Cleburne (AL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Cleburne (AL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Cleburne (AL)
3,996
Total Investors in Cleburne (AL)
1,149
Investor Owned SFR in Cleburne (AL)
985(24.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,019
SFR Owned
875
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
130
SFR Owned
140
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 985 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Cleburne County, Controlling 97% of Rental Homes
Investors own 24.6% of all single-family homes in Cleburne County, a portfolio overwhelmingly controlled by small, individual landlords (97.0%). In Q1 2026, landlords were aggressive net buyers with a 14-to-1 ratio, capturing 38.5% of all home sales and paying just 1.1% below homeowner prices as the market tightens.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 985 homes, 24.6% of the market, with individuals holding 88.8%.
The portfolio is overwhelmingly held in cash, with 924 of 985 properties (93.8%) owned outright and only 61 financed. Individual owners comprise 1,019 of the 1,149 total landlords in the county.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords' pricing advantage narrowed to just 1.1% in Q1, a $2,419 discount.
This marks a sharp decrease from mid-2025, when landlords enjoyed discounts as high as 28.1% ($64,163 in Q3) and 25.9% ($68,290 in Q2) compared to traditional homeowners. The average landlord acquisition price in Q1 was $225,964.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 38.5% of Q1 market activity, purchasing 20 of 52 homes sold.
All landlord purchase activity (100.0%) was driven by mom-and-pop investors. In fact, all 20 properties were acquired by new investors in the single-property tier, with institutional buyers making zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 97.0% of Cleburne County's rental housing.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 4 properties, or 0.4% of the investor market. The single-property tier alone makes up 81.6% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners in portfolios of 11-20 properties, holding a 55.0% share.
Below this threshold, individuals dominate, owning 89.2% of single-property portfolios and over 81% in the 2-10 property range. Pricing data by owner type within tiers was not available.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip code 36264, home to 567 investor properties.
This single zip code accounts for 57.6% of all investor-owned homes in the county. The highest investor penetration rate is in zip code 36272, where 30.5% of homes are investor-owned.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 14 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
This trend of accumulation is consistent, following a strong 2025 where landlords maintained a 7.7-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio (154 buys vs. 20 sells). In contrast, institutional investors were dormant, buying one and selling one property in all of 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 38.4% of all Q1 transactions, with 28 of 73 total market sales.
Activity was exclusively concentrated in the smallest tier, with 100% of landlord transactions made by new, single-property investors. These investors are not buying from other landlords, with 0% of their purchases coming from existing rental stock.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 985 homes, 24.6% of the market, with individuals holding 88.8%.
Detailed Findings

In Cleburne County, investors hold a significant 24.6% share of the single-family residential market, totaling 985 properties out of 3,996. This indicates a high level of real estate investing activity relative to the market size.

The ownership structure is dominated by individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 875 properties, constituting 88.8% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 140 properties (14.2%) owned by companies.

A defining characteristic of this market is the extremely low reliance on financing. An overwhelming 93.8% of investor-owned properties (924 homes) are held free and clear, with only 6.2% (61 properties) carrying a mortgage. This suggests a prevalent strategy of long-term, low-leverage investment.

The landlord base itself reflects this individual-driven market, with 1,019 individual landlords compared to only 130 company entities. This structure points to a highly fragmented market composed primarily of small-scale operators.

Nearly all investor-owned properties are utilized as rentals, with 968 of the 985 properties classified as rented, confirming the portfolio's focus on generating rental income.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords' pricing advantage narrowed to just 1.1% in Q1, a $2,419 discount.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties at an average price of $225,964, which was only 1.1% less than the $228,383 paid by traditional homeowners. This represents a minimal discount of just $2,419 per property.

This narrow price gap is a dramatic shift from the previous year. Throughout 2025, investors secured substantial discounts, peaking at 28.1% ($64,163) in Q3 and 25.9% ($68,290) in Q2, indicating a much stronger bargaining position in the recent past.

The shrinking discount suggests that competition for available housing stock may be increasing, forcing investors to bid closer to the prices paid by owner-occupants.

While landlords still maintain a pricing advantage, its near disappearance in the most recent quarter signals a potential tightening of the market and fewer opportunities for deep-value acquisitions compared to prior periods.

Overall price trends show appreciation, with the Q1 2026 average acquisition price of $225,964 for landlords surpassing all quarterly averages from 2025, which ranged from $164,260 to $195,688.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 38.5% of Q1 market activity, purchasing 20 of 52 homes sold.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a powerful force in the Q1 2026 market, purchasing 20 of the 52 single-family homes sold, which translates to a 38.5% market share. This high level of activity underscores their significant impact on local housing demand.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) accounted for 100.0% of all investor acquisitions during the quarter.

Notably, the market's growth is being fueled exclusively by new entrants. All 20 properties were purchased by 28 new entities entering the single-property tier, indicating a wave of first-time landlords rather than portfolio expansion by existing investors.

In stark contrast, there was zero acquisition activity from mid-size (11-1,000 properties) or institutional (1,000+ properties) investors, highlighting a complete absence of large-scale capital in the current purchasing landscape.

This pattern reveals a grassroots-level expansion of rental ownership, driven by small, new investors rather than large, consolidated players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 97.0% of Cleburne County's rental housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Cleburne County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a staggering 97.0% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio.

This market structure directly refutes narratives of corporate dominance. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a minimal footprint, holding just 4 properties, which accounts for only 0.4% of the local rental stock.

The foundation of the market is built on first-time landlords. The single-property tier is the largest segment by a wide margin, with 826 properties representing 81.6% of all investor holdings.

The distribution is heavily skewed towards the smallest players, with the top four tiers (1-10 properties) comprising 97.0% of holdings, while all tiers above 10 properties combined account for just 3.0%.

This highly fragmented ownership structure indicates a market characterized by numerous small, independent operators rather than a few dominant players.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners in portfolios of 11-20 properties, holding a 55.0% share.
Detailed Findings

A clear crossover point exists where ownership structure professionalizes. While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, holding 11 of the 20 properties (55.0%).

In the foundational tiers, individual ownership is the standard. Individuals own 756 of the single-property rentals (89.2%) and maintain over 81% control in every tier up to 10 properties.

This pattern suggests that as investors scale their operations beyond 10 properties, they are more likely to adopt a corporate structure for liability and management purposes.

The largest concentrations of company ownership are found at the smaller end of the mid-size category, signaling a strategic shift as portfolios begin to grow.

Even so, the vast majority of all investor-owned properties remain in the hands of individuals, reflecting the market's mom-and-pop character.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip code 36264, home to 567 investor properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals a hyper-concentration of investor ownership within Cleburne County. The zip code 36264 is the undisputed epicenter, containing 567 investor-owned properties, which is more than the next four top zip codes combined.

The dominance of 36264 is stark, as it alone holds 57.6% of the county's entire 985-property investor portfolio. This area also has a high investor ownership rate of 25.4%.

While 36264 leads by sheer volume, the highest saturation of investors is found in zip code 36272, where nearly one-third of homes (30.5%) are investor-owned.

Several zip codes, including 36269 (26.1% rate) and 36262 (23.1% rate), appear on both the top-count and top-percentage lists, identifying them as key, established investor hotspots.

This data points to a targeted investment strategy, with capital flowing into very specific neighborhoods rather than being evenly distributed across the county. This comprehensive market report highlights key regional trends.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 14 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals a clear trend of portfolio accumulation among landlords in Cleburne County. In Q1 2026, they were strong net buyers, with 28 purchases and only 2 sales, resulting in a net gain of 26 properties.

This aggressive acquisition stance is not new. It follows a full year of similar behavior in 2025, during which investors bought 154 properties and sold only 20, for a net gain of 134 properties and a buy/sell ratio of 7.7.

The transaction velocity shows a consistent appetite for acquiring new rental stock, with landlords steadily adding to their holdings quarter after quarter.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) display the opposite behavior: inactivity. Their transaction log for all of 2025 consisted of a single purchase and a single sale, indicating they are neither accumulating nor divesting in this market.

This dynamic reinforces the narrative that market growth is driven entirely by smaller investors actively expanding their portfolios, while large-scale capital remains on the sidelines.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 38.4% of all Q1 transactions, with 28 of 73 total market sales.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords played a major role in market liquidity, participating in 28 of the 73 total SFR transactions for a market share of 38.4%.

Transaction activity was entirely confined to new market entrants. All 28 transactions were attributed to investors in the single-property tier, who paid an average price of $225,964.

There were zero transactions recorded for any other investor tier, from two-property owners to large institutions, making the Q1 story one of grassroots market entry.

Investors are sourcing their properties from the general market, not from each other. Data shows that 0% of the 28 properties purchased by landlords were acquired from another landlord, indicating they are buying from homeowners.

This lack of inter-landlord trading suggests a buy-and-hold strategy is prevalent, with very little churn among existing rental properties. Investors are adding to the rental pool, not just trading assets within it.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small local investors dominate Cleburne County's housing market, controlling 97% of rentals and driving 38% of Q1 sales.
Holdings
Landlords own 985 single-family homes in Cleburne County, representing 24.6% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (88.8%) compared to companies (14.2%).
Pricing
The investor pricing advantage has tightened significantly, with landlords paying just 1.1% less than homeowners in Q1 2026 ($225,964 vs. $228,383), a sharp drop from discounts exceeding 25% in mid-2025.
Activity
In Q1, landlords purchased 38.5% of all homes sold (20 properties), with 100% of this activity coming from 28 new single-property investors entering the market for the first time.
Market Share
The market is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 97.0% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors own a negligible 0.4%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the bedrock of the market, but companies become the majority owners (55.0%) once a portfolio grows to the 11-20 property tier, signaling a shift to professionalization.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive accumulators, acting as net buyers with a 14-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 (28 buys vs. 2 sells), while institutional investors remain completely inactive.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Cleburne County, AL is defined by a deep-rooted and expanding base of local, individual investors, not large corporations. Investors own a significant 24.6% of the county's housing stock (985 properties), a share that is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (97.0%). This highly fragmented landscape, with individuals owning 88.8% of the rental properties, runs counter to the narrative of institutional consolidation. The market's financial stability is notable, as 93.8% of these homes are owned outright with cash.

In the first quarter of 2026, these small investors were the sole drivers of market activity. They captured 38.5% of all home sales, with every single purchase made by a new landlord buying their first property. This influx of new capital is impacting pricing; the historical discount investors enjoyed has evaporated to just 1.1%, suggesting heightened competition. Transaction patterns confirm a strong buy-and-hold strategy, as landlords acted as aggressive net buyers with a 14-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, all while sourcing properties from homeowners rather than trading amongst themselves.

The key takeaway from this market reports dashboard is that Cleburne County represents a robust, grassroots rental market. Its growth is fueled by new, small-scale entrepreneurs, and its properties are held as long-term, low-leverage assets. The lack of institutional presence and the tightening price environment suggest a mature, competitive landscape where local knowledge and direct-from-homeowner acquisition are paramount. The market's future will be shaped by the continued entry and success of these independent investors.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 20, 2026 at 06:51 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Cleburne (AL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Cleburne (AL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-al-cleburne/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.