Conecuh (AL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Conecuh (AL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Conecuh (AL)
2,772
Total Investors in Conecuh (AL)
571
Investor Owned SFR in Conecuh (AL)
582(21.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
519
SFR Owned
502
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
52
SFR Owned
83
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 582 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Control 92.3% of Investor Housing in Conecuh County's Stagnant Q4 Market
Investors own 582 SFR properties, a significant 21.0% of the total market in Conecuh County, AL. Ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among small, 'mom-and-pop' landlords (92.3%), with individual investors comprising 86.3% of all holdings. The market showed no sales activity in the latest quarter, with zero properties purchased by landlords or other buyers, signaling a complete freeze in transactions.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 21.0% of Conecuh County SFRs, with individuals holding 502 of the 582 properties.
Investor portfolios are almost entirely owned outright, with 575 properties held in cash versus only 7 financed. The vast majority of these properties (575) are classified as rented, non-owner-occupied homes. Individual landlords (519) outnumber company landlords (52) by nearly 10 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No Q4 2025 landlord or homeowner purchase data is available, preventing price comparison analysis.
Due to a complete lack of transactions in the most recent quarter for both landlords and traditional homeowners, it is not possible to calculate a price gap or analyze recent pricing trends. Historical data for 2024 and 2020-2023 also shows no recorded acquisitions, indicating a prolonged period of low transactional velocity.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlord purchasing activity came to a complete halt, with 0 properties acquired in Q4 2025.
The market saw zero total SFR purchases during the quarter, meaning landlords captured 0.0% of a non-existent market. Both mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors recorded zero acquisitions, reflecting a market-wide pause.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 92.3% of all investor-owned SFRs, with zero institutional presence.
Single-property landlords alone account for 77.1% of the investor market (452 properties). There are no institutional investors (Tier 09) active in Conecuh County. Due to a lack of recent sales, no tier-specific pricing analysis is possible.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners across every single portfolio tier in Conecuh County.
Unlike other markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners; individuals hold the majority even in the 3-5 property tier (74.5%). In the largest active tier (21-50 properties), individuals own 100% of the 28 properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip code 36401, which holds 427 of the 582 investor-owned properties.
Zip code 36401 not only has the highest count but also a high ownership rate of 23.6%. However, the highest penetration rate is in the much smaller 36474 zip code, where investors own 31.8% of the SFR housing stock.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, acquiring 18 properties while selling only 1.
This net buying activity from 2024 stands in stark contrast to the complete lack of transactions observed more recently. No institutional transactions were recorded, reflecting their absence from the market. Data on landlord-to-landlord sales is unavailable.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of transactions in Q4 2025, as the market saw no sales activity.
With zero total transactions in Conecuh County's SFR market for the quarter, no analysis of tier activity, pricing, or inter-landlord trading is possible. The market was effectively dormant for all buyer types.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 21.0% of Conecuh County SFRs, with individuals holding 502 of the 582 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant footprint in Conecuh County, owning 582 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 21.0% of the total 2,772 SFRs in the market. This high penetration rate indicates a market with substantial rental activity and investor presence.

The investor landscape is dominated by private individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 502 properties, accounting for 86.3% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own the remaining 83 properties (14.3%).

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for all-cash ownership. An overwhelming 575 of the 582 investor-owned homes are held free of financing, with only 7 properties carrying a mortgage. This suggests investors in this area are well-capitalized and may prioritize cash flow over leverage.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rentals, with 575 properties listed as rented and non-owner-occupied. This aligns perfectly with the number of cash-owned properties, indicating a clear strategy of buying and holding for rental income.

The entity count further underscores the dominance of small-scale investors. There are 519 individual landlords compared to just 52 company landlords, revealing that the market is driven by local entrepreneurs and small family operations, not large-scale corporate entities.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No Q4 2025 landlord or homeowner purchase data is available, preventing price comparison analysis.
Detailed Findings

A critical finding for Conecuh County is the complete absence of transactional data in the most recent quarter. There were no recorded SFR purchases by landlords, traditional homeowners, or any other buyer type, making it impossible to perform a price comparison for this period.

The lack of recent sales activity prevents the calculation of the typical price gap often seen between landlords and homeowners. In most markets, investors secure properties at a discount, but the frozen nature of the Conecuh County market provides no data to confirm or deny this trend locally.

Looking at historical timeframes provides no further clarity, as the data shows zero landlord acquisitions in both 2024 and the 2020-2023 period. This suggests that the current market stagnation is not an anomaly but rather an extension of extremely low market liquidity over the past several years.

This absence of data is itself a powerful insight, pointing to a highly illiquid market where properties are tightly held and transactions are exceedingly rare. For those engaged in real estate investing, this signifies a challenging environment for acquisitions.

Consequently, analysis of price appreciation or depreciation is not feasible. The market's price structure remains opaque without the benchmark of recent, comparable sales to establish current valuation trends.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlord purchasing activity came to a complete halt, with 0 properties acquired in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In a clear signal of market stagnation, landlords made zero SFR purchases in Conecuh County during Q4 2025. This inactivity was part of a broader market freeze, as the total number of SFRs sold in the county was also zero.

The landlord share of the market was consequently 0.0%. This lack of activity spanned all investor types, with no new properties entering investor portfolios during the quarter.

Small-scale 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who form the backbone of the local investor community, acquired zero properties. This indicates that even the most prevalent type of buyer was inactive.

Similarly, institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000+ properties also made no purchases, maintaining their 0.0% share of acquisitions. This is consistent with their non-existent ownership presence in the county.

No new landlords entered the market in Q4, as the single-property (Tier 01) category saw zero new entities making a purchase. The data points to a complete pause in both new investor entry and existing portfolio expansion.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 92.3% of all investor-owned SFRs, with zero institutional presence.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Conecuh County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), control a combined 92.3% of all investor-held SFRs.

The most significant segment is the single-property landlord (Tier 01), which alone accounts for 452 properties, representing 77.1% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights that the market is built on small, individual investments rather than large-scale operations.

Mid-size investors are a small fraction of the market. Landlords with 11-50 properties (Tiers 05-06) collectively own just 7.5% of the inventory, reinforcing the concentration at the smaller end of the spectrum.

In stark contrast to national headlines, there is zero institutional ownership in Conecuh County. The 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) holds no properties, indicating this market is completely off the radar for large corporate investors.

Due to the lack of sales activity across all timeframes provided, it is not possible to analyze acquisition price differences between tiers. The purchasing behavior and pricing strategies of different investor sizes cannot be determined from the available transaction data.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the dominant owners across every single portfolio tier in Conecuh County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority ownership across all active portfolio tiers in Conecuh County, a pattern that underscores the market's 'mom-and-pop' character. Even among single-property landlords, individuals own 90.8% of the properties (413 homes) compared to just 9.2% for companies (42 homes).

The trend continues as portfolio sizes increase. For landlords owning 3-5 properties, individuals hold a 74.5% majority share. This defies the typical trend seen in larger markets where company ownership begins to accelerate in mid-size tiers.

There is no crossover point where companies overtake individuals. In fact, in the largest active tier (21-50 properties), individual investors own 100% of the 28 properties, with zero company ownership recorded.

This data indicates that business formalization through LLCs or other corporate structures is not a common strategy for landlords in this market, even as they scale their portfolios to a modest size.

Without recent acquisition data, it's impossible to compare the purchasing prices or strategies of individual versus company investors within these tiers. All ownership data is based on the current portfolio holdings.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip code 36401, which holds 427 of the 582 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration is a key feature of investor ownership in Conecuh County. A single zip code, 36401, serves as the epicenter, containing 427 of the 582 total investor-owned properties, or 73.4% of the entire investor portfolio.

The 36401 zip code also demonstrates a high investor penetration rate at 23.6%, meaning nearly one in four single-family homes there is investor-owned. This area is the primary focus for local market reports and analysis.

While 36401 leads by volume, the highest ownership rate is found in the smaller zip code of 36474, where investors own 31.8% of the properties. This highlights a pocket of even more intense investor saturation, albeit with a much smaller total of 7 properties.

Other areas with notable investor presence include 36432 with 66 properties (16.7% rate) and 36475 with 47 properties (16.1% rate), showing that investor activity, while concentrated, is present throughout the county.

The data reveals a distinction between regions with high property counts and those with high ownership percentages. For example, 36473 has a 20.7% investor rate but only a handful of properties, indicating that small rural zip codes can have very high investor saturation.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, acquiring 18 properties while selling only 1.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data from 2024 shows that landlords in Conecuh County were actively expanding their portfolios, acting as strong net buyers. They purchased 18 single-family homes while selling only one during the year.

This net addition of 17 properties in 2024 provides a sharp contrast to the frozen market of Q4 2025, where zero buy or sell transactions occurred. This suggests a significant shift from active accumulation to a period of inactivity.

The transaction record is exclusively composed of activity from non-institutional landlords. The 1,000+ property tier recorded zero buys and zero sells, which is consistent with their 0.0% ownership share in the county.

The data does not specify the percentage of transactions that occurred between landlords. Without this, it's unclear how much of the 2024 buying activity was sourced from other investors versus traditional homeowners.

Similarly, a comparison of average buy and sell prices for 2024 is not available, which would otherwise provide insight into potential profit margins or market price movements during that period of activity.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of transactions in Q4 2025, as the market saw no sales activity.
Detailed Findings

The transaction summary for Q4 2025 confirms a completely dormant market in Conecuh County, with zero total SFR transactions recorded. Consequently, the landlord share of transactions was 0.0%.

No investor tier, from single-property landlords to the largest operators, engaged in any buying activity. The lack of transactions was uniform across the entire spectrum of investor sizes.

As there were no purchases, it is not possible to compare the average purchase prices across different tiers. The pricing strategies of smaller versus larger landlords in this market remain unknown based on recent activity.

Inter-landlord trading activity was also non-existent. The data shows zero properties were bought from other landlords, which is expected in a quarter with no transactions at all.

This complete halt in transactional flow is the most significant finding for the quarter, indicating that both supply and demand for SFR properties were either perfectly matched at zero or that external factors prevented any deals from closing.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Dominated by small investors, Conecuh County's real estate market shows high rental penetration but zero recent sales activity.
Holdings
Landlords own 582 SFR properties, representing 21.0% of Conecuh County's market, with individual investors overwhelmingly holding 502 of those properties (86.3%) compared to companies owning 83 (14.3%).
Pricing
No pricing analysis is possible for the quarter as zero transactions were recorded for either landlords or traditional homeowners, indicating a stalled market.
Activity
Q4 was completely inactive with landlords purchasing zero properties, representing 0.0% of all sales. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) exert near-total control, owning 92.3% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have no presence with a 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every portfolio size, controlling 90.8% of single-property rentals and 100% of properties in the largest active tier (21-50 units), with no crossover point to company majority.
Transactions
While landlords were strong net buyers in 2024 (18 buys vs. 1 sell), the most recent quarter saw zero transactions, resulting in a dormant market with no buy or sell activity.
Market Narrative

In Conecuh County, AL, the single-family rental market is characterized by a high concentration of small, individual investors. Landlords own a substantial 21.0% of the county's 2,772 SFR properties, totaling 582 homes. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who hold 92.3% of all investor-owned real estate. Individual investors account for 86.3% of these holdings (502 properties), with institutional firms completely absent from the market. This structure points to a deeply localized and fragmented investor base, a stark contrast to institutionally active metropolitan areas. A full property ownership by owner type report would detail these granular differences.

Investor behavior in Conecuh County is defined by cash-heavy ownership and, more recently, a complete halt in activity. An analysis of holdings reveals that 575 of 582 properties (98.8%) are owned outright without financing, suggesting a focus on long-term, debt-free rental income. While historical data shows landlords were net buyers in 2024, acquiring 18 properties while selling only one, the most recent quarter saw zero purchases. This market-wide freeze, with no transactions recorded for any buyer type, signals extreme illiquidity and a potential disconnect between buyer and seller expectations.

The key takeaway from this investor pulse is that Conecuh County represents a mature, tightly held rental market dominated by local cash investors. The current lack of transactions suggests a stable but stagnant environment where existing owners are holding firm and new buyers are unable or unwilling to enter. For outside investors, this presents a significant barrier to entry, while for local homeowners, it means the rental landscape is well-established but not aggressively expanding. The market's future direction will depend on whether this transactional freeze thaws, allowing for new price discovery and a resumption of activity.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 20, 2026 at 06:55 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Conecuh (AL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Conecuh (AL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-al-conecuh/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.