Jefferson (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Jefferson (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Jefferson (IL)
10,833
Total Investors in Jefferson (IL)
847
Investor Owned SFR in Jefferson (IL)
726(6.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
750
SFR Owned
601
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
97
SFR Owned
136
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 726 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Jefferson County with 91.5% Ownership, Aggressively Buying at a 40.8% Premium
Investors own 726 SFR properties in Jefferson County, IL (6.7% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 91.5% versus a negligible 0.3% for institutional investors. In a stark reversal of previous trends, landlords paid a 40.8% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026. They remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring over 5 properties for every 1 sold.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 726 SFR properties in Jefferson County, with individual landlords holding 82.8%.
Cash is the dominant financing method, backing 73.3% of investor-owned properties (532 homes), while only 26.7% are financed. The portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, with 90.8% of properties identified as rented (659 homes).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors paid a 40.8% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, a sharp reversal from prior discounts.
This Q1 premium of $70,603 per property ($243,483 vs $172,880) marks a significant shift from 2025, when landlords secured discounts as deep as 49.6% in Q2 and 25.5% in Q1. The data does not differentiate pricing between individual and company buyers.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 33.3% of all single-family homes sold in Jefferson County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of these investor purchases, acquiring 28 properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made zero acquisitions during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 91.5% of all investor-owned SFRs in Jefferson County.
Institutional investors have a nearly non-existent footprint, owning just 2 properties, or 0.3% of the investor-owned market. Pricing data by tier was not available for comparison.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners at the 6-10 property tier, a key professionalization point.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies own a 58.8% majority share in the 6-10 property tier. This corporate majority continues in the 11-20 property tier (53.1%). Price differences by owner type were not available.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in the 62816 zip code, which leads in both property count (41) and ownership rate (9.4%).
The 62816 zip code has the highest investor penetration rate at 9.4%. The next highest concentration is in 62808, with an 8.3% rate, though it has a much smaller property count.
Historical Transactions
Jefferson County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 5.1 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
This trend of accumulation has been consistent, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.3x in 2025 and 9.7x in 2024. The ratio, while still high, shows a slight moderation in acquisition pace compared to the prior two years.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were a party to 30.8% of all single-family home transactions in Q1 2026.
A pricing anomaly occurred, with small landlords (3-5 properties) paying an average of $838,333, far exceeding the $125,042 paid by new single-property investors. New investors sourced 22.2% of their purchases from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 726 SFR properties in Jefferson County, with individual landlords holding 82.8%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a 6.7% share of the single-family residential market in Jefferson County, owning 726 out of 10,833 total SFR properties.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly composed of individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 601 properties (82.8% of the investor portfolio), while companies own the remaining 136 properties (18.7%).

A similar pattern exists among landlord entities, where 750 of the 847 total landlords (88.5%) are individuals, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the local market.

Cash is the preferred method for holding assets. A significant 73.3% of the portfolio (532 properties) is owned outright, compared to just 194 properties (26.7%) that are financed, indicating a well-capitalized investor base.

The primary strategy for these holdings is generating rental income, as confirmed by the 659 properties (90.8%) classified as rented. This demonstrates a strong focus on long-term holds over speculative flipping for the vast majority of local investors engaging in real estate investing.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors paid a 40.8% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, a sharp reversal from prior discounts.
Detailed Findings

In a surprising market turn, landlords paid a significant premium for properties in Q1 2026. Their average acquisition price of $243,483 was 40.8% higher than the $172,880 paid by traditional homeowners, a difference of $70,603 per property.

This marks a dramatic reversal of a long-standing trend. Throughout 2025, landlords consistently paid less than homeowners, securing discounts of 2.8% in Q3, 49.6% in Q2, and 25.5% in Q1.

The shift from a nearly 50% discount to a 40% premium in less than a year suggests a fundamental change in market dynamics. This could be driven by increased competition for limited inventory or a strategic pivot by investors toward higher-value properties.

Landlord acquisition prices have shown extreme volatility, jumping from a low of $90,604 in Q2 2025 to the Q1 2026 high of $243,483. This volatility stands in contrast to the more stable pricing of homeowner purchases.

The data indicates that the 'investor discount' has not only vanished but has inverted, signaling a highly competitive purchasing environment for investors at the start of 2026.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 33.3% of all single-family homes sold in Jefferson County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors represented a powerful force in the Jefferson County market during Q4 2025, purchasing 27 of the 81 total SFRs sold, which amounts to a 33.3% market share.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100% of all investor acquisitions, highlighting their critical role in market liquidity.

New entrants were a significant component of Q4 activity. The data shows 26 distinct entities made single-property purchases, signaling a robust influx of new landlords into the market.

Single-property landlords were the most active segment, buying 21 properties, which represents 75.0% of all investor purchases for the quarter.

Institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties were completely inactive on the buy-side, acquiring zero properties and ceding the market entirely to smaller players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 91.5% of all investor-owned SFRs in Jefferson County.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Jefferson County is unequivocally dominated by small landlords. Those owning between 1 and 10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively hold 91.5% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

Single-property landlords form the foundation of this market. This tier alone accounts for 545 properties, representing 73.5% of the total investor portfolio.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) have a minimal presence, owning just 2 properties, which constitutes a mere 0.3% of the investor market share.

Ownership concentration declines rapidly as portfolio size increases. The combined share of all mid-to-large landlords (those with 11 or more properties) is just 8.5%.

This distribution pattern underscores that the local rental housing stock is primarily provided by small, local investors, not large, out-of-state corporations. Analysis of such trends is often based on comprehensive assessor data.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners at the 6-10 property tier, a key professionalization point.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern of ownership emerges across portfolio sizes: individuals dominate the entry-level tiers, while companies take control as portfolios scale.

Individual investors overwhelmingly own the smallest portfolios, accounting for 91.0% of single-property holdings and 82.4% of two-property holdings.

The critical crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier. At this stage, companies own a 58.8% majority of the properties, signaling a shift from casual investing to a more formalized business structure.

This trend of corporate ownership continues into the 11-20 property tier, where companies hold a 53.1% share, cementing the pattern of professionalization with scale.

Interestingly, even in the large 101-1,000 property tier, ownership is split evenly (50.0% individual vs. 50.0% company), indicating that high-net-worth individuals continue to manage large portfolios without incorporation.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in the 62816 zip code, which leads in both property count (41) and ownership rate (9.4%).
Detailed Findings

The 62816 zip code stands out as the epicenter of investor ownership in Jefferson County. It hosts the highest number of investor-owned properties at 41 and also boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 9.4%.

Following 62816, the zip codes with the next highest counts of investor properties are 62814 (29 properties) and 62810 (17 properties), defining the core regions for investment.

A distinction exists between areas with high volume and high concentration. For example, the 62808 zip code has the second-highest ownership rate (8.3%) but only 3 investor-owned homes, indicating a small market with significant investor interest.

This geographic concentration suggests that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods, likely based on factors like rental demand, property values, and potential for appreciation, which can be identified using advanced property search tools.

The data reveals a clear geographic focus, with a handful of zip codes attracting the vast majority of investment capital in the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Jefferson County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 5.1 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Jefferson County are actively and consistently growing their portfolios, as shown by their strong net buyer status over multiple years.

In the first quarter of 2026, investors demonstrated a robust appetite for acquisitions, purchasing 36 properties while selling only 7. This translates to a buy-to-sell ratio of 5.14-to-1.

This activity continues a powerful multi-year trend. In 2025, the ratio was 6.33-to-1 (114 buys vs. 18 sells), and in 2024 it was even higher at 9.67-to-1 (145 buys vs. 15 sells).

While the pace of net acquisitions has slightly moderated from its 2024 peak, the persistent high ratio confirms a long-term strategy of accumulation among the local investor community.

The data on landlord-to-landlord transactions was not available in this historical view, but the overall trend clearly points towards sustained growth and confidence in the local market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were a party to 30.8% of all single-family home transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a pivotal role in the Jefferson County market during Q1 2026, participating in 36 of the 117 total SFR transactions, for a 30.8% market share.

Transaction activity was dominated by mom-and-pop investors, who were responsible for 35 of the 36 landlord deals. Institutional buyers made zero transactions.

A notable outlier in Q1 pricing was observed in the small landlord tier (3-5 properties), which recorded an average purchase price of $838,333. This is nearly seven times the $125,042 average paid by single-property buyers and likely represents a multi-property portfolio deal or the acquisition of a uniquely high-value asset.

The investor market shows healthy internal liquidity, with 19.4% of all landlord purchases (7 of 36) being acquired from other landlords.

New entrants (single-property tier) are particularly active in this inter-investor market, with 22.2% of their acquisitions (6 properties) coming from existing landlords, suggesting they are a key source of inventory.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 91.5% of Jefferson County's investor market and are aggressively buying, paying a 40.8% premium in Q1.
Holdings
Landlords own 726 SFR properties, representing 6.7% of the market in Jefferson County, IL. Individual investors dominate this portfolio, holding 601 properties (82.8%) compared to 136 properties (18.7%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In a major market shift, landlords paid 40.8% more than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, an average of $243,483 versus $172,880, reversing a historical pattern of securing properties at a discount.
Activity
Investors purchased 33.3% of homes sold in Q4 2025, with mom-and-pop tiers accounting for all acquisitions. The quarter also saw 26 new single-property landlords enter the market, signaling strong grassroots-level growth.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with a 91.5% share of investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.3% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios starting at the 6-10 property tier, indicating a move toward professionalization as holdings grow.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 5.14x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (36 buys vs 7 sells). Data on institutional transactions was not available, but the broader market shows a clear trend of portfolio expansion.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Jefferson County, Illinois, is fundamentally a story of the local, small-scale landlord. Investors own 726 single-family homes, or 6.7% of the total market, but this ownership is highly concentrated among mom-and-pop operators (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 91.5% of the investor-owned housing stock. Individual investors, rather than corporations, own a vast majority of these properties (82.8%), while institutional capital has a nearly invisible footprint at just 0.3%. This structure, detailed in our Investor Pulse reports, defies the common narrative of corporate consolidation and highlights a market driven by community-level investment.

Investor behavior in early 2026 reveals an aggressive and well-capitalized group actively expanding its footprint. Landlords were net buyers in Q1, acquiring over five properties for every one they sold. This expansion comes at a higher cost, as a dramatic market shift saw investors pay a 40.8% premium over traditional homeowners, a complete reversal from the deep discounts they secured in 2025. This suggests intense competition for limited inventory or a strategic pivot to higher-quality assets. Activity remains exclusively in the hands of smaller investors, who accounted for 100% of Q4 2025 purchases.

The key takeaway for the Jefferson County housing market is that it is shaped by a large, active, and growing base of local landlords. Their willingness to pay a premium while continuing to accumulate properties signals strong confidence in the local rental market's future. This dynamic puts pressure on traditional homebuyers, who now face heightened competition from investors paying above asking prices. The market's health and rental affordability are therefore intrinsically linked to the decisions of thousands of individual investors rather than a few large institutions.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:08 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Jefferson (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Jefferson (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-il-jefferson/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.