Bee (TX) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bee (TX) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bee (TX)
6,439
Total Investors in Bee (TX)
1,757
Investor Owned SFR in Bee (TX)
1,826(28.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,534
SFR Owned
1,479
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
223
SFR Owned
371
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,826 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Bee County with 95% Ownership, Acquiring Properties at a 25% Discount
Investors own 28.4% of single-family homes in Bee County, TX, with small 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a staggering 95.4% of that portfolio versus just 0.2% for institutional investors. In the most recent quarter, landlords secured properties for 25.0% less than traditional homeowners and continued to be strong net buyers, while institutional investors have recently been net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,826 SFRs in Bee County, with individual landlords holding 81.0% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (1,565) versus being financed (261), indicating a market with high equity. Nearly all properties (1,758 of 1,826) are non-owner-occupied, confirming their use as rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties for 25.0% less than traditional homeowners, a $55,075 discount.
The significant price advantage for landlords has narrowed recently, down from a peak discount of 48.3% ($101,308) in Q2 2025. This trend suggests increasing competition or a shift in acquisition strategy.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 29.8% of all single-family homes sold in the fourth quarter, totaling 17 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove nearly all investor activity, accounting for 94.1% of landlord purchases (16 properties). Institutional investors made zero acquisitions in the same period.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 95.4% of all investor-owned housing in Bee County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 0.2% of the local investor portfolio (4 properties). Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, owning 1,156 properties or 60.8% of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners only in larger portfolios, crossing the 50% threshold at the 11-20 property tier.
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 87.8% of single-property holdings and 80.7% of two-property portfolios. The 11-20 property tier is the clear crossover point where corporate ownership structure (60.7%) becomes prevalent.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Bee County is highly concentrated, with zip code 78102 holding 1,450 investor properties.
While 78102 has the highest volume, other zip codes have higher saturation rates. Zip code 78391 has the highest investor ownership rate at 41.2%, followed by 78142 at 40.4%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Bee County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This trend of accumulation is consistent, with landlords also being strong net buyers in 2025 (142 buys vs. 41 sells) and 2024 (122 buys vs. 35 sells). In contrast, institutional investors were net sellers in 2025, divesting more properties than they acquired.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 24.7% of all single-family property transactions in the first quarter, totaling 20 transactions.
New investors entering the market paid the highest prices, with single-property landlords averaging $195,595 per purchase. In contrast, more established landlords in the 6-10 property tier paid just $28,000, suggesting they target different types of assets.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,826 SFRs in Bee County, with individual landlords holding 81.0% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Bee County, investors hold a significant 28.4% of the single-family residential market, totaling 1,826 properties out of 6,439 total SFRs. This demonstrates a substantial footprint for real estate investing in the local housing ecosystem.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 1,479 properties, or 81.0% of the investor-owned market. In contrast, company-owned portfolios account for just 371 properties (20.3%), challenging the narrative of a corporate-dominated rental landscape.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for all-cash holdings. A remarkable 1,565 investor-owned properties are held free and clear, compared to only 261 that are financed. This 6-to-1 cash-to-finance ratio suggests that investors in this area are well-capitalized and less reliant on leverage.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards rental income, with 1,758 properties classified as rented or non-owner-occupied. This high concentration confirms that the vast majority of these properties serve as housing for tenants rather than secondary homes for the owners.

The landlord base itself mirrors the property ownership split, with 1,534 individual landlords compared to 223 company landlords. This highlights that the market is supported by a large number of small, independent operators rather than a few large firms.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties for 25.0% less than traditional homeowners, a $55,075 discount.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Bee County demonstrate a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties in Q1 2026 for an average of $164,846, which is 25.0% below the $219,921 paid by traditional homeowners. This equates to a substantial average discount of $55,075 per property.

While still significant, the landlord discount has been tightening over the past year. The 25.0% gap in the latest quarter is considerably smaller than the discounts observed in 2025, which were 38.3% in Q3 ($84,716) and peaked at an extraordinary 48.3% in Q2 ($101,308).

This narrowing price gap may signal several market shifts. It could indicate that investors are facing more competition from retail buyers, that the availability of distressed or undervalued properties is shrinking, or that investors are targeting higher-quality assets that command prices closer to the market average.

The trend shows that while landlords maintain a strong negotiating position, their ability to secure deep discounts has diminished from the highs seen in the previous year. This reflects a potentially more competitive and normalized purchasing environment emerging in 2026.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 29.8% of all single-family homes sold in the fourth quarter, totaling 17 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a significant portion of the Bee County market in Q4, with landlords purchasing 17 of the 57 total SFRs sold, a market share of 29.8%. This robust activity underscores their role as a primary source of demand in the region.

The acquisition landscape is completely dominated by smaller investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 16 of the 17 investor purchases, representing 94.1% of investor activity. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had no recorded purchases, highlighting their absence from this market.

New market entrants were a key driver of this activity. The single-property tier alone saw 14 new entities acquire 11 properties, making up 64.7% of all landlord purchases. This signals a healthy influx of new, small-scale investors into the Bee County rental market.

Mid-size landlords played a minimal role in quarterly acquisitions, with only one purchase recorded in the 11-20 property tier. The focus remains squarely on the smallest operators, reinforcing the grassroots nature of investment in the area.

The data clearly shows that market momentum is being fueled by individuals and small operators entering the market or expanding small portfolios, not by large-scale corporate funds.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 95.4% of all investor-owned housing in Bee County.
Detailed Findings

The distribution of ownership in Bee County heavily favors small-scale investors, creating a highly decentralized market. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, collectively control a commanding 95.4% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

This finding decisively refutes any narrative of institutional dominance. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier hold a negligible 0.2% market share, owning just 4 properties in total. Their impact on the local rental stock is minimal compared to the thousands of properties held by small operators.

The backbone of the investor market is the single-property landlord. This tier alone accounts for 1,156 properties, representing 60.8% of all investor-owned SFRs. This indicates that the majority of landlords are individuals who have invested in a single rental property.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) also have a very small footprint, collectively owning just 4.3% of the investor portfolio. The market structure clearly shows that as portfolio size increases, the number of participating entities drops off dramatically.

Ultimately, the Bee County rental market is characterized by a widespread base of individual and small-portfolio owners, making it a quintessential example of a 'mom-and-pop' driven landscape.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners only in larger portfolios, crossing the 50% threshold at the 11-20 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Bee County shifts significantly with portfolio size. Individual investors are the undisputed leaders in smaller tiers, owning 87.8% of single-property portfolios and 83.6% of portfolios with 3-5 properties.

The pivot to corporate ownership occurs definitively in the 11-20 property tier. At this scale, companies own 34 properties (60.7%) compared to 22 properties (39.3%) owned by individuals. This suggests that the complexities and liability of managing a dozen or more properties often prompt the move to a formal business structure like an LLC.

Even as portfolio sizes grow, individual ownership persists. In the 6-10 property tier, ownership is nearly split, with individuals holding 53.8% and companies holding 46.2%, showing a gradual transition rather than an abrupt shift.

This tier-based analysis reveals a natural progression in investor strategy. Initial investments are typically made by individuals, while scaling into a mid-size portfolio often correlates with the adoption of a more formal, corporate ownership entity for asset protection and operational efficiency.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Bee County is highly concentrated, with zip code 78102 holding 1,450 investor properties.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor-owned properties in Bee County is exceptionally concentrated. A single zip code, 78102, is home to 1,450 properties, representing the vast majority of investor holdings in the county.

However, the areas with the highest volume are not necessarily the most saturated. The highest rate of investor ownership is found in zip code 78391, where investors own 41.2% of the single-family housing stock. This indicates a smaller market with a much deeper investor penetration.

Several other zip codes also show high investor saturation, including 78142 (40.4%), 78125 (40.0%), and 78146 (39.3%). These areas, while containing fewer properties overall, are defined by a high prevalence of rental homes relative to their total housing supply.

This contrast between high-count and high-percentage regions reveals different market dynamics. The concentration in 78102 points to a large, core rental market, while the high rates in smaller zip codes suggest niche areas that may be particularly attractive for rental property investment strategies.

Investors looking for opportunities can analyze this data to distinguish between markets with room for growth versus those that are already heavily saturated with rental properties.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Bee County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

The transactional data reveals a clear trend of portfolio growth among Bee County landlords, who are consistently net buyers. In the first quarter of 2026, they purchased 20 SFRs while selling only 5, a buy-to-sell ratio of 4-to-1 signaling strong accumulation.

This behavior is not a recent development. The net buying pattern was robust throughout the preceding two years. In 2025, landlords acquired 142 properties and sold 41 (a 3.5x ratio), and in 2024 they bought 122 while selling 35 (a 3.5x ratio).

A critical divergence appears when comparing the overall market to institutional investors. While the market as a whole is in acquisition mode, the 1,000+ property tier was a net seller in 2025, with 5 purchases overshadowed by 8 sales. This suggests a strategic retreat or portfolio rebalancing by the largest players.

The data paints a picture of a market where small, local investors are actively expanding their holdings and absorbing housing stock. Meanwhile, the very largest institutional players are showing signs of divestment, a trend that runs contrary to the broader market's direction.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 24.7% of all single-family property transactions in the first quarter, totaling 20 transactions.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords played a role in 20 of the 81 total SFR transactions, capturing 24.7% of all market activity. This solidifies their position as a consistent and significant source of housing transactions in Bee County.

Activity was driven entirely by mom-and-pop investors, who accounted for 19 of the 20 landlord transactions. Institutional investors logged zero transactions, underscoring their lack of active participation in the current market.

A striking pricing disparity exists between new and established investors. First-time landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $195,595 per property. Conversely, landlords in the 6-10 property tier spent an average of just $28,000, a nearly 7-fold price difference. This suggests new entrants may be buying turnkey properties at retail prices, while experienced investors are targeting distressed assets or off-market deals.

Inter-landlord trading is minimal, indicating that investors are primarily acquiring property from the general public. Among the most active tier (single-property), only 7.1% of their purchases (1 of 14) came from another landlord, showing the market is not a closed loop of investor-to-investor sales.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 95.4% of Bee County's investor market, acquiring properties as net buyers while institutions retreat.
Holdings
In Bee County, TX, investors own 1,826 single-family residences, representing 28.4% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (1,479 properties, 81.0%) versus companies (371 properties, 20.3%).
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated a significant pricing advantage in Q1 2026, paying an average of $164,846, which is 25.0% less than the $219,921 paid by traditional homeowners.
Activity
Investors accounted for 29.8% of all Q4 purchases, an activity driven almost exclusively by small landlords. During the quarter, 14 new single-property landlords entered the market, signaling strong grassroots growth.
Market Share
The market is dominated by small landlords (1-10 properties), who control 95.4% of all investor-owned housing. In sharp contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold a mere 0.2% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the bedrock of the market, but companies become the majority owners for portfolios in the 11-20 property tier, indicating a strategic shift to corporate structures as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Landlords are firmly in accumulation mode with a 4-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (20 buys vs. 5 sells). Conversely, institutional investors were net sellers in 2025, signaling a potential divestment strategy.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Bee County, Texas, is a story of widespread, small-scale ownership, not corporate consolidation. Investors hold a significant 28.4% of the county's single-family homes, totaling 1,826 properties. This market is overwhelmingly controlled by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who own a staggering 95.4% of all investor-held housing. Individual investors make up the vast majority of these owners, holding 81.0% of the properties. In stark contrast, institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a negligible footprint, controlling just 0.2% of the portfolio. This structure highlights a decentralized and grassroots rental market built by local operators.

Investor behavior reinforces this narrative. Landlords are active and aggressive net buyers, acquiring four properties for every one they sold in the most recent quarter and capturing nearly a third of all market purchases. They operate with a clear pricing advantage, securing homes for 25.0% less than traditional homebuyers in Q1. This activity is fueled by an influx of new participants, with 14 new single-property landlords entering the market in a single quarter. While the overall investor community is expanding its holdings, the largest institutional players are moving in the opposite direction, having been net sellers in 2025.

The key takeaway from this market report is that the health and direction of the Bee County rental market are dictated by the decisions of thousands of small investors, not a handful of large corporations. The divergence in strategy, with small landlords accumulating properties while institutions divest, suggests different outlooks on the market's future. This dynamic creates opportunities for local investors who can leverage market knowledge to acquire properties at a significant discount, continuing the trend of a highly fragmented and locally-controlled rental housing supply.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 03:10 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Bee (TX)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Bee (TX) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tx-bee/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.