Storey (NV) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Storey (NV) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Storey (NV)
1,467
Total Investors in Storey (NV)
626
Investor Owned SFR in Storey (NV)
438(29.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
562
SFR Owned
392
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
64
SFR Owned
61
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 438 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Storey County, Acquiring Homes at a 34% Discount
Investors own 29.9% of the Single-Family Residential market in Storey County, NV, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 99.3% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, investors purchased properties for 33.8% less than traditional homeowners. Activity is driven entirely by small investors, who are aggressive net buyers, with zero presence from institutional firms.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 438 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 89.5% share.
Cash purchases significantly outpace financing, with 272 properties owned outright versus 166 financed. The portfolio is intensely focused on rentals, as 435 of the 438 properties (99.3%) are non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 33.8% less than homeowners, securing a $196,911 average discount.
This significant price advantage for landlords has been consistent, with discounts reaching as high as 49.9% ($313,600) in Q1 2025. The data shows a persistent and substantial gap between what investors and traditional buyers pay for homes.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 42.1% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, with small investors driving all activity.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of the 8 investor purchases. Activity was led by new entrants, with 8 new single-property landlord entities joining the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.3% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 85.4% of all investor-held housing in Storey County. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence, holding 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners across every investor tier in Storey County.
There is no tier where companies hold a majority share; their highest concentration is 42.9% in the 3-5 property tier. In the 6-10 property tier, individuals own 100% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip code 89521, with 228 properties.
The highest rate of investor ownership is in zip code 89403, where investors own 41.9% of all SFR properties. The top areas by count and percentage overlap, showing deep investor penetration in specific neighborhoods.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Storey County are strong net buyers, acquiring 14.7 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
This accumulation trend has been consistent, with 44 properties bought versus only 3 sold in 2025. In 2024, the ratio was even higher, with 67 properties bought and only 4 sold.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 34.6% of all Q4 2025 transactions, all of them mom-and-pop investors.
Of the 9 landlord transactions, 0% were sourced from other landlords, meaning investors acquired their properties directly from the homeowner market. First-time landlords paid more on average ($408,538) than small multi-property landlords ($250,000).

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 438 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 89.5% share.
Detailed Findings

In Storey County, NV, investors hold a significant 29.9% of the single-family housing market, totaling 438 properties. This demonstrates a substantial presence of real estate investing activity relative to the total market size of 1,467 SFR properties.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 392 properties, accounting for 89.5% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own just 61 properties (13.9%).

A similar pattern appears in the entity count, where 562 individual landlords vastly outnumber the 64 company landlords, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the local market.

Investor portfolios are heavily geared towards cash ownership. There are 272 cash-owned properties compared to 166 financed properties, suggesting many investors operate with high liquidity and are less reliant on traditional mortgage financing.

The primary strategy for investors in this market is clear: rentals. A total of 435 of the 438 investor-owned properties are rented, meaning 99.3% of the portfolio is actively generating rental income, confirming a buy-and-hold strategy is paramount.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 33.8% less than homeowners, securing a $196,911 average discount.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Storey County demonstrate a remarkable ability to acquire properties at a significant discount compared to traditional homeowners. In Q1 2026, the average landlord acquisition price was $385,889, a full 33.8% below the $582,800 paid by homeowners, representing a savings of $196,911 per property.

This pricing advantage is not a recent phenomenon but a consistent market dynamic. Over the past year, the discount has remained substantial, ranging from 25.0% in Q3 2025 to a peak of 49.9% in Q1 2025. This indicates a sustained pattern of investors identifying and securing undervalued assets.

In Q1 2025, the price gap was at its widest, with landlords paying an average of $314,727 while homeowners paid $628,327, a staggering difference of $313,600. While the gap has fluctuated, it consistently provides investors with a major competitive edge.

The price landlords paid during the 2020-2023 boom period was $331,547 on average. Comparing this to the most recent quarter's price of $385,889 shows significant appreciation, yet investors continue to buy well below the typical market rate for homeowners.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 42.1% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, with small investors driving all activity.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 8 of the 19 total SFR properties sold in Storey County. This represents a commanding 42.1% market share for the quarter, highlighting their significant impact on local housing demand.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 100% of investor acquisitions, with institutional investors making zero purchases.

New market entrants were the primary driver of this activity. The single-property tier alone saw 8 distinct entities acquire 7 properties, indicating a healthy influx of new, first-time landlords into the Storey County market.

The data reveals a market completely devoid of large-scale institutional buying. With 0% of purchases attributed to the 1000+ property tier, the narrative in Storey County is one of grassroots investment, not corporate acquisition.

This concentration of activity at the smallest tier underscores the accessibility of the market for individual investors, who are actively expanding their portfolios or making their first rental property purchase.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.3% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Storey County is the epitome of a market dominated by small landlords. Investors with portfolios of 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively own 99.3% of all investor-held SFRs, leaving virtually no room for larger players.

Ownership is heavily concentrated at the smallest scale. Landlords with just a single property (Tier 01) own 381 homes, which accounts for 85.4% of the entire investor-owned housing stock. This highlights the critical role of first-time and small-scale investors in providing rental housing.

The narrative of large corporations buying up housing does not apply here. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a 0.0% market share, indicating a complete absence of large-scale corporate landlords in the county's SFR market.

Mid-size landlords are also exceptionally rare. Tiers representing portfolios of 11 to 1000 properties combined account for less than 1% of total investor ownership, further emphasizing the market's reliance on small operators.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market structure, where competition and market dynamics are dictated by the actions of hundreds of individual, small-portfolio owners, not a handful of large institutions.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority property owners across every investor tier in Storey County.
Detailed Findings

In Storey County, individual investors maintain majority ownership across all portfolio sizes, challenging the notion that larger portfolios are exclusively corporate. Even as portfolio sizes increase, individuals remain the primary owners.

There is no crossover point where companies become the dominant owner type. The highest concentration of company ownership is found in the small 3-5 property tier, where they hold 6 properties (42.9%), but individuals still hold the majority with 8 properties (57.1%).

The dominance of individual investors is most stark in the 6-10 property tier, where they own 100% of the 8 properties held by investors of that size.

Even at the entry-level, individual ownership is overwhelming. Among single-property landlords, 344 properties (88.0%) are owned by individuals, compared to just 47 (12.0%) owned by companies.

This pattern indicates that the path to portfolio growth in Storey County is one pursued primarily by private individuals, who continue to self-manage or hold properties under their own names rather than forming larger corporate entities as they expand.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip code 89521, with 228 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Storey County is not evenly distributed but concentrated in specific zip codes. The 89521 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity by volume, containing 228 investor-owned properties.

While 89521 leads in sheer count, the 89403 zip code has the highest market penetration. In this area, investors own 41.9% of the housing stock, indicating a profound influence on the local real estate market.

The top regions for investors show a strong correlation between high volume and high ownership rates. The top three zip codes by count (89521, 89440, 89403) also have the highest ownership percentages (29.4%, 33.0%, and 41.9% respectively), signaling that investors are doubling down in areas where they already have a strong foothold.

The top four zip codes alone account for 437 of the 438 investor-owned properties in the county, demonstrating an extreme level of geographic concentration.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Storey County are strong net buyers, acquiring 14.7 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data shows that landlords in Storey County are in a phase of aggressive accumulation. In 2025, they were decisive net buyers, purchasing 44 SFR properties while selling only 3, a buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 15-to-1.

This trend of portfolio expansion is not new. The pattern was even more pronounced in 2024, when landlords acquired 67 properties and sold just 4. This multi-year trend underscores a long-term bullish sentiment on the local rental market.

The extremely low sales volume suggests investors are pursuing a buy-and-hold strategy, focusing on long-term rental income rather than short-term flips. This contributes to a tighter for-sale market for traditional homebuyers.

Given the complete absence of institutional investors in the market, this net buying activity is driven entirely by the hundreds of small, mom-and-pop landlords who are steadily increasing their holdings one or two properties at a time.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 34.6% of all Q4 2025 transactions, all of them mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

In the most recent quarter of activity, Q4 2025, landlords played a major role by participating in 9 of the 26 total SFR transactions, a market share of 34.6%.

All transactional activity was confined to mom-and-pop tiers. Single-property investors (Tier 01) were the most active, conducting 8 transactions, while small landlords (Tier 03) conducted one. Institutional investors had no transaction activity.

A key finding is that 100% of investor purchases came from outside the landlord community. With 0% of properties 'Bought From Landlords', it is clear that investors in Storey County are acquiring their housing stock from traditional homeowners or new construction, not by trading assets among themselves.

There was a notable price difference based on investor size in Q4. New, single-property landlords paid an average of $408,538, whereas the more experienced small landlord in the 3-5 property tier acquired a property for just $250,000, suggesting potential for better deal-finding with experience.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Storey County is a small investor's stronghold, with mom-and-pops controlling 99% of rentals and buying homes 34% below market.
Holdings
Landlords own 438 Single-Family Residential properties in Storey County, NV, representing 29.9% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 392 of these properties (89.5%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties at a massive 33.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $385,889 while homeowners paid $582,800, a gap of $196,911.
Activity
Investors purchased 42.1% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, an effort driven entirely by small operators. During the quarter, 8 new single-property landlords entered the market, while institutional purchases remained at zero.
Market Share
The market is unequivocally controlled by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 99.3% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence, owning 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, with companies failing to achieve a majority share at any portfolio size. Companies are most represented in the 3-5 property tier but still only account for 42.9% of holdings there.
Transactions
Investors are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 44 properties while selling only 3 in 2025. With no institutional activity, this accumulation is entirely driven by small, individual landlords expanding their portfolios.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Storey County, NV is fundamentally shaped by small, individual investors. They own 438 properties, constituting a significant 29.9% of the total SFR housing stock. This ownership is highly fragmented, with individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords holding 89.5% of the investor-owned properties. In total, investors with 1-10 properties control a staggering 99.3% of the rental inventory, while institutional-scale investors have zero footprint in the county, challenging any narrative of a corporate takeover of local housing.

Investor behavior in Storey County is characterized by strategic acquisition and long-term accumulation. In the last active quarter (Q4 2025), these small investors were highly active, purchasing 42.1% of all homes sold. They achieve this with a significant pricing advantage, securing properties in Q1 2026 for 33.8% less than traditional homeowners. Transaction data confirms landlords are strong net buyers, consistently acquiring far more properties than they sell, and they primarily source these homes from the owner-occupied market rather than from other investors.

The key takeaway for the Storey County housing market is that it operates as a model of decentralized, small-scale investment. The market's health and the availability of rental housing are directly tied to the financial capacity and sentiment of hundreds of individual operators, not a few large firms. This structure results in intense competition for undervalued properties, providing a steady flow of rental options but also creating a challenging environment for traditional homebuyers competing against cash-heavy investors who can operate at a deep discount.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 12:08 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Storey (NV)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Storey (NV) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nv-storey/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.