Dukes (MA) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Dukes (MA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Dukes (MA)
12,067
Total Investors in Dukes (MA)
13,205
Investor Owned SFR in Dukes (MA)
9,302(77.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
11,139
SFR Owned
7,898
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
2,066
SFR Owned
2,106
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 9,302 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Dukes County: A Market Defined by Extreme Investor Saturation and Complete Mom-and-Pop Dominance
Investors own an extraordinary 77.1% of all Single-Family Residential properties in Dukes County, totaling 9,302 homes. This market is exclusively controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (100% share), with individual investors holding 84.9% of the portfolio. In Q4 2025, these small investors purchased 69.2% of all homes sold and have been aggressive net buyers, accumulating properties at a rate of 272 buys for every 1 sell in 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 9,302 SFR properties, a 77.1% market share dominated by individual landlords.
Individual landlords own 7,898 properties (84.9%) compared to companies' 2,106 (22.6%). Cash purchases outpace financing, with 5,544 properties owned outright versus 3,758 financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 9,293 of the 9,302 properties classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In a market reversal, landlords paid a 6.4% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026.
This $92,717 premium ($1,549,063 vs $1,456,346) contrasts sharply with the 13.1% and 3.4% discounts landlords secured in Q3 and Q1 of 2025, respectively. The pricing dynamic is highly volatile, with landlords also paying a 28.6% premium in Q2 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, purchasing 36 of 52 homes, a 69.2% market share.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of these purchases. New, single-property investors were the primary driver, acquiring 35 of the 36 properties and representing 46 new landlord entities.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors completely control the market, owning 100% of all landlord-held SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 8,827 properties, representing 93.0% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional ownership (1000+ properties) is non-existent at 0.0%.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own 84.9% of investor properties, with companies only gaining a majority in portfolios of 6 or more.
In the dominant single-property tier, individuals own 7,540 homes (79.9%) versus companies' 1,895 (20.1%). The crossover occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 89.5% of the assets.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with three zip codes holding 88.2% of all investor-owned homes.
The zip codes 02568 (2,829 properties), 02539 (2,691 properties), and 02557 (2,691 properties) are the epicenters. Investor ownership rates are extreme, reaching 100% in 02575 and 88.5% in 02557.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Dukes County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 272 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
This accumulation trend has been consistent, with 319 buys versus 7 sells in 2024. In Q2 2025, the ratio was an even more extreme 63 buys to just 1 sell.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove 69.1% of all Q4 2025 market transactions, with all activity coming from mom-and-pop investors.
New, single-property investors dominated, accounting for 46 of the 47 landlord transactions. Notably, 0% of these investor purchases were from other landlords, indicating they are buying from the homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 9,302 SFR properties, a 77.1% market share dominated by individual landlords.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Dukes County, MA reaches an exceptionally high level, with 9,302 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 77.1% of the total 12,067 SFRs in the market. This deep market penetration underscores the region's significance for real estate investing.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly tilted towards individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords control a commanding 7,898 properties, or 84.9% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own the remaining 2,106 properties (22.6%).

A similar pattern appears in the entity counts, where 11,139 individual landlords vastly outnumber the 2,066 company landlords. This 5.4-to-1 ratio of individual to company entities highlights a market driven by small-scale, personal investment.

In terms of financing, cash is the preferred method for holding property. Investors own 5,544 properties with cash, significantly more than the 3,758 properties that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base that is less reliant on leverage.

The portfolio's primary purpose is clear, with 9,293 of the 9,302 properties (99.9%) being rented or otherwise non-owner-occupied. This near-total focus on rental income confirms the business-oriented nature of SFR ownership in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In a market reversal, landlords paid a 6.4% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Acquisition pricing in Dukes County shows a volatile and unusual trend, directly challenging the common pattern of investors paying less than homeowners. In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $1,549,063, which is 6.4% more than the $1,456,346 paid by traditional homeowners, a premium of $92,717 per property.

This premium marks a significant reversal from other recent periods. For instance, in Q3 2025, landlords achieved a substantial 13.1% discount, paying $1,603,657 compared to homeowners at $1,845,556. Similarly, in Q1 2025, they secured a 3.4% discount.

However, the market has seen landlord premiums before. In Q2 2025, investors paid a staggering 28.6% premium, averaging $1,489,467 while homeowners paid just $1,158,333. This fluctuation indicates a highly competitive market where investors are willing to pay above market rate for desirable assets.

The long-term price appreciation is significant. The average landlord acquisition price during the 2020-2023 period was $1,311,040. By 2025, the average had risen to $1,585,884, signaling strong market growth.

It is important to note the Q1 2026 price data is based on zero recorded property purchases for that timeframe in the dataset, suggesting the figure may be derived from an automated valuation (AVM) or a different analytical model rather than closed transactions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, purchasing 36 of 52 homes, a 69.2% market share.
Detailed Findings

In the fourth quarter of 2025, landlords were the most significant buyers in the Dukes County SFR market, acquiring 36 of the 52 total properties sold. This represents a commanding 69.2% of all purchase activity for the period.

The entirety of this activity was driven by mom-and-pop landlords. Investors in Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties) made 100% of the landlord purchases, with zero activity recorded from mid-size or institutional investors.

New entrants fueled the market. The single-property tier alone accounted for 35 of the 36 properties purchased by investors (97.2%). This activity was spread across 46 distinct entities, indicating a broad base of new landlords entering the market.

The remaining purchase was made by an existing two-property landlord, further cementing the market's reliance on small-scale investors for transaction velocity.

The complete absence of purchases from investors with portfolios larger than two properties highlights a market structure that is fundamentally built on, and expanded by, small, independent operators.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors completely control the market, owning 100% of all landlord-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The distribution of property ownership in Dukes County is exceptionally concentrated at the smallest end of the investor scale. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), control 100% of the investor-owned SFR housing stock.

The single-property tier (Tier 01) is the bedrock of the market, with these landlords owning 8,827 properties. This accounts for a remarkable 93.0% of all investor-held SFRs, demonstrating that the market is overwhelmingly composed of first-time or single-asset investors.

The next tiers show a rapid drop-off in ownership. Two-property landlords hold 462 properties (4.9%), while those with 3-5 properties own 175 (1.8%). The scale continues to diminish, with only a handful of properties held by investors with 6-50 units.

Contrary to narratives about corporate consolidation in housing, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have absolutely no presence in the Dukes County SFR market, holding 0.0% of the properties.

This ownership structure reveals a market defined by its granularity, where thousands of small landlords, not a few large players, shape the rental landscape. This reliance on assessor data and detailed property records is crucial for understanding such a fragmented market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals own 84.9% of investor properties, with companies only gaining a majority in portfolios of 6 or more.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across most portfolio sizes in Dukes County, though a clear shift to corporate ownership occurs as portfolio sizes increase. Overall, individuals own 7,898 properties compared to 2,106 for companies.

In the largest and most foundational tier, single-property owners, individuals hold 7,540 properties (79.9%) while companies own 1,895 (20.1%). This 4-to-1 ratio underscores the dominance of personal ownership at the entry level.

A similar pattern holds for slightly larger portfolios. Individuals own 69.5% of two-property portfolios and 72.5% of properties in the 3-5 unit tier.

The crossover point where companies become the majority owners is the 6-10 property tier. In this segment, companies own 17 of the 19 properties, an 89.5% share. This trend continues in the 11-20 property tier, where companies hold a 66.7% majority.

This data illustrates a distinct lifecycle in investor ownership. Individuals initiate and dominate the small-portfolio landscape, while incorporation becomes the preferred structure for operators who scale beyond five properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with three zip codes holding 88.2% of all investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor-owned properties in Dukes County is extremely concentrated. Just three zip codes, 02568, 02539, and 02557, collectively contain 8,211 investor-owned SFRs, which is 88.2% of the county's total investor portfolio.

The zip code 02568 leads by sheer volume with 2,829 investor properties, followed closely by 02539 and 02557, each with 2,691 properties. This highlights specific neighborhoods or towns as the primary focus for investment capital.

When analyzing by ownership rate, the concentration is even more stark. The zip code 02575 is listed with a 100% investor ownership rate, indicating a complete absence of traditional homeowners. This is followed by 02557, where investors own 88.5% of the SFR stock.

Other areas with exceptionally high investor penetration include 02713 (87.7% rate), 02539 (75.9% rate), and 02568 (71.5% rate). These figures depict a market landscape where investors are not just participants but the defining majority.

This intense geographic focus suggests that local market knowledge and targeted property search strategies are critical for anyone operating in Dukes County, as investment opportunities are clustered in a few key areas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Dukes County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 272 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data reveals a clear and sustained trend of asset accumulation by landlords in Dukes County. Investors are overwhelmingly net buyers, significantly expanding their portfolios over time.

In the full year of 2025, landlords purchased 272 SFR properties while selling only one, resulting in a net gain of 271 properties. This buy-to-sell ratio of 272-to-1 demonstrates an exceptionally strong conviction in the local market.

This pattern was also evident in 2024, when investors bought 319 properties and sold only 7, for a net gain of 312 properties. The persistence of this trend indicates a long-term strategy of portfolio growth rather than short-term flipping.

A quarter-by-quarter view reinforces this finding. In Q2 2025, for example, landlords executed 63 purchases against a single sale, showing that the accumulation strategy is consistent throughout the year.

As there is no institutional investor presence in this market, this aggressive net buying behavior is entirely attributable to the thousands of mom-and-pop landlords who are steadily increasing their holdings in the county.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove 69.1% of all Q4 2025 market transactions, with all activity coming from mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

Landlord activity was the primary driver of the Dukes County real estate market in Q4 2025, accounting for 47 of the 68 total transactions. This gives investors a 69.1% share of all transaction volume for the quarter.

The entirety of this transaction volume was generated by mom-and-pop investors. The single-property tier (Tier 01) was the most active, conducting 46 transactions, while the two-property tier (Tier 02) added one transaction.

A key finding from the quarter is the source of these acquisitions. Zero percent of the properties purchased by investors were bought from other landlords. This indicates a one-way flow of properties from the traditional homeowner market into investor portfolios, rather than churn within the investor community.

Pricing for these transactions was high, with single-property buyers paying an average of $1,436,133. The single transaction in the two-property tier was slightly higher at $1,510,000.

The complete absence of institutional transactions and the 100% mom-and-pop share of activity reinforce that the market's liquidity and growth are dependent on small, independent buyers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Dukes County is an investor-saturated market, with mom-and-pop landlords owning 77.1% of homes and actively accumulating more.
Holdings
Landlords own 9,302 SFR properties in Dukes County, representing an extraordinary 77.1% of the market. Individual investors hold the vast majority with 7,898 properties (84.9%), while companies own the remaining 2,106 (22.6%).
Pricing
In a notable Q1 2026 pricing shift, landlords paid an average of $1,549,063, a 6.4% premium over traditional homeowners, reversing a previous trend of securing discounts.
Activity
Landlords drove Q4 2025 activity, purchasing 69.2% of all SFRs sold (36 properties). This was fueled by new entrants, with 46 single-property landlord entities making their first purchase.
Market Share
The market is exclusively controlled by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 100% of the investor-held housing. Institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6 or more properties, representing a clear structural shift for investors who scale.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 272-to-1 in 2025 (272 buys vs 1 sell). With no institutional players, all accumulation is driven by small investors.
Market Narrative

The single-family residential market in Dukes County, MA is defined by an unparalleled level of investor saturation. Landlords own 9,302 SFR properties, a staggering 77.1% of the county's total SFR stock. This market is not the domain of large corporations; it is exclusively controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own 100% of the investor portfolio. The ownership base is granular, with individual investors holding 84.9% of these properties, reinforcing a landscape built by thousands of small-scale operators, not Wall Street firms.

Investor behavior in Dukes County is characterized by aggressive accumulation and a willingness to pay top-dollar. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 69.2% of all homes sold, with nearly all purchases made by new, single-property investors. In a surprising turn, pricing data for Q1 2026 shows landlords paying a 6.4% premium over homeowners, a reversal from previous quarters that suggests intense competition for limited inventory. Transaction data from 2025 confirms a powerful net-buyer position, with investors acquiring 272 properties for every one they sold, steadily moving homes from the homeowner market into the rental pool.

The key takeaway from this market report is that Dukes County represents a hyper-concentrated, small-investor ecosystem. The extreme ownership rates, particularly in zip codes like 02557 (88.5%) and 02575 (100%), signal a mature rental market where opportunities for new entrants involve buying from a dwindling supply of traditional homeowners. The complete absence of institutional players and the dominance of individual, cash-heavy buyers create a unique market dynamic that defies national trends and underscores the power of localized, independent real estate investment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 06:33 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Dukes (MA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Dukes (MA) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ma-dukes/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.