Burke (GA) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Burke (GA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Burke (GA)
6,089
Total Investors in Burke (GA)
1,621
Investor Owned SFR in Burke (GA)
1,681(27.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,461
SFR Owned
1,491
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
160
SFR Owned
193
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,681 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Burke County, Owning 95% of Investor SFRs and Driving Market Activity
Investors own 1,681 SFR properties in Burke County (27.6% of the market), with individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a staggering 94.9% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords shifted to paying a 13.6% premium over homeowners, a sharp reversal from deep discounts seen in 2025, while remaining strong net buyers with a 9-to-1 buy/sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individuals own 88.7% of Burke County's 1,681 investor-owned properties.
Cash is the preferred method for holdings, with cash-owned properties (1,429) outnumbering financed ones (252) by nearly 6-to-1. Individual landlords make up the vast majority of entities, with 1,461 individuals compared to just 160 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 13.6% premium over homeowners in Q1, a stark reversal from 2025.
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $204,569, which is $24,486 more than homeowners. This contrasts sharply with 2025, when landlords consistently secured deep discounts, including paying 60.4% less than homeowners in Q3 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 53.3% of all SFR properties sold in Burke County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors drove this activity, accounting for 14 of the 16 landlord purchases (87.5%). All 14 of these acquisitions were made by new, single-property landlords, indicating a wave of new entrants.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 94.9% of all investor-owned SFRs in Burke County.
Single-property landlords alone represent the largest segment, owning 1,268 properties, or 74.2% of the total investor portfolio. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero ownership in the county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies gain an equal footing with individuals only in the 11-20 property tier.
Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios, holding 90.8% of single-property rentals and 86.7% of 3-5 property portfolios. In the 11-20 property tier, ownership is split exactly 50/50 between individuals and companies.
Geographic Distribution
The 30830 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 1,001 properties.
This single zip code accounts for nearly 60% of all investor-owned SFRs in Burke County. However, the 30441 zip code has the highest investor penetration rate at 33.3%, followed by 30456 at 32.1%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Burke County are strong net buyers, acquiring 9 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
This aggressive accumulation is a consistent trend, with investors maintaining a 7.2x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (72 buys vs. 10 sells) and a 3.9x ratio in 2024 (66 buys vs. 17 sells). Institutional investors recorded no transactions.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 45.0% of all SFR transactions in Burke County in Q1 2026.
Single-property landlords paid the highest prices, averaging $230,457. This is over three times the average price paid by small-medium landlords, who acquired properties for $75,000-$75,261.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individuals own 88.7% of Burke County's 1,681 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

In Burke County, investors hold a significant 27.6% share of the Single-Family Residential (SFR) market, totaling 1,681 properties. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors rather than corporations.

Individual landlords own 1,491 SFRs, which constitutes 88.7% of all investor-owned properties, while companies own the remaining 193 properties (11.5%). This highlights a market dominated by smaller-scale, local real estate investing.

The entity count further underscores this dynamic, with 1,461 individual landlords compared to only 160 company landlords. This indicates that while the average company portfolio is slightly larger, the market's backbone consists of a large number of individuals.

An analysis of financing reveals a strong preference for cash holdings. Investors own 1,429 properties outright in cash, dwarfing the 252 properties that are financed. This suggests a low-leverage environment where investors are not heavily reliant on debt.

The primary use for these properties is clear, with 1,632 of the 1,681 investor-owned homes classified as rented, confirming the portfolio's focus on providing rental housing to the community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 13.6% premium over homeowners in Q1, a stark reversal from 2025.
Detailed Findings

A dramatic shift in acquisition strategy occurred in Q1 2026, with landlords paying a significant premium for properties. The average landlord purchase price was $204,569, which is 13.6% higher than the $180,083 paid by traditional homeowners, a difference of $24,486 per property.

This marks a complete reversal from the pricing dynamics observed throughout 2025. In every quarter of 2025, landlords secured substantial discounts compared to homeowners. For example, the discount was 60.4% in Q3 ($136,657 vs $345,344), 55.3% in Q2 ($132,077 vs $295,638), and 44.3% in Q1 ($151,611 vs $272,135).

The trend suggests a recent increase in competition for SFR properties in Burke County, forcing investors to bid more aggressively to secure acquisitions, or a shift in the type of properties being targeted by investors.

Despite the recent premium, the average acquisition price during the 2020-2023 period was $154,976, indicating that the market has seen varied pricing conditions over the last several years.

This quarter-over-quarter volatility, moving from a massive $208,687 discount in Q3 2025 to a $24,486 premium in Q1 2026, signals a rapidly changing and competitive market environment for investors.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 53.3% of all SFR properties sold in Burke County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords demonstrated significant buying power in the most recent quarter of purchase data (Q4 2025), acquiring 16 of the 30 total SFRs sold, capturing a majority 53.3% of the market.

This purchasing activity was overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 14 of the 16 total landlord purchases, representing 87.5% of investor acquisition volume.

Notably, the market is seeing a surge of new participants. All 14 properties bought by mom-and-pop investors were acquired by single-property landlords, with 16 distinct entities making these purchases. This signals that new investors are the primary force behind recent market activity.

In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made zero purchases, highlighting their complete absence from the Burke County acquisition market.

The data shows that the growth in Burke County's rental market is not driven by large corporations but by a continuous influx of first-time or small-scale local landlords.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 94.9% of all investor-owned SFRs in Burke County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of investor-held properties in Burke County is defined by the dominance of small landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) control a staggering 94.9% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio.

The concentration at the smallest scale is even more pronounced. Landlords owning just a single property (Tier 01) make up the largest group, holding 1,268 properties, which accounts for 74.2% of all investor-owned housing.

As portfolio size increases, the number of properties drops off sharply. The combined mid-size tiers (11-1000 properties) own just 5.1% of the portfolio, demonstrating a very limited presence of larger investors.

Confirming the hyper-local nature of the market, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have absolutely no footprint in Burke County, with 0.0% ownership.

This distribution definitively shows that the SFR rental market in Burke County is supported and shaped by a large base of small, local investors, challenging any narrative of corporate landlord takeover.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies gain an equal footing with individuals only in the 11-20 property tier.
Detailed Findings

An analysis of ownership by entity type reveals that individual investors form the foundation of the rental market across nearly all portfolio sizes in Burke County. For single-property landlords, individuals own 1,154 properties (90.8%) compared to just 117 for companies (9.2%).

This individual dominance continues into larger tiers. In the 3-5 property tier, individuals own 137 properties (86.7%), and in the 6-10 property tier, they own 61 properties (95.3%).

The crossover point where companies establish a significant presence occurs in the 11-20 property tier. At this level, ownership is split evenly, with both individuals and companies holding 25 properties each (a 50.0% share for both).

Even in the 21-50 property tier, individuals still maintain a majority, owning 28 properties (77.8%) compared to 8 for companies (22.2%).

This pattern shows that while companies are present, they only begin to rival individual ownership once a portfolio grows beyond 10 properties. The market structure relies heavily on non-corporate landlords for its rental housing supply.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 30830 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 1,001 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Burke County is highly concentrated geographically, with the 30830 zip code serving as the clear hub of activity. It contains 1,001 investor-owned SFRs, representing 59.5% of the county's entire investor portfolio.

While 30830 leads overwhelmingly in sheer volume, other zip codes exhibit higher rates of investor penetration. The 30441 zip code has the highest concentration, with investors owning 33.3% of its SFR housing stock.

The top five areas by investor ownership percentage are 30441 (33.3%), 30456 (32.1%), 30426 (29.6%), 30805 (27.6%), and 30830 (27.5%). This shows that while activity is widespread, some smaller markets have a much denser investor presence.

The distinction between high-volume and high-penetration areas is important. The 30830 zip code has ten times the number of investor properties as 30441, but its overall investor ownership rate is lower. This suggests different market dynamics and opportunities across the county.

The other top zip codes by property count include 30815 (164 properties), 30456 (157 properties), and 30816 (109 properties), all showing significant but smaller clusters of investment.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Burke County are strong net buyers, acquiring 9 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals that landlords in Burke County are in a phase of aggressive portfolio growth. In Q1 2026, they purchased 18 properties while selling only 2, resulting in a 9.0x buy-to-sell ratio and a net gain of 16 properties.

This behavior is not a recent anomaly but a consistent, multi-year trend. For the full year of 2025, landlords acquired 72 properties and sold just 10, for a net increase of 62 properties and a 7.2x buy-to-sell ratio.

The trend of net accumulation was also evident in 2024, when investors bought 66 properties and sold 17, representing a 3.9x ratio and a net gain of 49 properties for their portfolios.

The consistent net-buyer position signals strong confidence in the Burke County rental market and a long-term strategy of accumulating rental assets.

In line with ownership data, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely inactive, with zero buy or sell transactions recorded in any recent timeframe. All transactional activity is being driven by smaller to mid-sized landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 45.0% of all SFR transactions in Burke County in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were a major force in the market, participating in 18 of the 40 total SFR transactions, a share of 45.0%.

A striking pricing disparity emerged among different investor tiers. Single-property landlords, likely new entrants, paid the highest average price at $230,457 per property. This suggests they are competing directly with homeowners for market-rate properties.

In contrast, more experienced small-to-medium landlords in the 11-50 property tiers acquired properties at a fraction of that price. The average purchase price for the 11-20 tier was just $75,261, and for the 21-50 tier, it was $75,000.

This price gap of over $155,000 between new and established investors indicates different acquisition strategies, with smaller, experienced landlords possibly targeting distressed or off-market deals while new investors buy on-market.

Notably, 0% of landlord purchases in Q1 were from other landlords. This indicates that investors are acquiring their inventory from the traditional market (homeowners) rather than trading assets among themselves, fueling new growth in the rental sector.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 95% of Burke County's investor market and are rapidly expanding portfolios.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,681 SFR properties, representing 27.6% of Burke County's market, with individual investors holding a dominant 88.7% (1,491 properties) compared to 11.5% (193 properties) for companies.
Pricing
In a sharp market reversal, landlords paid a 13.6% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1 2026 ($204,569 vs $180,083), a stark contrast to the deep discounts of up to 60.4% seen in 2025.
Activity
Investors captured a 53.3% share of all purchases in the latest quarter (16 properties), driven entirely by new, single-property landlords who accounted for 87.5% of investor buying activity.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control investor housing with a 94.9% share, while institutional investors (1000+) have no presence at all (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies achieve a 50/50 ownership split at the 11-20 property tier, marking the crossover point for corporate investment.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 9.0x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (18 buys vs 2 sells), a trend consistent with prior years. Institutional investors remain completely inactive.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Burke County, Georgia is unequivocally defined by the dominance of small-scale, individual landlords. These investors own 1,681 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, comprising a significant 27.6% of the total market. The ownership structure heavily favors individuals, who control 88.7% of this portfolio, over companies. This is further broken down by portfolio size, where 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) command an immense 94.9% share, while large institutional investors have zero presence. This data paints a clear picture of a rental market built and maintained by local entrepreneurs, not distant corporations.

Investor behavior in early 2026 signals a newly competitive environment. After enjoying deep purchasing discounts throughout 2025, landlords began paying a 13.6% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1. This activity is fueled by new market entrants, as single-property landlords drove 87.5% of recent investor purchases. Despite rising costs, the pace of acquisition remains aggressive; investors are strong net buyers, acquiring nine properties for every one they sold in Q1. This accumulation strategy, often funded with cash rather than financing, highlights strong confidence in the local rental market's future.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that Burke County represents a robust, growing market for small landlords. The high investor market share, combined with a continuous influx of new participants and a strong net-buying trend, indicates sustained demand for rental housing. The absence of institutional capital has left the field open for individuals to build portfolios. For homeowners and real estate professionals in Burke County, this means the primary source of competition and market liquidity comes from local investors who are deeply embedded in the community.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 05:17 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Burke (GA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Burke (GA) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ga-burke/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.