Kootenai (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Kootenai (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Kootenai (ID)
56,783
Total Investors in Kootenai (ID)
9,806
Investor Owned SFR in Kootenai (ID)
8,323(14.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
7,736
SFR Owned
5,895
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
2,070
SFR Owned
2,825
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 8,323 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Kootenai County's investor market is dominated by small landlords paying a premium to acquire properties, defying national trends.
Investors own 8,323 SFR properties in Kootenai County, representing 14.7% of the market. Small mom-and-pop landlords control an overwhelming 97.5% of this portfolio, while institutional presence is negligible. In Q1 2026, landlords surprisingly paid a 10.3% premium over traditional homeowners and continued to be strong net buyers, accumulating properties even as acquisition pace slows.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 8,323 properties in Kootenai County, with individual landlords holding 70.8% of the portfolio.
Cash purchases significantly outpace financing, with 5,217 properties owned outright compared to 3,106 with a mortgage. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, as 8,035 of the 8,323 investor-owned properties are non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Defying national norms, Kootenai County landlords paid a 10.3% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $676,962 per purchase.
This trend marks a dramatic shift, as the landlord premium has surged from 20.0% in Q2 2025 to 25.7% in Q3 2025, a stark reversal from the 4.4% discount they received in Q1 2025. This indicates intensifying competition among investors for limited inventory.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 12.7% of all SFR properties sold in Kootenai County during Q4 2025, purchasing 74 homes.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove nearly all activity, accounting for 94.8% (73 properties) of investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties acquired only one single property, representing just 1.3% of the investor total.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control a commanding 97.5% of all investor-owned SFRs in Kootenai County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties have a minimal presence, owning just 4 properties, which amounts to 0.0% of the investor-owned market share. This structure reinforces the market's reliance on small, local capital.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type for portfolios of 6 or more properties, despite individuals owning the majority of smaller portfolios.
Individuals own 76.0% of single-property portfolios and 56.6% of 3-5 property portfolios. However, the balance shifts dramatically at the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 79.1% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in Coeur d'Alene, with zip codes 83814 and 83815 holding 3,989 properties combined.
While 83814 has the highest count of investor properties (2,170), the highest penetration rate is found in 83803 (Athol), where investors own 38.4% of the housing stock. This highlights different investment dynamics across the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Kootenai County are strong net buyers, acquiring 103 properties while selling only 39 in Q1 2026.
This net buying trend has been consistent, with landlords adding a net 301 properties in 2025 and 543 in 2024. Institutional investors were neutral in Q1 (2 buys, 2 sells) but were also net buyers in prior years, albeit on a much smaller scale.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 10.9% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, purchasing 103 properties out of 949 total sales.
A significant price disparity exists between investor tiers. Institutional buyers paid 15.0% less than new mom-and-pop landlords, at an average of $500,938 compared to $589,371. Larger investors also showed a higher tendency to buy from other landlords, with 50% of their purchases coming from existing investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 8,323 properties in Kootenai County, with individual landlords holding 70.8% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Kootenai County, investors hold 8,323 single-family residential properties, making up 14.7% of the total 56,783 SFRs in the market.

Individual real estate investing is the primary driver, with 5,895 properties (70.8%) held by individuals compared to 2,825 (33.9%) owned by companies. This preference for individual ownership is also reflected in the entity count, where 7,736 individual landlords far outnumber the 2,070 company landlords.

A significant strategic preference for all-cash acquisitions is clear, with 5,217 properties (62.7%) owned free and clear, versus 3,106 that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base that can move quickly on opportunities.

The investor portfolio is overwhelmingly geared towards generating rental income. A total of 8,035 properties are designated as non-owner-occupied, which accounts for 96.5% of all investor-owned homes in the county.

The data points to a market characterized by a large number of small, individual investors. The ratio of 7,736 individual landlords to 5,895 properties indicates that the vast majority own just one or a few properties each.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Defying national norms, Kootenai County landlords paid a 10.3% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $676,962 per purchase.
Detailed Findings

In a surprising reversal of typical market dynamics, landlords in Kootenai County paid significantly more than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026. The average landlord acquisition price was $676,962, a $63,285 (10.3%) premium over the homeowner average of $613,677.

This premium is not an anomaly but the continuation of a sharp, accelerating trend. The investor price advantage has completely eroded over the last year, moving from a 4.4% discount in Q1 2025 to a staggering 25.7% premium by Q3 2025, signaling intense competition.

The price landlords are willing to pay has fluctuated, but the recent trend suggests aggressive purchasing. The Q1 2026 average price of $676,962 is a notable increase from the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $529,598, reflecting significant market appreciation.

This pattern of paying above homeowner prices suggests investors are targeting high-demand properties or using strong cash offers to outbid conventional buyers in competitive situations.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 12.7% of all SFR properties sold in Kootenai County during Q4 2025, purchasing 74 homes.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 12.7% of the total market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 74 of the 582 SFRs sold in Kootenai County.

The market for new acquisitions is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 94.8% of all investor purchases, totaling 73 properties.

New entrants are a major force, with 73 new single-property landlord entities entering the market in Q4. These first-time investors alone purchased 53 properties, making up 68.8% of all landlord acquisitions for the quarter.

Activity drops off sharply in larger tiers. Mid-size landlords (11-50 properties) bought only 3 homes combined, showcasing the highly fragmented nature of purchasing activity.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had a negligible impact on the acquisitions market, purchasing just a single property. This highlights that market activity is driven by local and small-scale capital, not large corporations.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control a commanding 97.5% of all investor-owned SFRs in Kootenai County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Kootenai County is defined by the dominance of small landlords. Investors with portfolios of 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively own 8,443 properties, which is 97.5% of the entire investor-owned SFR market.

Single-property landlords alone (Tier 01) are the largest group, holding 5,980 properties and accounting for 69.0% of all investor-owned housing. This signifies a market built on entry-level and small-scale investment.

Ownership concentration dissipates rapidly as portfolio sizes increase. Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) own a combined 216 properties, representing just 2.5% of the investor market share.

Institutional capital is virtually non-existent in the Kootenai County SFR market. The 1,000+ property tier holds only 4 properties, a 0.0% market share, challenging any narrative that large corporations are controlling the local housing supply.

This distribution underscores a highly fragmented ownership structure, with thousands of small investors shaping the rental market rather than a few large entities. Such a structure can lead to different market behaviors compared to institutionally dominated areas.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type for portfolios of 6 or more properties, despite individuals owning the majority of smaller portfolios.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges in ownership structure based on portfolio size. Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller tiers, holding 76.0% of single-property portfolios and 64.0% of two-property portfolios.

The crossover point where corporate ownership becomes dominant occurs in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04). In this segment, companies own 283 properties (79.1%), while individuals own just 75 (20.9%).

This trend of corporate dominance accelerates in larger tiers. Companies own 89.4% of properties in the 11-20 size bracket and 71.7% in the 21-50 bracket, suggesting investors tend to incorporate as their portfolios grow in scale and complexity.

Even within the 3-5 property tier, ownership is nearly split, with individuals holding a slim majority at 56.6% (720 properties) compared to companies at 43.4% (553 properties). This indicates the move toward incorporation often begins early in an investor's journey.

The largest active tier, Large (101-1000), follows this pattern with companies owning 75.0% of the 20 properties, reinforcing the strategy of using corporate entities for managing substantial real estate assets.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in Coeur d'Alene, with zip codes 83814 and 83815 holding 3,989 properties combined.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration is a key feature of Kootenai County's investor market. Just three zip codes, 83814 (Coeur d'Alene), 83815 (Coeur d'Alene), and 83835 (Hayden), contain 5,132 investor-owned properties, representing 61.7% of the county's total investor portfolio.

The 83814 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership by volume, with 2,170 properties. This area alone accounts for 26.1% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

However, the highest rate of investor ownership is not in the areas with the highest counts. The zip code 83803 (Athol) leads with a 38.4% investor ownership rate, followed closely by 83833 (Harrison) at 38.0% and 83876 (Worley) at 32.0%.

This distinction between high-volume and high-penetration areas suggests different market strategies. The high counts in Coeur d'Alene point to a large, liquid rental market, while the high rates in smaller zip codes may indicate a focus on vacation rentals or more rural investment opportunities.

The top three regions by count, 83814, 83815, and 83835, have ownership rates of 23.8%, 15.6%, and 13.2% respectively, which are significant but lower than the rates in smaller, more saturated sub-markets.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Kootenai County are strong net buyers, acquiring 103 properties while selling only 39 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

The investor community in Kootenai County remains in a phase of accumulation, consistently buying more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, they demonstrated a strong net-buyer position, with 103 acquisitions against only 39 dispositions, for a net gain of 64 properties.

This behavior is part of a long-term trend. Throughout 2025, investors were net buyers by 301 properties (464 buys vs. 163 sells), and in 2024, they added a net 543 properties to their portfolios (701 buys vs. 158 sells).

While the overall pace of acquisitions has slowed from its 2024 peak, the buy-to-sell ratio remains robust, signaling continued confidence in the local rental market.

The small contingent of institutional investors (1,000+ tier) showed a neutral position in Q1 2026, with 2 purchases and 2 sales. Historically, however, they have also been net accumulators, adding a net 3 properties in 2025 and 1 in 2024.

The persistent net-buyer stance across all investor types contributes to inventory pressure in the broader housing market, as more properties are absorbed into long-term rental portfolios than are released for sale.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 10.9% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, purchasing 103 properties out of 949 total sales.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords represented 10.9% of all market transactions, purchasing 103 of the 949 SFRs that were sold in Kootenai County.

New, single-property landlords were the most active group, accounting for 73 of the 103 investor transactions. These entry-level investors paid one of the highest average prices at $589,371, suggesting they are competing in the primary retail market.

A stark pricing difference emerges between the smallest and largest investors. Institutional buyers (1000+ tier) paid an average of just $500,938, which is $88,433 (15.0%) less than their single-property counterparts. This suggests a strategy focused on acquiring undervalued or off-market assets.

The most expensive purchases were made by mid-size landlords in the 11-20 property tier, who paid an average of $1,134,690, indicating a focus on premium properties.

Inter-landlord trading activity is notable in certain segments. Half of all purchases made by the 6-10 property tier and the 1000+ institutional tier were from other landlords. This contrasts with new, single-property buyers, where only 8.2% of their purchases came from fellow investors, showing they primarily buy from homeowners.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Kootenai County's market is fueled by small investors paying a premium to acquire properties, defying national trends.
Holdings
Landlords own 8,323 SFR properties, representing 14.7% of Kootenai County's market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 5,895 properties (70.8%) compared to 2,825 (33.9%) for companies.
Pricing
In a surprising reversal, landlords paid a 10.3% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, with an average acquisition price of $676,962 versus the homeowner price of $613,677.
Activity
Investors purchased 12.7% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter (Q4 2025), with 73 new single-property landlords entering the market and mom-and-pop investors driving 94.8% of all acquisition activity.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 97.5% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a statistically insignificant 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors command the majority of smaller portfolios, but companies become the dominant owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties and larger, a clear trend toward incorporation with scale.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, with a 2.64x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (103 buys vs 39 sells). In contrast, institutional investors were perfectly neutral, with 2 acquisitions and 2 sales.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Kootenai County, Idaho, is fundamentally shaped by small, individual capital, a stark contrast to narratives of corporate consolidation. Investors own 8,323 properties, or 14.7% of the county's single-family housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold a commanding 97.5% share. Individual investors own 70.8% of these homes, though a clear pattern of incorporation emerges as portfolios grow beyond five properties. Institutional presence is virtually nonexistent, at just 0.0% of the investor market, affirming that local players drive this rental economy.

Investor behavior in Kootenai County defies national trends, particularly in pricing. In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average 10.3% premium over traditional homeowners, a complete reversal from the discounts seen a year prior. This suggests intense competition for a limited supply of desirable properties. Despite the higher costs, investors remain aggressive accumulators, acting as strong net buyers with a 2.64-to-1 buy/sell ratio in the first quarter. This activity is led by new entrants, with 73 first-time landlords joining the market in the last reported quarter, underscoring the appeal of Kootenai County for small-scale real estate investing.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that Kootenai County's housing market is influenced by a highly fragmented base of well-capitalized local investors who are willing to pay more than average homebuyers to secure assets. This dynamic contributes to price pressure and tightens inventory for traditional buyers. The market's future will be dictated not by Wall Street firms, but by the collective actions of thousands of small landlords who continue to show strong confidence in the region's growth and rental demand.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 02:37 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Kootenai (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Kootenai (ID) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-id-kootenai/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.