 17 sells). This sustained pattern points to long-term confidence in the local rental market.

The low number of properties being sold by investors suggests a tight market with limited supply coming from the existing landlord pool. With only two properties sold by landlords in Q1, it appears most are content with the performance of their current assets.

Institutional transaction activity is minimal and does not influence the overall market dynamics. In 2025, these large investors were net buyers by only two properties (4 buys vs. 2 sells), and they were neutral in 2024. Their transaction footprint is too small to be a market driver.

Overall buying volume from investors has remained robust and stable, with 116 purchases in 2025 and 93 in 2024. This consistent demand, coupled with very low selling volume, is a primary factor shaping the county's housing market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove market activity in Q1 2026, participating in 72.5% of all property transactions in Todd County.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was the dominant force in Todd County's housing market in Q1 2026, with landlords involved in 29 of the 40 total transactions, a share of 72.5%. This high participation rate confirms that investors are the most active buyer segment.

A distinct inverse correlation between investor size and purchase price was evident. The newest investors (Tier 01) paid the most, with an average price of $278,095 across 22 transactions. In contrast, landlords in the 6-10 property tier paid an average of only $30,000, suggesting they are accessing a different type of inventory, possibly distressed or off-market properties.

Sourcing strategies also differed significantly by investor experience. New investors in the 1-5 property range acquired 0% of their properties from other landlords, indicating they are buying from homeowners. However, the more established 6-10 property tier sourced 100% of their acquisitions from other landlords, pointing to a mature, internal market for deals.

The price spread between the smallest and largest mom-and-pop tiers active in Q1 was immense. The average Tier 01 purchase price was more than nine times higher than the average Tier 06-10 price ($278,095 vs. $30,000), highlighting vastly different investment strategies within the small landlord community.

Consistent with other findings, institutional investors recorded zero transactions in the first quarter, playing no role in the transactional market and ceding the field entirely to mom-and-pop buyers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors control 92% of rentals in Todd County, driving 73% of home sales while aggressively expanding portfolios.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,110 SFR properties in Todd County, representing a significant 34.5% of the market. The ownership is dominated by individuals, who hold 992 of these properties (89.4%), compared to 125 (11.3%) for companies.
Pricing
In a striking deviation from national trends, landlords paid a 57.0% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, with an average acquisition price of $231,646 versus the homeowner average of $147,543.
Activity
Investors drove 72.5% of Q1 market activity, purchasing 29 of 40 homes sold. This was led by an influx of new investors, with 22 transactions attributed to the single-property tier.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have a near-total grip on the market, controlling 92.0% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible share of just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners across most portfolio sizes, with companies only achieving majority ownership (51.5%) at the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are in a phase of aggressive accumulation, acting as strong net buyers with a 14.5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (29 buys vs. 2 sells). Institutional investors are not a factor in the transactional market.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Todd County, Kentucky is fundamentally defined by the dominance of small, individual investors. Landlords own a substantial 34.5% of the county's entire SFR housing stock, totaling 1,110 properties. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold a 92.0% share, while institutional investors have a nearly nonexistent footprint at 0.2%. Ownership is deeply personal, with individuals holding 89.4% of investor properties, only ceding majority control to company structures once a portfolio scales beyond 10 properties. This structure, detailed in the property ownership by owner type report, points to a market built on local capital and individual enterprise, not corporate consolidation.

Investor behavior in the first quarter of 2026 underscores their market control and bullish outlook. Landlords drove 72.5% of all home sale transactions, acting as aggressive net buyers with a 14.5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio. In a surprising turn, these investors paid a 57.0% premium over traditional homeowners, suggesting intense competition for desirable assets. A clear pattern emerged where new, single-property investors paid the highest prices, while more experienced small landlords secured properties for a fraction of the cost, often by purchasing directly from other landlords. This bifurcation highlights sophisticated, differing strategies even within the mom-and-pop segment.

The key takeaway for Todd County is that its housing market is shaped by a robust and growing class of small-scale landlords who are actively accumulating properties. The high investor ownership rate and transaction share mean these individuals effectively set the market's pace. The absence of institutional capital and the reliance on cash purchases suggest a market that is insulated from broader financial trends but driven by local economic conditions and rental demand. For homeowners and prospective buyers, this means consistently competing with highly active, cash-ready investors who are committed to expanding their local portfolios.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 06:08 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Todd (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Todd (KY) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ky-todd/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.