Macon (MO) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Macon (MO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Macon (MO)
4,076
Total Investors in Macon (MO)
1,056
Investor Owned SFR in Macon (MO)
1,013(24.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,017
SFR Owned
963
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
39
SFR Owned
50
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,013 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Macon County, MO, Buying 60% of Homes in Q1 Amidst Zero Institutional Presence
Investors own 24.9% of all single-family homes in Macon County, a market controlled almost entirely by individuals (95.1%) and small mom-and-pop landlords (96.4%). In Q1 2026, these investors were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 60% of all properties sold while institutional investors remained completely absent from the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,013 homes (24.9% of market), with individuals comprising 95.1% of all holdings.
The majority of investor properties, 896 in total, are owned outright with cash, compared to just 117 that are financed. Of the 1,056 total landlords in the county, 1,017 are individuals and only 39 are companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord purchase activity in Q1 2026 prevents a direct price comparison with homeowners.
Historical data from 2025 reveals extreme price volatility, with landlords paying a 14.6% premium ($28,280) in Q3 but securing discounts as high as 49.5% ($93,650) in Q1. This fluctuation highlights a thin market with inconsistent pricing.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured a commanding 60.0% of all home purchases in the first quarter.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of this activity, with 9 total purchases. The market also saw 5 new single-property landlords make their first acquisition, signaling continued growth from small investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 96.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 64.9% of the entire investor portfolio, holding 685 properties. In contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have zero presence in this market (0.0%).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, with no crossover point for company control.
Even in the largest active tier (21-50 properties), individuals own 97.0% of the homes. Companies hold a minor stake across all small tiers, such as 3.9% in the single-property tier and 13.8% in the 6-10 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
The 63552 zip code contains the most investor-owned homes at 554, but smaller zips show higher saturation.
The highest investor ownership rate is 40.0% in the 63539 zip code. Other highly concentrated areas include 63534 (36.4%) and 63538 (35.5%), demonstrating significant investor focus in specific local pockets.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9 properties for every 2 they sold in Q1 2026.
This trend of accumulation is consistent, with a 10.7x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (64 buys vs. 6 sells) and a 4.8x ratio in 2024 (43 buys vs. 9 sells). There has been no recorded transaction activity from institutional investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 60.0% of all Q1 property transactions, purchasing 9 of the 15 homes sold.
Mom-and-pop investors drove 100% of this activity. Notably, only one of the nine landlord purchases (11.1%) was sourced from another landlord, indicating they are primarily acquiring inventory from the traditional homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,013 homes (24.9% of market), with individuals comprising 95.1% of all holdings.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Macon County represents a significant market footprint, with 1,013 single-family residential properties comprising 24.9% of the county's total SFR housing stock of 4,076.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by individual ownership rather than corporate entities. Individual investors hold 963 properties, accounting for 95.1% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own just 50 properties (4.9%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the landlord entity count, where 1,017 of the 1,056 total landlords (96.3%) are individuals. This highlights a market driven by local, small-scale real estate investing.

A striking financial characteristic of this portfolio is the low reliance on financing. A total of 896 properties (88.4%) are owned with cash, while only 117 (11.6%) are financed, suggesting a mature and financially stable investor base.

The rental focus is clear, with 979 properties classified as rented, confirming the primary business use of the investor-owned portfolio in Macon County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord purchase activity in Q1 2026 prevents a direct price comparison with homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, there were no recorded SFR purchases by landlords in Macon County, making a direct price comparison against traditional homeowners (who paid an average of $148,333) impossible for the current quarter.

Analysis of 2025 data reveals a highly volatile pricing environment, likely due to low transaction volumes. In Q3 2025, landlords paid an average of $221,822, a surprising 14.6% premium over the homeowner price of $193,542.

This premium contrasts sharply with earlier in 2025. In Q2, landlords achieved a 48.3% discount ($88,375 vs. $171,021), and in Q1 they secured a 49.5% discount ($95,625 vs. $189,275).

This extreme swing from a nearly 50% discount to a 15% premium in a matter of months underscores the lack of consistent pricing trends and suggests that individual deal characteristics have an outsized impact on average prices in this market.

Overall price appreciation is evident when comparing the 2020-2023 average landlord purchase price of $116,038 to the 2025 average of $163,566, a 40.9% increase.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured a commanding 60.0% of all home purchases in the first quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity dominated the Macon County housing market in Q1 2026, with landlords acquiring 9 of the 15 total SFR properties sold, a remarkable 60.0% market share.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from small, mom-and-pop landlords. Investors in Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of the 9 properties bought, with institutional investors making zero acquisitions.

New entrants are a key driver of growth. Five new single-property landlords entered the market, representing 55.6% of all investor purchases for the quarter and demonstrating a healthy pipeline of new investment.

The activity was concentrated at the smallest scale. Beyond the five new landlords, two entities in the 3-5 property tier purchased 3 homes, and one landlord in the 6-10 property tier acquired a single home.

The complete absence of purchasing by mid-size or institutional investors reinforces the local, small-scale nature of real estate investment in this county.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 96.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Macon County is definitively controlled by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), hold a combined 96.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The single-property tier is the bedrock of the market, with 685 properties comprising 64.9% of the total investor portfolio. This highlights the importance of first-time and small-scale investors.

The distribution skews heavily toward the smallest tiers, with two-property landlords holding 10.4% (110 properties) and those with 3-5 properties holding 15.0% (158 properties).

There is a complete absence of large-scale institutional ownership. Landlords in Tier 09 (1,000+ properties) own 0.0% of the properties in Macon County, challenging any narrative of a corporate takeover in this market.

Even mid-size investors are rare, with those owning 11-50 properties collectively holding just 3.6% of the investor-owned housing stock, further emphasizing the hyper-local ownership landscape.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, with no crossover point for company control.
Detailed Findings

Unlike larger urban markets, there is no portfolio size in Macon County where company ownership surpasses that of individuals. Individual investors are the majority holders across every single tier, from single-property owners to the largest local portfolios.

Individual dominance is nearly absolute. In the single-property tier, individuals own 658 of 685 properties (96.1%). This pattern persists even as portfolios grow.

Even in the county's largest measured ownership tier (21-50 properties), individuals own 32 of the 33 properties, a staggering 97.0% share.

Company ownership represents a small, supplementary role in the market. Their largest proportional stake is in the 6-10 property tier, where they own 9 properties, or 13.8% of that segment.

This data from the property ownership by owner type report confirms that the investment landscape is built on personal holdings, not corporate strategies, regardless of portfolio size.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 63552 zip code contains the most investor-owned homes at 554, but smaller zips show higher saturation.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity shows clear geographic concentration within Macon County. The 63552 zip code is the epicenter of activity by volume, containing 554 investor-owned SFR properties.

However, the highest market penetration occurs in smaller zip codes. The 63539 zip code leads with a 40.0% investor ownership rate, meaning two out of every five SFRs there are investor-owned.

Other areas of high concentration include 63534 (36.4% investor-owned), 63538 (35.5%), and 63558 (34.0%). These figures point to specific neighborhoods or towns that are particularly attractive to rental property investors.

This analysis reveals the classic distinction between volume and saturation. While 63552 has the highest count of investor properties, its ownership rate of 23.2% is significantly lower than in other parts of the county.

The top five zip codes by property count are 63552 (554), 63549 (157), 63534 (68), 63532 (57), and 65247 (47), together accounting for a substantial portion of the county's rental housing stock.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9 properties for every 2 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Macon County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, they demonstrated a clear net-buyer position, purchasing 9 homes while selling only 2.

This pattern of aggressive growth has been sustained over the past two years. In 2025, investors bought 64 properties and sold just 6, a buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 11 to 1.

The trend was similar in 2024, which saw 43 landlord purchases versus only 9 sales, resulting in a net gain of 34 properties to the investor portfolio.

The transaction data shows no activity from institutional investors (1,000+ property tier) in any recorded timeframe, reinforcing that the market's growth is driven entirely by smaller, local players.

The steady pace of net acquisitions indicates strong confidence among local landlords in the Macon County rental market and a clear strategy of portfolio expansion.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 60.0% of all Q1 property transactions, purchasing 9 of the 15 homes sold.
Detailed Findings

The first quarter's transaction data highlights the dominant role of investors in market liquidity, as landlords were a party to 9 of the 15 total SFR transactions, a 60.0% share.

All 9 of these transactions were purchases made by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), with zero activity from institutional or mid-size investors. The single-property tier was most active, accounting for 5 of the 9 transactions.

Investors are primarily buying from non-investors. Of the 9 landlord purchases, only 1 property (in the 3-5 property tier) was bought from another landlord. This low rate of inter-investor trading suggests a focus on acquiring homes from traditional owner-occupiers.

Pricing assessor data for the quarter was unavailable (listed as 'nan'), preventing an analysis of price variations between different investor tiers for Q1 purchases.

The high transaction share combined with low landlord-to-landlord sales indicates that small investors are the primary force absorbing housing supply as it becomes available from the general market in Macon County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Macon County's housing market is defined by small investors who own 25% of all homes and bought 60% of Q1 sales.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,013 SFR properties, representing 24.9% of Macon County's market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 963 properties (95.1%), versus just 50 (4.9%) owned by companies.
Pricing
There were no landlord purchases in Q1 2026, but 2025 data showed extreme price volatility, with landlord deals ranging from a 49.5% discount in Q1 to a 14.6% premium in Q3 compared to homeowners.
Activity
Investors were exceptionally active in Q1, purchasing 9 of the 15 homes sold for a 60.0% market share. This growth was fueled by new entrants, with 5 new single-property landlords joining the market.
Market Share
The market is entirely controlled by small landlords, with mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) owning 96.4% of all investor housing. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) have absolutely no presence, owning 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across every portfolio size, with no crossover tier where companies become the majority. Even in the largest local portfolios (21-50 properties), individuals own 97.0%.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 4.5x buy/sell ratio in Q1 (9 buys vs. 2 sells), a trend consistent with prior years. Institutional investors recorded zero transactions and are not a factor in the market.
Market Narrative

In Macon County, Missouri, the real estate investment landscape is fundamentally shaped by local, individual operators. Investors command a significant 24.9% of the single-family housing market, owning 1,013 properties. This ownership is not corporate; a staggering 95.1% of these homes are held by individual investors. The market structure detailed in these Investor Pulse reports shows that mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 96.4% of the investor-owned portfolio, while institutional firms with over 1,000 properties are entirely absent.

Investor behavior in Q1 2026 underscores a period of aggressive expansion. Landlords acquired 60% of all homes sold, demonstrating their role as the primary source of demand in the market. This activity is driven by the smallest players, including 5 brand-new, single-property landlords who entered the market this quarter. Transaction data reveals a consistent net-buyer stance, with a 4.5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1. While pricing data was unavailable for the quarter, historical figures from 2025 show a volatile market where small investors negotiated deals ranging from massive discounts to occasional premiums, typical of a market with low transaction volumes.

The key takeaway for Macon County is the profound and complete dominance of the small, local landlord. This is a market operating entirely outside the national narrative of institutional consolidation. The high ownership penetration and voracious buying activity signal strong local confidence in rental demand. For homeowners, this means the most likely buyer for their property is an investor, while for the market at large, it indicates that its stability and character are tied directly to the financial health and strategic decisions of thousands of individual community stakeholders, not distant corporations.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 09:17 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Macon (MO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Macon (MO) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mo-macon/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.