Valley (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Valley (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Valley (ID)
4,258
Total Investors in Valley (ID)
2,959
Investor Owned SFR in Valley (ID)
2,092(49.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,432
SFR Owned
1,644
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
527
SFR Owned
549
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,092 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Valley County, ID: Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate 49% of Market, Pay Premiums for High-Value Properties
Investors own 2,092 Single-Family Residential properties in Valley County, a staggering 49.1% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (96.7%), with zero institutional presence. In Q1, investors bucked national trends by paying a 79.4% premium over traditional homeowners and acted as aggressive net buyers, acquiring 27 properties while only selling one.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,092 SFRs, with individuals holding 78.6% of the portfolio.
The majority of investor-owned properties are held with cash (64.6%) compared to just 35.4% being financed. Nearly all properties in the landlord portfolio, 98.3% (2,057 properties), are non-owner-occupied rentals, indicating a strong focus on generating rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors paid a 79.4% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $791,588 per purchase.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners is extremely volatile, swinging from a 14.5% landlord discount in Q2 2025 to a 147.9% premium in Q1 2025. This indicates investors are targeting a different, higher-end segment of the market than typical homebuyers. The average investor purchase price has fallen from its 2024 average of $911,026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 2025, purchasing 19 properties and capturing 57.6% of all market sales.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 100% of investor acquisitions, with zero properties purchased by institutional investors. Activity was concentrated at the entry level, with 22 new single-property landlord entities acquiring 16 homes, making up 80% of all investor purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors are the market, controlling 96.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 1,745 homes, representing a massive 80.7% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors have zero presence, holding 0.0% of the market share. This structure defies the common narrative of large corporate landlord dominance.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owners in portfolios of 6-20 properties, capturing 80% of each tier.
While individuals own 77.9% of single-property portfolios, companies take majority control at the 6-10 property tier. In an unusual pattern, the 51-100 property tier is 98.1% owned by individuals, suggesting a few large private portfolios exist.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 83638 zip code holding 79% of all investor-owned homes.
Investor ownership rates are extremely high across the county, with the top five zip codes all reporting rates above 43%. The 83657 zip code is 100% investor-owned, and 83677 has a 60.9% investor penetration rate, signaling areas with very few traditional homeowners.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at a 27-to-1 ratio in Q1 2026.
This strong buying trend is consistent over time, with landlords maintaining a 9.7x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 and a 10.25x ratio in 2024. With zero institutional activity, all transactions are driven by smaller investors steadily accumulating properties.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove half of all market activity in Q1, accounting for 50% of total transactions.
All 27 landlord transactions were from mom-and-pop investors, with zero institutional involvement. New, single-property landlords paid the highest prices, averaging $804,120, significantly more than the $578,550 paid by more established small landlords. None of the investor purchases in Q1 were from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,092 SFRs, with individuals holding 78.6% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Valley County, landlords have a significant footprint, owning 2,092 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 49.1% of the area's 4,258 total SFRs. This high concentration signals a market heavily influenced by real estate investing activity.

The ownership structure is dominated by 2,432 individual investors, who make up 82.2% of all landlord entities. They control 1,644 properties, representing 78.6% of the investor-owned portfolio. In contrast, 527 company investors own 549 properties, or 26.2% of the total.

A strong preference for all-cash acquisitions is evident, with 1,351 properties (64.6%) held free and clear. The remaining 741 properties (35.4%) are financed, suggesting that a significant portion of local investors operate without leverage. This reliance on cash highlights substantial private capital deployment in the local market.

The portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to rentals. An overwhelming 98.3% of investor-owned properties (2,057 homes) are classified as non-owner-occupied. This underscores that the primary strategy for local investors is buy-and-hold for rental income, rather than short-term flipping.

The sheer number of individual landlords (2,432) compared to the total properties they own (1,644) suggests that the vast majority are small-scale operators, a finding reinforced by the tier ownership data. This market is defined by local, private capital, not large-scale corporate players.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors paid a 79.4% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $791,588 per purchase.
Detailed Findings

In a striking deviation from national trends, landlords in Valley County paid a significant premium for properties in the first quarter of 2026. Their average acquisition price was $791,588, which is $350,295, or 79.4%, higher than the traditional homeowner average of $441,293. This suggests investors are targeting luxury or high-demand properties not typically pursued by local homebuyers.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been exceptionally volatile. In Q1 2025, landlords paid a staggering 147.9% premium ($927,047 vs. $373,984). However, this reversed by Q2 2025, when they secured a 14.5% discount. This volatility indicates that investor purchasing strategy is highly selective and focused on specific market opportunities rather than broad-based acquisitions.

Recent acquisition prices, while high, are below prior years. The Q1 2026 average of $791,588 is down from the 2024 average of $911,026, though still significantly higher than the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $625,785. This illustrates a market that, while cooling from its peak, remains at a historically elevated price point for investors.

The data does not contain any landlord acquisitions for most of 2024 and 2025, which may reflect the small, transactional nature of the market. The high-premium purchases that did occur were likely strategic acquisitions of premium assets, such as vacation rentals or luxury second homes, which are common in the region.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 2025, purchasing 19 properties and capturing 57.6% of all market sales.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in the last quarter of 2025, with landlords acquiring 19 of the 33 total SFRs sold in Valley County. This represents a commanding 57.6% market share, underscoring their role as the primary drivers of transaction volume.

The market's new activity is entirely fueled by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of all investor purchases (20 properties), as one entity added to an existing portfolio. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made no acquisitions.

A significant wave of new landlords entered the market. The single-property tier saw 22 new entities purchase 16 properties, representing 80% of all investor-bought homes. This influx of first-time investors highlights the area's appeal for those starting a real estate portfolio.

Beyond new entrants, a smaller portion of activity came from existing small landlords. Five entities in the 3-5 property tier expanded their holdings, acquiring 4 properties and accounting for the remaining 20% of investor purchases.

The complete absence of mid-size and institutional purchasing activity reinforces the hyper-local, small-investor character of the Valley County real estate market. Growth is driven from the bottom up, by individuals and small companies making their first or second investment.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors are the market, controlling 96.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Valley County is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) control a combined 96.7% of all investor-held SFRs, demonstrating a market built entirely on small-scale, private capital.

The single-property landlord tier is the bedrock of the local rental market. These 1,745 investors own 80.7% of all investor properties, a level of concentration at the smallest tier that is rarely seen. This indicates a very low barrier to entry and a strong culture of individual property search and ownership.

Mid-size investors play a very minor role. Tiers holding between 11 and 1,000 properties collectively own just 3.3% of the investor-owned housing stock. The largest holdings are in the 51-100 tier, with 54 properties (2.5%), which is still a marginal share.

There is absolutely no institutional investor presence in Valley County. The 1,000+ property tier holds a 0.0% market share, a stark contrast to many other markets nationwide. This absence of large-scale players leaves the market entirely to individual investors and small businesses.

This ownership distribution highlights a market insulated from the strategies and fluctuations of large institutional capital. Market dynamics, from pricing to rental rates, are dictated by the collective actions of thousands of small, independent landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owners in portfolios of 6-20 properties, capturing 80% of each tier.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors form the base of the market, company ownership becomes prevalent as portfolios grow. The crossover point occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 12 properties (80.0%), compared to just 3 for individuals.

Individuals overwhelmingly dominate the smallest portfolios. They own 1,420 (77.9%) of single-property holdings and 109 (69.0%) of two-property holdings. This confirms that entry into the market is primarily an individual pursuit.

The 11-20 property tier also shows strong company control, with corporate entities owning 8 properties, or 80.0% of the homes in this bracket. This suggests that as landlords scale their operations beyond a handful of properties, they tend to incorporate for liability and financial purposes.

An interesting anomaly exists in the 51-100 property tier, which is 98.1% individual-owned (53 of 54 properties). This indicates the presence of at least one very large, private family portfolio rather than a corporate-style investment fund.

This tiered analysis reveals a clear lifecycle: investors typically start as individuals and incorporate as they scale into the mid-sized tiers. The lack of company ownership at the very top tier is simply due to the absence of any institutional-scale players in the county.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 83638 zip code holding 79% of all investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor ownership in Valley County is extremely concentrated. A single zip code, 83638, contains 1,652 investor-owned properties, which accounts for 79.0% of the entire investor portfolio in the county. This area is the clear epicenter of rental and investment activity.

High investor penetration is a defining characteristic of the local market. The top zip code by count, 83638, also has a 50.3% investor ownership rate, meaning more than half of all SFRs there are owned by investors. This is followed by 83611 (44.9% rate) and 83615 (43.9% rate).

Several smaller zip codes exhibit even more extreme investor saturation. ID-Valley-83657, although containing only one SFR, is 100% investor-owned. More significantly, ID-Valley-83677 has a 60.9% investor ownership rate, indicating a market where traditional homeowners are in the minority.

The data reveals a strong correlation between the areas with the highest count of investor properties and those with the highest ownership rates. This differs from many markets where high-count areas may have moderate rates. In Valley County, investors are heavily clustered in the same few locations.

This intense geographic focus suggests that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods known for high rental demand, likely driven by tourism or local employment hubs. This concentration can significantly shape the character and housing availability within these hyper-local markets.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at a 27-to-1 ratio in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Valley County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 27 homes while selling only one, demonstrating immense confidence in the local market and a clear net-buyer position.

This aggressive buying behavior is not a new phenomenon. In 2025, investors bought 184 properties and sold only 19, a buy-to-sell ratio of 9.7 to 1. The trend was similar in 2024, with 164 purchases versus 16 sales, a ratio of 10.25 to 1.

With a 0.0% institutional market share, there is no transaction activity to report from large-scale investors. The market's liquidity and growth are entirely dependent on the continuous buying pressure from thousands of small, independent landlords.

The data does not provide a breakdown of landlord-to-landlord sales, so it is unclear how much of this activity is churn within the investor community versus acquisitions from the owner-occupied market. However, given the high net acquisition numbers, it's clear that the overall investor portfolio is expanding rapidly.

The sustained, high-velocity buying from landlords is a primary force shaping the Valley County housing market. This continuous absorption of housing stock for rental purposes reduces the inventory available for traditional homebuyers and contributes to the high investor ownership rates seen across the region.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove half of all market activity in Q1, accounting for 50% of total transactions.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a driving force in the Valley County market during Q1, participating in 27 of the 54 total SFR transactions. This 50.0% share of activity demonstrates their critical role in setting prices and determining market liquidity.

All Q1 investor transactions were executed by mom-and-pop landlords, with institutional investors remaining completely on the sidelines. The bulk of the activity came from the single-property tier, which was responsible for 22 of the 27 transactions.

A notable pricing disparity emerged between new and existing investors. First-time, single-property landlords paid an average of $804,120 for their acquisitions. This is 39.0% higher than the $578,550 average price paid by landlords in the more experienced 3-5 property tier, suggesting new entrants may be competing for premium, turnkey properties.

Investors sourced all of their Q1 acquisitions from outside the existing landlord pool. The data shows that 0.0% of properties were bought from other landlords, indicating that investors are buying from homeowners, developers, or builders, thereby consistently moving properties from the owner-occupied market into the rental stock.

The combination of high transaction share and sourcing from the non-investor market shows how landlord activity directly impacts housing stock availability for traditional homebuyers in Valley County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Valley County's housing market is defined by small investors, who own 49.1% of all homes and are aggressively buying more.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,092 SFR properties in Valley County, representing a 49.1% penetration of the local market. Ownership is dominated by individuals, who hold 1,644 properties (78.6%), while companies own the remaining 549 (26.2%).
Pricing
In a stark reversal of typical market dynamics, landlords paid a 79.4% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1, with an average purchase price of $791,588 compared to the homeowner average of $441,293.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 57.6% of all properties sold, with all 100% of these purchases made by mom-and-pop investors. This activity was led by 22 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the investment market, owning 96.7% of all investor-held SFRs. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence in this county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the foundation of the market, but companies become the majority owners (80.0%) in portfolios sized between 6 and 20 properties, marking a clear point of professionalization.
Transactions
Landlords are heavily in an accumulation phase, operating as strong net buyers with a 27-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (27 buys vs 1 sell). Institutional investors were completely inactive, with zero buys or sells.
Market Narrative

The single-family residential market in Valley County, Idaho is fundamentally shaped by small, independent investors. They own 2,092 properties, a remarkable 49.1% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 properties), who control 96.7% of all investor-owned homes. Individual investors make up the bulk of this group, owning 78.6% of the properties, while institutional firms with over 1,000 homes have no presence at all. This market structure, detailed in our latest market reports, creates a dynamic driven by private capital and local decision-making, not corporate strategy.

Investor behavior in Valley County defies national norms. In Q1, landlords were aggressive net buyers with a 27-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, indicating strong confidence and a clear strategy of portfolio expansion. Rather than seeking discounts, these investors paid a 79.4% premium over traditional homeowners, targeting high-value properties with an average price of $791,588. This activity is led by new entrants, with 22 first-time landlords joining the market in the last quarter. Furthermore, investors sourced 100% of new purchases from the non-investor market, effectively transferring housing stock into the rental pool.

The key takeaway for the Valley County housing market is its status as a stronghold for the independent landlord, where nearly half the homes are rentals. The high concentration in specific zip codes, like 83638 where investors own over 50% of homes, points to a market segmented between primary residences and investment properties, likely for a robust vacation rental economy. The lack of institutional presence and the premium prices paid by investors suggest a focus on quality over quantity, a trend that will continue to influence housing affordability and availability for local residents.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 03:02 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Valley (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Valley (ID) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-id-valley/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.