Moore (NC) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Moore (NC) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Moore (NC)
39,651
Total Investors in Moore (NC)
15,244
Investor Owned SFR in Moore (NC)
12,090(30.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
14,265
SFR Owned
10,842
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
979
SFR Owned
1,401
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 12,090 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate 97.8% of Moore County's Investor Market, Aggressively Buying at a 25.7% Discount
Investors own 30.5% of single-family homes in Moore County, a market overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (97.8%) while institutional investors hold a mere 0.1%. In Q1 2026, landlords were aggressive net buyers with a 10.6x buy/sell ratio, securing properties for 25.7% less than traditional homeowners. This activity is driven by small investors, as institutions maintained a neutral position.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 12,090 homes in Moore County (30.5% of market), with individuals holding 89.7% of the portfolio.
The majority of these properties, 66.5% (8,043), are owned free and clear with cash, while 33.5% (4,047) are financed. An overwhelming 98.5% of the investor-owned portfolio is designated as non-owner-occupied, underscoring a strong focus on rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 25.7% less than homeowners, a significant discount of $141,576 per property.
This price gap has widened dramatically from a low of 1.0% in Q2 2025, showing increasing purchasing power for investors. Overall, landlord acquisition prices have appreciated 12.0% from the 2020-2023 average of $364,805 to $408,724 in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords were highly active in Q4 2025, purchasing 129 properties, which accounted for 35.4% of all market sales.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, making up 98.5% of all investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) acquired only a single property, representing just 0.8% of the landlord total.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 97.8% of all investor-owned housing in Moore County.
This leaves a mere 0.1% of the market for institutional investors with over 1,000 properties. Single-property landlords alone form the market's foundation, owning 9,995 properties, which is 80.7% of the entire investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies assume majority control in portfolios of 6-10 properties and larger.
The crossover occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where company ownership reaches 50.4%. This trend accelerates in the 21-50 property tier, with companies owning 97.1% of the homes.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is heavily concentrated in zip code 27376, which contains 2,208 investor-owned properties at a 60.9% rate.
Certain zip codes show extreme saturation, with 27259 at 100.0% and 28350 at 93.3% investor ownership. The top two zip codes by property count (27376 and 28327) together hold 34.1% of all investor properties in the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 10.6 properties for every one sold in Q1 2026, while institutions are neutral.
The net buying ratio has accelerated sharply from 4.9 in 2024 and 6.6 in 2025. In Q1 2026, landlords bought 191 properties and sold only 18, while institutional investors bought one and sold one.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 33.9% of all Q1 2026 transactions, with institutional buyers paying 72.7% less than new landlords.
The average purchase price for a new single-property landlord was $424,100, while the single institutional purchase was for $115,836. Investors rarely buy from other landlords; only 1.8% of purchases by new investors came from an existing landlord.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 12,090 homes in Moore County (30.5% of market), with individuals holding 89.7% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 30.5% share of the single-family residential market in Moore County, totaling 12,090 properties. This high penetration rate indicates a mature rental market with substantial non-owner-occupied housing stock.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by 14,265 individual landlords who control 10,842 properties, representing 89.7% of the investor-owned portfolio. In contrast, 979 company landlords own 1,401 properties (11.6%), highlighting the grassroots nature of real estate investing in the area.

A strong indicator of financial stability among landlords is the prevalence of cash ownership. A total of 8,043 properties (66.5%) are owned outright, more than double the 4,047 properties (33.5%) that are financed with a mortgage.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards rental income, with 11,904 properties, or 98.5% of all landlord-owned homes, classified as non-owner-occupied. This near-total focus on rentals defines the primary strategy for investors in Moore County.

The entity structure reveals a landscape of small operators. With 15,244 total landlords for 12,090 properties, the average portfolio size is very small, reinforcing the finding that individual 'mom-and-pop' investors are the backbone of the local rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 25.7% less than homeowners, a significant discount of $141,576 per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Moore County demonstrated a profound pricing advantage in Q1 2026, acquiring properties for an average of $408,724 while traditional homeowners paid $550,300. This represents a substantial 25.7% discount, or $141,576 in savings per home.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been highly volatile, indicating shifting market dynamics. The discount surged in the new year, expanding from just 1.0% ($5,051) in Q2 2025 and 10.0% ($51,115) in Q3 2025 to its current high, suggesting investors are finding better deals or targeting different types of properties.

Despite securing large discounts, the average price paid by investors is on an upward trend. The Q1 2026 average price of $408,724 is a 12.0% increase over the average price of $364,805 during the 2020-2023 period, reflecting overall market appreciation.

Comparing prices year-over-year shows that while the market is heating up, investors are widening their competitive edge. The Q1 2025 discount was also significant at 19.5% ($102,002), but the most recent quarter shows an even stronger buying advantage for landlords.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords were highly active in Q4 2025, purchasing 129 properties, which accounted for 35.4% of all market sales.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing remained robust in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 129 of the 364 single-family homes sold in Moore County. This activity gave investors control over 35.4% of all transactions during the quarter.

The acquisition landscape is almost entirely controlled by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, were responsible for 128 of the 129 purchases, or 98.5% of all investor activity.

New entrants and the smallest landlords led the charge. Buyers in the single-property tier acquired 112 homes, accounting for 86.2% of all properties bought by investors in Q4.

Institutional appetite for properties in Moore County was practically non-existent. Large investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties purchased only one home, making up less than 1% of the landlord acquisition volume.

The data clearly shows that market growth is fueled from the bottom up, with a constant influx of new and small investors, rather than consolidation by large corporate entities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 97.8% of all investor-owned housing in Moore County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Moore County definitively refutes any narrative of a corporate takeover, as detailed in the property ownership by owner type report. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) hold a commanding 97.8% share of all investor-owned single-family homes.

The backbone of the rental market consists of single-property landlords. This tier alone accounts for 9,995 properties, representing 80.7% of the total investor portfolio and demonstrating that the typical landlord is a small, local operator.

Institutional investors have a negligible presence in the county. The 1000+ property tier holds just 11 homes, which translates to a market share of only 0.1%, underscoring their limited impact on the local housing market.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also hold a small fraction of the market. Combined, these Tiers 05-08 control just 2.1% of investor-owned properties, further emphasizing the market's fragmentation among small owners.

This distribution has remained stable, with the vast majority of ownership concentrated in the smallest tiers, indicating a high barrier to entry for large-scale consolidation or a lack of interest from larger players in this specific market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies assume majority control in portfolios of 6-10 properties and larger.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges when examining ownership structure by portfolio size: individuals build small portfolios, while companies are used for scaling. Individual investors own 92.9% of properties in the single-unit tier and 88.3% in the two-unit tier.

The strategic shift to a corporate structure occurs once a portfolio reaches 6-10 properties. At this tier, company ownership surpasses individual ownership for the first time, reaching a 50.4% majority share.

As portfolios grow, company ownership becomes nearly absolute. In the 21-50 property tier, companies own 34 of the 35 properties, a commanding 97.1% share, indicating that incorporation is the standard for managing larger-scale investments.

Even within the 3-5 property tier, a significant portion (23.1%) is company-owned, suggesting many investors incorporate early in their journey as they plan for future growth.

This data reveals a distinct lifecycle for investors in Moore County, starting as individuals and transitioning to corporate entities as their holdings and operational complexity increase.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is heavily concentrated in zip code 27376, which contains 2,208 investor-owned properties at a 60.9% rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Moore County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in specific zip codes. The 27376 zip code is the epicenter, with 2,208 investor-owned properties, representing a staggering 60.9% ownership rate for that area.

Some smaller sub-regions are almost exclusively owned by investors. Zip code 27259 reports a 100.0% investor ownership rate, and 28350 follows closely at 93.3%, signaling these areas may be dominated by rental communities or vacation properties.

Just two zip codes, 27376 and 28327 (1,912 properties), account for a combined 4,120 properties. This represents 34.1% of the entire investor-owned portfolio in Moore County, highlighting critical pockets of investment concentration.

This geographic clustering suggests investors are targeting areas with specific characteristics, such as high rental demand, desirable amenities, or favorable zoning, leading to hyper-localized market conditions.

The data points to a market of contrasts, with some areas having moderate investor presence while others have become investor strongholds, which can significantly impact local housing dynamics for traditional homebuyers.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 10.6 properties for every one sold in Q1 2026, while institutions are neutral.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Moore County are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as decisive net buyers. In Q1 2026, they purchased 191 properties while selling only 18, resulting in a net gain of 173 properties and a powerful 10.6-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.

This trend of aggressive acquisition has been accelerating. The buy-to-sell ratio has climbed steadily from 4.9 in 2024 to 6.6 in 2025, culminating in the current high, which signals growing confidence and capital deployment in the local market.

The behavior of institutional investors provides a stark contrast. In Q1 2026, the 1000+ property tier demonstrated a perfectly neutral position, acquiring one property and selling one. This indicates a strategy of portfolio maintenance or repositioning rather than expansion.

The overall market's growth is therefore exclusively driven by smaller, non-institutional landlords who continue to expand their portfolios at a rapid pace.

This divergence in strategy suggests that small investors see significant opportunity in Moore County, while large institutions may be focusing their capital elsewhere or have reached their target allocation for the area.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 33.9% of all Q1 2026 transactions, with institutional buyers paying 72.7% less than new landlords.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Q1 2026 market, participating in 33.9% of all single-family residential transactions. Their 191 purchases out of 564 total sales demonstrate their significant and ongoing impact on market liquidity.

A vast pricing disparity exists between the smallest and largest investors. Single-property landlords paid an average of $424,100 per home, whereas the institutional tier paid just $115,836 for its acquisition. This 72.7% price difference suggests large investors target fundamentally different, lower-cost assets.

The market for landlord-to-landlord sales is very thin. New investors entering the market sourced only 3 of their 168 properties (1.8%) from existing landlords, indicating they primarily purchase from traditional homeowners or new construction.

Mom-and-pop landlords dominated the transaction volume, accounting for 188 of the 191 investor transactions. The institutional tier, with just one transaction, was a negligible contributor to the quarter's activity.

This Q1 activity reinforces the market's core identity: it is driven by a high volume of small investors buying from the general public, with different tiers employing vastly different pricing strategies based on their scale and investment criteria.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, individual landlords dominate 97.8% of Moore County's investor market, accelerating acquisitions while institutions remain on the sidelines.
Holdings
Landlords own 12,090 single-family properties in Moore County, representing 30.5% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (89.7%) compared to companies (11.6%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties at a significant 25.7% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $408,724 versus $550,300, a savings of $141,576 per home.
Activity
Investors were involved in 33.9% of all Q1 transactions, and in the prior quarter, 86.2% of landlord purchases (112 properties) were made by new or single-property investors, signaling strong grassroots growth.
Market Share
The investor market is controlled by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 97.8% of the housing stock. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a mere 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the norm for smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, a structure that dominates nearly all larger portfolios.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 10.6x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (191 buys vs 18 sells), while institutional investors are effectively neutral, with their acquisitions and dispositions perfectly balanced (1 buy vs 1 sell).
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Moore County, NC, is a landscape defined by small, independent operators. Investors own a substantial 30.5% of the county's housing stock, a total of 12,090 properties. This portfolio is not in the hands of large corporations; instead, individual investors own 89.7% of these homes. The dominance of mom-and-pop landlords is stark, as they control 97.8% of all investor-owned properties, while institutional firms with over 1,000 homes hold a statistically insignificant 0.1% share. This structure, detailed in many market reports, points to a highly fragmented market driven by local capital and expertise.

In terms of activity, these small investors are behaving bullishly. In Q1 2026, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 10.6 properties for every one they sold. This aggressive stance is paired with a sharp purchasing strategy, as they secured homes for 25.7% less than traditional homebuyers during the same period, a discount averaging $141,576. The fuel for this growth comes from new entrants, with single-property landlords accounting for 86.2% of purchases in the previous quarter. In stark contrast, institutional investors are static, with their buying and selling activity perfectly balanced, indicating a strategy of portfolio management rather than expansion.

The key takeaway for the Moore County housing market is that it is shaped by a multitude of small investors, not a handful of large ones. This dynamic fosters a competitive purchasing environment where local knowledge and deal-sourcing provide a significant edge, as evidenced by the deep discounts investors achieve. The consistent influx of new landlords and the accelerating pace of acquisitions by existing small players signal continued confidence in the local rental market. The market's future trajectory will be determined by the collective actions of these thousands of independent operators, not by the strategic decisions of Wall Street firms.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 10:45 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Moore (NC)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Moore (NC) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nc-moore/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.