Yellowstone (MT) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Yellowstone (MT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Yellowstone (MT)
36,225
Total Investors in Yellowstone (MT)
6,834
Investor Owned SFR in Yellowstone (MT)
5,911(16.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,791
SFR Owned
4,511
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,043
SFR Owned
1,549
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5,911 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Yellowstone County, Controlling 94% of Rental Homes and Actively Buying
In Yellowstone County, landlords own 5,911 SFR properties, representing 16.3% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by small 'mom-and-pop' investors (94.0%), with institutional firms holding a negligible 0.1%. In Q1, landlords were aggressive net buyers and secured properties at a 14.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 5,911 properties in Yellowstone County, with individuals holding 76.3% of the portfolio.
The majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (3,777) rather than financed (2,134). An overwhelming 97.1% of the portfolio is classified as non-owner-occupied, with 5,737 of 5,911 properties being rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Yellowstone County paid 14.4% less than homeowners in Q1, a discount of $58,778 per property.
The landlord purchasing advantage has widened significantly, jumping from just 4.1% in Q3 2025 to 14.4% in Q1 2026. Prices for landlord acquisitions in Q1 2026 ($349,940) are 19.3% higher than the 2020-2023 average ($293,325), showing significant market appreciation.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 20.8% of all SFR properties sold in the last quarter, purchasing 77 homes.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 92.3% of all landlord purchases. New single-property landlords were the most active group, acquiring 57 properties, or 73.1% of the investor total.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 94.0% of all investor-held SFRs in Yellowstone County.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties control a minuscule 0.1% of the market, holding just 9 properties. The single-largest group are first-time landlords, with the single-property tier alone accounting for 66.8% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
The ownership crossover occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where companies first become the majority owners at 66.0%.
Individuals dominate the smallest tiers, owning 85.4% of single-property portfolios and 70.0% of two-property portfolios. Conversely, companies control nearly all larger portfolios, such as the 21-50 property tier where they own 99.1% of homes.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Yellowstone County is heavily concentrated in zip codes 59101 and 59102, which together hold 4,008 investor-owned properties.
The highest rate of investor ownership is in zip code 59015, where investors own 52.8% of the homes. Zip code 59101 also shows high penetration with a 24.3% investor ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Yellowstone County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 5.26 properties for every one they sold in Q1 2026.
This net buying trend has been consistent, with landlords purchasing 583 properties and selling only 145 in 2025. Institutional investors have shifted strategy, becoming net buyers in 2025 and Q1 2026 after being net sellers in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 18.2% of all market transactions in Q1, conducting 100 purchases.
Institutional investors paid 34.6% less than new single-property buyers, with an average price of $268,009 versus $409,690. Institutions were also more likely to buy from other landlords, with 33.3% of their purchases being inter-investor deals.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 5,911 properties in Yellowstone County, with individuals holding 76.3% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Yellowstone County, MT, landlords hold a significant portfolio of 5,911 single-family residential properties, accounting for 16.3% of the total 36,225 SFRs in the market. This highlights a notable concentration of investor activity in the local housing market.

Individual investors are the backbone of the rental market, owning 4,511 properties, which is 76.3% of the total investor-owned inventory. In contrast, company-owned properties number 1,549, or 26.2%, demonstrating that small-scale operators, not large corporations, form the majority of landlords.

The market is composed of 6,834 distinct landlord entities, with individuals again forming the supermajority at 5,791 (84.7%) compared to 1,043 company landlords (15.3%). This ratio of entities to properties suggests smaller average portfolio sizes, reinforcing the dominance of local investors.

A strong indicator of financial stability among investors is the preference for cash ownership. Landlords own 3,777 properties outright (63.9% of their portfolio), while only 2,134 properties (36.1%) are financed, suggesting a less leveraged and more resilient investor base.

The portfolio is heavily focused on rental income generation, with 5,737 properties (97.1%) identified as rented or non-owner-occupied. This high percentage underscores that the vast majority of investor-owned homes are actively contributing to the local rental housing supply.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Yellowstone County paid 14.4% less than homeowners in Q1, a discount of $58,778 per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors demonstrated significant purchasing power in Q1 2026, acquiring properties for an average price of $349,940. This was substantially lower than the $408,718 paid by traditional homeowners, representing a 14.4% discount or a savings of $58,778 per home.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has expanded dramatically. The 14.4% discount in Q1 2026 is a sharp increase from the more modest discounts of 4.1% in Q3 2025 and 5.3% in Q2 2025, signaling a growing ability for investors to find and secure better deals.

Despite securing discounts, investors are still paying more than they did in the recent past, reflecting broad market appreciation. The Q1 2026 average purchase price of $349,940 is 19.3% higher than the average price of $293,325 during the 2020-2023 period.

Quarterly price comparisons show volatility but a consistent pattern of landlords paying less. For example, in Q1 2025, landlords achieved an even larger discount of 15.7% ($352,907 vs $418,747), indicating that Q1 2026's strong discount is not an anomaly but part of a strategic acquisition pattern.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 20.8% of all SFR properties sold in the last quarter, purchasing 77 homes.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a significant portion of the Yellowstone County market last quarter, with landlords purchasing 77 of the 371 total SFRs sold, a market share of 20.8%. This demonstrates sustained demand from the real estate investing community.

The acquisition market is heavily dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) purchased 72 of the 77 properties, making up 92.3% of all investor buying activity and reaffirming their role as the primary drivers of the rental market.

New entrants are a powerful force, with 75 new single-property landlord entities acquiring 57 properties. This group alone was responsible for 73.1% of all investor purchases, indicating a healthy and growing base of small, local landlords.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had a minimal impact on the market, purchasing only 2 properties. This represents just 2.6% of landlord acquisitions, challenging the narrative of large corporations dominating the purchasing landscape.

Mid-size landlords also showed limited activity, with various tiers from 11 to 1,000 properties combining to purchase only 4 properties. This further concentrates recent buying activity at the smallest end of the investor spectrum.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 94.0% of all investor-held SFRs in Yellowstone County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of rental properties in Yellowstone County is overwhelmingly dominated by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a combined 94.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, owning 4,115 homes, which constitutes 66.8% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the fragmented nature of ownership and the importance of individual, small-scale participants.

The influence of large-scale investors is nearly non-existent. Institutional landlords in the 1,000+ property tier own a total of just 9 properties, representing only 0.1% of the investor-owned housing stock. This finding directly contradicts the common perception of Wall Street's widespread market control.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) also hold a relatively small share, collectively owning 358 properties or 5.9% of the total. The ownership is heavily concentrated in the smallest tiers, with a sharp drop-off as portfolio sizes increase.

This distribution reveals a market defined by local, small-business landlords rather than large, remote corporate entities. The data suggests that housing policy and market analysis should focus on the behavior and needs of these smaller operators who provide the vast majority of rental housing.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
The ownership crossover occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where companies first become the majority owners at 66.0%.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges when examining ownership by entity type across different portfolio sizes. Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, owning 3,588 (85.4%) of single-property investments and 385 (70.0%) of two-property portfolios.

The transition to corporate ownership happens decisively as portfolios grow. The 6-10 property tier serves as the crossover point, where companies take a 66.0% majority share, owning 200 properties compared to 103 for individuals.

In the mid-size tiers, company ownership becomes almost absolute. For investors with 11-20 properties, companies own 88.7%, and in the 21-50 property tier, they control a staggering 99.1% (109 out of 110 properties).

This trend signifies a strategic shift where investors managing larger and more complex portfolios tend to incorporate for liability, operational efficiency, and financial reasons. It suggests that growth in the rental market is often accompanied by professionalization under a corporate structure.

Even in the large 101-1,000 property tier, companies maintain their dominance with an 84.6% share. The data clearly shows that while individuals form the broad base of the market, companies are the preferred vehicle for scaling a real estate investor business.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Yellowstone County is heavily concentrated in zip codes 59101 and 59102, which together hold 4,008 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership is not evenly distributed across Yellowstone County. Two zip codes, 59101 and 59102, are the epicenters of activity, containing 2,011 and 1,997 investor-owned properties, respectively.

While 59101 and 59102 lead by sheer volume, other areas show a much higher density of investor ownership. Zip code 59015 stands out with an investor ownership rate of 52.8%, indicating that more than half the homes in that area are investor-owned.

The high-volume area of 59101 also has a high concentration, with a 24.3% ownership rate. This combination of high count and high percentage makes it a key submarket for rental activity and investment.

In contrast, 59102 has a high count of investor properties (1,997) but a more moderate ownership rate of 15.2%, suggesting it is a larger housing market overall where investor presence is significant but less concentrated than in 59101 or 59015.

The data for zip codes 59002, 59006, and 59057 appears incomplete, preventing a full analysis of those areas. However, the available information points to specific corridors of high investor concentration within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Yellowstone County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 5.26 properties for every one they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Yellowstone County is in a strong accumulation phase. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 100 properties while selling only 19, demonstrating a clear strategy of portfolio growth and a bullish outlook on the local market.

This pattern of net buying is not a recent phenomenon. Throughout 2025, landlords maintained a buy-to-sell ratio of over 4 to 1 (583 buys vs. 145 sells). Similarly, in 2024, they acquired 554 properties and sold 148, reinforcing a multi-year trend of expansion.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties), while a small part of the market, show a notable strategic shift. After being net sellers in 2024 (2 buys vs. 5 sells), they reversed course to become net buyers in 2025 (8 buys vs. 4 sells) and continued this trend in Q1 2026 (3 buys vs. 2 sells).

The transaction data indicates a liquid and active market where investors are consistently adding to their portfolios rather than divesting. The high net acquisition rate suggests strong confidence in future rent growth and property appreciation in the region.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 18.2% of all market transactions in Q1, conducting 100 purchases.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter, landlords were a significant force in the transaction market, with their 100 purchases accounting for 18.2% of the 549 total SFR transactions in Yellowstone County.

A vast pricing disparity exists between the smallest and largest investors. New single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $409,690. In sharp contrast, institutional buyers (1,000+ properties) paid an average of only $268,009, a 34.6% discount that highlights their ability to source more advantageous deals.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated transaction volume, conducting 91 of the 100 investor purchases. This mirrors their dominance in overall ownership and shows they are the most active traders in the market.

Institutional investors appear more strategic in their sourcing. One-third (33.3%) of their Q1 acquisitions were purchased from other landlords. This is significantly higher than the 13.3% rate for single-property buyers, suggesting institutions may be acquiring existing rental portfolios rather than competing for on-market listings.

The data reveals a tiered market where smaller, new investors often pay a premium to enter, while larger, more established players leverage their scale and connections to acquire properties at a substantial discount.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors command 94% of Yellowstone County's rental market, expanding portfolios as net buyers
Holdings
Landlords own 5,911 SFR properties, 16.3% of the market in Yellowstone County, MT, with individual investors holding a dominant 76.3% (4,511 properties) compared to companies at 26.2% (1,549 properties).
Pricing
In Q1, landlords secured a significant 14.4% pricing advantage over traditional homeowners, paying an average of $349,940 while homeowners paid $408,718, a savings of $58,778 per property.
Activity
Investors purchased 20.8% of all homes sold last quarter (77 properties), with activity overwhelmingly driven by new single-property landlords who acquired 57 of those homes.
Market Share
The investor market is defined by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 94.0% of investor-owned housing, while institutional firms own a mere 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the base of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios starting at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to professionalization as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Investors are in a strong growth phase, acting as net buyers with a 5.26-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 (100 buys vs 19 sells), a trend mirrored by institutional investors who have also shifted to a net buying position.
Market Narrative

In Yellowstone County, MT, the single-family rental market is fundamentally shaped by small, local investors, not large corporations. Landlords own 5,911 properties, representing 16.3% of the total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly in the hands of individuals, who own 76.3% of these homes. The market structure detailed in these Investor Pulse reports shows a deep fragmentation, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a staggering 94.0% of all investor-owned properties, while institutional firms with over 1,000 properties own a negligible 0.1%.

Investor behavior in the first quarter reveals a confident and expanding market. Landlords were active net buyers, acquiring 5.26 properties for every one they sold. They demonstrated a keen ability to secure favorable pricing, paying 14.4% less than traditional homeowners, a discount that translates to nearly $59,000 per transaction. This activity was led by new market entrants, as 73% of all investor purchases were made by single-property landlords, signaling a robust and growing base of small-scale real estate entrepreneurs.

The key takeaway from this analysis is that the health and direction of the Yellowstone County rental market are tied to the decisions of thousands of individual and small-business owners. The narrative of institutional dominance does not apply here; instead, the market is characterized by widespread, small-scale participation. These investors are actively growing their holdings and have proven adept at navigating the market to acquire properties below typical homeowner prices, ensuring a steady supply of rental housing while building local wealth.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 10:23 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Yellowstone (MT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Yellowstone (MT) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mt-yellowstone/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.