Jefferson Davis Parish (LA) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Jefferson Davis Parish (LA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Jefferson Davis Parish (LA)
10,065
Total Investors in Jefferson Davis Parish (LA)
2,199
Investor Owned SFR in Jefferson Davis Parish (LA)
2,041(20.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,920
SFR Owned
1,589
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
279
SFR Owned
487
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,041 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Jefferson Davis Parish with 95% of Holdings, Securing 66% Property Discounts
Investors own 2,041 SFR properties in Jefferson Davis Parish, representing 20.3% of the market. The market is overwhelmingly controlled by small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (95.0% of holdings) versus a negligible institutional share (0.3%). In Q1, investors secured properties at a massive 66.3% discount compared to homeowners and shifted from being net buyers to a neutral position, signaling a potential market cooldown.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 2,041 properties, with individual landlords owning a dominant 77.9% share.
Cash is the primary funding source, with 1,808 properties owned outright compared to just 233 financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 1,989 of the 2,041 properties identified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired properties for 66.3% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $151,699.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners is highly volatile, swinging from a 19.7% discount in Q3 2025 to a 76.1% premium in Q2 2025. Landlord acquisition prices of $77,211 in Q1 2026 are lower than the average prices seen in both 2024 ($151,097) and 2025 ($170,944).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlord purchasing slowed in Q4, accounting for just 6.6% of all SFR market acquisitions.
Mom-and-pop landlords were the only active buyers, representing 100% of investor purchases. Single-property investors led this activity, acquiring 4 of the 5 properties purchased by landlords.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 95.0% of all investor-owned SFRs in the parish.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties control a minuscule 0.3% of the local market, owning just 6 properties. Single-property landlords alone account for two-thirds (66.3%) of all investor-owned housing.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners once portfolios scale to the 11-20 property tier.
Individuals dominate smaller tiers, owning 88.3% of single-property portfolios and 71.2% of two-property portfolios. The crossover happens decisively at the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 80.4% of the assets.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 70546 alone holding 1,162 investor-owned properties.
The highest rate of investor ownership is in zip code 70640, where investors own 38.5% of SFRs. The area with the most investor properties, 70546, has a lower but still significant ownership rate of 23.8%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords shifted to a neutral stance in Q1 2026, with 7 buys and 7 sells, after being strong net buyers in 2024 and 2025.
This neutrality follows a period of aggressive accumulation, where investors were net buyers of 70 properties in 2024 and 22 in 2025. Institutional investors were marginal net buyers in previous years, but their activity has been minimal.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in just 5.9% of all SFR transactions in Q1, with 7 total landlord transactions.
All 7 transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors, with zero activity from institutional buyers. The two-property tier sourced its single purchase directly from another landlord, while single-property buyers did not.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 2,041 properties, with individual landlords owning a dominant 77.9% share.
Detailed Findings

In Jefferson Davis Parish, landlords hold a significant 2,041 single-family properties, making up 20.3% of the total 10,065 SFRs in the market. This demonstrates a substantial investor presence in the local housing ecosystem.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly composed of individual investors rather than large corporations. Individuals own 1,589 properties, accounting for 77.9% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own the remaining 487 properties (23.9%).

A striking financial characteristic of this market is the preference for cash acquisitions. An overwhelming 1,808 properties (88.6% of the portfolio) are owned without financing, compared to only 233 that are financed. This suggests a market of well-capitalized investors who are less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards generating rental income, with 1,989 properties (97.5%) classified as rented. This high concentration underscores the primary strategy of local investors as providers of rental housing.

The investor base itself reflects the individual ownership trend, with 1,920 individual landlords making up the vast majority of the 2,199 total entities. This highlights that the market is driven by small-scale operators, not a handful of large firms.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired properties for 66.3% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $151,699.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Jefferson Davis Parish demonstrated an exceptional ability to acquire properties at a deep discount in the first quarter. Landlords paid an average of just $77,211, which is a staggering 66.3% less than the $228,910 paid by traditional homeowners, saving an average of $151,699 per property.

This pricing advantage is not consistent, showcasing significant volatility in recent quarters. For instance, in Q2 2025, landlords paid a surprising 76.1% premium, while in Q3 2025 they secured a more modest 19.7% discount. This fluctuation suggests investors may be targeting different types of properties or capitalizing on unique opportunities each quarter.

The average acquisition price in Q1 2026 ($77,211) marks a significant drop from prices in the recent past. It is well below the average prices paid during 2025 ($170,944) and 2024 ($151,097), indicating a potential shift toward lower-cost assets or a cooling in the segment of the market where investors are most active.

The pandemic-era boom saw average acquisition prices of $86,460 between 2020-2023. The most recent quarterly price of $77,211 is even below this historical benchmark, reinforcing the idea that investors are currently focused on value-driven acquisitions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlord purchasing slowed in Q4, accounting for just 6.6% of all SFR market acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition activity represented a small fraction of the overall market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing just 5 of the 76 total SFRs sold, a market share of 6.6%. This indicates a reserved purchasing posture from investors leading into the new year.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from small-scale 'mom-and-pop' landlords (Tiers 01-04), who accounted for 100% of investor acquisitions. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made no purchases in the parish during this period.

New entrants and the smallest investors drove the market. The single-property tier was the most active, with 6 new entities acquiring 4 properties, making up 80% of all landlord purchases. This highlights a continued interest from new individuals entering the real estate investing market.

Mid-size and large landlords were completely absent from the purchasing landscape in Q4. The data shows zero acquisitions from any tier holding more than two properties, reinforcing that recent activity is concentrated entirely at the smallest end of the investor spectrum.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 95.0% of all investor-owned SFRs in the parish.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Jefferson Davis Parish is definitively shaped by small, independent operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own a commanding 95.0% of all investor-held SFRs, a figure that challenges the narrative of corporate dominance in residential housing.

The market's foundation is built on single-property landlords. This group (Tier 01) alone owns 1,430 properties, representing 66.3% of the entire investor portfolio. This signifies that the typical landlord is an individual with a single rental property, not a large-scale enterprise.

Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint in the parish. Their holdings amount to just 6 properties, or 0.3% of the investor-owned market. This demonstrates that large, Wall Street-backed firms are not a significant factor in the local rental market.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) also represent a small portion of the market. Tiers holding 11-50 properties collectively own just 2.9% of the portfolio, while those with 101-1,000 properties account for another 1.8%.

This tiered ownership structure reveals a highly fragmented market. The vast majority of rental housing is provided by local residents and small-scale investors, indicating a decentralized and community-based investment environment.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners once portfolios scale to the 11-20 property tier.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the overall market, a clear pattern emerges as portfolios grow: companies take over at larger scales. The tipping point occurs in the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 45 properties (80.4%) compared to just 11 owned by individuals.

Individuals form the bedrock of the small-portfolio market. They own 1,283 (88.3%) of the single-property landlord holdings and 136 (71.2%) of the two-property portfolios. This demonstrates that entry into the rental market is primarily an individual endeavor.

The transition toward corporate ownership is gradual but clear. In the 3-5 property tier, individuals still hold a majority (65.0%), but in the 6-10 property tier, the split is nearly even, with individuals at 51.6% and companies at 48.4%. This tier represents the bridge between individual and corporate management.

This ownership split by tier suggests a lifecycle for real estate investor portfolios. They often begin with individuals, and as they scale beyond 10 properties, the operational and legal benefits of a corporate structure become more prevalent, leading to a shift in ownership type.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 70546 alone holding 1,162 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Jefferson Davis Parish is not evenly distributed but is instead concentrated in specific zip codes. The 70546 zip code is the epicenter of activity, with 1,162 investor-owned properties, far surpassing any other area.

The zip code with the highest penetration of investors is 70640, where 38.5% of single-family residences are investor-owned. This highlights that the areas with the highest raw counts of investor properties are not always the ones with the highest market share.

Following the lead of 70546, other key areas for investor ownership by count include 70549 (291 properties), 70591 (255 properties), and 70532 (151 properties). Together, these top four zip codes account for a significant portion of the total investor portfolio.

Comparing ownership rates shows different hotspots. Zip code 70532 has the second-highest rate at 26.8%, followed by 70549 at 23.9%. This data is crucial for understanding which sub-markets have the highest density of rental properties.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords shifted to a neutral stance in Q1 2026, with 7 buys and 7 sells, after being strong net buyers in 2024 and 2025.
Detailed Findings

After two years of portfolio growth, landlords in Jefferson Davis Parish paused their net acquisitions in the first quarter of 2026. Transaction data shows a perfectly balanced market with 7 properties bought and 7 properties sold, indicating a shift to a neutral or cautious stance.

This recent equilibrium contrasts sharply with prior years. In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 94 properties while selling only 24 for a net gain of 70. The pace slowed in 2025 but remained positive, with 52 buys and 30 sells for a net gain of 22 properties.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) have shown similarly positive but much smaller-scale activity. They were marginal net buyers in both 2024 (net +1) and 2025 (net +1), suggesting a strategy of very slow accumulation or portfolio optimization rather than aggressive expansion.

The sudden halt in net buying activity among the broader landlord community in Q1 could signal a response to changing local market conditions, pricing, or a belief that the best acquisition opportunities have passed for the moment. It represents the most significant shift in investor sentiment in over two years.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in just 5.9% of all SFR transactions in Q1, with 7 total landlord transactions.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlord transactions constituted a small portion of the overall housing market, accounting for just 7 of the 118 total SFR transactions (5.9%). This low volume reflects the cautious, neutral stance observed in historical transaction data.

The market activity was exclusively driven by the smallest investors. The single-property tier conducted 6 transactions at an average price of $78,554, while the two-property tier made one purchase at $70,500. There were no transactions from any landlord holding more than two properties.

A notable difference in acquisition strategy emerged between the smallest tiers. The single-property landlords did not purchase any of their 6 properties from other investors. In contrast, the two-property landlord's single acquisition was a landlord-to-landlord deal, suggesting a focus on acquiring existing rental assets.

The complete absence of institutional buyers (1000+ tier) in the Q1 transaction data reinforces their minimal role in the Jefferson Davis Parish market. The transactional flow is currently dominated by individuals and small-scale operators making strategic, low-volume moves.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Jefferson Davis Parish with 95% of Holdings, Securing Deep Property Discounts
Holdings
Landlords own 2,041 SFR properties, representing 20.3% of the market in Jefferson Davis Parish. Ownership is concentrated among individual investors, who hold 1,589 properties (77.9%), compared to 487 (23.9%) held by companies.
Pricing
In Q1, landlords paid an average of $77,211 per property, a remarkable 66.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners ($228,910). This represents a savings of $151,699 on a typical purchase.
Activity
Landlord purchasing was subdued in the latest quarter, with investors accounting for 7 purchases in Q1 (5.9% of total transactions). All acquisitions were made by 'mom-and-pop' investors, with no institutional buying activity recorded.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 95.0% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, holding just 0.3% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the backbone of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11-20 properties. This signals a shift to corporate structures as investors scale their holdings.
Transactions
Investors adopted a neutral market position in Q1, with a 1.0x buy-to-sell ratio (7 buys vs. 7 sells). This marks a significant pause after two consecutive years of being strong net buyers.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Jefferson Davis Parish is fundamentally a story of the small, local investor. Landlords own 2,041 properties, a significant 20.3% of the parish's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is not controlled by Wall Street, but by individuals, who own 77.9% of these homes. The market structure analysis is clear: 'mom-and-pop' landlords with 1-10 properties control a staggering 95.0% of investor housing, while large institutional firms have a nearly invisible footprint at just 0.3%.

Investor behavior in the first quarter of 2026 reveals a highly strategic and value-oriented approach. While their overall transaction volume was low, accounting for just 5.9% of all market activity, their purchasing efficiency was extraordinary. They acquired properties at an average price of $77,211, a 66.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This period also marked a significant strategic shift. After two years of being decisive net buyers and expanding their portfolios, landlords hit the brakes, with buying and selling activity perfectly balanced, signaling a new, more cautious phase.

The key takeaway from this data is that the Jefferson Davis Parish rental market is decentralized and dominated by savvy, small-scale operators who can effectively find and secure undervalued assets. The narrative of large corporations buying up neighborhoods does not apply here. Instead, the market's health and direction are dictated by the collective actions of hundreds of local investors. Their recent move from aggressive acquisition to a neutral stance is the most important trend to watch, as it may signal a broader cooling or stabilization in the local housing market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 06:19 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Jefferson Davis Parish (LA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Jefferson Davis Parish (LA) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-la-jefferson_davis/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.