Brunswick (NC) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Brunswick (NC) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Brunswick (NC)
78,861
Total Investors in Brunswick (NC)
31,161
Investor Owned SFR in Brunswick (NC)
23,315(29.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
26,748
SFR Owned
17,725
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
4,413
SFR Owned
6,035
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 23,315 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Brunswick County a Hotbed for Small Investors Paying Premiums, Owning 93% of Rentals
Investors own 29.6% of all single-family homes in Brunswick County, NC, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 93.2% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords surprisingly paid 26.3% more than traditional homeowners, even as they remained aggressive net buyers with a 13-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 23,315 SFR properties in Brunswick County, with individuals holding 76.0%.
Cash is a significant factor, with 14,396 properties owned outright versus 8,919 that are financed. The portfolio is highly focused on rentals, as 23,164 of the 23,315 investor-owned properties are non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid a 26.3% premium over homeowners, averaging $628,785 per home.
This trend of investors paying more than homeowners is consistent, with the premium reaching as high as 29.2% ($135,491) in Q2 2025. The price gap has remained substantial over the past year, consistently above 20%.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 44.3% of all SFR purchases in the most recent quarter, buying 389 homes.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 68.3% of all investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made up a trivial 0.3% of acquisitions, with just a single purchase.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 93.2% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 82.0% of all investor-owned housing, with 19,680 properties. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) have a minimal presence, owning just 0.5% of the portfolio, or 116 properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type for portfolios of 6 or more properties.
While individuals own over 81% of single-property portfolios, their share drops to just 25.5% in the 6-10 property tier. In this tier, companies own 74.5% of the properties, marking a clear shift in ownership structure as portfolios scale.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 28465 zip code, with 5,249 investor-owned properties.
This concentration in 28465 is so high that investors own 54.2% of all SFRs there. Other hotspots with high investor ownership rates include 28452 (47.2%) and 28462 (45.9%), indicating specific neighborhoods are prime targets for rentals.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Brunswick County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 13 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This accumulation trend is consistent over time, with landlords maintaining a net buyer position every quarter for the past two years, adding 2,238 properties in 2025 and 2,667 in 2024. Institutional investors are also net buyers, but their activity is minimal, adding just 4 net properties in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 39.0% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, a total of 510 purchases.
A startling price gap exists between investor tiers: new single-property landlords paid an average of $623,395, while the lone institutional buyer paid just $210,000, a 66.3% discount. Inter-landlord trades are rare for new buyers, with only 3.7% of single-property landlords buying from another investor.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 23,315 SFR properties in Brunswick County, with individuals holding 76.0%.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a substantial footprint in Brunswick County, holding 23,315 single-family properties, which accounts for 29.6% of the total 78,861 SFRs in the market. This high penetration rate indicates a market with strong rental demand and significant investor focus.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by 26,748 individual landlords, who own 17,725 properties (76.0% of the investor-owned portfolio). In contrast, 4,413 company landlords hold the remaining 6,035 properties (25.9%), underscoring the market's reliance on small-scale, non-corporate ownership.

A notable sign of financial strength among investors is the prevalence of cash ownership. There are 14,396 cash-owned properties, significantly outnumbering the 8,919 properties that are financed. This suggests many investors have high liquidity and are not heavily leveraged.

The portfolio's purpose is clear: generating rental income. An overwhelming 99.4% of investor-owned properties (23,164 of 23,315) are classified as non-owner-occupied, confirming their use as rental units rather than secondary homes.

The disparity between entity count and property count reveals different operational scales. While there are six times as many individual landlords as company landlords (26,748 vs. 4,413), companies on average own more properties per entity, signaling a more professionalized or scaled approach compared to the typical individual owner.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid a 26.3% premium over homeowners, averaging $628,785 per home.
Detailed Findings

Contrary to the common belief that investors secure discounts, landlords in Brunswick County consistently pay a significant premium compared to traditional homeowners. In Q1 2026, the average landlord acquisition price was $628,785, a full 26.3% or $130,799 higher than the homeowner average of $497,986.

This premium is not a recent anomaly but a persistent market feature. Over the past year, the gap has been consistently wide, peaking in Q2 2025 when investors paid a 29.2% premium ($598,968 vs. $463,477). This suggests investors are targeting different, possibly higher-value or more desirable rental properties than the average homebuyer.

The data reveals a steady appreciation in acquisition prices for investors. Prices rose from an average of $531,857 in the 2020-2023 period to $574,979 in 2024 and have continued to climb into 2026, reflecting strong competition and demand in the investment property segment.

The narrowest price gap observed recently was in Q1 2025, yet even then, landlords paid a 20.7% premium ($90,562 more per property). The inability for investors to find discounts in this market points to a highly competitive environment where demand for rental-grade assets outstrips supply.

This pricing behavior could indicate that investors are prioritizing assets with higher potential returns, such as properties in prime locations or new construction, and are willing to pay a premium to acquire them over the general homebuying public.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 44.3% of all SFR purchases in the most recent quarter, buying 389 homes.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was exceptionally strong in the last quarter, with landlords purchasing 389 of the 879 SFRs sold, a commanding 44.3% market share. This high level of acquisition demonstrates intense demand from investors and their significant role in the local real estate market's transaction volume.

The engine of this activity is clearly small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 271 of the 389 investor purchases, representing 68.3% of the total. This highlights the decentralized nature of investor buying in Brunswick County.

New entrants are a major force, with the single-property tier alone accounting for 229 purchases (57.7% of the investor total). These acquisitions were made by 328 distinct entities, indicating a fresh wave of first-time landlords entering the market.

In stark contrast to the activity from small landlords, institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000+ properties had a negligible impact, purchasing only a single property. This data directly contradicts the narrative of large corporations dominating housing acquisitions in this area.

Mid-size and large landlords (51-1000 properties) also showed concentrated bursts of activity, with just four entities acquiring a combined 121 properties. This suggests targeted, large-scale acquisitions by a few larger regional players, distinct from the broad-based buying of mom-and-pop investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 93.2% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of investment properties in Brunswick County is dominated by small landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively hold 93.2% of all investor-owned SFRs, cementing their role as the backbone of the local rental market.

The concentration at the smallest end of the spectrum is profound. Landlords who own just a single property (Tier 01) make up the largest group by far, controlling 19,680 properties, or 82.0% of the entire investor portfolio. This signifies a market characterized by individual initiative rather than corporate consolidation.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a remarkably small footprint, owning just 116 properties, which translates to a mere 0.5% of the investor market. This finding challenges any perception that large, Wall Street-type firms are the primary owners of rental homes in the area.

Even mid-size and large investors (11-1000 properties) hold a relatively small combined share. These tiers collectively account for only 6.3% of investor-owned properties, further emphasizing the market's fragmentation and reliance on smaller operators.

This distribution reveals a highly decentralized rental market. The decisions of thousands of individual, small-portfolio landlords have a far greater cumulative impact on housing availability and pricing than the actions of a few large firms.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type for portfolios of 6 or more properties.
Detailed Findings

A distinct pattern emerges when examining ownership by portfolio size: individuals dominate smaller portfolios, while companies take over as portfolio size increases. For single-property landlords, individuals represent 81.2% of owners, but this share steadily declines as investors acquire more properties.

The crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier. At this level, company ownership surges to 74.5%, while individual ownership falls to just 25.5%. This signals that scaling beyond five properties often involves formalizing operations under a corporate entity for liability, financing, or tax purposes.

This trend continues in larger tiers. For portfolios of 11-20 properties, companies own 65.4% of the assets, and for portfolios of 21-50 properties, their share grows to 75.3%. This confirms that significant portfolio growth is almost exclusively a corporate endeavor in this market.

Despite the company dominance in larger tiers, the sheer volume of small, individual landlords means they still control the majority of the overall market. Individuals own 16,268 properties in the single-property tier alone, far outnumbering the total properties owned by companies across all tiers (6,035).

This dual structure suggests two different types of real estate investing strategies at play: a high volume of individuals managing small-scale investments, and a smaller number of more professionalized companies managing larger, more complex portfolios.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 28465 zip code, with 5,249 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership is not evenly distributed but is highly concentrated in specific zip codes within Brunswick County. The 28465 zip code is the clear epicenter, with 5,249 investor-owned properties, far surpassing any other area.

The dominance of investors in 28465 is not just a matter of volume but also of market penetration. Investors own 54.2% of all single-family residential properties in that zip code, meaning more than half the homes are rentals. This level of concentration can significantly shape the local housing market's character and affordability.

Other areas also show high investor saturation. The zip codes 28452, 28462, and 28469 all have investor ownership rates exceeding 40%. This pattern indicates that investors are targeting specific sub-markets, likely those with strong rental demand, vacation potential, or favorable property characteristics.

Interestingly, the list of top regions by property count is slightly different from the list of top regions by ownership percentage. While 28461 has the second-highest count of investor properties (3,088), its ownership rate is a more modest 24.6%, suggesting it is a larger market overall. In contrast, a smaller market like 28452 has a much higher saturation rate (47.2%).

This data points to clear investment hotspots where rental properties define the local real estate landscape. Understanding these micro-markets is crucial for analyzing housing trends, as the dynamics in a 54% investor-owned area are fundamentally different from those in a primarily owner-occupied neighborhood.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Brunswick County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 13 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals a strong and sustained trend of portfolio accumulation among landlords in Brunswick County. In Q1 2026, they purchased 510 properties while selling only 39, resulting in a buy-to-sell ratio of 13.1 to 1 and a net gain of 471 properties.

This behavior is not a short-term spike but a long-term pattern. Throughout 2025, landlords were consistently net buyers, acquiring 2,499 properties and selling just 261 for a net increase of 2,238 homes. The trend was similar in 2024, with a net gain of 2,667 properties, signaling a multi-year phase of aggressive expansion.

Even the largest institutional investors (1000+ tier) are in an accumulation phase, though their scale of activity is vastly smaller. In 2025, they were net buyers by a margin of 4 properties (5 buys vs. 1 sell), demonstrating that even the biggest players see value in growing their local footprint, albeit cautiously.

The high volume of purchases relative to sales indicates strong confidence in the Brunswick County rental market. Investors are clearly choosing to hold and expand their portfolios rather than liquidate assets, suggesting expectations of continued rent growth and price appreciation.

This persistent net buying activity contributes significantly to market demand, absorbing a large portion of available housing stock and competing directly with traditional homebuyers for properties.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 39.0% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, a total of 510 purchases.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a driving force in the Brunswick County market in Q1 2026, participating in 510 of the 1,309 total SFR transactions. This 39.0% share of activity underscores their critical role in market liquidity and price discovery.

A dramatic pricing disparity exists between different types of investors, revealing divergent acquisition strategies. First-time, single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $623,395. In stark contrast, institutional and large investors paid significantly less, with acquisitions in the $210,000 to $316,869 range.

The most extreme example of this price divide is the 66.3% difference between what new mom-and-pop buyers paid ($623,395) and what the institutional buyer paid ($210,000). This suggests smaller investors are often buying turn-key properties at retail prices, while larger, more sophisticated players are sourcing deals off-market or acquiring distressed assets at a deep discount.

The market for inter-landlord transactions is not a primary source for new investors. Only 3.7% of purchases by single-property landlords came from other investors, indicating they are primarily buying from homeowners or builders. This contrasts with one mid-size tier where 100% of purchases (albeit a single transaction) came from another landlord, hinting at a more insular market among established players.

Overall transaction volume was dominated by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who were responsible for 384 of the 510 investor transactions. This reinforces that the market's pulse is dictated by the collective actions of thousands of small investors, not a handful of large ones.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Brunswick County, owning 93.2% of rentals and paying 26% premiums over homeowners.
Holdings
Investors own 23,315 single-family homes in Brunswick County, NC, representing 29.6% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (76.0%) over companies (25.9%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $628,785, a 26.3% premium over traditional homeowners ($497,986). A stark internal divide exists, with institutional buyers paying 66.3% less than new mom-and-pop investors in the same quarter.
Activity
Landlords were highly active, acquiring 44.3% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter. This activity was led by small buyers, including 328 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control 93.2% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a marginal 0.5% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6 or more properties, a clear crossover point for operational scale.
Transactions
Investors are aggressive accumulators with a 13.1-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (510 buys vs. 39 sells). Institutional investors are also net buyers, but their transaction volume is negligible.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Brunswick County, NC is defined by the dominance of small, individual investors. Landlords own a significant 29.6% of the county's housing stock, totaling 23,315 properties. This portfolio is not controlled by large corporations; instead, 'mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 properties) hold an overwhelming 93.2% share, while institutional investors own a mere 0.5%. Ownership is primarily in the hands of individuals (76.0%), with companies only becoming the majority owners in portfolios larger than five properties. This decentralized structure means the market is shaped by the collective actions of thousands of small operators.

Investor behavior in Brunswick County defies conventional wisdom. Rather than seeking discounts, landlords consistently pay a premium, spending 26.3% more than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026 ($628,785 vs. $497,986). This trend points to intense competition for desirable rental assets. A deeper look at the comprehensive property datasets reveals a two-tiered market: new, single-property investors paid top-dollar prices near $623,395, while institutional buyers secured properties for as low as $210,000. Despite high prices, investors remain in a phase of aggressive accumulation, buying 13 homes for every one they sold in the first quarter.

The key takeaway is that Brunswick County's housing market is heavily influenced by a vibrant, yet stratified, investor community. The high market penetration, particularly in hotspots like the 28465 zip code where investors own 54.2% of homes, creates a competitive environment for all buyers. The market dynamic is characterized by new, small-scale investors paying retail premiums to enter, while a small number of larger, sophisticated players leverage scale and strategy to acquire assets at a substantial discount. This suggests a maturing rental market where experience and capital provide a significant competitive advantage.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 09:22 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Brunswick (NC)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Brunswick (NC) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nc-brunswick/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.