Phillips (CO) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Phillips (CO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Phillips (CO)
1,416
Total Investors in Phillips (CO)
354
Investor Owned SFR in Phillips (CO)
320(22.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
309
SFR Owned
262
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
45
SFR Owned
64
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 320 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 96% of Phillips County's Investor Market, Securing Deep Discounts
Investors own 22.6% of Single-Family Residences in Phillips County, with small, individual landlords controlling a staggering 96.4% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, investor activity, though minimal, captured 25.0% of all sales, securing an 80.1% price discount compared to traditional homeowners. The market shows a strong preference for cash acquisitions and a complete absence of institutional (1000+ property) ownership.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 320 SFR properties in Phillips County, with individuals holding 81.9% of the portfolio.
Of the 320 investor-owned homes, a remarkable 264 (82.5%) were purchased with cash, while only 56 are financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 309 properties identified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 80.1% less than homeowners, an average discount of $221,500 per property.
The price gap is extremely volatile; landlords paid a 45.0% premium in Q3 2025 and a 3.6% premium in Q2 2025, suggesting opportunistic buying in a low-volume market. No clear trend indicates whether individuals or companies pay more due to sparse data.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 25.0% of all single-family homes sold in Phillips County during Q1 2026.
All (100.0%) of this quarter's investor activity came from the 'mom-and-pop' segment, specifically a single new landlord purchasing their first investment property. Institutional investors made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 96.4% of all investor-owned SFR housing in Phillips County.
Single-property landlords are the dominant force, owning 227 properties, which is 69.0% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence in the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners across every portfolio size in Phillips County, with no available pricing data comparison.
Companies fail to become the majority at any tier; even in the 3-5 property segment, individuals own 81.1% of the homes. For single-property portfolios, individual ownership stands at a commanding 88.7%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with 94% of all investor-owned properties located in just two zip codes.
The zip codes 80734 (183 properties) and 80731 (119 properties) are the hubs of investor ownership. Smaller zip codes show extreme penetration rates, with 80744 at 100% and 80721 at 41.9% investor ownership.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Phillips County shifted to net buyers in 2025 with 16 purchases vs 6 sales, after a balanced 2024.
Activity returned to equilibrium in Q1 2026 with one purchase and one sale. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) have been completely inactive, recording zero buy or sell transactions in the available data.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord activity represented 25.0% of all Q1 2026 transactions, driven by a single mom-and-pop purchase.
The one transaction was by a new single-property landlord who paid $55,000. This property was acquired from a non-investor, as 0% of Q1 purchases came from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 320 SFR properties in Phillips County, with individuals holding 81.9% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Phillips County constitutes a significant 22.6% of the total Single-Family Residential market, with 320 out of 1,416 SFR properties held by investors. This high penetration rate indicates a strong rental market relative to the county's size.

The profile of the typical real estate investor is overwhelmingly individual-based. Individual landlords own 262 properties, making up 81.9% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies hold the remaining 64 properties (20.0%).

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for all-cash acquisitions. An overwhelming 82.5% of the investor portfolio (264 properties) is owned outright without financing, compared to just 56 financed properties. This suggests a market dominated by investors with high liquidity who are not reliant on leverage.

The primary strategy for these holdings is generating rental income. A total of 309 properties are currently rented, confirming the rental-centric nature of investor activity in the county.

The landlord landscape is composed of 354 distinct entities, with 309 individuals and 45 companies. The higher number of individual landlords compared to their property count points towards smaller, more fragmented ownership structures.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 80.1% less than homeowners, an average discount of $221,500 per property.
Detailed Findings

A dramatic pricing disparity emerged in Q1 2026, where the average landlord acquisition price was just $55,000 compared to $276,500 for traditional homeowners. This represents a massive $221,500 discount, or 80.1%, for investors, likely reflecting a distressed or off-market purchase.

However, this steep discount is an anomaly in a highly volatile market. In the preceding year, the trend was reversed. In Q3 2025, landlords paid a 45.0% premium ($316,250 vs $218,130), and in Q2 2025, they paid a 3.6% premium ($323,500 vs $312,136).

This quarter-over-quarter fluctuation demonstrates that there is no consistent landlord discount in Phillips County. Instead, the data points to a market characterized by low transaction volumes where individual opportunistic deals heavily skew quarterly averages.

Comparing broader timeframes, the average landlord acquisition price in 2024 was $316,996, while the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average was significantly lower at $162,901, indicating substantial price appreciation in recent years despite the quarterly volatility.

The low number of transactions each quarter prevents a meaningful analysis of pricing differences between individual and company investors, as single purchases can dominate the entire dataset for a given period.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 25.0% of all single-family homes sold in Phillips County during Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for one-quarter of the Phillips County housing market in Q1 2026, with landlords acquiring 1 of the 4 total SFR properties sold. This 25.0% market share highlights continued investor demand even in a low-volume environment.

The entirety of this quarter's purchasing activity was driven by the smallest investor class. A single new landlord entered the market, acquiring their first property and accounting for 100.0% of all investor purchases.

This activity underscores the grassroots nature of the local rental market. There were no purchases from mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) or institutional investors (Tier 09), reinforcing their lack of presence in the county.

The data reveals a market where growth is driven by new, small-scale entrants rather than the expansion of existing large portfolios. The single purchase was made by one entity, highlighting a one-to-one relationship between active entities and properties acquired this quarter.

In summary, the Q1 purchasing story for Phillips County is one of a single, decisive move by a new mom-and-pop investor, which alone was enough to represent a significant portion of total market sales.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 96.4% of all investor-owned SFR housing in Phillips County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of investor-owned properties in Phillips County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a combined 96.4% of the rental housing stock.

First-time or single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of this market. This group alone owns 227 properties, which accounts for 69.0% of all investor-owned SFRs, highlighting the market's reliance on small, individual investors.

The distribution is heavily skewed towards the smallest tiers. Following single-property owners, landlords with 3-5 properties hold the next largest share at 16.1% (53 properties), and two-property owners hold 8.5% (28 properties).

Conversely, there is a complete absence of large-scale institutional ownership. Tier 09 investors (1,000+ properties) own zero properties in the county, challenging any narrative of corporate landlords controlling the local market.

Even mid-size landlords have a very small footprint. Investors owning 11-50 properties collectively hold just 12 properties, representing only 3.6% of the investor market, further cementing the county's character as a mom-and-pop driven rental landscape.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the dominant owners across every portfolio size in Phillips County, with no available pricing data comparison.
Detailed Findings

In Phillips County, individual investors maintain majority ownership across every single investor tier, a clear sign that corporate ownership has not made significant inroads. There is no crossover point where companies become the dominant owner type.

For the largest group, single-property landlords, individuals own 205 of the 227 properties, an 88.7% share, compared to just 11.3% for companies.

This pattern of individual dominance continues as portfolios grow. Among landlords owning 3-5 properties, individuals still hold a commanding 81.1% majority (43 properties), with companies owning only 10 properties in this tier.

The data demonstrates that the path to portfolio growth in this county is primarily pursued by individual investors, not by the incorporation of rental businesses into formal company structures.

Due to the low transaction volume and fragmented nature of the data, a meaningful comparison of acquisition prices between individual and company buyers within specific tiers is not possible for this reporting period.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with 94% of all investor-owned properties located in just two zip codes.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor properties in Phillips County is extremely concentrated. The vast majority of activity is focused in just two areas: zip codes 80734 and 80731, which together contain 302 of the 320 total investor-owned SFRs, or 94.4% of the portfolio.

The zip code 80734 is the largest hub for investors, with 183 properties and a 20.5% investor ownership rate. Following closely is 80731, with 119 properties and an even higher penetration rate of 25.4%.

While larger zip codes have the highest raw counts, some smaller micro-markets exhibit the highest saturation of investor ownership. Zip code 80744 is technically 100.0% investor-owned (1 of 1 property), and 80721 has a 41.9% investor ownership rate, making it a significant pocket of rental activity.

This analysis reveals a key distinction between where investors own the most properties (volume) and where they dominate the local market (percentage). Both metrics point to specific, targeted areas rather than a broad, county-wide spread of investment.

The top five regions by investor count account for nearly the entire investor portfolio, indicating that investors are focusing their capital on a few select communities within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Phillips County shifted to net buyers in 2025 with 16 purchases vs 6 sales, after a balanced 2024.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data shows a dynamic shift in landlord strategy in Phillips County. After a nearly balanced year in 2024 with 13 buys and 12 sells, investors became strong net buyers in 2025, acquiring 16 properties while selling only 6.

This acquisitive trend showed signs of cooling in the most recent quarter. In Q1 2026, the market returned to a neutral position with one property bought and one property sold by investors.

The transaction data is driven entirely by smaller investors. Institutional firms in the 1000+ property tier have recorded zero transaction activity, indicating they are neither acquiring nor divesting assets in this market.

The peak of buying activity occurred in Q2 and Q3 of 2025, where landlords collectively purchased 4 properties in each quarter while only selling 2, demonstrating a clear period of portfolio expansion.

Overall, the trend reveals that local landlords were actively accumulating properties through 2025, a pace that has since normalized at the start of 2026, signaling a potential shift to a more stable hold period.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord activity represented 25.0% of all Q1 2026 transactions, driven by a single mom-and-pop purchase.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were involved in 25.0% of all SFR transactions in Phillips County, with 1 out of 4 total sales going to an investor. This single transaction defined the entirety of investor market activity for the quarter.

The purchase was made by a new investor entering the market in the single-property tier. This highlights that market growth is currently coming from new entrants rather than portfolio expansions by existing landlords.

The acquisition price for this Tier 01 transaction was $55,000, significantly below the county's typical market prices and suggesting a strategy focused on acquiring lower-cost or distressed assets.

Notably, this transaction did not involve another investor. The property was purchased from a non-landlord, meaning 0% of Q1 investor acquisitions came from inter-landlord trading. This signals an expansion of the rental pool rather than a shuffling of existing rental assets.

There were no transactions from mid-size or institutional tiers, reinforcing that the transactional market, much like the ownership landscape, is exclusively a mom-and-pop playing field in Phillips County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small individual investors dominate Phillips County, controlling 96% of rental homes with a heavy reliance on cash acquisitions.
Holdings
Landlords own 320 Single-Family Residential properties in Phillips County, representing 22.6% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 262 of these properties (81.9%), compared to 64 (20.0%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, investors acquired property at an 80.1% discount compared to homeowners, paying an average of $55,000 versus $276,500. This reflects opportunistic buying in a low-volume market, as investors paid significant premiums in parts of 2025.
Activity
Investors purchased 25.0% of all homes sold in Q1 2026, with all activity originating from one new single-property landlord entering the market. No purchases were made by mid-size or institutional investors.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market, owning 96.4% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero ownership stake in the county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners across all portfolio sizes, and there is no tier where companies overtake them. Individuals own 88.7% of all single-property rentals, demonstrating their foundational role in the market.
Transactions
After being strong net buyers in 2025 (16 buys vs 6 sells), landlords reached a balanced position in Q1 2026 with 1 purchase and 1 sale. Institutional investors remain completely inactive on both the buy and sell sides.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Phillips County, Colorado, is a definitive example of a market driven by small, local operators. Investors hold a significant 22.6% of all Single-Family Residences, totaling 320 properties. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 81.9% of these homes, compared to just 20.0% for companies. The market structure is dominated by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control a staggering 96.4% of investor-owned housing, while institutional firms with 1,000+ properties have no presence whatsoever.

Investor behavior in Phillips County is characterized by opportunistic, cash-heavy acquisitions. In Q1 2026, the sole investor purchase captured 25.0% of market activity and was secured at an 80.1% discount to the average homeowner price, though this follows quarters with significant premiums, indicating a volatile, deal-driven environment. A heavy reliance on cash is evident, with 82.5% of the investor portfolio owned free of financing. Transactionally, landlords were net buyers in 2025 before activity balanced in Q1 2026, with all movement driven by small investors.

The key takeaway is that the Phillips County rental market operates entirely outside the national narrative of corporate consolidation. It is a grassroots ecosystem built on individual capital and local knowledge, where market share is gained one property at a time by new entrants. The high investor penetration rate, combined with the lack of institutional capital, suggests a stable, mature rental market that serves local housing needs without influence from large-scale proptech platforms or Wall Street firms.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 02:21 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Phillips (CO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Phillips (CO) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-co-phillips/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.