Coos (NH) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Coos (NH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Coos (NH)
13,768
Total Investors in Coos (NH)
8,350
Investor Owned SFR in Coos (NH)
5,790(42.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
7,595
SFR Owned
5,222
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
755
SFR Owned
821
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5,790 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Coos County, Buying 63.5% of Homes at a 37.2% Premium
Investors own 5,790 single-family properties in Coos County, representing a significant 42.1% of the market. This landscape is controlled by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords owning 99.7% of the portfolio while institutional firms have zero presence. In Q1 2026, landlords paid a surprising 37.2% premium over homeowners and acted as aggressive net buyers, acquiring 21 properties for every one sold.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 5,790 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 90.2% share.
The investor portfolio is heavily equity-based, with 4,409 properties owned with cash versus 1,381 that are financed. Of the total portfolio, 5,758 properties are utilized as rentals, underscoring the business focus of these holdings.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 37.2% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, averaging $323,307 per purchase.
This trend marks a significant shift from a year ago when landlords paid a 7.5% discount in Q1 2025. The price gap has consistently widened in favor of homeowners, with landlords paying premiums of 21.7% in Q2 2025 and 33.1% in Q3 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 33 of 52 homes sold for a 63.5% market share.
Activity was exclusively driven by mom-and-pop investors, who accounted for 100% of landlord purchases. New single-property landlords were the most active, acquiring 30 properties, or 90.9% of the investor total.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords own a near-total monopoly with 99.7% of all investor-owned SFRs in Coos County.
Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, controlling 5,300 properties, or 88.8% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have absolutely no presence, owning 0.0% of the stock.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors form the base of the market, while companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6 or more properties.
Companies control 69.6% of properties in the 6-10 property tier and 93.3% in the 11-20 tier. Conversely, individuals own 88.9% of all single-property investor homes and 74.0% of two-property portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip codes 03592, 03576, and 03598, which contain the most investor-owned homes.
Certain areas exhibit extreme saturation, with investor ownership reaching 100.0% in 03575 and 83.3% in 03597. The top regions for property count, like 03592 (69.1%) and 03576 (54.3%), also feature very high investor ownership rates.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 21-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026, acquiring 42 properties and selling only 2.
This accumulation strategy is a long-term trend, evidenced by a 22.3x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (357 buys vs 16 sells) and a 16.5x ratio in 2024 (330 buys vs 20 sells). There is no transaction data for institutional investors, consistent with their 0% ownership.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were a party to 58.3% of all market transactions in Q1, purchasing 42 properties.
A distinct pricing pattern emerged: new, single-property investors paid the most at $339,663 per home, while the larger 6-10 property landlords paid the least at just $97,028. This larger tier also sourced 100% of its acquisitions from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 5,790 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 90.2% share.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Coos County is substantial, with 5,790 properties comprising 42.1% of the total single-family residential market. This high penetration rate indicates a mature rental market with significant non-owner-occupied housing stock.

The profile of the typical real estate investor in this area is an individual, not a corporation. Individual landlords own 5,222 properties, or 90.2% of the investor portfolio, compared to just 821 properties (14.2%) held by companies, reinforcing a 'mom-and-pop' market structure.

A striking financial characteristic of the portfolio is the low reliance on debt. A total of 4,409 properties are owned outright with cash, vastly outnumbering the 1,381 properties that are financed. This suggests investors in Coos County are well-capitalized and may be less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is overwhelmingly dedicated to rental use. A total of 5,758 of the 5,790 investor-owned properties are rented, demonstrating a clear focus on generating rental income rather than short-term speculation.

There are 8,350 distinct landlord entities in the county, with individuals (7,595) outnumbering companies (755) by more than ten to one. This highlights a fragmented ownership landscape dominated by a large number of small-scale operators.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 37.2% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, averaging $323,307 per purchase.
Detailed Findings

In a reversal of typical market dynamics, landlords in Coos County paid a significant premium for properties in Q1 2026. Their average acquisition price of $323,307 was 37.2% higher than the traditional homeowner average of $235,565, a cash difference of $87,742 per property.

The trend of landlords paying more than homeowners is not an anomaly but an accelerating pattern over the past year. After securing a 7.5% discount in Q1 2025, landlords began paying premiums that grew each quarter: 21.7% in Q2, 33.1% in Q3, and culminating in the 37.2% premium in Q1 2026.

This pricing behavior suggests intense competition for a limited supply of desirable rental properties, forcing investors to outbid owner-occupant buyers. It may also indicate that investors are targeting higher-quality or better-located assets not being pursued by the average homebuyer.

Acquisition prices have shown strong appreciation compared to the pandemic era. The Q1 2026 average price of $323,307 represents a 26.6% increase over the average price of $255,367 seen between 2020-2023.

The data challenges the assumption that investors always acquire properties at a discount. In Coos County's current market, investment demand is driving prices above homeowner levels, impacting overall housing affordability.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 33 of 52 homes sold for a 63.5% market share.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity was exceptionally strong in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 33 properties. This represents a commanding 63.5% of the 52 total SFR homes sold in Coos County during the quarter.

The market's activity is entirely concentrated among small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of all investor acquisitions, with zero properties purchased by institutional firms.

A significant influx of new investors entered the market. The single-property tier, representing first-time landlords, was the most powerful buying force, purchasing 30 properties, which accounts for 90.9% of all investor-bought homes.

These 30 properties were acquired by 39 distinct entities, indicating some properties were purchased in partnership, a common strategy for new investors to pool capital and mitigate risk.

The lack of any mid-size or institutional buying activity underscores the hyper-local, small-scale nature of Coos County's investment landscape. The market is being shaped not by large corporations, but by a continuous stream of new, aspiring landlords.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords own a near-total monopoly with 99.7% of all investor-owned SFRs in Coos County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Coos County is definitively characterized by small-scale landlords. Investors with portfolios of 1-10 properties (mom-and-pop) control 99.7% of all investor-owned housing, a level of dominance rarely seen.

The market's foundation rests on single-property investors. This tier alone accounts for 5,300 properties, representing 88.8% of the total investor portfolio. This indicates a low barrier to entry and a fragmented market composed of thousands of individual owners.

In stark contrast to national narratives, institutional capital has no foothold in Coos County. The 1,000+ property tier holds a 0.0% share, meaning there are no large-scale corporate landlords operating in the local SFR market.

Even mid-size landlords play a negligible role. Portfolios ranging from 11 to 50 properties collectively own just 16 homes, making up less than 0.3% of the market.

This distribution reveals a market insulated from the strategies of large institutional firms, where performance is driven by the cumulative decisions of thousands of individual owners rather than a few large portfolio managers.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors form the base of the market, while companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6 or more properties.
Detailed Findings

Ownership preferences shift distinctly as portfolio sizes grow in Coos County. While individual investors are the primary owners of smaller portfolios, companies become the dominant entity type for larger ones.

The crossover point occurs at the 6-10 property tier. In this segment, companies own 16 properties (69.6%), marking the first tier where they hold a majority share over individual owners.

For the smallest investors, individual ownership is standard. Individuals own 4,872 (88.9%) of single-property portfolios and 311 (74.0%) of two-property portfolios, showing a preference for personal ownership at the entry level.

Company dominance solidifies as portfolios expand further. In the 11-20 property tier, companies own 14 of the 15 properties, a commanding 93.3% share. This suggests that as investors scale, they increasingly turn to corporate structures like LLCs for liability protection and organizational purposes.

Even in the largest portfolios, individuals are not completely absent. An individual owner holds one property in the 11-20 tier and 7 properties in the 6-10 tier, demonstrating that personal ownership can persist even as holdings grow.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip codes 03592, 03576, and 03598, which contain the most investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor properties in Coos County is not uniform but concentrated in a few key areas. The top three zip codes by sheer volume are 03592 (1,263 properties), 03576 (1,001 properties), and 03598 (888 properties).

Several zip codes display remarkably high investor saturation rates. The most extreme example is 03575, where 100.0% of SFR properties are investor-owned, followed by 03597 (83.3%) and 03579 (82.8%).

There is a strong correlation between the areas with the highest count of investor properties and those with high ownership rates. Zip codes like 03592 (69.1% investor-owned), 03576 (54.3%), and 03579 (82.8%) appear on both the top-count and top-percentage lists, indicating these are the core hubs of investment activity.

This concentration suggests that investors are targeting specific communities, likely those with strong rental demand, desirable amenities, or favorable property characteristics. This can create pockets within the county where it is very difficult for traditional homebuyers to compete.

The variance in ownership rates is wide, from 100.0% in 03575 down to 18.3% in 03570. This highlights that while some areas are investor hotspots, others remain primarily composed of owner-occupied homes.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 21-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026, acquiring 42 properties and selling only 2.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Coos County are overwhelmingly in a phase of portfolio accumulation. In Q1 2026, they demonstrated a strong net-buyer position, purchasing 42 properties while only selling 2, a buy-to-sell ratio of 21.

This is not a recent shift but a sustained, multi-year trend of aggressive acquisition. Throughout 2025, landlords maintained a 22.3-to-1 ratio with 357 buys versus just 16 sells. The pattern was similar in 2024, with 330 buys and 20 sells for a 16.5-to-1 ratio.

The extremely low sales volume suggests that investors in this market are focused on long-term holds and generating rental income, rather than short-term flipping or speculative selling. This creates a highly illiquid market for investor-owned properties.

The consistent net buying behavior signals strong confidence in the local rental market's future performance. Landlords are actively increasing their exposure to Coos County real estate rather than divesting.

Consistent with their 0.0% ownership share, there were no recorded transactions for institutional (1000+ tier) investors. All market dynamics are being driven by smaller, local operators who are steadily expanding their portfolios.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were a party to 58.3% of all market transactions in Q1, purchasing 42 properties.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter, landlord activity was a driving force in the market, with investors involved in 42 of the 72 total SFR transactions for a 58.3% share. All 42 of these transactions were purchases by mom-and-pop investors.

A clear inverse relationship between investor size and purchase price was evident. The smallest investors (single-property tier) paid the highest average price at $339,663. In contrast, the largest active buyers (6-10 property tier) paid the lowest average price at $97,028.

This price disparity suggests different acquisition strategies. New investors may be paying retail prices on the open market for move-in-ready homes, while more experienced small landlords are finding discounted, off-market, or value-add opportunities.

The source of deals also varied by tier. The 6-10 property tier acquired 100% of its new properties from other landlords, indicating a sub-market of inter-investor trading. Meanwhile, the smaller tiers made 0% of their purchases from other landlords, meaning they acquired properties from homeowners or new construction.

The market's transaction flow is dominated by small players. Single-property investors alone accounted for 39 of the 42 landlord transactions (92.9%), reaffirming that market momentum is dictated by the entry of new, small-scale landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop investors define the Coos County market, owning 99.7% of rental homes and paying a 37.2% premium to acquire more.
Holdings
Landlords own 5,790 SFR properties in Coos County, NH, a 42.1% share of the total market. Individual investors hold 5,222 of these homes (90.2%), while companies own 821 (14.2%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 37.2% more than traditional homeowners, an average premium of $87,742 per property ($323,307 vs $235,565), reversing a trend of landlord discounts from the previous year.
Activity
Investors captured a 63.5% share of all Q4 2025 home sales, with 100% of this activity coming from mom-and-pop landlords. During the quarter, 39 new single-property landlord entities entered the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market, owning 99.7% of all investor-held SFRs. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a 0.0% market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors own the vast majority of smaller portfolios (88.9% of single-property homes), but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 69.6% of properties.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive accumulators, acting as strong net buyers with a 21-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (42 buys vs 2 sells). Institutional investors were completely inactive, with zero buys or sells.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Coos County, New Hampshire, is a market defined by the dominance of small, local operators. Investors own a substantial 5,790 homes, representing 42.1% of all single-family properties. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 90.2% of these assets. The market structure directly challenges common narratives about corporate landlords; mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 99.7% of the investor-owned housing stock, while large-scale institutional firms have no presence whatsoever.

Investor behavior in Coos County is characterized by aggressive acquisition and a surprising willingness to pay premium prices. In Q4 2025, these investors purchased 63.5% of all homes sold. In a striking reversal of typical patterns, they paid 37.2% more than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, suggesting fierce competition for limited inventory. This appetite for expansion is further confirmed by their transaction patterns: landlords in Coos County are staunch net buyers, acquiring 21 properties for every one they sold in the most recent quarter, a clear signal of confidence in the local market.

The primary takeaway is that Coos County operates as a distinct ecosystem driven by a large base of well-capitalized, small-scale investors who are focused on long-term holds. The absence of institutional players and the high premiums paid by local landlords indicate a market where local knowledge and rental income potential are valued above discounted, high-volume acquisitions. This dynamic creates a challenging environment for traditional homebuyers, who must compete directly with a large, active, and motivated investor class for a limited supply of homes. These trends and more are covered in our comprehensive market reports.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:43 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Coos (NH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Coos (NH) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nh-coos/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.