Teton (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Teton (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Teton (ID)
3,238
Total Investors in Teton (ID)
2,119
Investor Owned SFR in Teton (ID)
1,633(50.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,691
SFR Owned
1,219
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
428
SFR Owned
466
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,633 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Teton County, Owning Over 50% of Single-Family Homes
Investors own 1,633 single-family properties in Teton County, a 50.4% market share, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 99.0% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords were aggressive net buyers and purchased homes at a 36.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners, signaling sophisticated acquisition strategies in a market almost entirely devoid of institutional presence.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,633 SFRs, 50.4% of the market, with individuals holding 74.6% of properties.
The investor portfolio is heavily cash-based, with 1,043 properties owned outright versus 590 that are financed. Of the 1,633 properties, 1,622 are designated as rentals, indicating an almost exclusively non-owner-occupied strategy.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 36.5% less than homeowners, a massive $543,074 average discount.
This massive discount reverses a volatile trend from 2025, where landlords paid significant premiums, including a 152.6% premium in Q2 2025. This highlights extreme price fluctuations and potentially different asset types being traded each quarter. The available data does not differentiate between individual and company pricing.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 48.9% of all home purchases in Q4 2025, buying 22 of the 45 properties sold.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of these acquisitions. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero purchases, highlighting a complete absence of large-scale buyers.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 86.5% of all investor-held housing stock. In stark contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties control just 0.1% of the inventory. Price variation data by tier is not available for this geography.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 57.9% of assets.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller tiers, owning 75.8% of single-property portfolios and 60.8% of two-property portfolios. The 3-5 property tier represents an even 50/50 split, marking the transition point where investors begin to incorporate.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with zip codes 83455 and 83422 holding 1,302 properties.
These two areas account for 80% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county. Investor ownership rates are extremely high across the board, with the top four zip codes all exceeding 52%, peaking at 54.8% in 83424.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 33 properties while selling only 2 in Q1 2026.
This accumulation trend is consistent over time, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 8.7 to 1 in 2025 (183 buys vs 21 sells) and 8.5 to 1 in 2024 (145 buys vs 17 sells). Institutional investors recorded no transaction activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove 55.9% of all market transactions in Q1 2026, with 33 of 59 total purchases.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100% of these transactions. New and single-property landlords bought homes at an average price of $919,300, and only 6.2% of their purchases came from other landlords, showing a focus on acquiring from the general market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,633 SFRs, 50.4% of the market, with individuals holding 74.6% of properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Teton County represents a significant market force, with landlords holding 1,633 of the 3,238 total Single-Family Residential properties, a remarkable 50.4% penetration rate.

The market is overwhelmingly controlled by 1,691 individual landlords who own 1,219 properties (74.6%), compared to 428 company landlords holding 466 properties (28.5%). This structure underscores the dominance of smaller, non-corporate investors in the local rental landscape.

A key indicator of financial strength is the prevalence of cash ownership. Landlords in Teton County own 1,043 properties with no financing, far outpacing the 590 properties that carry a mortgage. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is intensely focused on rental income, with 1,622 of the 1,633 investor-owned properties classified as rented. This near-total focus on non-owner-occupied properties highlights a clear strategy of providing housing for the rental market rather than speculative flipping.

While individual entities (1,691) vastly outnumber companies (428), their average portfolio size is smaller. This points to a broad base of small-scale investors forming the backbone of the county's rental housing supply, a departure from narratives focused on large corporate ownership.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 36.5% less than homeowners, a massive $543,074 average discount.
Detailed Findings

A dramatic pricing advantage emerged for landlords in Q1 2026, who acquired properties at an average price of $946,526 compared to the $1,489,600 paid by traditional homeowners. This represents a substantial 36.5% discount, or $543,074 per property.

This quarter's discount marks a sharp reversal from 2025's trend, which saw landlords paying significant premiums. For instance, in Q2 2025, landlords paid $1,024,502 on average, a 152.6% premium over the homeowner price of $405,650, suggesting a highly volatile market or a focus on different property classes in different periods.

The volatility in the price gap between landlords and homeowners is a defining feature of the Teton County market. After paying premiums of 51.8%, 152.6%, and 6.3% in the first three quarters of 2025, the shift to a 36.5% discount in Q1 2026 indicates that investor purchasing strategy may be opportunistic and not tied to a consistent price point relative to the retail market.

Despite quarterly fluctuations, a clear long-term appreciation trend is visible in landlord acquisition prices. The average price has risen from $681,705 in the 2020-2023 period to $946,526 in Q1 2026, reflecting significant market growth.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 48.9% of all home purchases in Q4 2025, buying 22 of the 45 properties sold.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity dominated the Q4 2025 market, with landlords purchasing 22 of the 45 total SFRs sold, a commanding 48.9% market share. This high level of activity indicates investors were the single most powerful buyer group during the quarter.

The entirety of this purchasing power came from small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100% of all landlord acquisitions. Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely inactive, making no purchases.

The market saw a significant influx of new participants, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) making up the vast majority of activity. This tier alone acquired 21 of the 22 properties (95.5%) purchased by investors, driven by 30 distinct new landlord entities entering the market.

The data reveals a market being shaped from the ground up by new and small-scale players. The concentration of activity in the single-property tier suggests a healthy and accessible entry point for local real estate investing.

The complete lack of acquisitions from mid-size or institutional tiers further reinforces the narrative that Teton County's investor landscape is defined by individuals and small businesses, not large, consolidated portfolios.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Teton County is exceptionally concentrated among small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a staggering 99.0% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio.

Single-property landlords are the bedrock of this market, holding 1,439 properties. This represents 86.5% of all investor-owned housing, a figure that underscores the highly fragmented and decentralized nature of ownership.

The role of large-scale investors is statistically insignificant in this market. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) own just a single property, accounting for a mere 0.1% of the landlord portfolio. This finding directly counters the common narrative of corporate consolidation in housing markets.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) also have a very small footprint, collectively owning only 16 properties, or 1.0% of the investor total. The market clearly does not support significant scaling for rental operators beyond the small landlord level.

This distribution reveals a market heavily reliant on individual capital and local management, with ownership deeply embedded in the community rather than directed by outside institutional forces.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 57.9% of assets.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors form the base of the market, a clear trend emerges as portfolios grow: investors shift to corporate structures for ownership. Companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, holding 11 properties (57.9%) compared to 8 held by individuals.

The smallest portfolios are almost exclusively held by individuals. In the single-property tier, individuals own 1,124 properties (75.8%), establishing them as the primary entry point for new landlords.

The 3-5 property tier serves as the crossover point. Here, ownership is split exactly 50/50, with both individuals and companies holding 30 properties each. This suggests that as investors approach this scale, the benefits of incorporation for liability and financing become critical.

This pattern illustrates a natural lifecycle for a real estate investor in Teton County. They typically start as an individual, and if they scale their operations beyond five properties, they are more likely to formalize their business under a company structure.

The data highlights that even when operating as companies, the investors in this market are still small-scale, with the largest concentration of company-owned properties falling within the 'mom-and-pop' definition.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with zip codes 83455 and 83422 holding 1,302 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that landlord ownership in Teton County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in a few key areas. The top three zip codes, 83455 (708 properties), 83422 (594 properties), and 83452 (281 properties), together account for 1,583 of the 1,633 investor-owned SFRs, or 97% of the total.

The zip codes with the highest counts of investor properties also boast some of the highest investor ownership rates. In 83424, investors own 54.8% of all SFRs, followed closely by 83422 (52.5%) and 83452 (52.2%). This indicates that investors are a dominant force in the county's primary residential areas.

Unlike many markets where high property counts and high ownership percentages are found in different areas, in Teton County they overlap significantly. This suggests that the most desirable areas for traditional homeowners are also the primary targets for rental investors.

The intense concentration within these few zip codes highlights the strategic focus of local investors. They are not scattered across the region but are instead deeply invested in specific communities, which has a profound impact on the local housing supply and rental market dynamics.

The data points to a market where investors are not just participants but are the defining feature of the local housing landscape in these core zip codes.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 33 properties while selling only 2 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals a strong and sustained trend of portfolio accumulation among landlords in Teton County. In Q1 2026, they were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 33 SFR properties while selling only 2, resulting in a net gain of 31 properties.

This behavior is not a recent development. Throughout 2025, investors maintained a buy-to-sell ratio of 8.7-to-1, acquiring 183 properties and selling just 21. A similar pattern was observed in 2024, with 145 buys against 17 sells.

The consistent, high-volume net buying activity signals strong confidence in the local rental market. Investors are clearly in a phase of expansion and are actively increasing their holdings rather than liquidating assets.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) were completely absent from the transaction market, recording zero buys and zero sells in all reported periods. This reinforces that all market momentum is being driven by smaller, local investors.

The persistent accumulation by the landlord segment is a primary driver of market dynamics, reducing the for-sale inventory available to traditional homeowners and expanding the rental housing stock.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove 55.9% of all market transactions in Q1 2026, with 33 of 59 total purchases.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were the most dominant force in the Teton County real estate market, accounting for 33 of the 59 total SFR transactions, a 55.9% share. This level of activity shows that investors were involved in more than half of all home sales.

All of this transaction volume was generated by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), with institutional investors making no purchases. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, conducting 32 of the 33 landlord transactions.

A notable finding is the low level of inter-landlord trading. Among single-property buyers, only 2 of their 32 purchases (6.2%) were from another landlord. This indicates that new investors are primarily acquiring properties from traditional homeowners, increasing the overall stock of rental housing.

Pricing strategies vary even among small investors. The average purchase price for single-property landlords was $919,300, while the single transaction in the two-property tier was significantly higher at $1,382,136.

The transaction data confirms that the market's momentum is fueled by an expanding base of new, small-scale landlords who are actively converting owner-occupied housing into rental properties.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Teton County, Owning 50.4% of All Single-Family Homes
Holdings
Landlords own 1,633 SFR properties, representing a 50.4% share of Teton County's market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 1,219 properties (74.6%), while companies own 466 (28.5%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties at a remarkable 36.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $946,526 versus $1,489,600, a savings of $543,074 per home.
Activity
Investor activity surged in Q1 2026, accounting for 55.9% of all home purchases (33 of 59). This was driven by new entrants, with 30 new single-property landlord entities entering the market in the prior quarter.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market, owning 99.0% of all investor-held SFRs. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint at just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the foundation of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, controlling 57.9% of assets in that tier. This indicates a clear trend of incorporation as investors scale.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive accumulators, acting as strong net buyers in Q1 2026 with 33 purchases versus only 2 sales. Institutional investors were completely inactive, recording no transactions.
Market Narrative

The real estate market in Teton County, Idaho, is defined by an exceptionally high concentration of investor ownership, where landlords now hold 1,633 single-family homes, a 50.4% share of the entire market. This landscape is not shaped by Wall Street, but by local, small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 99.0% of the investor-owned housing stock, while institutional firms have a nearly non-existent presence at just 0.1%. The ownership base is deeply rooted in the community, with individual investors owning 74.6% of these rental properties.

In the first quarter of 2026, these investors demonstrated their market power by participating in 55.9% of all home sales. They operated as aggressive net buyers, acquiring 33 properties while only selling two, signaling strong confidence in continued growth. Their purchasing strategy appears highly sophisticated, as they secured properties at an average price of $946,526, a massive 36.5% discount compared to the prices paid by traditional homeowners. This activity is fueled by a constant influx of new participants, with 30 new single-property landlords entering the market in the preceding quarter.

The key takeaway from this data is that Teton County is a market dominated and actively shaped by a large, expanding base of well-capitalized individual investors. Their ability to purchase at a discount and their high transaction volume directly influence housing availability and affordability for all residents. The dominant trend is one of sustained accumulation by this mom-and-pop segment, which is converting an increasing share of the for-sale housing stock into long-term rental properties, profoundly impacting the local rental and ownership landscape.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 02:59 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Teton (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Teton (ID) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-id-teton/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.