Hemphill (TX) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Hemphill (TX) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Hemphill (TX)
867
Total Investors in Hemphill (TX)
220
Investor Owned SFR in Hemphill (TX)
215(24.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
200
SFR Owned
186
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
20
SFR Owned
29
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 215 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Hemphill County, TX, with 99.5% Market Control and Deep Purchase Discounts
In Hemphill County, investors own 215 SFR properties, representing 24.8% of the market. This ownership is almost entirely in the hands of small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (99.5%), with individual investors holding 86.5% of the portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords were highly active, capturing 40.0% of all sales and purchasing properties at a remarkable 55.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 215 properties in Hemphill County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 86.5% share.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (186 properties) rather than financed (29 properties). Individual landlords number 200, a 10-to-1 ratio over the 20 company landlords. Nearly all properties, 210 of 215, are non-owner-occupied rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, Hemphill County landlords paid 55.1% less than homeowners, a massive $84,468 average discount.
Landlord pricing is highly volatile in this low-volume market, swinging from a 100.0% premium in Q1 2025 to the current 55.1% discount. The average landlord purchase price in Q1 2026 was just $68,750, a sharp decrease from prices seen in 2024 ($132,469) and 2025 ($118,750).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 40.0% of all Hemphill County home purchases in the first quarter, buying 2 of 5 total properties sold.
Activity was driven exclusively by new market entrants, with 100.0% of landlord purchases made by 'mom-and-pop' investors buying their very first rental property. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors are the market in Hemphill County, controlling a near-total 99.5% of all investor-owned homes.
Single-property landlords alone own 70.0% of the investor-held housing stock, with 154 properties. Institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties have absolutely no presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own over 93% of single-property rentals, establishing them as the foundation of Hemphill County's market.
Companies do not achieve majority ownership at any portfolio size in this market. Even in the largest local tier (6-10 properties), individuals control 90.0% of the assets. The highest company concentration is in the 3-5 property tier, where they hold just 35.1%.
Geographic Distribution
In Hemphill County's primary zip code, 79014, investors own a significant 24.8% of the single-family housing stock.
All 215 investor-owned properties in the county are located within this zip code. This high concentration demonstrates a substantial investor footprint relative to the total market size of 867 SFR properties.
Historical Transactions
Hemphill County landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring 12 properties while selling only 3 in 2025.
This trend of portfolio growth was even stronger in 2024, when investors bought 17 properties and sold only 4. The data shows a clear pattern of accumulation over the past two years. There is no transaction data for institutional investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove 40.0% of Hemphill County's Q1 market transactions, with all purchases made by single-property investors.
These new investors paid an average of $68,750 per property. Notably, 0.0% of these transactions were inter-landlord deals, meaning all properties were acquired from homeowners or other non-investor sellers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 215 properties in Hemphill County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 86.5% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 24.8% stake in the Hemphill County single-family residential market, controlling 215 out of 867 total SFR properties.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by individual ownership, with 186 properties (86.5%) held by individuals compared to just 29 (13.5%) owned by companies. This structure underscores a market built on local, small-scale real estate investing rather than corporate consolidation.

Reflecting this individual dominance, the entity count shows 200 individual landlords versus only 20 company landlords, a stark 10-to-1 ratio.

Financial strategies lean heavily towards outright ownership. A total of 186 properties are held free and clear as cash assets, while only 29 are financed, indicating a low-leverage, stable investment environment.

The portfolio is clearly rental-focused, with 210 of the 215 properties classified as non-owner-occupied, confirming the primary business model is providing rental housing to the community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, Hemphill County landlords paid 55.1% less than homeowners, a massive $84,468 average discount.
Detailed Findings

A dramatic pricing advantage emerged for landlords in Q1 2026, who purchased properties for an average of $68,750. This was a staggering 55.1% less than the $153,218 paid by traditional homeowners, translating to an $84,468 discount per transaction.

This significant discount marks a sharp reversal from previous quarters, highlighting the market's price volatility. For instance, in Q2 2025, landlords secured a 45.3% discount, but in Q1 2025 they paid a 100.0% premium ($131,250 vs $65,625 for homeowners), suggesting opportunistic buying behavior in a market with few transactions.

The current acquisition price of $68,750 is well below recent annual averages, which stood at $118,750 in 2025 and $132,469 in 2024.

This quarter's pricing is more in line with the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $63,958, indicating a potential market correction or a shift towards acquiring lower-value properties.

The low transaction volume in Hemphill County amplifies these price swings, where a few deals can significantly alter quarterly averages, but the Q1 2026 data clearly shows investors acquiring properties at a deep discount.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 40.0% of all Hemphill County home purchases in the first quarter, buying 2 of 5 total properties sold.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was a major force in the Hemphill County market during Q1 2026, with landlords responsible for 40.0% of all SFR sales. They acquired 2 of the 5 homes sold during the period.

The quarter's buying activity was fueled entirely by the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100.0% of all investor purchases.

Specifically, all activity was concentrated in the single-property tier. Two new landlords entered the market, each purchasing their first investment property, signaling grassroots growth in the local rental market.

This contrasts sharply with national narratives, as mid-size and institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely inactive, making zero purchases in the county.

The data points to a market where the primary source of investor demand comes from new, local individuals making their initial foray into real estate, rather than portfolio expansion by established players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors are the market in Hemphill County, controlling a near-total 99.5% of all investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Hemphill County is defined by the absolute dominance of small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 99.5% of all investor-owned SFRs, a figure that leaves virtually no room for larger players.

First-time and single-property landlords are the bedrock of this market. This group alone holds 154 properties, which constitutes 70.0% of the entire investor-owned housing supply.

The ownership concentration continues in the smaller tiers, with two-property owners holding 8.2% (18 properties) and landlords with 3-5 properties controlling another 16.8% (37 properties).

There is a complete absence of institutional capital in the Hemphill County SFR market. Investors in Tier 09 (1,000+ properties) own zero properties, underscoring the exclusively local and small-scale nature of rental ownership.

The market structure is one of extreme fragmentation, with a large number of small owners rather than a consolidation of assets under a few large entities. The largest local portfolios fall into the 6-10 property tier, which accounts for just 4.5% of holdings.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own over 93% of single-property rentals, establishing them as the foundation of Hemphill County's market.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the backbone of the Hemphill County rental market across all portfolio sizes. In the critical single-property tier, individuals own 144 of the 154 properties, a commanding 93.5% share.

Unlike in larger urban markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. Individual ownership prevails even as portfolios grow, with individuals holding 72.2% of two-property portfolios and 64.9% of portfolios with 3-5 properties.

The strongest presence for corporate ownership is in the 3-5 property tier, yet even there they hold only 13 properties, representing a minority 35.1% share.

In the county's largest investor segment (6-10 properties), individual ownership is again dominant at 90.0%, with companies holding just a single property.

This data firmly establishes that the path to building a rental portfolio in Hemphill County is one pursued almost exclusively by private individuals, with very limited corporate involvement at any scale.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
In Hemphill County's primary zip code, 79014, investors own a significant 24.8% of the single-family housing stock.
Detailed Findings

The entirety of real estate investor activity in Hemphill County is concentrated in the 79014 zip code. This area contains all 215 investor-owned single-family homes.

Investors have a substantial market penetration in this region, with their holdings representing 24.8% of the total 867 SFR properties available. This rate is significantly higher than many other rural areas, indicating a strong rental market.

The geographic data confirms that Hemphill County's investor market is a single, localized ecosystem rather than a collection of disparate submarkets.

All analysis of trends, pricing, and ownership is directly applicable to the 79014 zip code, as it is the sole area of investor focus.

The high ownership percentage suggests that rental housing provided by private landlords plays a crucial role in the local community's overall housing supply.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Hemphill County landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring 12 properties while selling only 3 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Hemphill County have been in a state of consistent portfolio expansion. In 2025, they demonstrated strong net buying activity, adding 12 properties while divesting only 3, for a net gain of 9 homes.

This pattern of accumulation continues a multi-year trend. In 2024, the net buying was even more pronounced, with 17 purchases against just 4 sales, resulting in a net increase of 13 properties.

The most recent full quarter with transaction data, Q3 2025, showed a buy-to-sell ratio of 6-to-1, with 6 properties purchased and only 1 sold.

This sustained net positive acquisition activity indicates investor confidence in the local rental market and a long-term strategy of growing their holdings.

Given the complete absence of institutional investors in the county, this buying activity is entirely attributable to smaller, local landlords who are steadily increasing their footprint in the community.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove 40.0% of Hemphill County's Q1 market transactions, with all purchases made by single-property investors.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a pivotal role in market liquidity during the first quarter, participating in 2 of the 5 total SFR transactions for a 40.0% market share.

All investor transaction activity was concentrated at the entry level of the market. The 2 landlord purchases were both made by investors in the single-property tier, indicating new capital entering the rental space.

The average purchase price for these new landlords was $68,750, a price point that is significantly lower than homeowner averages and suggests a focus on acquiring affordable rental stock.

No inter-landlord trading occurred during the quarter, with 0.0% of properties being bought from other landlords. This signifies that investors are sourcing their inventory from the traditional market, likely acquiring homes from owner-occupiers.

The transaction data reinforces the theme of a market fueled by new, small investors, as no purchases were made by mid-size or institutional tiers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.5% of Hemphill County's investor market, acquiring homes at a 55.1% discount in Q1.
Holdings
Landlords own 215 SFR properties in Hemphill County, representing 24.8% of the total market, with individual investors overwhelmingly holding 86.5% of these assets compared to 13.5% for companies.
Pricing
Landlords secured an exceptional 55.1% discount compared to homeowners in Q1 2026, paying an average of $68,750 per property, which is $84,468 less than the typical homebuyer.
Activity
Investors purchased 40.0% of all homes sold in Q1, with 100% of this activity coming from two new single-property landlords entering the market for the first time.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have a near-total grip on the market with 99.5% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes in Hemphill County; companies do not achieve majority ownership at any tier, holding just 10.0% in the largest local segment (6-10 properties).
Transactions
Landlords in Hemphill County are consistently net buyers, growing their portfolios year-over-year, with a 4-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025 (12 buys vs. 3 sells). Institutional investors were inactive.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Hemphill County, Texas, is a model of small-scale, local ownership. Investors control a substantial 24.8% of the single-family housing market, with a total of 215 properties. This portfolio is overwhelmingly managed by individuals, who own 86.5% of these homes, compared to just 13.5% held by companies. The market structure is definitively 'mom-and-pop,' as landlords with 1-10 properties control 99.5% of all investor-owned assets, while large-scale institutional investors have no footprint whatsoever.

In the first quarter of 2026, these local investors were highly influential, capturing 40.0% of all home sales. Their purchasing behavior highlighted a keen eye for value, as they acquired properties at an average price of just $68,750, a remarkable 55.1% discount compared to what traditional homeowners paid. This activity was driven entirely by new entrants, with two first-time landlords making up all investor purchases. This trend of accumulation is consistent, as data from 2024 and 2025 shows landlords have been persistent net buyers, steadily expanding their local portfolios.

The key takeaway for Hemphill County is that its rental market is sustained by a fragmented network of private citizens, not corporate entities. These investors provide a significant portion of the local housing supply and demonstrate an ability to acquire properties efficiently. The market's health and growth are tied directly to the financial capacity and confidence of these small, local operators who are actively and consistently investing in their own community.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 03:38 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Hemphill (TX)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Hemphill (TX) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tx-hemphill/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.