Daggett (UT) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Daggett (UT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Daggett (UT)
673
Total Investors in Daggett (UT)
882
Investor Owned SFR in Daggett (UT)
546(81.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
805
SFR Owned
529
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
77
SFR Owned
75
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 546 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Daggett County's Investor Market: 81% Ownership, Zero Recent Activity
Investors own a staggering 81.1% of all Single-Family Residential properties in Daggett County, a portfolio of 546 homes. This market is almost entirely controlled by individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords (99.8%), with zero recorded investor purchases or sales in Q4 2025, indicating a complete lack of market liquidity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 546 SFRs, with individuals holding 96.9% of the portfolio.
All 546 investor-owned properties were acquired with cash, as none are currently financed. The entire portfolio of 546 properties is classified as non-owner-occupied, reflecting a 100% rental or second-home focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No Q4 2025 pricing data is available due to zero landlord or homeowner transactions.
A lack of recent sales activity prevents any analysis of price trends or the comparison between landlord and homeowner acquisition costs. The complete absence of transactions is the most significant finding for this period.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of market activity.
With no acquisitions, both mom-and-pop landlords and institutional investors had a 0.0% share of purchase activity. No new single-property landlords entered the market this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Pricing analysis by tier is unavailable due to a lack of recent transactions. The market features a single property classified under an institutional owner, representing 0.2% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners in every tier, holding 100% in the 3-5 property bracket.
Companies do not achieve majority ownership at any tier. In the largest active tier (two-property), individuals own 91.7% of properties (44 homes).
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in two zip codes, with 84046 holding 445 properties.
Both zip codes in Daggett County have extremely high investor ownership rates. The 84046 zip code has an 83.3% rate, while 84023 has a 72.7% rate.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available, preventing analysis of market liquidity.
The absence of buy/sell data means the net buyer or seller status of landlords cannot be determined. It is also impossible to track transaction volume trends over time.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of the 0 total market transactions in Q4 2025.
With no transactions, purchase prices across all tiers were $0. There was no inter-landlord trading activity during the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 546 SFRs, with individuals holding 96.9% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Daggett County, investors own 546 of the 673 total Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing an exceptionally high market penetration of 81.1%.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the market, holding 529 properties, which is 96.9% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. In contrast, company-owned properties number just 75, or 13.7% of the total, though this implies some properties are co-owned by both individuals and companies.

A defining feature of this market is its financing structure: 100% of the 546 investor-owned homes are cash properties. This complete absence of financed properties suggests a market of high-equity owners not reliant on leverage for their holdings.

The entire investor portfolio of 546 properties is non-owner-occupied, indicating every property is intended for rental income or as a second home, reinforcing the investment-focused nature of ownership in the county.

The ownership structure is highly fragmented, with 882 distinct landlord entities for 546 properties. Individual landlords (805) vastly outnumber company landlords (77), a ratio of more than 10 to 1, highlighting a landscape defined by small-scale real estate investing.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No Q4 2025 pricing data is available due to zero landlord or homeowner transactions.
Detailed Findings

Analysis of acquisition pricing for Q4 2025 is not possible for Daggett County, as there were no recorded SFR transactions for either landlords or traditional homeowners during this period.

The absence of sales data makes it impossible to calculate any price gap between investor and homeowner purchases, a key metric for understanding market dynamics in other regions.

Without recent transactions, it is not possible to establish current market valuation trends or compare them against historical periods like 2024 or the 2020-2023 boom years.

The lack of market activity is the most critical insight, suggesting a highly illiquid market where properties are tightly held and transactions are rare.

This data gap highlights a market characterized by long-term holds rather than active trading, distinguishing Daggett County from more dynamic real estate environments.

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of market activity.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity in Daggett County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with zero SFR properties acquired by landlords. This represents 0.0% of the total 0 market purchases.

The market pause was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) both recorded zero purchases for the quarter.

No new landlords entered the market in Q4 2025. The count for new single-property (Tier 01) entities purchasing homes was zero, indicating no new small-scale investment during this period.

The lack of acquisitions points to a period of market stabilization or stagnation, with no new capital being deployed into SFR properties by the investor community.

This halt in activity contrasts sharply with the high overall ownership rate, suggesting that while Daggett County is an investor-heavy market, it is not currently a market for active acquisition.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Daggett County is almost entirely composed of small-scale owners. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, control 99.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the foundation of the market, owning 504 properties, which constitutes 88.4% of the entire investor portfolio on their own.

The next tiers show a steep drop-off: two-property owners hold 46 properties (8.1%), and those with 3-5 properties hold just 18 (3.2%).

Institutional ownership is statistically insignificant, with a single property (0.2% of the total) falling into the 1,000+ property tier. This is likely an anomaly in the data rather than a sign of a true institutional presence.

The extreme concentration in the smallest tiers underscores that the Daggett County investment market is driven by individuals and families, not large corporations. The complete findings can be seen in the property ownership by owner type report.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors are the dominant owners in every tier, holding 100% in the 3-5 property bracket.
Detailed Findings

Individual landlords maintain majority control across all significant portfolio sizes in Daggett County, reinforcing their market dominance. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners.

In the largest segment, single-property owners, individuals hold 484 properties (87.4%) compared to 70 properties (12.6%) for companies.

The dominance of individual owners is even more pronounced in larger portfolios. In the two-property tier, individuals own 44 of 48 properties (91.7%), and they own all 18 properties (100%) in the 3-5 property tier.

This ownership pattern defies the typical trend seen in other markets, where company ownership increases significantly with portfolio size. Here, even as portfolios grow, they remain under individual ownership.

The minimal corporate presence suggests that investors in this area prefer direct ownership rather than using legal entities like LLCs for their holdings, which could be related to the nature of the properties (e.g., vacation homes).

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in two zip codes, with 84046 holding 445 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Daggett County is highly concentrated geographically, with the vast majority of properties located in the 84046 zip code, which contains 445 investor-owned homes.

The second zip code, 84023, accounts for the remaining 101 investor-owned properties, showing a clear geographic preference within the county.

Both regions exhibit exceptionally high investor penetration rates. In 84046, 83.3% of all SFRs are investor-owned, a rate that signals a market dominated by non-owner-occupiers.

Similarly, the 84023 zip code shows a 72.7% investor ownership rate, further confirming that this is a county-wide phenomenon, not just an isolated pocket.

The data reveals a market where both the highest count of investor properties and the highest ownership percentages are found in the same areas, indicating a uniform and deeply penetrated investor landscape.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available, preventing analysis of market liquidity.
Detailed Findings

A complete lack of historical transaction data for Daggett County prevents any analysis of buying and selling behavior among landlords.

It is impossible to determine if landlords have historically been net buyers or net sellers, as there are no transaction counts to calculate a buy/sell ratio.

Analysis of inter-landlord trading is not feasible. The percentage of transactions that occur between investors, a key indicator of market maturity, cannot be measured.

Similarly, institutional investor (1,000+ tier) transaction patterns cannot be assessed, though their minimal ownership presence suggests their trading activity would be negligible.

The primary insight from this section is the opacity and illiquidity of the market, where assessor data shows ownership is stable and transactional velocity is extremely low or non-existent.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of the 0 total market transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, the transaction market in Daggett County was dormant, with zero total SFR transactions recorded. Consequently, landlords' share of market transactions was 0.0%.

No transaction volume was observed across any investor tier, from single-property owners to the largest portfolios. All tiers recorded zero buys and zero sells.

Average purchase prices are not applicable, as no properties were purchased. The average price for every tier was effectively $0 for the quarter.

There was no inter-landlord trading activity. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was zero, reflecting the overall lack of market movement.

The complete absence of transactions is the definitive story of the quarter, highlighting a market that is entirely buy-and-hold with no current liquidity.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Investors own 81.1% of Daggett County's housing but Q4 2025 market activity was zero
Holdings
Landlords own 546 of the 673 SFR properties in Daggett County, an 81.1% market penetration rate. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 529 properties (96.9%), while companies own just 75 (13.7%).
Pricing
Pricing analysis is unavailable for Q4 2025, as zero transactions were recorded for either landlords or traditional homeowners, indicating a complete halt in market activity.
Activity
There was no investor purchase activity in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0 properties and accounting for 0.0% of all sales. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-absolute control, owning 99.8% of all investor housing. Institutional investors hold just a single property, representing only 0.2% of the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, including 100% of portfolios with 3-5 properties. There is no crossover point where companies gain a majority stake.
Transactions
No buy or sell transactions were recorded for any landlord type in Q4 2025. This lack of data prevents the calculation of a buy/sell ratio, confirming the market's current illiquidity.
Market Narrative

The real estate market in Daggett County, UT, presents a unique case of extreme investor saturation combined with minimal market activity. Investors own a remarkable 546 of the 673 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, an 81.1% market penetration that is exceptionally high. This landscape is not driven by corporations; instead, it is controlled by 805 individual landlords who own 96.9% of the investor portfolio. The structure is hyper-fragmented, with 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties) controlling a near-total 99.8% of holdings, while institutional ownership is virtually non-existent at just 0.2%.

Investor behavior in Daggett County is characterized by a buy-and-hold strategy, evidenced by a complete lack of transactions in Q4 2025. There were zero purchases by investors and zero sales in the broader market, making it impossible to analyze pricing or compare investor purchasing power against homeowners. All 546 investor-owned properties are held free and clear with no financing, suggesting a market of high-equity individuals who are not motivated by short-term gains or subject to interest rate pressures. This results in a highly illiquid market where assets rarely change hands.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that Daggett County is a closed, stable ecosystem of long-term holds, likely dominated by second homes or vacation properties rather than a traditional rental market. The high ownership concentration and lack of recent activity signal a market with significant barriers to entry for new investors and limited opportunities for existing ones to divest. For anyone analyzing the U.S. housing market, Daggett County serves as a powerful example of how high investor ownership does not always correlate with high market dynamism or liquidity.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 04:25 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Daggett (UT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Daggett (UT) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ut-daggett/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.