Georgetown (SC) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Georgetown (SC) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Georgetown (SC)
19,561
Total Investors in Georgetown (SC)
5,869
Investor Owned SFR in Georgetown (SC)
4,342(22.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,263
SFR Owned
3,816
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
606
SFR Owned
643
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,342 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate 99% of Georgetown's SFR Market as Institutions Retreat
In Georgetown County, investors own 4,342 SFR properties (22.2% of the market), with small mom-and-pop landlords controlling an overwhelming 99.1% share. In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties at a 15.2% discount compared to homeowners. While the overall market saw investors as strong net buyers, institutional players were net sellers, signaling a strategic divergence.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 4,342 SFRs in Georgetown County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 87.9% share.
The majority of these holdings were purchased with cash (3,170 properties) rather than financed (1,172 properties). The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 99.1% of investor-owned properties identified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 15.2% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, securing an average discount of $93,320 per property.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners is highly volatile, swinging from a 17.0% landlord discount in Q1 2025 to a 9.1% landlord premium in Q2 2025, before returning to a deep discount this quarter.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 33.3% of all SFR properties sold in Georgetown County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominated acquisition activity, accounting for 96.9% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made up just 1.6% of the acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.1% of investor-owned SFRs in Georgetown County.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of the local investor portfolio. In Q1 transactions, these large investors paid 64.7% less per property than new single-property landlords.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners starting at the 11-20 property tier, holding an 85.7% share.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 88.1% of single-property holdings, their share drops significantly as portfolio size increases. The crossover to majority-company ownership signals a shift toward professionalization at the 11-property mark.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 29585 zip code alone containing 1,713 investor-owned SFRs (22.5% of its market).
The top two zip codes by property count, 29585 and 29440, together account for 3,215 properties, representing 74.0% of all investor holdings in Georgetown County. The 29510 zip code has the highest investor penetration rate at 27.5%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Georgetown County are aggressive net buyers, while institutional investors are net sellers.
In Q1 2026, the overall landlord market acquired 89 properties while selling only 18. Conversely, the institutional tier sold two properties and purchased only one, signaling a clear divergence in strategy.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 28.9% of all 308 SFR transactions in Georgetown County during Q1 2026.
A massive price gap exists between investor tiers: institutional buyers paid an average of $162,000, 64.7% less than the $458,925 average for new single-property landlords. Mid-size landlords (3-5 properties) were most likely to buy from other investors, with 50% of their purchases sourced this way.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 4,342 SFRs in Georgetown County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 87.9% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 22.2% of the Single-Family Residential (SFR) market in Georgetown County, totaling 4,342 properties out of 19,561.

Individual investors are the backbone of the local rental market, owning 3,816 properties, which constitutes 87.9% of all landlord-owned SFRs. In contrast, company-owned properties number just 643, or 14.8% of the total, underscoring the dominance of smaller-scale real estate investing.

A striking 73.0% of the investor portfolio (3,170 properties) was acquired with cash, compared to only 1,172 properties that are financed. This indicates a high level of liquidity and lower debt exposure among local landlords.

The distinction between entity count and property count reveals the typical scale of operations. While there are 5,263 individual landlords, they own an average of less than one SFR property each within this specific market, compared to 606 company landlords, highlighting that most investors are small-scale participants.

The portfolio is overwhelmingly geared towards generating rental income, with 4,302 of the 4,342 properties classified as rented. This 99.1% rental rate confirms that the vast majority of these properties are actively serving as housing for tenants.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 15.2% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, securing an average discount of $93,320 per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, acquiring properties for an average price of $519,396 while traditional homeowners paid $612,716. This represents a substantial 15.2% discount, saving investors an average of $93,320 per home.

The landlord purchasing advantage has been inconsistent over the past year, indicating fluctuating market dynamics. For example, in Q2 2025, landlords paid a surprising 9.1% premium ($46,903 more than homeowners), a stark contrast to the 17.0% discount ($95,973) they achieved just one quarter earlier in Q1 2025.

The data shows a significant price appreciation for investor-acquired properties since the 2020-2023 period. The average acquisition price of $418,622 during those years has risen to $519,396 in the most recent quarter, marking a 24.1% increase.

Although transactional data for 2024 and 2025 is sparse in this dataset, the available figures show higher average prices in those years ($596,975 and $540,820, respectively) compared to the 2020-2023 baseline, reinforcing the trend of rising asset values in the region.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 33.3% of all SFR properties sold in Georgetown County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was a major force in the Q4 2025 market, with landlords acquiring 64 of the 192 total SFRs sold, capturing a 33.3% market share.

The market continues to be driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 62 of the 64 landlord purchases, a commanding 96.9% of investor buying activity.

New entrants are a key feature of the current market. In Q4, 75 new single-property landlord entities entered the market, purchasing 52 properties. This single tier accounted for 81.2% of all properties bought by investors during the quarter.

Mid-size and institutional activity was minimal. Only one property was purchased by a mid-size landlord (11-20 properties) and one by an institutional investor (1000+), highlighting their limited impact on recent acquisition volumes.

The data reveals a broad base of new investment, with 75 distinct entities acquiring 52 properties in the single-property tier. This suggests a pattern of many new investors buying their first rental property rather than a few investors buying multiple properties.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.1% of investor-owned SFRs in Georgetown County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Georgetown County is almost entirely composed of small-scale landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively hold 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs, a figure that challenges the narrative of corporate dominance in residential real estate.

Single-property landlords alone (Tier 01) represent the largest segment by a wide margin, owning 3,785 properties, which is 85.0% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

Institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties (Tier 09) have a minimal presence, owning just 4 properties in the county. This amounts to only 0.1% of the investor market, indicating they are not a significant factor in local housing ownership.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also have a very small share, collectively owning less than 1% of the investor-owned properties. This further reinforces the market's reliance on small, local investors.

The extreme concentration in the smaller tiers, with 91.7% of properties held by landlords with 1-2 properties, suggests the market is characterized by individuals and families participating in real estate rather than large, consolidated entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners starting at the 11-20 property tier, holding an 85.7% share.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure shifts dramatically as portfolio sizes grow. While individual investors dominate the overall market, companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, controlling 24 of the 28 properties (85.7%).

Individuals form the bedrock of the entry-level tiers. They own 88.1% of single-property portfolios, 78.6% of two-property portfolios, and 76.1% of 3-5 property portfolios, demonstrating their foundational role in the local rental market.

The transition point is stark. The percentage of properties owned by individuals falls from 74.2% in the 6-10 property tier to just 14.3% in the 11-20 property tier. This crossover indicates that as investors scale, they increasingly adopt a corporate structure for management and liability purposes.

Even within the dominant single-property tier, companies play a role by owning 464 properties, or 11.9% of that segment. This suggests some investors use a corporate entity from their very first purchase.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 29585 zip code alone containing 1,713 investor-owned SFRs (22.5% of its market).
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Georgetown County is not evenly distributed but is heavily concentrated in a few key zip codes. The 29585 area leads by volume with 1,713 investor-owned properties, followed closely by 29440 with 1,502 properties.

Together, the top two zip codes (29585 and 29440) hold 3,215 SFRs, which is 74.0% of the entire investor portfolio in the county. This intense focus suggests these specific areas offer the most attractive conditions for rental investment.

The areas with the highest counts of investor properties also have the highest rates of investor ownership. The zip code 29510 has the highest concentration at 27.5%, while the other top areas all post rates above 20%, including 29585 (22.5%) and 29440 (21.9%).

This overlap between high-volume and high-penetration areas indicates that investors are clustering in the same markets, rather than spreading out into areas with lower competition. These core zip codes define the primary rental market in Georgetown County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Georgetown County are aggressive net buyers, while institutional investors are net sellers.
Detailed Findings

A powerful trend of accumulation defines the investor market in Georgetown County, with landlords consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, investors were strong net buyers, with 89 purchases versus only 18 sales.

This net-buyer behavior is a long-term pattern. For the full year of 2025, landlords acquired 440 properties while selling only 60, a buy-to-sell ratio of over 7-to-1. The trend was similar in 2024, with 374 buys and 47 sells.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) are moving in the opposite direction. In the most recent quarter, they were net sellers, divesting two properties while acquiring only one. This retreat, though small in volume, contrasts sharply with the broader market's expansionary behavior.

The data suggests two separate market narratives: one of broad-based accumulation driven by thousands of small landlords, and another of strategic divestment by the handful of institutional players with local holdings.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 28.9% of all 308 SFR transactions in Georgetown County during Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were a significant driver of market activity, participating in 89 of the 308 total SFR transactions for a 28.9% share.

A vast pricing disparity exists between the smallest and largest investors. Single-property landlords paid the second-highest average price at $458,925, while the single institutional purchase was for just $162,000. This 64.7% price difference suggests institutional buyers are targeting a vastly different class of asset, likely distressed or off-market properties.

The highest prices this quarter were paid by two-property landlords, with an average of $664,286, indicating a focus on higher-value assets as they expand their small portfolios.

Intra-investor sales are a key source of inventory for some segments. Landlords in the 3-5 property tier acquired 50.0% of their new properties from other landlords, showing a liquid secondary market for established investors. In contrast, new single-property buyers sourced only 10.7% of their homes from other landlords.

Transaction volume was heavily skewed towards the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) conducted 87 of the 89 investor transactions, while the institutional tier completed just one.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Command 99% of Georgetown's Investor Market as Institutions Divest
Holdings
Investors own 4,342 single-family residential properties in Georgetown County, SC, representing 22.2% of the total market. Individual investors dominate, holding 87.9% of these properties compared to 14.8% owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties for 15.2% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $93,320 per property ($519,396 vs. $612,716).
Activity
Landlords acquired 33.3% of all SFRs sold in Q4 2025, with activity overwhelmingly driven by small investors. The quarter saw 75 new single-property landlords enter the market.
Market Share
The investor market is controlled by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 99.1% of all investor-held SFRs. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a mere 0.1% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, signaling a shift to formal business structures as investors scale.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 89 properties while selling only 18 in Q1 2026. However, institutional investors are bucking the trend as net sellers, with 1 buy versus 2 sells.
Market Narrative

In Georgetown County, SC, the investor pulse reveals a market fundamentally controlled by small, individual operators. Investors hold 4,342 SFR properties, a significant 22.2% of the county's housing stock. This landscape is shaped not by Wall Street but by Main Street: individual investors own a commanding 87.9% of these homes. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) collectively control a staggering 99.1% of the investor-owned market, while large institutional firms (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint of just 0.1%.

Investor behavior in Georgetown County demonstrates strategic and opportunistic purchasing. In Q1 2026, landlords acquired homes at a 15.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners, saving an average of $93,320 per transaction. This activity is overwhelmingly driven by new and small investors, who comprised 96.9% of landlord purchases in the last quarter. The market shows a clear divergence in strategy: while the broad base of landlords are aggressive net buyers (acquiring 89 homes vs. selling 18 in Q1), the small institutional segment is actively divesting, signaling a retreat from the market.

The key takeaway is that the Georgetown County rental market is a testament to the power of grassroots investment. The dominance of individual, cash-heavy buyers and the simultaneous retreat of institutional players suggest a stable, locally-driven market resilient to the pressures that affect larger corporate investors. This structure, concentrated in specific zip codes like 29585 and 29440, creates a unique ecosystem where small-scale landlords define market trends, pricing, and the availability of rental housing.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 02:08 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Georgetown (SC)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Georgetown (SC) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-sc-georgetown/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.