Green (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Green (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Green (KY)
3,986
Total Investors in Green (KY)
1,589
Investor Owned SFR in Green (KY)
1,300(32.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,479
SFR Owned
1,168
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
110
SFR Owned
155
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,300 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 99.7% of Investor Housing in Green County, Buying at a 34% Discount
Investors own 1,300 SFRs in Green County (32.6% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 99.7% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, investors drove 64.1% of all market transactions, purchasing properties at a 34.2% discount to homeowners and acting as aggressive net buyers with a 25-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 1,300 SFR properties in Green County, with individual investors holding 89.8%.
Landlord portfolios are heavily cash-based, with 1,120 properties owned outright versus just 180 financed. An overwhelming 96.9% of the investor-owned portfolio is designated as non-owner-occupied rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords bought properties for 34.2% less than homeowners, a $95,203 discount.
This price advantage is highly volatile, swinging from landlords paying a 2.5% premium in Q2 2025 to securing massive discounts in other quarters. Landlord acquisition prices have appreciated from a $137,111 average during 2020-2023.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, purchasing 18 of 28 homes sold (64.3% market share).
All landlord purchasing activity (100.0%) came from mom-and-pop investors, with zero properties acquired by institutional firms. The market saw 19 new single-property landlords enter, acquiring 12 properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.7% of all investor-owned SFRs in Green County.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence, holding 0.0% of the market. Single-property landlords are the bedrock, owning 916 properties, which is 67.2% of the entire investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, holding 66.7% of SFRs.
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, owning 91.6% of single-property holdings and 92.0% of two-property portfolios. The 6-10 property tier represents a transition zone, with companies owning a substantial 43.5% share.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 42743 zip code alone containing 1,065 properties.
This single zip code accounts for 81.9% of all investor-owned SFRs in Green County. The zip code with the highest investor ownership *rate* is 42728, where 50.0% of homes are investor-owned, showing a different pattern of concentration.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 25 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This strong accumulation trend is consistent over time, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 12.9x for the full year 2025 (168 buys vs. 13 sells). There is no transaction data available for institutional investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 64.1% of all Q1 2026 transactions, with 25 of 39 total sales.
A surprising pricing pattern emerged: new single-property investors paid the highest average price at $212,833, while larger small landlords (6-10 properties) paid the least at $58,000. Inter-landlord trades were minimal, accounting for just 10.5% of purchases for the most active tier.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 1,300 SFR properties in Green County, with individual investors holding 89.8%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is a significant feature of the Green County market, with landlords holding 1,300 single-family residential properties. This portfolio constitutes 32.6% of the total 3,986 SFRs in the area, indicating a high level of investor penetration.

The market is overwhelmingly defined by private individuals rather than corporations. Individual investors own 1,168 properties, which is 89.8% of the total investor portfolio, dwarfing the 155 properties (11.9%) held by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where there are 1,479 individual landlords compared to only 110 company landlords, showing a highly fragmented ownership base.

A key financial characteristic of this market is the prevalence of cash ownership. Landlords hold 1,120 properties free of financing, compared to only 180 that are financed, indicating a low reliance on leverage and high equity positions.

The investor portfolio is almost entirely focused on generating rental income. A total of 1,260 of the 1,300 properties are non-owner-occupied, a rate of 96.9%, which highlights a strong rental market strategy among local investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords bought properties for 34.2% less than homeowners, a $95,203 discount.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Green County demonstrated a significant pricing advantage in the first quarter of 2026, acquiring properties at an average price of $183,083. This represents a 34.2% discount compared to the $278,286 average paid by traditional homeowners, a cash difference of $95,203 per property.

This substantial discount marks a sharp return to favorable pricing for investors, especially when compared to the narrow 4.8% discount seen in Q3 2025 or the 24.5% discount in Q1 2025.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been notably inconsistent. For instance, in Q2 2025, landlords briefly paid a 2.5% premium ($3,750 more) than homeowners, highlighting a fluctuating and opportunistic purchasing environment.

Despite the ability to secure discounts, the overall acquisition price for landlords has trended upwards over the long term. The Q1 2026 average of $183,083 is a notable increase from the $169,309 average in 2024 and the $137,111 average during the 2020-2023 period.

This volatility in the price gap suggests that investors are adept at finding value that is not always available, capitalizing on specific opportunities rather than a consistent market-wide discount.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, purchasing 18 of 28 homes sold (64.3% market share).
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition activity was exceptionally strong in the fourth quarter of 2025, with investors purchasing 18 of the 28 total SFRs sold in Green County. This captured a commanding 64.3% of the total market share for the period.

The purchasing landscape was exclusively controlled by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, accounted for 100.0% of all investor acquisitions during the quarter.

In line with overall ownership patterns, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had no purchasing activity, indicating their absence from this local market's acquisition scene.

Market growth is being fueled by new entrants. Single-property landlords were the most active group, with 19 new entities acquiring 12 properties, which represents 66.7% of all landlord purchases.

The data underscores a market driven by local, small-scale real estate investing, where new landlords are the primary source of demand and larger corporations are not a factor in new acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.7% of all investor-owned SFRs in Green County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of investment properties in Green County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale, local investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, control a near-total 99.7% of the entire investor-owned SFR housing stock.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no footprint in this market, with a 0.0% ownership share, challenging any narrative of large-scale corporate consolidation.

The foundation of the rental market is built on first-time or single-property investors. This tier alone accounts for 916 properties, representing 67.2% of all landlord-held homes, making it the most critical segment of the market.

The next largest tiers are also small in scale. Landlords with two properties hold 11.0% (150 properties), and those with 3-5 properties hold 16.4% (224 properties).

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented and decentralized market where the typical landlord is a local individual managing a small portfolio, not a large corporation.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, holding 66.7% of SFRs.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors control the overall market, ownership patterns shift significantly as portfolio sizes increase. Companies become the majority property holders in the 11-20 property tier, owning 66.7% of the homes in that specific segment.

In smaller tiers, individual ownership is nearly absolute. Individuals own 91.6% of single-property investor homes and 92.0% of two-property portfolios, establishing them as the entry point for real estate investment.

The 6-10 property tier acts as a clear transition point where corporate ownership structure becomes more common. In this tier, companies own 30 properties, a significant 43.5% share, compared to the 39 properties (56.5%) held by individuals.

This data illustrates a typical investor lifecycle: individuals start small, and as portfolios scale, the operational and legal benefits of a corporate structure lead to a crossover in ownership type.

Pricing comparisons between individual and company buyers within these tiers cannot be determined from the available data, but the structural shift is a clear indicator of growing sophistication with portfolio size.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 42743 zip code alone containing 1,065 properties.
Detailed Findings

Real estate investor ownership in Green County is extremely concentrated in a single area. The 42743 zip code is home to 1,065 investor-owned properties, representing a staggering 81.9% of the county's entire investor SFR portfolio.

While 42743 dominates by sheer volume, it is not the area with the highest penetration rate. That distinction belongs to the 42728 zip code, where investors own 50.0% of the single-family homes.

Other zip codes with high investor ownership rates include 42746 (35.4%) and 42764 (33.7%), indicating pockets of high investor density throughout the county.

The divergence between the top zip code by count (42743) and the top zip code by percentage (42728) illustrates a key market dynamic: one area attracts the most investment volume, while smaller, potentially distinct areas can have higher saturation.

This geographic breakdown shows investors are not evenly distributed but rather cluster in specific submarkets, with 42743 being the undeniable epicenter of activity and capital deployment in the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 25 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals a powerful and sustained trend of portfolio accumulation among landlords in Green County. In the first quarter of 2026, investors were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 25 properties while only selling one.

This behavior is not a recent development but a consistent pattern of growth. For the full year of 2025, landlords acquired 168 properties and sold just 13, resulting in a net gain of 155 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 13-to-1.

The pace of acquisition has remained robust and consistent over the past several years, with 141 properties bought versus only 8 sold in 2024, a ratio of over 17-to-1.

This relentless net buying activity signals strong confidence in the local rental market and indicates a long-term hold strategy is prevalent among the local investor base.

Data on institutional-level transactions or the percentage of trades occurring between landlords is not available for this market, but the overall trend is clear accumulation.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 64.1% of all Q1 2026 transactions, with 25 of 39 total sales.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords were a dominant force in the transaction market, participating in 25 of the 39 total SFR sales, which translates to a market share of 64.1%.

All of this investor activity originated from mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), with institutional firms completely absent from the transactional landscape for the quarter.

A clear inverse relationship between investor size and purchase price was observed among active buyers. The newest investors (single-property tier) paid the highest average price at $212,833 for their 19 transactions.

In contrast, more experienced small landlords in the 6-10 property tier acquired one home for just $58,000, suggesting they are targeting different types of properties, possibly those requiring rehabilitation, or are more adept at securing deep discounts.

The market for landlord-to-landlord sales is not very active. Only 2 of the 19 transactions (10.5%) by single-property investors were sourced from other landlords, indicating most acquisitions come from the traditional homeowner market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 99.7% of Investor Housing in Green County, Buying at a 34% Discount
Holdings
Investors own 1,300 SFR properties in Green County, representing a significant 32.6% of the market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 1,168 properties (89.8%), versus 155 (11.9%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties for 34.2% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average price of $183,083 compared to the homeowner average of $278,286.
Activity
Landlords drove market activity in Q1 2026, accounting for 64.1% of all transactions (25 of 39). In the prior quarter, the market saw 19 new single-property landlords emerge, signaling healthy growth from small investors.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) exert near-total control over the investor market, owning 99.7% of the housing stock. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in Green County.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the backbone of the market, but companies become the majority owners in larger portfolios, with the crossover point occurring at the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are firmly in an accumulation phase, acting as strong net buyers with a 25-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026. Institutional investors recorded no transaction activity.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Green County, KY, is fundamentally shaped by small, independent investors. Landlords own a substantial 1,300 properties, accounting for 32.6% of the county's total SFR stock. This ownership is highly fragmented and localized, with individual investors holding 89.8% of the properties. The market structure defies the national narrative of corporate consolidation, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.7% of investor-owned homes, while institutional firms have no presence.

Investor behavior underscores a confident, long-term strategy of accumulation. In Q1 2026, landlords drove 64.1% of all transactions and demonstrated a keen ability to find value, purchasing properties at a 34.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This aggressive acquisition is part of a sustained trend; investors acted as strong net buyers with a 25-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in the quarter. Interestingly, new market entrants in the single-property tier tend to pay higher prices, while more established small landlords secure properties for significantly less, pointing to a market that rewards experience.

The key takeaway for Green County is its character as a classic mom-and-pop market, driven by local capital and insulated from the trends affecting institutional investors. The market is defined by strong, consistent net buying, a focus on long-term rental holds financed primarily with cash, and deep geographic concentration, with one zip code (42743) housing over 80% of all investor properties. This creates a stable yet competitive environment where success is dictated by local knowledge and deal-finding skill rather than large-scale capital deployment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 05:46 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Green (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Green (KY) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ky-green/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.