Duchesne (UT) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Duchesne (UT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Duchesne (UT)
6,393
Total Investors in Duchesne (UT)
4,072
Investor Owned SFR in Duchesne (UT)
4,020(62.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,310
SFR Owned
3,177
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
762
SFR Owned
861
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,020 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Duchesne County is a small investor stronghold, with landlords owning 62.9% of SFRs and mom-and-pops driving 100% of activity.
Investors own 4,020 SFR properties, a staggering 62.9% of the market in Duchesne County, UT. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 100% of this portfolio, with zero institutional presence. In the most recent quarter, landlords captured 73.1% of all purchases, securing a massive 24.7% price discount compared to traditional homeowners and continuing an aggressive net buying streak.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 4,020 SFRs, 62.9% of the market, with individuals holding a 79.0% majority share.
Cash is the dominant financing method, with 3,456 properties owned outright versus just 564 financed. The portfolio is almost entirely rental-focused, as 4,012 of the 4,020 properties (99.8%) are non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a massive 24.7% discount in Q1, paying $119,797 less than homeowners on average.
This significant discount marks a sharp reversal from 2025, when landlords paid premiums as high as 13.4% ($43,408) in Q1 2025. Acquisition prices show consistent appreciation, climbing from a $261,636 average during 2020-2023 to $364,364 in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, acquiring 19 properties for a 73.1% market share.
Mom-and-pop investors accounted for 100% of all landlord purchases, with zero institutional activity. The quarter saw the emergence of 18 new single-property landlords, highlighting strong grassroots growth.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords completely control the market, owning 100% of all investor-held SFRs in Duchesne County.
Single-property landlords are the backbone of the market, alone owning 3,569 properties, an 88.3% share of the total investor portfolio. Institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have zero presence in this county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors form the majority in every ownership tier, holding 81.0% of single-property portfolios.
Companies approach parity only in the 3-5 property tier, owning 49.6% of properties in that segment. There is no crossover point where companies become the dominant owner type in this market.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip codes 84021 and 84066, which together contain 2,117 investor-owned properties.
Certain zip codes exhibit extreme investor saturation, with ownership rates reaching as high as 90.7% in 84001 and 89.5% in 84031. The top zip by count, 84021, also has a very high ownership rate of 88.7%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 19-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026, acquiring 19 properties while selling only one.
This highly acquisitive trend is consistent over time, with landlords maintaining a 26.6-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025 (133 buys vs. 5 sells) and a 10.8-to-1 ratio in 2024 (141 buys vs. 13 sells). Institutional investors recorded no transaction activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove 73.1% of all market transactions in Q4 2025, purchasing 19 of the 26 total properties sold.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100% of these transactions, with new, single-property landlords leading the charge. These new investors paid an average price of $364,364 and sourced only 5.6% of their acquisitions from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 4,020 SFRs, 62.9% of the market, with individuals holding a 79.0% majority share.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Duchesne County, UT is exceptionally high, with landlords holding 4,020 single-family residences, which constitutes a 62.9% share of the total 6,393 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors are the primary drivers of this market, owning 3,177 properties (79.0%) compared to the 861 properties (21.4%) held by companies. This is reflected in the landlord entity count, where 3,310 individuals far outnumber the 762 company landlords.

The investor portfolio is overwhelmingly geared towards rentals. An analysis of property status reveals that 4,012 of the 4,020 investor-owned homes (99.8%) are non-owner-occupied, signaling a clear focus on generating rental income.

Cash transactions dominate investor holdings. Landlords in Duchesne County own 3,456 properties free and clear, more than six times the 564 properties that are financed. This indicates a market with high liquidity and less reliance on traditional mortgage transaction data for acquisitions.

The data points to a mature rental market where the vast majority of assets are held for investment purposes, financed by cash, and controlled primarily by individual operators rather than large corporations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a massive 24.7% discount in Q1, paying $119,797 less than homeowners on average.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, acquiring properties for an average of $364,364 while traditional homeowners paid $484,161. This resulted in a substantial 24.7% discount for investors, a savings of $119,797 per property.

The Q1 2026 discount represents a dramatic market shift. This is a complete reversal from the previous year, where landlords were paying significant premiums. For instance, in Q1 2025, landlords paid 13.4% more ($367,051 vs $323,643) than homeowners, and 9.1% more in Q2 2025 ($361,359 vs $331,215).

Despite quarterly fluctuations in the price gap, the overall trend for acquisition prices is one of steady growth. The average landlord purchase price has climbed from $261,636 during the 2020-2023 period to $326,339 in 2024, $352,196 in 2025, and now $364,364 in the first quarter of 2026.

The return to a significant landlord discount could signal a shift in market dynamics, where investors are better positioned to find and negotiate favorable deals compared to retail buyers. This trend gives investors a distinct advantage in a market with appreciating values.

The pricing volatility relative to homeowners, moving from a 13.4% premium to a 24.7% discount in a year, suggests that investor and homeowner demand are operating on different cycles or responding to different market pressures in Duchesne County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, acquiring 19 properties for a 73.1% market share.
Detailed Findings

Landlord purchasing activity was overwhelmingly dominant in Q4 2025, capturing 19 of the 26 total SFR sales in Duchesne County. This represents a 73.1% market share, underscoring the vital role investors play in local market liquidity.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of the 19 properties acquired by investors, with no participation from mid-size or institutional players.

The market is characterized by a continuous influx of new participants. The single-property tier saw 18 different entities each purchase one home, accounting for 94.7% of all investor acquisitions. This indicates a healthy and active entry point for first-time investors.

In contrast to the surge in small-scale buying, there was a complete absence of activity from larger investors. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made zero purchases, reinforcing the local, small-scale nature of this real estate investing market.

The concentration of activity in the smallest tiers suggests that the market's growth is driven by individuals and small businesses expanding their portfolios one property at a time, rather than by large-scale portfolio acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords completely control the market, owning 100% of all investor-held SFRs in Duchesne County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Duchesne County is exclusively defined by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, owning between 1 and 10 properties, account for 100% of the 4,020 investor-owned SFRs.

Ownership is heavily concentrated at the smallest end of the spectrum. Landlords with just a single property (Tier 01) represent the largest segment by a wide margin, holding 3,569 properties, which is 88.3% of the entire investor-owned housing stock.

The next largest group, two-property landlords, holds a distant 330 properties (8.2%), followed by owners with 3-5 properties, who control 131 homes (3.2%). This structure highlights a market built on grassroots investment.

There is a complete absence of large-scale investors. The data shows zero properties held by mid-size landlords with 51-1,000 properties and no presence from institutional investors (Tier 09), who typically own portfolios of 1,000+ homes.

This ownership distribution paints a clear picture of a market dominated by local, individual investors, a stark contrast to narratives of corporate landlord dominance seen in other regions.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors form the majority in every ownership tier, holding 81.0% of single-property portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across all portfolio sizes in Duchesne County. In the largest tier of single-property landlords, individuals own 2,901 properties (81.0%) versus 681 held by companies.

As portfolios grow, company ownership increases but never overtakes individuals. In the two-property tier, the split is 66.3% individual (220 properties) to 33.7% company (112 properties).

The closest companies come to a majority is in the 3-5 property tier, where they own 65 properties (49.6%), nearly matching the 66 properties (50.4%) held by individuals. This is the peak of company concentration.

Even in the 6-10 property tier, individuals reassert their dominance, holding 7 properties (77.8%) compared to just 2 for companies (22.2%).

The data clearly shows that Duchesne County is a market driven by individual capital. There is no tier at which corporate ownership becomes the majority, reinforcing the mom-and-pop character of the local rental landscape.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip codes 84021 and 84066, which together contain 2,117 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Duchesne County is highly concentrated geographically. The top two zip codes, 84021 and 84066, hold 1,068 and 1,049 investor-owned properties respectively, accounting for over half of all such properties in the county.

Several zip codes display extraordinary levels of investor penetration. The highest rate is in 84001, where investors own 90.7% of all SFRs, followed closely by 84031 at 89.5% and 84021 at 88.7%. These figures indicate areas that function almost exclusively as rental markets.

There is a distinction between areas with the highest count versus the highest percentage. While 84021 is a leader in both categories, 84066 is second for total count (1,049) but has a much lower ownership rate of 36.9%, suggesting it is a larger residential area with more traditional homeowners.

Conversely, the zip codes with the highest investor penetration rates (84001, 84031, 84002) are not in the top five for absolute property count, indicating they are likely smaller areas that have been almost entirely acquired by investors.

This geographic analysis reveals specific neighborhood pockets where property search for rentals is the norm and investor activity has fundamentally shaped the local housing stock.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 19-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026, acquiring 19 properties while selling only one.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Duchesne County are overwhelmingly in accumulation mode, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, landlords were strong net buyers, adding a net of 18 properties to their portfolios with 19 purchases and only one sale.

This behavior is not a recent development but a long-term trend. In the full year of 2025, investors purchased 133 properties while selling only 5, a buy-to-sell ratio of 26.6x and a net gain of 128 properties.

The pattern was similar in 2024, which saw 141 acquisitions against 13 sales, resulting in another net gain of 128 properties for the year.

The transaction data shows no activity from institutional investors (1,000+ property tier). The market's net buying pressure is generated entirely by smaller, mom-and-pop-scale landlords.

The sustained and high-volume net buying activity from landlords is a primary force shaping the local real estate market, steadily increasing the share of rental housing stock over time.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove 73.1% of all market transactions in Q4 2025, purchasing 19 of the 26 total properties sold.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, investor activity was the dominant force in the Duchesne County market, with landlords involved in 19 of the 26 total SFR transactions, a commanding 73.1% share.

All investor transaction activity was concentrated in the smallest tiers. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) conducted 18 of the 19 investor transactions, while two-property landlords (Tier 02) accounted for the remaining one.

New entrants to the market paid an average price of $364,364 per property, demonstrating significant capital deployment from small-scale investors.

Investors in this market primarily acquire properties from the open market rather than from each other. Of the 18 properties purchased by single-property landlords, only one (5.6%) was bought from another landlord, indicating low levels of inter-investor trading.

The transactional data confirms that the market's velocity is driven by new and small investors, who are expanding their footprint by purchasing from traditional homeowners or new construction rather than absorbing existing rental portfolios.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Duchesne County, UT, owning 62.9% of all single-family homes with zero institutional competition.
Holdings
Landlords own 4,020 single-family properties, representing a massive 62.9% of the market in Duchesne County. Individual investors hold the vast majority of these at 3,177 properties (79.0%), compared to 861 (21.4%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated significant market leverage, paying 24.7% less than traditional homeowners. This amounted to an average discount of $119,797 per property ($364,364 vs. $484,161).
Activity
Investors acquired 73.1% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter (19 of 26 properties), an activity level driven entirely by small landlords. The period saw 18 new single-property investors enter the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) completely control the investment landscape, owning 100% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in this county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes. Companies only approach ownership parity in the 3-5 property tier (49.6%) and never achieve a majority, underscoring the market's grassroots nature.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 19-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (19 buys vs. 1 sell). This acquisitive stance is driven exclusively by small investors, as institutions recorded no transactions.
Market Narrative

The real estate market in Duchesne County, UT is fundamentally shaped by small, independent investors who have achieved a remarkable level of market penetration. Landlords own 4,020 single-family properties, a staggering 62.9% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This landscape is built by individuals, who own 79.0% of these investment properties, far outpacing corporate entities. The market structure defies the common narrative of institutional dominance; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 100% of the investor-owned portfolio, with zero properties held by institutional-scale players.

Investor behavior in Duchesne County is characterized by aggressive acquisition and savvy pricing. In the most recent quarter, landlords were responsible for 73.1% of all home purchases. This activity is coupled with a significant financial advantage, as investors paid an average of 24.7% less than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, a discount worth $119,797 per property. This purchasing is part of a sustained trend of accumulation, with investors acting as strong net buyers, exemplified by a 19-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in the last quarter. The market's growth is fueled by a constant influx of new participants, with 18 new single-property landlords making purchases in Q4 2025 alone.

The key takeaway for Duchesne County is that it operates as a distinct ecosystem dominated by a large number of small-scale, cash-heavy investors. With hyper-concentrated ownership rates reaching over 90% in some zip codes, the area functions more like a large, decentralized rental market than a traditional sales market. The absence of institutional capital and the overwhelming dominance of individual landlords create a unique environment where local knowledge and deal-sourcing capabilities provide a powerful competitive edge, a trend expected to continue as small investors steadily expand their holdings.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 04:26 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Duchesne (UT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Duchesne (UT) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ut-duchesne/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.