Rockland (NY) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Rockland (NY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Rockland (NY)
61,357
Total Investors in Rockland (NY)
13,918
Investor Owned SFR in Rockland (NY)
10,107(16.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
12,045
SFR Owned
8,115
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,873
SFR Owned
2,043
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 10,107 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Rockland County's market is defined by small investors paying a 14.3% premium over homeowners as institutions divest.
Investors own 10,107 SFR properties, representing 16.5% of Rockland County's market. This landscape is dominated by individual investors who control 80.3% of the portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords acquired 47.9% of all properties sold, paying a surprising 14.3% premium over traditional homeowners, while institutional investors continued to be net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 10,107 SFR properties in Rockland County, with individuals owning 80.3% of the portfolio.
The majority of investor-owned properties are financed (6,345) rather than held in cash (3,762). A total of 9,923 properties are confirmed rented, highlighting the portfolio's focus on income generation. Individual landlords (12,045) vastly outnumber company landlords (1,873).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In a market reversal, landlords paid a 14.3% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $910,587 per purchase.
This premium represents a $113,732 higher price paid by landlords compared to homeowners ($796,855) in Q1. The trend of landlords paying more has been consistent, with similar premiums observed in Q3 2025 (14.3%) and Q1 2025 (13.7%). Prices have appreciated significantly since the 2020-2023 period, when the average landlord acquisition price was $686,084.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, purchasing 172 properties, which accounted for 47.5% of all SFR sales.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for an overwhelming 98.3% of these purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made zero acquisitions, showing a complete absence from the market's buying activity. The market saw 207 new single-property landlord entities emerge this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) own 99.3% of all investor-held SFRs in Rockland County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties control a negligible 0.0% of the market, holding just 3 properties. The single-property landlord tier is the largest segment by far, alone accounting for 8,857 properties or 86.4% of all investor-owned housing. This data firmly establishes the market as dominated by small-scale operators.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 57.5% of assets in that segment.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 82.3% of single-property holdings and 71.1% of two-property portfolios, companies assert control in larger tiers. In the 21-50 property tier, company ownership surges to 91.7%. This clear crossover point indicates a shift in strategy and capital structure as portfolios scale.
Geographic Distribution
The 10977 zip code leads Rockland County with 1,401 investor-owned properties, a 23.8% ownership rate.
High investor concentration is also found in 10901 (1,171 properties, 22.7% rate) and 10956 (1,115 properties, 12.2% rate). The 11219 zip code shows a 100% investor ownership rate, likely an outlier or a small area with unique properties. The 10982 zip code has the second-highest rate at 33.3%.
Historical Transactions
Rockland County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 8.3 properties for every one they sold in Q1 2026.
This trend of accumulation is consistent, with landlords being net buyers in every period analyzed, including a net gain of 1,424 properties in 2025. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) are net sellers, having sold more properties than they bought in both 2024 and 2025. The data on landlord-to-landlord sales is incomplete.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 47.9% of all Q1 transactions, purchasing 225 properties.
Single-property investors dominated this activity with 208 transactions, paying a high average price of $898,057. Small landlords in the 6-10 property tier paid the most, averaging $1,482,581 on a single transaction. Inter-landlord activity was minimal, with only 8.2% of single-property investor purchases coming from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 10,107 SFR properties in Rockland County, with individuals owning 80.3% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Rockland County, investors hold a significant 16.5% of the single-family residential market, totaling 10,107 properties. This demonstrates a substantial presence of real estate investing activity within the local housing ecosystem.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly composed of individuals, who own 8,115 properties, or 80.3% of the total investor portfolio. Companies own the remaining 2,043 properties (20.2%), a clear indication that the market is driven by smaller-scale operators rather than large corporations.

This individual dominance is further reflected in the entity count, where 12,045 individual landlords operate compared to just 1,873 company landlords. This 6.4-to-1 ratio underscores the granular, mom-and-pop nature of SFR ownership in the county.

Financing is the preferred method for holding these assets, with 6,345 properties carrying a mortgage, compared to 3,762 properties owned outright with cash. This suggests investors are leveraging debt to expand their portfolios.

The primary use for these properties is clear, as 9,923 are classified as rented. This high rental concentration confirms that the vast majority of investor-owned SFRs in Rockland County serve as housing for tenants.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In a market reversal, landlords paid a 14.3% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $910,587 per purchase.
Detailed Findings

Contrary to national trends, landlords in Rockland County are paying a significant premium for properties compared to traditional homeowners. In Q1 2026, the average landlord acquisition price was $910,587, which is 14.3% higher than the $796,855 paid by homeowners, a cash difference of $113,732 per property.

This pattern is not a recent anomaly; it has been a consistent feature of the market. In Q3 2025, landlords also paid a 14.3% premium ($919,525 vs. $804,773), and in Q1 2025, they paid a 13.7% premium ($865,663 vs. $761,113), signaling aggressive acquisition strategies.

The data reveals substantial price appreciation over the last few years. The Q1 2026 average price of $910,587 marks a 32.7% increase from the average price of $686,084 during the 2020-2023 period, highlighting rapid value growth in investor-targeted assets.

Throughout 2025, landlord acquisition prices consistently outpaced the previous year, with the annual average rising from $795,783 in 2024 to $879,197 in 2025, an increase of 10.5%.

This consistent, high premium suggests a competitive market where investors are willing to pay above homeowner-market rates, possibly for properties with specific rental potential, zoning advantages, or other off-market characteristics not captured by typical automated valuation (AVM) models.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, purchasing 172 properties, which accounted for 47.5% of all SFR sales.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was exceptionally strong in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 172 of the 362 total SFR properties sold in Rockland County. This represents a commanding 47.5% market share of all purchases for the quarter.

The acquisition activity was almost entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, accounted for 170 of the 172 investor purchases, comprising 98.3% of the landlord total.

New entrants and first-time investors were the primary force, with the single-property (Tier 01) category alone responsible for 160 purchases (92.5% of all landlord acquisitions). This activity was spread across 207 distinct new landlord entities.

Mid-size and large investors were barely active. Tiers holding between 11 and 1,000 properties collectively purchased only three properties in the entire quarter, demonstrating their limited role in market acquisitions.

Significantly, institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties made zero purchases in Q4. This highlights a stark divergence between the aggressive expansion of small landlords and the complete purchasing inactivity of large-scale institutions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) own 99.3% of all investor-held SFRs in Rockland County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of investor-held real estate in Rockland County is overwhelmingly dominated by small landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04, owning 1-10 properties) collectively control 99.3% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio.

First-time and single-property landlords form the bedrock of this market. This tier alone accounts for 8,857 properties, representing a massive 86.4% of all investor-owned homes, underscoring the importance of small-scale real estate entrepreneurship in the county.

As portfolio size increases, ownership concentration drops off dramatically. Landlords with 2-5 properties hold 11.6% of the portfolio (1,187 properties), while all tiers above 10 properties combined own less than 1% of the total.

The role of institutional capital is virtually nonexistent. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier own a mere 3 properties in total, accounting for 0.0% of the market share. This finding challenges any narrative of a corporate takeover of local housing.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market where ownership is spread across thousands of small operators, rather than concentrated in the hands of a few large firms. This structure has significant implications for market stability, rental pricing, and property management standards. The available assessor data confirms this widespread ownership pattern.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 57.5% of assets in that segment.
Detailed Findings

A distinct crossover point exists where company ownership surpasses individual ownership in Rockland County's investor market. This transition occurs in the small-medium (11-20 properties) tier, where companies own 23 properties, or 57.5% of the total in that bracket.

Individual investors are the undisputed leaders in smaller portfolios. They own 7,325 (82.3%) of single-property investor homes and 450 (71.1%) of two-property portfolios, showcasing their foundational role at the entry level of the market.

The shift to corporate structures becomes more pronounced as portfolio sizes grow. For landlords owning 21-50 properties, company ownership reaches a commanding 91.7%, with individuals holding only a single property in this tier.

Even in the 6-10 property tier, company ownership is significant, accounting for 44.0% of properties. This suggests that formalizing ownership under a corporate entity becomes a common strategy well before an investor reaches a large scale.

This pattern indicates that while individuals drive market entry and small-portfolio growth, scaling operations beyond 10 properties is strongly correlated with the use of a corporate structure for asset holding and management.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 10977 zip code leads Rockland County with 1,401 investor-owned properties, a 23.8% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Rockland County is geographically concentrated, with three zip codes accounting for a substantial portion of the portfolio. The 10977 area is the epicenter, with 1,401 investor-owned properties, representing a high 23.8% ownership rate.

Following closely are the 10901 zip code, with 1,171 investor properties and a 22.7% rate, and the 10956 zip code, holding 1,115 properties at a 12.2% rate. Together, these three areas represent a significant core of rental housing in the county.

Some smaller zip codes exhibit extremely high penetration rates. The 11219 area shows a 100.0% investor ownership rate, which could indicate a single new development or a data anomaly. The 10982 zip code also has a very high concentration, with a 33.3% investor ownership rate.

This geographic clustering suggests that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods, likely driven by factors like school districts, transit access, and rental demand. A detailed property search within these hot spots could reveal specific asset characteristics that are attracting investment.

The contrast between areas with high counts (like 10977) and those with high percentages (like 10982) highlights different types of market saturation. Some areas have a large volume of rentals, while others represent smaller, more intensely investor-dominated pockets.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Rockland County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 8.3 properties for every one they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Rockland County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, they purchased 225 SFRs while selling only 27, resulting in a buy-to-sell ratio of 8.33 and a net gain of 198 properties for the quarter.

This aggressive buying behavior is a long-term trend. In 2025, landlords acquired 1,548 properties and sold just 124, a net increase of 1,424 properties. The pattern was similar in 2024, with a net gain of 2,162 properties (2,296 buys vs. 134 sells).

A critical divergence exists between the overall market and its largest players. While the market as a whole is expanding, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) are actively divesting. In 2025, they were net sellers with 2 buys versus 3 sells, and this followed a net selling position in 2024 (1 buy vs. 4 sells).

This dynamic indicates that the growth in Rockland County's investor market is fueled exclusively by small and mid-sized landlords, while the largest institutional players are reducing their exposure. This retreat by institutions could signal a strategic shift or a perception of peak market conditions.

The consistent net buying from the vast majority of landlords points to strong confidence in the local rental market's future performance and potential for appreciation. The full picture can be explored in our other Investor Pulse reports.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 47.9% of all Q1 transactions, purchasing 225 properties.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were a driving force in the Rockland County market, participating in 47.9% of all 470 SFR transactions by purchasing 225 properties. This high share demonstrates their significant impact on market liquidity and price setting.

Transaction volume was heavily concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active group, conducting 208 transactions, which is 92.4% of all investor purchase activity for the quarter.

Purchase prices in Q1 varied significantly by tier, with smaller investors often paying the highest prices. The average price for a Tier 01 purchase was a substantial $898,057. The highest average price was recorded in the 6-10 property tier at $1,482,581, although this was based on a single transaction.

This pricing behavior, where new or small investors pay top-of-market prices, aligns with the broader finding that landlords are paying a premium over homeowners. This could indicate intense competition for desirable rental properties.

Internal market churn appears low, as most investors purchased from non-landlords. Only 8.2% of properties bought by single-property investors (17 of 208) were acquired from another landlord, suggesting that most new inventory is coming from the traditional homeowner market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small investors dominate Rockland County's housing market, paying a 14.3% premium while institutional players retreat.
Holdings
Landlords own 10,107 SFR properties, 16.5% of Rockland County's total market. This portfolio is controlled by individual investors, who own 8,115 properties (80.3%) compared to companies owning 2,043 (20.2%).
Pricing
In a notable market inversion, landlords paid 14.3% more than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, an average premium of $113,732 per property ($910,587 vs. $796,855).
Activity
Investors captured a significant 47.9% share of all Q1 2026 sales, purchasing 225 properties. In the prior quarter, small landlords drove 98.3% of investor acquisitions, with 207 new single-property entities entering the market.
Market Share
The market is defined by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.3% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a negligible 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors command the smaller-scale market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios starting at the 11-20 property tier, where they control 57.5% of assets.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with an 8.33x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (225 buys vs 27 sells), but institutional investors are actively divesting, maintaining a net seller position over the past two years.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Rockland County, NY, is fundamentally shaped by small, individual operators, not large corporations. Investors own 10,107 single-family residential properties, constituting 16.5% of the total market. An overwhelming 99.3% of these homes are held by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), with individuals personally owning 80.3% of the entire investor portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have a near-zero presence, owning just three properties and controlling 0.0% of the market share.

Investor behavior in Rockland County defies conventional wisdom. In Q1 2026, landlords were a dominant market force, purchasing 47.9% of all homes sold. Instead of securing discounts, they paid an average premium of 14.3% above what traditional homeowners paid, a trend consistent over the past year. This aggressive acquisition is reflected in their transaction patterns: landlords are strong net buyers with an 8.33-to-1 buy-sell ratio, while the few institutional players are net sellers, signaling a clear divestment from the area.

The key takeaway from this market report is that Rockland County's rental market is a localized, fragmented ecosystem fueled by new and small-scale capital. The high premiums suggest intense competition for rental-ready assets, and the institutional retreat indicates a potential belief that the market has peaked. This dynamic creates a unique environment where the primary drivers of property values and rental availability are thousands of individual decision-makers rather than a handful of corporate boardrooms.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 12:23 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Rockland (NY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Rockland (NY) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ny-rockland/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.