Stark (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Stark (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Stark (IL)
1,911
Total Investors in Stark (IL)
279
Investor Owned SFR in Stark (IL)
296(15.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
266
SFR Owned
284
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
13
SFR Owned
13
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 296 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Stark County's Investor Market: Dominated by Cash-Buying Individuals Amidst a Frozen Q4
Investors own 15.5% of Stark County's SFR market, with individuals comprising 95.9% of that ownership. Mom-and-pop landlords control 94.8% of investor properties while institutional presence is zero. The market saw no landlord purchase activity in Q4 2025, though investors were strong net buyers earlier in 2024.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 296 Stark County properties, with individuals holding a dominant 95.9% share.
All 296 investor-owned properties were acquired with cash, as there are zero financed holdings. A total of 278 properties are classified as rented, highlighting a strong focus on rental income. The market consists of 266 individual landlords and only 13 company landlords.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No recent comparable sales data is available to analyze landlord versus homeowner pricing in Q4 2025.
Due to zero recorded landlord or homeowner transactions in the most recent quarters, it is not possible to establish a price gap or track trends. Historical data from 2020-2023 shows an average landlord acquisition price of $52,218, but with no recent activity, a current comparison is unfeasible.
Current Quarter Purchases
The real estate market in Stark County saw zero purchases from landlords in Q4 2025.
With no landlord activity, the market share for both mom-and-pop and institutional investors was 0.0% for the quarter. There were no new single-property landlords entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.8% of investor-owned SFRs in Stark County.
Single-property landlords alone account for 64.9% of all investor-owned housing, with 200 properties. Institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have no presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier in Stark County, with no crossover point for company control.
Individuals own 95.0% of single-property portfolios and 100.0% of portfolios in the 11-20 property range. Companies own a total of only 13 properties across all tiers combined.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Stark County is highly concentrated in zip codes 61491 and 61483.
Zip codes 61426 and 61345 exhibit the highest investor penetration rates at 46.7% and 41.7%, respectively. The zip code 61491 has the highest count of investor-owned properties with 103.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Stark County were strong net buyers in 2024, acquiring 15 properties while selling only 2.
The buy-to-sell ratio for landlords in 2024 was an aggressive 7.5 to 1. No transaction data is available for institutional investors, consistent with their lack of presence in the county.
Current Quarter Transactions
Matching the purchasing freeze, landlord-involved transactions represented 0.0% of market activity in Q4 2025.
With no transactions, there was no activity to compare across tiers. Neither mom-and-pop nor institutional investors recorded any transactions during the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 296 Stark County properties, with individuals holding a dominant 95.9% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold 296 single-family residential properties in Stark County, representing a significant 15.5% of the total 1,911 SFRs in the market.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly tilted towards private individuals. Individual landlords own 284 properties, or 95.9% of the investor portfolio, compared to just 13 properties (4.4%) owned by companies.

A defining characteristic of this market is its complete reliance on cash transactions. All 296 investor-owned properties are held free of financing, indicating that investors here do not use leverage for their acquisitions.

The vast majority of the portfolio is actively used for rental income, with 278 properties classified as rented. This demonstrates a clear strategy focused on generating cash flow from rental operations.

The entity count mirrors the property ownership split, with 266 individual landlords making up the bulk of the market, dwarfing the 13 company entities operating in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No recent comparable sales data is available to analyze landlord versus homeowner pricing in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The real estate market in Stark County experienced extremely low transaction volume, resulting in a lack of available pricing data for Q4 2025. Consequently, a direct price comparison between landlords and traditional homeowners for the quarter is not possible.

Historical data provides some context, with the average landlord acquisition price during the 2020-2023 period recorded at $52,218. The average price for acquisitions in 2024 was slightly higher at $56,077.

The absence of recent sales prevents any analysis of a potential landlord discount, a common feature in more active markets. It suggests a market that is either illiquid or has not seen recent investor-led transactions that meet reporting criteria.

Without quarterly data points, tracking the evolution of the price gap between investor types is not feasible. The market's price dynamics remain opaque due to the low number of recorded sales.

This data gap highlights the challenges of analyzing micro-markets with infrequent transactions, where statistical trends require a longer-term view and more consistent activity.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
The real estate market in Stark County saw zero purchases from landlords in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity in Stark County came to a complete halt in Q4 2025. Landlords acquired zero single-family properties, resulting in a 0.0% share of the total market purchases for the quarter.

The inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who form the backbone of the local market, made no acquisitions during this period.

Similarly, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had no purchasing activity, which is consistent with their overall 0.0% ownership share in the county.

The quarter saw no new entrants into the landlord market. The number of new single-property (Tier 01) landlords created was zero, indicating a pause in new real estate investing ventures.

This freeze in acquisition activity points to a period of market stabilization, a lack of available inventory, or a wait-and-see approach from local investors at the end of the year.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.8% of investor-owned SFRs in Stark County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Stark County is fundamentally a small-scale operation. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, command 94.8% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio.

First-time or single-property landlords are the most significant group, owning 200 properties, which constitutes 64.9% of all investor holdings. This highlights the granular, community-level nature of real estate investment in the area.

Mid-size investors are a very small fraction of the market. The 11-20 property tier holds just 15 properties (4.9%), and there is only one property held by an owner in the 101-1000 tier.

There is absolutely no institutional investor presence in Stark County. The 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) holds zero properties, reflecting a market that is unattractive or inaccessible to large-scale corporate landlords.

This ownership distribution underscores a market dominated by local, small-portfolio investors rather than large, professionalized operations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier in Stark County, with no crossover point for company control.
Detailed Findings

In Stark County, individual investors maintain majority control across every single portfolio size. Even among single-property owners, individuals account for 191 of the 200 properties (95.0%).

Unlike in larger markets, there is no crossover tier where companies become the dominant owner type. Individual ownership remains robust even in larger local portfolios, such as the 6-10 property tier (95.7% individual) and the 11-20 property tier (100.0% individual).

Corporate investment is minimal and scattered. Companies own just 10 properties in the single-property tier and one property each in the 3-5 and 6-10 property tiers.

This pattern reveals a market where real estate investment is primarily a private, non-corporate endeavor. The financial and operational structure of the market is geared towards individual capital, not institutional funds.

The complete absence of company ownership in several tiers, including the two-property and 11-20 property categories, reinforces the profile of Stark County as a quintessential mom-and-pop investor market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Stark County is highly concentrated in zip codes 61491 and 61483.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Stark County is not evenly distributed, showing significant concentration in a few key zip codes. The largest number of investor-owned homes are in 61491 (103 properties) and 61483 (90 properties).

Certain areas have remarkably high investor penetration rates. In zip code 61426, investors own 46.7% of the SFR housing stock, while in 61345, they own 41.7%.

These high-concentration zones suggest targeted investment in areas perceived to have strong rental demand or acquisition opportunities.

The top zip code by sheer volume, 61491, has an investor ownership rate of 14.3%, which is close to the county-wide average of 15.5%.

This geographic analysis reveals that while the overall county has a notable investor presence, specific neighborhoods are true investor strongholds, with ownership rates far exceeding the regional average.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Stark County were strong net buyers in 2024, acquiring 15 properties while selling only 2.
Detailed Findings

Looking at the full year of 2024 provides a broader context to the frozen Q4 2025. During 2024, Stark County landlords were actively growing their portfolios, demonstrating a strong net buyer position.

Investors collectively purchased 15 SFR properties throughout 2024 while only selling 2, resulting in a net gain of 13 properties for the landlord category.

This activity translates to a buy-to-sell ratio of 7.5, indicating that for every property an investor sold, 7.5 were purchased. This signals strong confidence and a clear accumulation strategy among local landlords during that period.

There were no recorded transactions for institutional-grade investors (1,000+ properties), which aligns with their zero percent ownership share in the county.

The robust buying activity in 2024 contrasts sharply with the inactivity of late 2025, suggesting a significant shift in market conditions or investor sentiment over the course of the year.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Matching the purchasing freeze, landlord-involved transactions represented 0.0% of market activity in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The final quarter of 2025 was marked by a complete absence of transactions involving landlords in Stark County. This resulted in a 0.0% share of total market transactions for the investor segment.

This lack of activity was consistent across all investor sizes. The typically active mom-and-pop tiers (01-04) recorded zero transactions, mirroring the market-wide pause.

Consequently, no analysis of inter-landlord trading is possible for the quarter, as no properties were bought from or sold to other landlords.

Pricing strategies also cannot be compared, as the average purchase price for all tiers was $0 due to the lack of sales.

This transactional data confirms the findings from the purchasing summary: Q4 2025 was a period of complete inactivity for the Stark County real estate investor market.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Stark County's individual, cash-only investors dominate 95.9% of holdings while market activity froze in Q4 2025.
Holdings
Landlords own 296 SFR properties, 15.5% of Stark County's market, with individual investors holding 284 (95.9%) and companies owning just 13 (4.4%).
Pricing
Insufficient recent sales data prevents a pricing comparison between landlords and homeowners, pointing to a very low-volume market.
Activity
Investor purchase activity was completely frozen in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0 properties and no new landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 94.8% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1,000+) own 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes, holding 100% of properties in some mid-size tiers, with no crossover point for company control.
Transactions
While Q4 2025 was inactive, landlords were strong net buyers in 2024 with a 7.5x buy/sell ratio (15 buys vs 2 sells). Institutional investors had no transaction activity.
Market Narrative

In Stark County, the real estate investor market is defined by small-scale, individual ownership. Investors hold 296 single-family properties, making up 15.5% of the county's total SFR stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by private individuals, who own 284 properties (95.9%), compared to just 13 (4.4%) held by companies. The market structure is granular, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) commanding 94.8% of all investor-owned homes, while institutional capital is entirely absent.

Investor behavior in Stark County is conservative and cash-driven. All 296 investor-owned properties are owned outright with no financing, signaling a low-leverage, risk-averse strategy. While the most recent quarter (Q4 2025) saw a complete freeze in purchasing activity with zero acquisitions, the broader trend in 2024 was one of accumulation. During that year, landlords were strong net buyers, purchasing 15 properties while only selling two. This demonstrates a recent and significant shift from active acquisition to a period of pause.

The key takeaway for Stark County is that it operates as a distinct micro-market, shielded from the large-scale corporate trends seen elsewhere. It is a closed ecosystem of local, cash-rich individuals who invest for the long term. The high concentration of investor ownership in specific zip codes, some nearing 50%, suggests targeted, localized strategies. The recent halt in activity may signal a lack of inventory or a collective decision to wait for more favorable market conditions, a dynamic dictated entirely by the sentiment of its many small, independent landlords.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:24 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Stark (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Stark (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-il-stark/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.