McKean (PA) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the McKean (PA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in McKean (PA)
12,027
Total Investors in McKean (PA)
2,668
Investor Owned SFR in McKean (PA)
2,453(20.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,571
SFR Owned
2,365
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
97
SFR Owned
113
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,453 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate McKean County, Acquiring Properties at a 26.5% Discount
Individual landlords control 96.4% of the 2,453 investor-owned properties in McKean County, PA, a segment that makes up 20.4% of the total SFR market. In Q1, these investors captured 18.1% of all transactions, paying an average of $97,979, significantly less than the $133,330 paid by homeowners. While small landlords are strong net buyers, institutional investors are effectively absent from the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individuals own 96.4% of the 2,453 investor-owned SFRs in McKean County
Of these holdings, 1,875 properties were acquired with cash, far outpacing the 578 that were financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 2,404 properties classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 26.5% less than homeowners in Q1, a $35,351 discount per property
This significant discount is a consistent trend, with landlords securing even larger price gaps in prior quarters, such as a 37.8% discount ($54,603) in Q3 2025. The average acquisition price for landlords in Q1 2026 was $97,979, compared to $133,330 for traditional homeowners.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors purchased 20.5% of all SFR properties sold in McKean County during Q4 2025
Mom-and-pop landlords drove this activity, accounting for 94.1% of all investor purchases. New single-property investors were the most active group, acquiring 15 of the 16 properties bought by landlords, while institutional investors made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.4% of investor-owned SFRs
In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% share. The single-property landlord tier is the largest segment, alone accounting for 1,960 properties, or 77.9% of the total investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own over 93% of properties in every tier up to 20 units
Companies fail to achieve majority ownership in any tier, holding their largest share (22.2%) in the 6-10 property tier. Even among single-property landlords, individuals represent 96.5% of owners.
Geographic Distribution
Bradford's 16701 zip code is the epicenter of investment, holding 808 investor-owned properties
While 16701 has the highest count, other zip codes show extreme saturation, with 16724 having an 87.5% investor ownership rate. Five separate zip codes in the county have investor ownership rates above 50%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 19 properties while selling only 5 in Q1 2026
This net-buyer trend is consistent, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.6-to-1 in 2025 (105 buys vs 23 sells). In contrast, institutional investors are dormant, with balanced transactions (1 buy, 1 sell in 2025) effectively making them net sellers or neutral.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 18.1% of all McKean County real estate transactions in Q1
New, single-property investors dominated this activity, conducting 17 of the 19 landlord transactions. These small investors paid an average price of $97,979, and 11.8% of their purchases were from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individuals own 96.4% of the 2,453 investor-owned SFRs in McKean County
Detailed Findings

In McKean County, PA, investors hold a significant 20.4% of the single-family residential market, totaling 2,453 properties. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who own 2,365 properties, or 96.4% of the total. In contrast, company-owned properties number just 113, accounting for only 4.6%, highlighting a market dominated by small-scale operators rather than large corporations.

The ownership structure is mirrored in the landlord entities themselves, with 2,571 individual landlords compared to just 97 company landlords. This 26-to-1 ratio of individual to corporate entities underscores the granular, 'mom-and-pop' nature of the local rental market.

A strong preference for all-cash acquisitions is evident in the portfolio composition. Cash-purchased properties (1,875) outnumber financed ones (578) by more than three to one. This financial approach suggests investors in this market possess high liquidity and may be targeting properties that do not qualify for traditional financing, enabling them to secure favorable pricing.

The primary strategy for these holdings is clearly rental income generation. The data shows 2,404 properties are currently rented, representing nearly the entire investor-owned portfolio. This deep penetration into the rental market solidifies the role of these investors as key housing providers in McKean County.

This market structure, characterized by individual ownership and cash purchases, is foundational to understanding the local real estate investing landscape. The data points to a market driven by personal capital and a strategy focused on long-term rental returns.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 26.5% less than homeowners in Q1, a $35,351 discount per property
Detailed Findings

Investors in McKean County consistently acquire properties at a substantial discount compared to traditional homeowners. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords paid an average of $97,979, which is 26.5% less than the $133,330 average paid by homeowners. This equates to a raw savings of $35,351 per transaction, showcasing a significant pricing advantage.

This price gap is not a new phenomenon but a persistent market feature. Looking back, the investor discount was even more pronounced in previous quarters. In Q3 2025, the gap reached 37.8% ($54,603), and in Q2 2025 it was 30.2% ($48,430). This pattern suggests investors are systematically targeting and securing undervalued assets, possibly through off-market deals or by purchasing properties requiring renovation.

Acquisition prices show a clear upward trend from the pandemic era. The average price paid by landlords during 2020-2023 was $71,919. The Q1 2026 price of $97,979 represents a 36.3% increase from that period, indicating significant market appreciation while still maintaining a price advantage over other buyers.

The data reveals a stark difference in purchasing power and strategy between investors and homeowners. While homeowners may compete for market-ready homes, investors appear to operate in a different pricing tier, allowing them to build portfolios at a much lower cost basis.

This consistent ability to purchase below the typical market rate is the primary financial driver of investor success in McKean County, enabling profitable rental yields and creating a buffer for potential market fluctuations.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors purchased 20.5% of all SFR properties sold in McKean County during Q4 2025
Detailed Findings

During the fourth quarter of 2025, landlords were a major force in the McKean County market, acquiring 16 of the 78 total SFR properties sold. This activity gave investors a 20.5% share of all purchases, demonstrating their consistent role in absorbing available housing inventory.

The market's new activity is almost exclusively fueled by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 16 purchases, or 94.1% of all investor acquisitions. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made no purchases, underscoring their absence from this local market.

First-time or single-property investors were the most significant driver of Q4 activity. This tier alone acquired 15 properties, representing 88.2% of all landlord purchases. This influx of 17 new landlord entities signals a healthy and accessible entry point for new participants in the local rental market.

The concentration of purchasing power is firmly at the smallest end of the investor spectrum. While one property was acquired by a mid-size landlord (101-1000 properties), the overwhelming majority of transactions were conducted by individuals or entities just beginning their investment journey.

This quarterly snapshot confirms that the growth in investor ownership is not driven by large corporations but by a steady stream of new, small-scale landlords entering the McKean County housing market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.4% of investor-owned SFRs
Detailed Findings

The ownership landscape in McKean County is defined by the dominance of small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, collectively control 95.4% of all investor-owned single-family homes. This concentration reveals that the local rental market is supported almost entirely by small, local operators.

The single-property landlord (Tier 01) forms the bedrock of the investor community. This group alone owns 1,960 properties, which translates to a massive 77.9% share of the entire investor portfolio. The next largest tier, two-property owners, holds just 6.8%, highlighting the extreme concentration at the entry level.

Conversely, the presence of large-scale and institutional investors is virtually nonexistent. The institutional tier (1,000+ properties) accounts for a mere 0.1% of holdings, with just 2 properties. This finding directly counters the narrative of large corporations controlling the housing market, at least in this specific geography.

The entire spectrum of mid-size to large investors (11 to 1,000+ properties) combined owns only 4.6% of the investor-held SFRs. This structure indicates a highly fragmented market with a very low barrier to entry, but limited scaling for investors beyond a small portfolio.

This distribution, detailed in our property ownership by owner type report, shows that local housing is primarily in the hands of community-level investors, not distant financial institutions.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own over 93% of properties in every tier up to 20 units
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across every single landlord tier in McKean County, with no crossover point where companies become dominant. In the single-property tier, individuals own 1,912 properties (96.5%) compared to just 69 for companies (3.5%). This pattern of individual dominance persists as portfolios grow.

Even in tiers with larger portfolios, companies struggle to gain a significant foothold. For instance, in the small landlord tier (3-5 properties), individuals own 93.5% of the properties. The highest concentration of company ownership is in the 6-10 property tier, and even there, they only account for 22.2% of the holdings (12 properties).

This data indicates that forming a corporate entity is not the preferred or necessary strategy for managing rental properties in this market. The vast majority of landlords, regardless of portfolio size, operate under their individual names.

The lack of a corporate crossover point is a defining feature of McKean County's investor landscape. It suggests that the market does not support or attract the type of scaled operations that typically necessitate corporate structures for liability or financing purposes.

Ultimately, whether an investor owns one property or twenty, they are overwhelmingly likely to be an individual. This reinforces the deeply personal and small-scale nature of real estate investment throughout the county.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Bradford's 16701 zip code is the epicenter of investment, holding 808 investor-owned properties
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in McKean County is geographically concentrated, with the 16701 zip code (Bradford) serving as the primary hub. This single area contains 808 investor-owned properties, far surpassing any other region in the county. However, its investor ownership rate of 15.8% is closer to the county average.

A different story emerges when looking at ownership rates, which reveal pockets of intense investor saturation. The 16724 zip code has an astonishing 87.5% of its SFRs owned by investors, indicating it is almost exclusively a rental market. Four other zip codes (16733, 16727, 16726, 16725) also have investor ownership rates exceeding 50%.

The top five regions by sheer count of investor properties are 16701 (808 properties), 16735 (282), 16743 (240), 16749 (178), and 16731 (154). These areas represent the largest pools of rental housing stock within the county.

The contrast between high-count areas and high-percentage areas is significant. While Bradford (16701) has the volume, smaller communities have a much higher density of rental properties relative to their total housing stock. This suggests different market dynamics, with urban centers offering scale and smaller towns offering niche rental opportunities.

This geographic analysis, possible through comprehensive assessor data, is crucial for understanding where rental housing is most prevalent and where opportunities for new investment may exist.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 19 properties while selling only 5 in Q1 2026
Detailed Findings

Landlords in McKean County are actively expanding their portfolios, consistently buying more properties than they sell. In the first quarter of 2026, they purchased 19 SFRs while only selling 5, establishing a strong net-buyer position. This behavior signals confidence in the local rental market's future.

This trend of accumulation is not isolated to the current quarter. Throughout 2025, landlords acquired 105 properties and sold just 23, a buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 4.6 to 1. Similarly, in 2024, they purchased 107 properties versus selling 36. This sustained acquisition pressure is a key driver of market dynamics.

The behavior of institutional investors (1,000+ tier) provides a sharp contrast. Their activity is minimal and balanced, with one purchase and one sale in 2025, and two of each in 2024. This neutral position means they are not contributing to the net growth of investor-owned housing and are effectively divesting or rebalancing at a micro-scale relative to their portfolio size.

The data clearly separates the strategies of small, local landlords from large institutions. Local investors are in an aggressive growth phase, while the institutional presence is static and insignificant to overall market trends.

This ongoing accumulation by mom-and-pop investors is reshaping the county's housing stock, steadily converting properties into long-term rentals.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 18.1% of all McKean County real estate transactions in Q1
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, investors played a role in 19 of the 105 total SFR transactions in McKean County, capturing an 18.1% market share. This consistent transactional presence highlights their importance to local market liquidity.

Activity was heavily concentrated at the entry level of the market. The single-property tier was responsible for 17 of the 19 landlord transactions. This indicates that the bulk of investor buying is driven by new entrants or small landlords adding their next property, rather than portfolio growth from larger players.

The average purchase price for these new single-property investors was $97,979. This price point is significantly below the average paid by homeowners, reinforcing that new investors are succeeding by finding value-priced opportunities.

A notable portion of acquisitions involves inter-investor trading. Among single-property buyers, 11.8% of their purchases (2 properties) came from other landlords. This suggests a fluid market where investors are actively trading assets among themselves.

Institutional investors were entirely absent from Q1 transactions, recording zero deals. The transactional data from the quarter confirms the overarching market theme: McKean County real estate is a game played and won by small, local investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Individual investors control 96% of McKean County's rental market, buying at 26.5% discounts as institutions stay away
Holdings
Investors own 2,453 SFR properties in McKean County, representing 20.4% of the market. Individual investors hold a commanding 96.4% of these properties (2,365), while companies own just 3.6% (113).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties for 26.5% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $35,351 per property ($97,979 vs $133,330).
Activity
Landlords acquired 20.5% of all properties sold in the most recent quarter, with activity dominated by 17 new single-property landlord entities entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with a 95.4% share of investor housing, while institutional investors own a mere 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, holding over 93% of properties in portfolios up to 20 units; companies fail to become the majority at any portfolio size.
Transactions
Landlords remain aggressive net buyers with a 3.8x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (19 buys vs 5 sells), while institutional investors are effectively neutral, with zero net acquisitions in recent years.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in McKean County, Pennsylvania, is unequivocally dominated by small, individual operators. These 'mom-and-pop' landlords own 2,453 single-family properties, constituting a significant 20.4% of the total housing stock. The ownership split is heavily skewed, with individual investors controlling 96.4% of these assets, compared to a meager 3.6% for companies. This structure is further reinforced by tier analysis, which shows landlords with 1-10 properties control 95.4% of the investor-owned market, while large-scale institutional investors have a virtually nonexistent footprint at just 0.1%.

Investor behavior is characterized by strategic, value-driven acquisitions and consistent portfolio growth. In the first quarter, landlords were involved in 18.1% of all market transactions and demonstrated a keen ability to find deals, paying an average of $97,979 per property. This represents a 26.5% discount compared to the $133,330 paid by traditional homeowners. This group is actively accumulating properties, evidenced by a strong 3.8-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1. This activity is primarily fueled by new market entrants, with single-property investors accounting for the vast majority of recent purchases.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that the narrative of corporate landlords taking over housing does not apply in McKean County. The market's health and the supply of rental housing are dependent on the financial capacity and strategic decisions of thousands of individual investors. Their ability to operate efficiently at lower price points and their sustained net-buying position them as the principal force shaping the local housing landscape. For anyone analyzing this market, from policymakers to other investors, understanding the motivations and methods of this dominant mom-and-pop segment is critical.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 01:51 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography McKean (PA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 McKean (PA) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-pa-mckean/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.