Gregg (TX) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Gregg (TX) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Gregg (TX)
33,264
Total Investors in Gregg (TX)
5,643
Investor Owned SFR in Gregg (TX)
6,417(19.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,695
SFR Owned
4,380
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
948
SFR Owned
2,119
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 6,417 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Gregg County with 87.3% ownership, securing 34% discounts on acquisitions.
Investors own 19.3% of the single-family homes in Gregg County, with small landlords controlling a vast 87.3% of that portfolio versus a mere 0.2% for institutions. In the most recent quarter, landlords purchased 19.5% of all homes sold, paying 34.0% less than traditional homeowners and continuing a trend of aggressive net buying.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 6,417 SFRs in Gregg County, with individuals holding a 68.3% majority.
Cash ownership far outweighs financing, with 4,571 properties owned outright compared to 1,846 that are financed. The vast majority of the portfolio, 6,222 properties (96.9%), are actively utilized as rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 34.0% discount in Q1, paying $99,394 less than homeowners.
The landlord discount has fluctuated significantly, from a massive 48.8% ($154,408) in Q2 2025 to just 6.3% ($17,087) in Q1 2025, before settling at 34.0% in the latest quarter.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 19.5% of all SFRs sold in the last quarter, purchasing 78 homes.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) drove the activity, accounting for 63 properties, or 80.8% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors acquired just 4 properties (5.1%).
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a massive 87.3% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a tiny ownership footprint at just 0.2% (12 properties). However, their recent purchasing activity (5.1% of Q4 buys) suggests they are actively expanding their local portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 70.7% of homes.
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 85.7% of single-property holdings. The ownership flips decisively in the 6-10 property tier, where companies own over two-thirds of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in three zip codes: 75602, 75604, and 75601.
The zip code 75606 shows a 100% investor ownership rate, a statistical anomaly. The highest mainstream rate is in 75602 at 27.9%, where investors own 1,302 properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers in Q1, acquiring 2.26 properties for every one they sold.
Institutional investors are also net buyers in Q1 (7 buys vs 4 sells), a reversal from 2024 when they were net sellers. Overall landlord buying volume has slowed, with 97 purchases in Q1 compared to 135 in Q3 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 18.2% of all Q1 transactions, with 97 purchases.
Institutional investors paid 8.7% less than new single-property landlords ($199,570 vs $218,537). Small landlords in the 3-5 property tier were most likely to buy from other investors, with 36.4% of their purchases coming from existing landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 6,417 SFRs in Gregg County, with individuals holding a 68.3% majority.
Detailed Findings

In Gregg County, investors hold a significant 19.3% share of the single-family residential market, owning 6,417 of the 33,264 total SFR properties.

Individual investors are the primary force, owning 4,380 properties, which constitutes 68.3% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. Company-owned properties account for the remaining 2,119 homes (33.0%).

The landlord landscape is composed of 4,695 individual entities and 948 company entities, a nearly 5-to-1 ratio that underscores the prevalence of small-scale real estate investing in the region.

A high-equity, low-leverage strategy is evident, as 71.2% of investor-owned properties (4,571) are held in cash, compared to just 28.8% (1,846) that are financed.

The portfolio is overwhelmingly focused on providing rental housing, with 6,222 properties (96.9%) classified as rented, confirming their active role in the local housing market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 34.0% discount in Q1, paying $99,394 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Gregg County demonstrate a significant pricing advantage, paying an average of $192,755 in Q1 2026, which is 34.0% less than the $292,149 paid by traditional homeowners.

This price gap translates to an average discount of $99,394 per property, indicating that investors are highly effective at sourcing deals below the typical retail market rate.

The price advantage for landlords has been volatile, peaking at an extraordinary 48.8% discount ($154,408) in Q2 2025 and hitting a low of 6.3% ($17,087) in Q1 2025, suggesting market conditions heavily influence their acquisition strategy.

Recent landlord acquisition prices of $192,755 are slightly below the average of $204,514 seen during the 2020-2023 pandemic-era boom, signaling a more disciplined pricing environment.

The consistent ability to purchase at a deep discount suggests that investors are likely targeting distressed properties, off-market opportunities, or portfolios not available to the general public.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 19.5% of all SFRs sold in the last quarter, purchasing 78 homes.
Detailed Findings

In the most recent quarter of activity (Q4 2025), landlords captured a 19.5% share of the market, purchasing 78 of the 401 SFR properties sold in Gregg County.

Small-scale investors were the primary engine of this activity, with mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) responsible for 63 acquisitions, a commanding 80.8% of the investor total.

The market continues to attract new participants, with 51 new single-property landlord entities entering the market and acquiring 42 properties, underscoring the accessibility of local real estate.

Institutional buyers (1,000+ properties) had a very limited presence, purchasing only 4 homes, which amounts to just 5.1% of landlord activity and challenges the narrative of large corporate dominance.

Activity was concentrated in the smallest tier, where single-property landlords alone bought 42 properties, representing 53.8% of all investor purchases for the quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a massive 87.3% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Gregg County is overwhelmingly dominated by small landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a combined 87.3% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the rental market, owning 3,641 properties alone, which accounts for 54.7% of the entire investor portfolio.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties own just 12 homes in the county. This represents a minuscule 0.2% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Mid-size investors (owning 11-1,000 properties) hold the remaining 12.5% of the portfolio, serving as a bridge between the smallest and largest operators.

Despite their tiny current holdings (0.2%), institutional players accounted for 5.1% of landlord purchases in the last quarter. This mismatch signals a clear strategic intent to increase their market share in Gregg County.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 70.7% of homes.
Detailed Findings

A distinct crossover point from individual to corporate ownership occurs as portfolios scale. In the 6-10 property tier, companies own 415 homes (70.7%), marking the first level where they hold a clear majority.

Individual investors are the undisputed leaders in smaller portfolios, owning 85.7% of all single-property holdings (3,155 homes) and 73.2% of two-property portfolios.

The 3-5 property tier acts as a transition zone where ownership is more balanced, with individuals still holding a slight majority at 59.8% before the corporate shift.

Beyond the crossover point, company ownership becomes the standard. Companies own 69.5% of properties in the 11-20 tier and 68.0% in the 21-50 tier.

This trend suggests that as operational complexity increases with portfolio size, investors gravitate toward corporate structures like LLCs for liability protection and streamlined management.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in three zip codes: 75602, 75604, and 75601.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Gregg County is geographically concentrated, with three zip codes holding the largest portfolios: 75602 (1,302 properties), 75604 (1,301 properties), and 75601 (1,051 properties).

Zip code 75606 is an outlier with a 100.0% investor ownership rate, which may point to a build-to-rent community or a unique commercial-to-residential land use classification.

Among more traditional zip codes, 75602 has the highest investor penetration rate at 27.9%, meaning more than one in every four homes is investor-owned. This is followed closely by 75647 (25.6%) and 75601 (24.9%).

The data reveals a distinction between high-volume and high-percentage areas. For example, 75604 has the second-highest count of investor properties but a more moderate ownership rate of 17.3%, indicating it is a larger overall housing market.

This geographic clustering allows investors to build operational density, potentially leading to more efficient property management and better market intelligence in targeted submarkets.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords remain strong net buyers in Q1, acquiring 2.26 properties for every one they sold.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Gregg County are consistently in an accumulation phase. In Q1 2026, they demonstrated strong net buying behavior, purchasing 97 properties while selling only 43, for a buy-to-sell ratio of 2.26.

This net positive acquisition trend is not new; in 2025, landlords maintained a 2.48 ratio (445 buys vs. 179 sells), and in 2024, the ratio was even higher at 3.13 (523 buys vs. 167 sells).

Institutional investors have pivoted their strategy. After being net sellers in 2024 (3 buys vs. 4 sells), they have since become net buyers, acquiring 20 properties versus 9 sales in 2025 and continuing the trend with 7 buys versus 4 sales in Q1 2026.

However, the overall pace of acquisitions has moderated recently. The 97 purchases in Q1 2026 represent a slowdown from the 135 seen in Q3 2025, suggesting a more selective purchasing environment.

The sustained net buying across all investor types signals strong long-term confidence in the local rental market and directly contributes to a tighter for-sale inventory for traditional homebuyers.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 18.2% of all Q1 transactions, with 97 purchases.
Detailed Findings

In Q1, landlords were a significant force in the market, responsible for 97 of the 532 total SFR transactions, which translates to an 18.2% market share of all purchases.

A clear pricing advantage emerges with investor scale. Institutional investors paid an average of $199,570 per property, 8.7% less than the $218,537 average paid by first-time, single-property landlords.

Despite paying higher prices, mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) dominated transaction volume, executing 75 of the 97 landlord purchases (77.3%) in the quarter.

Small, established landlords are the most active in the investor-to-investor marketplace. Those in the 3-5 property tier sourced 36.4% of their acquisitions from other landlords, highlighting a liquid secondary market for rental assets.

Institutional buyers also participated in this secondary market, sourcing 28.6% of their acquisitions from other landlords, while new single-property investors sourced 21.2% of their deals from existing landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Gregg County with 87.3% ownership as landlords secure 34% discounts.
Holdings
Investors own 6,417 SFR properties, representing 19.3% of the market in Gregg County, with individual investors holding a 68.3% majority (4,380 properties) over companies at 33.0% (2,119 properties).
Pricing
In Q1, landlords paid an average of $192,755, securing properties at a 34.0% discount compared to traditional homeowners ($292,149), a savings of $99,394 per home.
Activity
Landlords acquired 19.5% of all SFRs sold in the last quarter (78 properties), with activity led by 51 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market, owning 87.3% of all investor-held SFRs, while large institutional investors own a minimal 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners once a portfolio grows to the 6-10 property tier, where they own 70.7% of the homes.
Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in Q1, acquiring 2.26 homes for every one sold (97 buys vs 43 sells), a trend followed by institutional investors who also expanded their portfolios (7 buys vs 4 sells).
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Gregg County is defined by the dominance of small, local investors, not large-scale corporations. Investors collectively own 6,417 homes, a significant 19.3% of the county's total SFR stock. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control a staggering 87.3% of all investor-owned properties. In contrast, institutional investors own a mere 0.2%. The ownership structure is primarily individual-based (68.3%) rather than corporate, further cementing the image of a market driven by local entrepreneurs.

Investor activity remains robust, as seen in the latest quarter where they purchased 19.5% of all homes sold. This activity is fueled by a continuous influx of new entrants, with 51 new single-property landlords joining the market. A key driver of this behavior is the ability to acquire properties at a deep discount; in Q1, landlords paid 34.0% less than traditional homebuyers. This pricing advantage enables a consistent strategy of portfolio growth, with landlords across all tiers acting as strong net buyers, acquiring 2.26 properties for every one they sold in the first quarter.

The key takeaway from these market reports is that the Gregg County housing market is heavily influenced by a large, fragmented base of small investors who are adept at finding value and are consistently growing their holdings. While institutional players are showing signs of increasing their stake, their current impact is minimal. This dynamic creates a competitive environment for traditional homebuyers, who often compete against cash-heavy investors able to purchase properties far below the average retail price. It also signals a healthy, accessible market for new investors looking to enter the rental space.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 03:34 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Gregg (TX)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Gregg (TX) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tx-gregg/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.