Gallatin (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Gallatin (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Gallatin (IL)
2,018
Total Investors in Gallatin (IL)
1,116
Investor Owned SFR in Gallatin (IL)
887(44.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,095
SFR Owned
866
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
21
SFR Owned
23
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 887 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Individual Landlords Drive 44% Investor Ownership in Gallatin County, Dominating with Cash Purchases and Near-Zero Corporate Presence
In Gallatin County, investors own 887 Single-Family Residential properties, a significant 44.0% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals (97.6%), with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) holding 99.8% of the investor portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords captured 60.0% of all SFR purchases, acquiring properties at a 62.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners, while remaining consistent net buyers over the past two years.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 887 SFR properties in Gallatin County, with individuals holding a commanding 97.6% share.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with 789 purchased with cash versus only 98 financed. Landlords in this market are heavily rental-focused, with 876 properties designated as rented. Individual landlords (1,095 entities) vastly outnumber company landlords (21 entities).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Q1 2026 paid an average of $55,822, a staggering 62.8% less than traditional homeowners.
The price gap shows extreme volatility; landlords paid a premium in both Q2 2025 (25.6%) and Q3 2025 (20.6%) before securing a massive discount in Q1 2026. The Q1 discount translated to an average savings of $94,178 per property compared to homeowners ($55,822 vs. $150,000). The data does not provide a breakdown between individual and company prices due to low transaction volumes.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q1 2026 activity, purchasing 3 of the 5 homes sold for a 60.0% market share.
Mom-and-pop landlords were the only active investors, accounting for 100.0% of all landlord purchases in the quarter. All 3 properties were acquired by new, single-property landlords, signaling fresh entrants into the rental market. No institutional investors made purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.8% of Gallatin County's investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 785 properties, representing 85.8% of all investor holdings. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just one property, or 0.1% of the investor-owned market. Price data by tier is unavailable due to low transaction volume.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every ownership tier in Gallatin County, with no company majority at any level.
Individuals own 98.0% of single-property portfolios and 96.7% of two-property portfolios. Even in the small 3-5 property tier, individuals own 95.1% of the homes. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners, highlighting a market completely defined by personal ownership.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in specific zip codes, with 62984 holding the most properties at 285.
The highest investor ownership rate is 60.0% in zip code 62869. Several other zip codes show deep investor penetration, including 62867 (52.2%) and 62934 (47.6%), indicating that certain neighborhoods are landlord-majority areas. These high-count and high-percentage regions often overlap.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Gallatin County are consistent net buyers, acquiring more properties than they sold in every recorded period.
In 2025, landlords demonstrated a 3-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, purchasing 9 properties while selling only 3. This trend was similar in 2024, with 8 buys and 2 sells. There were no institutional transactions recorded, confirming their inactivity in the market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords captured 60.0% of all Q1 2026 transactions, with all purchases made by new single-property investors.
These new mom-and-pop landlords paid an average price of $55,822. Zero percent of their purchases were from other landlords, indicating they are acquiring properties from the traditional homeowner market. Institutional investors recorded zero transactions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 887 SFR properties in Gallatin County, with individuals holding a commanding 97.6% share.
Detailed Findings

In Gallatin County, investors have a remarkably high penetration rate, owning 887 single-family properties, which constitutes 44.0% of the total 2,018 SFRs in the market. This indicates a market heavily influenced by real estate investing activity.

The investor landscape is almost entirely composed of individual owners, who control 866 properties, or 97.6% of the investor-owned portfolio. In stark contrast, companies own just 23 properties (2.6%), highlighting a near-total absence of corporate or institutional-scale operations in the county.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for all-cash purchases. An overwhelming 89.0% of investor properties (789 total) are owned outright, compared to just 11.0% (98 properties) that carry financing. This suggests a market dominated by well-capitalized private investors who are not reliant on leverage.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards generating rental income, with 876 of the 887 properties classified as rented. This aligns with the high concentration of non-owner-occupied holdings, signaling that the primary strategy for local landlords is long-term rental income rather than short-term flips.

The entity count further reinforces the dominance of small-scale investors. There are 1,095 individual landlords compared to only 21 company landlords, a ratio of more than 52 to 1. This structure confirms that the market is driven by local, mom-and-pop style operations rather than large, consolidated entities.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Q1 2026 paid an average of $55,822, a staggering 62.8% less than traditional homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties at a deep discount, paying an average price of $55,822. This was $94,178, or 62.8%, below the average price of $150,000 paid by traditional homeowners, indicating a significant pricing advantage for investors in the most recent quarter.

However, this pricing advantage is not a consistent trend but rather a point of high volatility. In the preceding quarters of 2025, the dynamic was completely reversed. Landlords paid a 25.6% premium in Q2 (at $190,000) and a 20.6% premium in Q3 (at $121,167) compared to homeowners, suggesting that market conditions and deal types fluctuate dramatically.

The year-over-year pricing trend shows a general decrease in acquisition costs for landlords. The average price in 2024 was $87,413, and the average for 2025 was $95,500, both significantly higher than the Q1 2026 average of $55,822. This could signal either a market correction or investors targeting lower-priced assets.

The low transaction volume in recent quarters is a critical piece of context for this price analysis. With zero properties acquired by landlords in several quarters of 2025 and only a handful in Q1 2026, the average prices are susceptible to being skewed by a small number of unique deals.

Overall, while landlords demonstrated an exceptional ability to secure low-priced properties in Q1 2026, their acquisition pricing over the past year has been erratic. The data points to a market where investors are opportunistic, with pricing advantages varying greatly from one quarter to the next rather than following a stable discount pattern.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q1 2026 activity, purchasing 3 of the 5 homes sold for a 60.0% market share.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a majority of the market in Q1 2026, with landlords purchasing 3 of the 5 total SFRs sold, capturing a 60.0% share of transactions. This high percentage, even on low volume, underscores the significant role investors play in Gallatin County's housing market.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from the smallest investor segment. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 100.0% of all investor acquisitions, demonstrating that market growth is driven from the ground up by small-scale operators.

Specifically, all 3 properties were bought by new landlords entering the market. These single-property (Tier 01) investors represent new capital and an expansion of the rental property base in the county, rather than consolidation by existing players.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing landscape, recording zero acquisitions in Q1. This reinforces the theme of a market driven exclusively by local individuals, not large corporations.

The concentration of activity in the single-property tier, with 3 new entities each buying one home, highlights a pattern of gradual, decentralized market entry. This is the opposite of a market being taken over by a few large players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.8% of Gallatin County's investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Gallatin County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), collectively control 99.8% of all investor-held SFRs. This concentration underscores the market's reliance on local, individual capital.

The single-property landlord (Tier 01) is the bedrock of the local rental market. This tier alone accounts for 785 properties, making up 85.8% of the entire investor portfolio. This signifies that a vast majority of landlords are individuals who have invested in a single rental home.

Conversely, institutional-scale ownership is virtually nonexistent. Investors in the 1000+ property tier (Tier 09) own just a single property in the county, accounting for a mere 0.1% of the investor-owned housing stock. This finding directly counters the narrative of large corporations dominating smaller housing markets.

Mid-size landlords are also exceedingly rare. The tiers representing portfolios of 11-1000 properties are almost empty, with only one property listed in the 21-50 tier. This demonstrates a sharp drop-off in ownership after the 1-10 property range, with no significant mid-market consolidation.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented and decentralized ownership landscape. The market's health and stability are tied to hundreds of individual small landlords rather than the strategic decisions of a few large firms, a key characteristic for local policymakers and residents to understand.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every ownership tier in Gallatin County, with no company majority at any level.
Detailed Findings

In Gallatin County, individual investors maintain majority ownership across every single investor tier, a clear sign of a market free from corporate consolidation. There is no crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership, which typically occurs in larger portfolios in other markets.

The dominance of individuals is most pronounced at the entry level. In the single-property tier, individuals own 771 of 787 properties (98.0%). This pattern continues into the two-property tier, where individuals hold 59 of 61 properties (96.7%).

Even as portfolios grow slightly, company ownership remains minimal. For landlords with 3-5 properties, individuals still own 95.1% of the homes (58 properties), while companies own only 3. This indicates that even local landlords who expand their holdings tend to do so under their own name rather than forming a corporate entity.

In the 6-10 property tier, individual ownership is absolute at 100.0%. This lack of company presence in what is typically a transitional tier for professionalizing landlords further emphasizes the non-corporate nature of the local market.

The data clearly shows that the path to portfolio growth in Gallatin County is not through incorporation. The market structure is fundamentally built on individual ownership, regardless of portfolio size, making it a distinct outlier compared to more corporatized real estate markets.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in specific zip codes, with 62984 holding the most properties at 285.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Gallatin County is not evenly distributed but is instead concentrated in a few key zip codes. The 62984 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity by volume, containing 285 landlord-owned properties, which represents 45.8% of its total SFR housing stock.

Certain areas exhibit extremely high rates of investor ownership, effectively becoming landlord-majority communities. The 62869 zip code leads with a 60.0% investor ownership rate, followed closely by 62867 at 52.2%. These figures show that in some parts of the county, more than half the homes are owned by investors.

Other hotspots for investor ownership include 62979, with 212 properties (42.7% rate), and 62934, with 147 properties and an even higher penetration rate of 47.6%. This data from our property ownership by owner type report helps pinpoint where rental housing is most prevalent.

The top five zip codes by investor-owned property count are 62984 (285), 62979 (212), 62934 (147), 62867 (96), and 62871 (73). Together, these five areas account for a significant portion of the total investor portfolio in the county.

There is a strong correlation between the areas with the highest counts and the highest percentages of investor ownership. This suggests that investors are targeting the same specific communities, leading to deep saturation in those locations rather than a light spread across the entire county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Gallatin County are consistent net buyers, acquiring more properties than they sold in every recorded period.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data shows that landlords in Gallatin County are in a phase of steady accumulation. They have consistently operated as net buyers, purchasing more properties than they sell across all measured timeframes, signaling confidence in the local rental market.

In the full year of 2025, investors bought 9 SFR properties and sold only 3, resulting in a net gain of 6 properties and a strong 3-to-1 buy/sell ratio. This behavior demonstrates a clear strategy of portfolio expansion.

The pattern of net buying was also evident in 2024, where landlords acquired 8 properties and divested only 2, also for a net gain of 6 properties. The consistency across two consecutive years points to a sustained, long-term growth trend.

The most recent quarterly data for Q3 2025 continues this trend, with 4 properties bought and 2 sold, for a net gain of 2 properties. This indicates that the momentum of acquisition has carried through recent periods.

Notably, there is no transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ tier). Their complete absence from both buying and selling activities confirms they are not a factor in the transactional flow or liquidity of the Gallatin County market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords captured 60.0% of all Q1 2026 transactions, with all purchases made by new single-property investors.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were the primary drivers of market activity, involved in 3 of the 5 total transactions for a 60.0% market share. This dominance in a low-volume quarter highlights their outsized influence on local sales.

All landlord transactions were conducted by the smallest investors. The single-property tier (Tier 01) accounted for 100% of landlord-involved transactions, with 3 purchases made by what are likely first-time landlords.

The average purchase price for these new landlords was $55,822, significantly lower than prices paid by traditional homeowners in the same period. This suggests a focus on acquiring lower-cost, entry-level assets for their rental portfolios.

A key finding from the Q1 data is the source of these properties. None of the 3 homes purchased by investors were bought from other landlords (0.0% inter-landlord rate). This shows that investors are not trading properties amongst themselves but are instead acquiring inventory from the general housing market, primarily from homeowners.

Mirroring all other activity reports, institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely inactive, with zero transactions recorded. The transactional market, like the ownership market, is exclusively a mom-and-pop affair in Gallatin County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Individual investors define Gallatin County's market, owning 44% of all homes with a 99.8% mom-and-pop control.
Holdings
Landlords own 887 SFR properties, representing a high 44.0% of Gallatin County's market. Ownership is almost exclusively individual, with private investors holding 866 properties (97.6%) compared to just 23 (2.6%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties for 62.8% less than homeowners, paying an average of $55,822 against the homeowner price of $150,000, a discount of $94,178 per property.
Activity
Investors captured 60.0% of all Q1 2026 sales, with all 3 purchases made by new, single-property landlords entering the market for the first time.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the investor market, owning 99.8% of the housing stock, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all portfolio sizes in Gallatin County, with no crossover point where companies become the majority. Individuals own 98.0% of single-property portfolios and 100.0% of 6-10 property portfolios.
Transactions
Landlords are consistent net buyers, posting a 3-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025 (9 buys vs. 3 sells), steadily growing their portfolios. Institutional investors are completely inactive, with zero recorded transactions.
Market Narrative

Gallatin County, IL presents a unique real estate market defined by an exceptionally high concentration of small, individual investors. Landlords own 887 Single-Family Residential properties, a staggering 44.0% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This landscape is not shaped by Wall Street firms but by local players; individual investors own 97.6% of these properties. The market structure is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 99.8% of the investor portfolio, while institutional firms have a near-zero presence with just a single property.

Investor behavior in Gallatin County is characterized by opportunistic acquisitions and steady portfolio growth. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords purchased 60.0% of all homes sold, with every single acquisition made by a new landlord entering the market. They demonstrated a keen ability to find value, paying an average of $55,822, which is 62.8% below the price paid by traditional homeowners. This purchasing is part of a longer-term trend of accumulation, as landlords have been consistent net buyers over the past two years, signaling strong confidence in the local rental market.

The key takeaway for Gallatin County is that its housing market is fundamentally a mom-and-pop operation on a significant scale. The high investor penetration rate, combined with the dominance of individual, cash-heavy owners and the absence of corporate players, creates a distinct local dynamic. This market is driven by the decisions of hundreds of small investors acquiring properties from the general homeowner population, not by the large-scale strategies of institutional funds. This structure suggests a stable, long-term rental market deeply embedded within the community's fabric, as detailed in our comprehensive market reports.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 03:52 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Gallatin (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Gallatin (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-il-gallatin/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.