Macoupin (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Macoupin (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Macoupin (IL)
16,576
Total Investors in Macoupin (IL)
3,810
Investor Owned SFR in Macoupin (IL)
3,395(20.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,556
SFR Owned
2,955
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
254
SFR Owned
494
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,395 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Macoupin County, Securing 16.5% Price Discount as Net Buying Accelerates
In Macoupin County, investors own 20.5% of single-family homes, with small 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a staggering 93.0% of that portfolio while institutional presence is nearly zero. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties at a 16.5% discount compared to homeowners and accelerated their portfolio growth, buying 6.86 homes for every one sold.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,395 SFR properties in Macoupin County, with individuals holding 87.0%.
The majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (2,442) versus financed (953). The portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 3,285 of 3,395 properties (96.8%) classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 16.5% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, a discount of $35,288 per property.
The landlord pricing advantage has reversed dramatically; investors paid premiums as high as 14.9% in Q2 2025 before securing the current discount. Property values have appreciated significantly, with the 2025 average landlord price ($188,589) up 39.8% from the 2020-2023 average ($134,889).
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors purchased 38.8% of all SFR properties sold in Macoupin County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove nearly all activity, accounting for 97.4% of investor purchases. New, single-property investors alone acquired 33 of the 38 properties (86.8%), while institutional investors bought only one.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 93.0% of all landlord-owned SFRs in Macoupin County.
Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just one property, or 0.0% of the investor market. Single-property landlords are the dominant force, alone accounting for 2,449 properties, a 69.6% share.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners for portfolios over 100 properties.
Individuals own 93.6% of single-property portfolios and 78.1% of 3-5 property portfolios. The 21-50 property tier represents a transition point, with ownership split almost evenly between individuals (51.0%) and companies (49.0%).
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip code 62033, with 471 properties and a 24.4% ownership rate.
The top three zip codes (62033, 2069, and 62014) collectively hold 966 investor-owned properties. Several smaller zip codes, like 62683 and 62692, show 100% investor ownership, indicating niche, fully-rented areas.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 6.86 properties for every one sold in Q1 2026.
The pace of net buying is accelerating, up from a 4.31x ratio in 2024 and a 6.08x ratio in 2025. In Q1 2026, landlords bought 48 homes while selling only 7, signaling strong confidence in the local market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 36.4% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, totaling 48 transactions.
A stark pricing difference exists by tier: the single institutional purchase was at $79,848, which is 51.8% less than the $165,762 average paid by new mom-and-pop buyers. New investors sourced 11.6% of their purchases from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,395 SFR properties in Macoupin County, with individuals holding 87.0%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant footprint in the Macoupin County housing market, owning 3,395 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 20.5% of the total 16,576 SFRs.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by 3,556 individual landlords who control 2,955 properties, or 87.0% of the investor-owned market. In contrast, 254 company entities own the remaining 494 properties (14.6%).

A strong preference for all-cash ownership is evident, with 2,442 properties owned outright compared to 953 that are financed. This 2.56-to-1 ratio of cash-to-financed properties indicates a well-capitalized investor base.

The portfolio's purpose is clearly for rental income, as 3,285 of the 3,395 properties (96.8%) are non-owner-occupied. This high concentration confirms the assets are being actively used as investments.

The data points to a market characterized by a large number of small, individual operators rather than large corporate landlords, shaping the local real estate investing landscape.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 16.5% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, a discount of $35,288 per property.
Detailed Findings

In a major market shift, landlords secured a significant 16.5% pricing discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q1 2026. They paid an average of $178,495, while homeowners paid $213,783, creating a $35,288 price advantage for investors.

This marks a dramatic reversal from 2025, when landlords were paying a premium. For instance, in Q2 2025, investors paid 14.9% more than homeowners ($212,661 vs. $185,156), a swing of over 30 percentage points in pricing power in just three quarters.

The quarter-over-quarter trend shows the price gap widening in favor of investors, moving from a 12.9% discount in Q3 2025 to the current 16.5% discount in Q1 2026.

Despite recent price moderation, long-term appreciation is substantial. The average landlord acquisition price in 2025 ($188,589) was 39.8% higher than the average during the 2020-2023 period ($134,889), reflecting strong market growth and providing an accurate home valuation trend.

This pricing volatility and recent discount suggest investors are becoming more adept at finding undervalued properties or that market conditions are shifting to favor buyers with ready capital.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors purchased 38.8% of all SFR properties sold in Macoupin County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords represented a major purchasing force in the Q4 2025 market, acquiring 38 of the 98 total SFRs sold, a market share of 38.8%.

The quarter's activity was almost entirely fueled by 'mom-and-pop' investors (Tiers 01-04), who were responsible for 37 of the 38 acquisitions, or 97.4% of all landlord purchases.

A wave of new entrants is visible, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) making up the vast majority of buyers. These 43 new entities acquired 33 properties, which is 86.8% of the investor total for the quarter.

This grassroots activity contrasts sharply with the institutional tier (1000+ properties), where a single entity purchased just one property, contributing only 2.6% to the investor purchase volume.

The data clearly shows that market growth is being driven from the bottom up by new and small-scale investors, not large corporations.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 93.0% of all landlord-owned SFRs in Macoupin County.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Macoupin County is fundamentally a small-landlord environment. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, command a 93.0% share of all investor-owned housing.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of this market, holding 2,449 properties. This represents 69.6% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio, underscoring the fragmented nature of ownership.

As portfolio size increases, the number of properties drops off sharply. The combined mid-size and large tiers (11-1000 properties) hold only 7.0% of the investor-owned stock.

Institutional ownership is virtually nonexistent. The 1000+ property tier contains only a single home, accounting for 0.0% of the market and challenging narratives of widespread corporate ownership in this area.

This distribution, detailed in reports like the property ownership by owner type report, confirms that the local rental market is sustained by thousands of small-scale participants, not a handful of large ones.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners for portfolios over 100 properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual ownership is the standard for smaller investors in Macoupin County. Individuals own 93.6% of single-property (Tier 01) portfolios and continue to hold a strong majority of 78.1% in the 3-5 property tier.

The use of a corporate structure becomes more common as portfolios grow. Company ownership increases from just 6.4% in Tier 01 to a significant 32.3% in the 6-10 property tier.

The 21-50 property tier serves as a clear transition zone where portfolios are nearly evenly split between individuals (51.0%) and companies (49.0%), indicating a shift towards more formalized business structures.

The definitive crossover point occurs at the 101-1000 property tier, where companies take a 60.0% majority stake, solidifying their dominance among the largest operators in the county.

This pattern reveals a life cycle of an investor: starting as an individual and incorporating into a company as the portfolio scales and requires more sophisticated management.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip code 62033, with 471 properties and a 24.4% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership is not evenly distributed across Macoupin County but is instead concentrated in specific pockets. The top three zip codes by count hold nearly a third of all investor properties.

The primary hub for investor activity is zip code 62033, which contains 471 investor-owned SFRs. This concentration results in a high investor ownership rate of 24.4% for that area.

Following behind are zip codes 62069, with 290 investor properties (21.5% rate), and 62014, with 205 properties (16.5% rate), reinforcing the trend of regional clustering.

An interesting anomaly appears in smaller zip codes like 62683 and 62692, which both report a 100.0% investor ownership rate. This suggests the existence of small enclaves with very few total homes that are entirely operated as rental properties.

Investors looking for opportunities could use a property search tool to identify similar patterns of high rental density and concentrated activity within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 6.86 properties for every one sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals landlords in Macoupin County are in a phase of aggressive portfolio expansion. They have consistently been net buyers, with the pace of acquisitions increasing year-over-year.

In Q1 2026, the buy-to-sell ratio reached an impressive 6.86-to-1, with 48 properties purchased and only 7 sold. This indicates a strong bullish sentiment among local investors.

This trend shows significant acceleration. The Q1 2026 ratio is a notable increase from the 6.08-to-1 ratio recorded for the full year of 2025 (237 buys vs. 39 sells) and the 4.31-to-1 ratio in 2024 (280 buys vs. 65 sells).

The sustained and growing net accumulation of properties suggests that landlords view the Macoupin County rental market as a stable and profitable environment for long-term investment.

Insights like these, which track investor sentiment over time, are a key feature of market intelligence products like the Investor Pulse reports.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 36.4% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, totaling 48 transactions.
Detailed Findings

During Q1 2026, landlords played a crucial role in market liquidity, participating in 48 of the 132 total SFR transactions, which amounts to a 36.4% market share.

The vast majority of this activity was driven by the smallest investors. New, single-property landlords (Tier 01) were responsible for 43 of the 48 landlord transactions during the quarter.

A dramatic price gap highlights different acquisition strategies between investor tiers. The average purchase price for new mom-and-pop buyers was $165,762. In contrast, the lone institutional purchase was secured for just $79,848, a 51.8% discount.

Inter-landlord trading provided a sourcing channel for new entrants. Of the 43 properties bought by single-property investors, 5 were acquired from other landlords, representing an 11.6% share of their purchases.

The data from these market reports indicates that while new investors are active, larger players can leverage their scale and resources to acquire properties at a substantially lower cost basis.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Macoupin County with 93% Ownership, Accelerating Purchases and Deepening Price Discounts
Holdings
Investors own 3,395 SFR properties, 20.5% of the Macoupin County market. The landscape is controlled by individuals, who own 2,955 of these properties (87.0%), while companies own the remaining 494 (14.6%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 16.5% less than homeowners, securing a significant $35,288 average discount per property ($178,495 vs. $213,783). This reverses a trend from early 2025 when investors were paying a premium.
Activity
Landlords were highly active in Q1 2026, accounting for 36.4% of all market transactions. This activity was led by new investors, with single-property landlords dominating acquisitions.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with a 93.0% ownership share of investor housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 101-1000 property tier, signaling a shift to corporate structures as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6.86 properties for every one sold in Q1 2026 (48 buys vs. 7 sells), an accelerating trend. Data on institutional net transaction status was not available.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Macoupin County, IL is defined by the dominance of small, individual investors. Landlords own 3,395 properties, capturing a 20.5% share of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who hold 93.0% of all investor-owned homes. Individuals, rather than corporations, are the primary owners, accounting for 87.0% of the properties. Institutional presence is practically zero, with only one property held by a 1000+ unit operator, challenging the narrative of a corporate takeover in this market.

Investor behavior in Q1 2026 signals a confident and aggressive outlook. Landlords were involved in 36.4% of all transactions and demonstrated a strong net-buyer position, acquiring 6.86 properties for every one sold, a pace that has accelerated since 2024. They also showed a keen ability to secure favorable pricing, paying 16.5% less than traditional homeowners, a complete reversal from early 2025 when they were paying a premium. This purchasing activity is led by new entrants, with single-property landlords driving the majority of acquisitions.

The key takeaway from this analysis is that the Macoupin County rental market is a healthy, fragmented ecosystem built on the activity of thousands of small operators. The real story is not one of institutional consolidation but of grassroots growth, with new investors continually entering the market. These investors are expanding their holdings, securing properties at a discount, and signaling strong confidence in the future of the local housing market. This dynamic creates a competitive environment where local knowledge and deal-sourcing are paramount to success for any real estate investor.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:14 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Macoupin (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Macoupin (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-il-macoupin/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.