Lincoln (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lincoln (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lincoln (ID)
1,238
Total Investors in Lincoln (ID)
615
Investor Owned SFR in Lincoln (ID)
448(36.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
590
SFR Owned
434
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
25
SFR Owned
25
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 448 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Investors Dominate Lincoln County, Owning 36% of Homes with Zero Institutional Presence
In Lincoln County, ID, investors own 448 SFR properties (36.2% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 98.9% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords reversed historical trends by paying a 43.4% premium over homeowners, while 2025 data shows they were aggressive net buyers with a 9.33x buy-to-sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 448 SFR properties (36.2% of the market), with individuals holding 96.9%.
Investors show strong financial positioning, with cash purchases outnumbering financed properties by more than 3 to 1 (353 cash vs. 95 financed). The portfolio is almost entirely rental-focused, with 446 of 448 properties being rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a surprising 43.4% premium in Q1 2026, averaging $486,447 per property.
This represents a dramatic reversal from previous quarters, where landlords enjoyed discounts as high as 94.3% in Q2 2025. In Q1 2026, landlords paid $147,207 more than traditional homeowners.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 23.5% of all SFR properties sold in the most recent quarter.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100% of these landlord purchases. All 4 properties were acquired by new or single-property landlords, with zero activity from institutional buyers.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 98.9% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 80.1% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors have zero presence, owning 0.0% of properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate every portfolio tier, with no crossover point to company majority.
Companies hold a minimal 4.7% of single-property portfolios and only 14.6% of two-property portfolios, their highest share. Individuals own 100% of properties in the 3-5 and 11-20 property tiers.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 83352 holding 313 investor-owned properties.
Zip code 83349 has the highest investor saturation among larger areas at 50.0%, while 83347 shows 100% investor ownership on a single property.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were aggressive net buyers in 2025, acquiring 28 properties while selling only 3.
This activity resulted in a strong buy-to-sell ratio of 9.3 to 1, signaling a period of rapid portfolio accumulation. No institutional transactions were recorded.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 28.6% of all SFR transactions in the most recent quarter.
All 6 landlord transactions were conducted by single-property investors, who paid an average of $486,447. Notably, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 448 SFR properties (36.2% of the market), with individuals holding 96.9%.
Detailed Findings

In Lincoln County, ID, investors hold a significant 36.2% of the Single Family Residential (SFR) market, totaling 448 properties out of 1,238 available.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual "mom-and-pop" investors, who own 434 properties, constituting 96.9% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

Company ownership is minimal, with just 25 properties, representing only 5.6% of the investor-held SFRs in the county.

A strong preference for cash acquisitions is evident, with 353 properties owned outright compared to just 95 that are financed. This 3.7-to-1 ratio of cash-to-financed properties indicates a well-capitalized investor base.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards rental income, as 446 of the 448 investor-owned properties are designated as rented, demonstrating a 99.6% rental focus.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a surprising 43.4% premium in Q1 2026, averaging $486,447 per property.
Detailed Findings

In a striking reversal of typical market behavior, landlords in Lincoln County paid a significant premium for properties in Q1 2026. The average acquisition price for an investor was $486,447, which is 43.4% higher than the $339,240 paid by traditional homeowners.

This $147,207 premium per property in the first quarter of 2026 marks a sharp departure from the deep discounts seen throughout 2025. For example, investors secured a 39.3% discount in Q3 2025 and an extraordinary 94.3% discount in Q2 2025.

The drastic shift from a market where landlords paid $427,661 less than homeowners (Q2 2025) to one where they are paying $147,207 more suggests a potential shift in inventory quality, intense competition for specific assets, or an anomaly driven by very low transaction volume.

Despite a complete lack of landlord purchase activity recorded in most recent quarters, the Q1 2026 data points to a highly opportunistic or targeted acquisition strategy that defies the usual pattern of purchasing below market value.

The volatility in the landlord-homeowner price gap, swinging from a 94.3% discount to a 43.4% premium within a year, highlights the unique and perhaps illiquid nature of the Lincoln County investment market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 23.5% of all SFR properties sold in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 23.5% of the SFR market in the latest quarter, with landlords purchasing 4 of the 17 total properties sold in Lincoln County.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by small-scale investors. All 4 properties were acquired by "mom-and-pop" landlords in the single-property tier, reaffirming their role as the exclusive drivers of market growth.

This quarter saw the entry of 6 new landlord entities into the market, all of whom purchased their first investment property, indicating fresh interest in Lincoln County's rental market.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had no presence in the market, recording zero purchases and holding no properties, underscoring the county's isolation from large-scale corporate real estate investing.

The concentration of all acquisitions within the smallest investor tier signals a grassroots-level market dynamic, free from the influence of mid-size or institutional capital.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 98.9% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Lincoln County is completely defined by small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) controlling 98.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, owning 378 properties, which accounts for 80.1% of the total investor portfolio. This highlights the market's dependence on new and small investors.

The ownership concentration at the small end of the spectrum is extreme. The top four tiers (1-10 properties) collectively own 467 of the 472 investor properties for which tier data is available.

In stark contrast to national trends, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have absolutely no footprint in Lincoln County, with 0.0% ownership.

Even mid-size investors are virtually nonexistent. Only 5 properties are owned by landlords with portfolios larger than 10 units, reinforcing the county's character as an exclusively small-investor market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate every portfolio tier, with no crossover point to company majority.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority ownership across every single investor tier in Lincoln County, a clear indicator of a market driven by personal capital rather than corporate entities.

There is no "crossover point" where companies become the dominant owner type. Even in the two-property tier, individuals own 85.4% of the properties (35 properties), with companies holding just 14.6% (6 properties).

Company ownership is most prevalent in the single-property (4.7%) and two-property (14.6%) tiers, but their presence diminishes entirely in larger portfolios like the 3-5 and 11-20 property tiers, where individuals hold 100%.

This ownership structure, where individuals represent over 95% of single-property landlords and maintain control even as portfolios grow, is characteristic of a rural or semi-rural market without significant corporate investment.

The complete absence of company ownership in several mid-size tiers suggests that scaling as a corporate entity is not a common or perhaps viable strategy in Lincoln County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 83352 holding 313 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Lincoln County is geographically concentrated, with a single zip code, 83352, accounting for 313 of the 448 investor-owned properties, or nearly 70% of the total portfolio.

Certain pockets exhibit extremely high investor penetration rates. Zip code 83349 has a 50.0% investor ownership rate, with 109 out of 218 properties held by investors.

The most extreme example of saturation is in the small zip code of 83347, where the single SFR property is investor-owned, resulting in a 100.0% rate.

The top two zip codes by investor count, 83352 and 83349, together contain 422 properties, representing 94.2% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county, demonstrating a hyper-localized investment strategy.

This pattern of concentration suggests that investors are targeting very specific communities or neighborhoods within Lincoln County, rather than a broad, county-wide approach.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords were aggressive net buyers in 2025, acquiring 28 properties while selling only 3.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Lincoln County demonstrated a strong appetite for accumulation throughout 2025, acting as decisive net buyers in the market.

Transaction data for 2025 shows landlords purchased 28 SFR properties while only selling 3, resulting in a net gain of 25 properties to their portfolios.

This calculates to a buy-to-sell ratio of 9.33, indicating that for every property an investor sold, more than nine were acquired. This signifies strong confidence in the local rental market.

Consistent with their 0% ownership stake, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) recorded zero buy or sell transactions, playing no role in the market's transactional activity.

The high net buyer status among the existing investor base points to a phase of expansion and market consolidation, driven entirely by smaller, individual operators.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 28.6% of all SFR transactions in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords participated in 6 of the 21 total SFR transactions, capturing a 28.6% share of market activity in Lincoln County.

The entirety of this investor activity was driven by the smallest players, with 100% of the 6 transactions executed by single-property landlords. This highlights the market's reliance on new entrants.

These new or small investors paid an average price of $486,447, a figure significantly higher than homeowner prices for the same period, suggesting they may have targeted premium properties.

A key finding is that 0% of these purchases were from other landlords. This indicates that investors are acquiring properties from the traditional market (homeowners) rather than trading assets among themselves, signaling pure market expansion.

With no activity from mid-size or institutional tiers, the transactional market mirrors the ownership structure: exclusively driven by mom-and-pop investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Lincoln County with 99% ownership, as landlords capture 36.2% of all SFR housing.
Holdings
Landlords own 448 SFR properties, representing a high 36.2% of Lincoln County's market. The portfolio is almost entirely controlled by individual investors, who hold 434 properties (96.9%), while companies own just 25 (5.6%).
Pricing
In a surprising Q1 2026 reversal, landlords paid a 43.4% premium over homeowners, with an average price of $486,447 compared to the homeowner average of $339,240.
Activity
Landlords purchased 23.5% of all SFRs sold last quarter (4 properties), with 100% of this activity driven by new, single-property landlords.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control 98.9% of all investor housing in the county. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes, owning over 85% of properties in every tier. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owner.
Transactions
In 2025, landlords were aggressive net buyers with a 9.33x buy/sell ratio (28 buys vs 3 sells), signaling strong portfolio growth. Institutional investors recorded no transactions.
Market Narrative

Lincoln County, Idaho presents a market uniquely dominated by small, individual investors. Landlords own a substantial 36.2% of all single-family homes, a portfolio of 448 properties. This ownership is overwhelmingly grassroots, with individual investors controlling 434 properties (96.9%) compared to a mere 25 held by companies. The market structure is defined by "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties), who control 98.9% of the investor-owned housing stock, while institutional-scale investors have no presence whatsoever. This composition, detailed in comprehensive market reports, points to a market operating entirely outside the trends of corporate real estate consolidation.

Recent investor behavior reveals both aggressive accumulation and anomalous pricing. In 2025, landlords were strong net buyers, acquiring properties at more than nine times the rate they sold them. In the most recent quarter, they captured 23.5% of all purchases, with every single acquisition made by a new or single-property landlord. However, these investors paid a steep 43.4% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, a stark reversal from deep discounts seen in prior periods. This suggests intense competition for a very limited supply of desirable rental properties.

The key takeaway from Lincoln County is the portrait of a hyper-localized and saturated small investor market. The high 36.2% investor penetration rate, combined with 99% mom-and-pop control and zero institutional footprint, signals a mature, self-contained ecosystem. The recent price premium paid by new investors could indicate that the barrier to entry is rising, as newcomers must pay above market rate to secure a foothold. This dynamic makes Lincoln County a fascinating case study of a market shaped exclusively by individual capital and local demand.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 02:44 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Lincoln (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Lincoln (ID) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-id-lincoln/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.