Lewis (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lewis (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lewis (TN)
3,514
Total Investors in Lewis (TN)
1,042
Investor Owned SFR in Lewis (TN)
923(26.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
978
SFR Owned
766
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
64
SFR Owned
169
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 923 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Lewis County with 88% Market Share, Securing 41% Discounts
In Lewis County, TN, investors own 923 single-family properties, making up 26.3% of the market. The market is defined by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 88.3% of investor-owned homes while institutional ownership is nonexistent. In Q1 2026, these investors purchased homes at an average 40.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners and remain strong net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 923 SFR properties in Lewis County, with individual landlords holding 83.0%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (779) rather than financed (144). Nearly all properties (914 of 923) are designated as non-owner-occupied rentals. Ownership is highly fragmented, with 978 individual landlords compared to just 64 company entities.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, Lewis County investors paid 40.8% less than homeowners, a $117,432 discount.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners is highly volatile, swinging from a 30.4% premium paid by investors in Q3 2025 to the current 40.8% discount. Average acquisition prices have risen modestly from the 2020-2023 average of $142,891 to $170,106 in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 23.8% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, with small investors driving all activity.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of the 10 investor purchases last quarter. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions. The market saw 16 new single-property landlord entities emerge, signaling strong interest from new entrants.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 88.3% of investor-owned SFR housing in Lewis County.
Single-property landlords alone own 76.2% of all investor-held SFRs, a total of 719 properties. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence in the county, owning 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals overwhelmingly own properties across all tiers, making up 94% of single-property landlords.
Companies fail to gain a majority share at any portfolio size in Lewis County. Even in the 6-10 property tier, individuals still own a 66.7% majority of the homes. The data does not provide a price comparison between individual and company buyers.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with the 38462 zip code holding 80% of all investor SFRs.
While one zip code dominates by count, another, 38483, has the highest investor penetration rate at 43.4%. This highlights specific neighborhoods with extremely high concentrations of rental properties.
Historical Transactions
Lewis County landlords are persistent net buyers, acquiring 17 properties while selling only 4 in Q1 2026.
This net buyer trend is consistent over time, with a net gain of 43 properties in 2025 and 52 in 2024. The minimal institutional activity that exists is volatile; they were net sellers in Q3 2025 but net buyers for the full year.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 26.2% of all Lewis County property transactions in Q1 2026.
Single-property investors dominated activity, conducting 16 of the 17 landlord transactions. These small investors sourced nearly a third (31.2%) of their new properties from other landlords, showing an active secondary market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 923 SFR properties in Lewis County, with individual landlords holding 83.0%.
Detailed Findings

In Lewis County, TN, investors hold a significant 26.3% of the single-family residential market, totaling 923 properties out of 3,514. This high penetration rate underscores the importance of real estate investing in the local housing ecosystem.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals, who own 766 properties, or 83.0% of the investor portfolio. Companies account for the remaining 169 properties (18.3%), highlighting a market driven by local entrepreneurs rather than large corporations.

A striking financial characteristic of this portfolio is the preference for cash purchases. A total of 779 properties (84.4%) are owned outright without financing, compared to only 144 that are financed. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio's purpose is clear, with 914 of the 923 properties (99.0%) identified as non-owner-occupied rentals. This demonstrates a focused strategy on generating rental income within the county.

The fragmentation of ownership is further evidenced by the number of landlord entities. There are 1,042 distinct landlords, with 978 being individuals and only 64 registered as companies, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the Lewis County rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, Lewis County investors paid 40.8% less than homeowners, a $117,432 discount.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Lewis County demonstrated a strong purchasing advantage in Q1 2026, acquiring properties for an average price of $170,106. This was a staggering 40.8% less than the $287,538 paid by traditional homeowners, translating to a cash discount of $117,432 per property.

However, this investor discount is not a consistent market feature. The price relationship has been extremely volatile, with landlords paying a 30.4% premium ($85,649 more) just two quarters prior in Q3 2025. This fluctuation suggests investors are opportunistic, targeting specific types of properties or distress situations that don't follow general market trends.

The market has seen price appreciation since the post-pandemic era. The average investor acquisition price of $170,106 in Q1 2026 represents a 19.0% increase from the 2020-2023 average of $142,891, though this growth is tempered by the quarter-to-quarter price volatility.

The significant price differences between quarters, from a high of $367,613 in Q3 2025 to $170,106 in Q1 2026, indicate a market where average prices are heavily influenced by a small number of transactions with varying property characteristics.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 23.8% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, with small investors driving all activity.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a substantial portion of the market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 10 of the 42 total SFR properties sold, a market share of 23.8%. This level of activity highlights their consistent role in local housing transactions.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, owning between 1 and 10 properties, made 100% of all investor acquisitions. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the market.

New market entrants were the primary driver of demand. Investors in the single-property tier purchased 10 properties, representing 90.9% of all landlord acquisitions for the quarter. These purchases were made by 16 distinct entities, suggesting some properties may be co-owned.

The data clearly shows that the growth in Lewis County's rental market is fueled from the ground up. There is no evidence of large-scale, institutional consolidation; instead, the market is expanding through the addition of new, small-scale landlords.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 88.3% of investor-owned SFR housing in Lewis County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Lewis County is the definition of a mom-and-pop market. Landlords owning 1-10 properties control a commanding 88.3% of all investor-owned single-family homes, a figure that refutes any narrative of corporate dominance.

Ownership is heavily concentrated at the smallest scale. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the backbone of the rental market, owning 719 properties, which accounts for 76.2% of the entire investor portfolio. This underscores the importance of first-time and small-scale investors to the local housing supply.

The complete absence of institutional capital is a defining feature of this market. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) own 0.0% of the properties, indicating this market is not a target for large-scale aggregators.

Mid-size investors also play a limited role. The majority of the remaining properties are held by landlords in the 51-100 property tier, who control 8.6% of the portfolio, with all other mid-size tiers owning negligible shares.

This distribution of ownership suggests a highly fragmented and localized market, where investment strategies are likely driven by personal capital and local knowledge rather than broad, national trends. Reliable assessor data is crucial for these smaller investors to make informed decisions.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals overwhelmingly own properties across all tiers, making up 94% of single-property landlords.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the dominant force across every single portfolio tier in Lewis County, from single-property owners to those holding up to 50 properties. This pattern reinforces that the local rental market is operated by private citizens, not corporate entities.

The concentration of individual ownership is highest at the entry level. Among single-property landlords, 94.0% of the 719 properties are owned by individuals (684 properties), with only 6.0% held by companies.

There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. Unlike in larger metropolitan markets, companies remain a minority partner even as portfolio sizes grow. In the 6-10 property tier, individuals own 66.7% of the assets, demonstrating their sustained control.

The data indicates that even as investors scale their operations in Lewis County, they tend to do so under their own names rather than forming larger corporate structures. This may reflect the nature of the local market, where personal relationships and direct management are prevalent.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with the 38462 zip code holding 80% of all investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Lewis County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in specific areas. The zip code 38462 is the undisputed hub of activity, containing 740 investor-owned properties, or 80.2% of the county's entire investor portfolio.

While 38462 leads by sheer volume, the zip code 38483 stands out for having the highest density of investor ownership. In this area, 43.4% of all single-family homes are investor-owned, indicating a neighborhood predominantly composed of rental properties.

Other areas also show significant investor penetration, including 38485 (33.3% rate) and 38461 (23.6% rate). This pinpoints specific pockets within the county where investors have focused their acquisition strategies.

The stark difference between the top area by count (740 properties) and the next largest (141 properties) shows a clear preference for a single primary submarket. Investors looking to enter or expand in Lewis County are overwhelmingly targeting one specific zone. A detailed property search tool would be essential to identify opportunities in these high-concentration areas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Lewis County landlords are persistent net buyers, acquiring 17 properties while selling only 4 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data confirms that landlords in Lewis County are in an accumulation phase, consistently buying more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, they demonstrated a strong net buyer position, adding a net of 13 properties to their portfolios through 17 purchases and only 4 sales.

This behavior is not a recent phenomenon but part of a multi-year trend. In 2025, landlords were net buyers of 43 properties (62 buys vs. 19 sells), and in 2024, they added a net of 52 properties (63 buys vs. 11 sells). This signals sustained confidence and long-term investment in the local market.

Institutional investors, while barely active, show a much more erratic pattern. They flipped from being net sellers in Q3 2025 (1 buy, 2 sells) to slight net buyers for the full year of 2025 (4 buys, 2 sells). Their transaction volume is too low to establish a clear strategy but contrasts with the steady accumulation by smaller landlords.

The persistent net buying from the dominant mom-and-pop investor base indicates a healthy, growing rental market where existing landlords are reinvesting and expanding their holdings.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 26.2% of all Lewis County property transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords played a significant role in market liquidity, participating in 17 of the 65 total single-family transactions, for a market share of 26.2%. This demonstrates that investors are a core component of the buy-side demand in Lewis County.

Transaction activity was almost entirely driven by the smallest investor tier. Landlords in the single-property tier accounted for 16 of the 17 investor transactions, purchasing properties at an average price of $176,425.

A notable pattern is the amount of inter-landlord trading. Among the single-property tier investors, 31.2% of their purchases (5 transactions) were acquired from other landlords. This indicates a liquid market where investors can efficiently trade assets among themselves.

The data highlights a dynamic where new or aspiring landlords are often buying their first rental property from an existing, perhaps exiting, landlord. This churn is a key feature of the local investment cycle and is a primary focus of many Investor Pulse reports.

In contrast to the active mom-and-pop segment, there were zero transactions recorded for institutional investors, confirming their complete inactivity in the county during the first quarter.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords define Lewis County's market, owning 88.3% of rentals while securing 40.8% discounts.
Holdings
Investors own 923 SFR properties in Lewis County, representing 26.3% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (83.0%) compared to companies (18.3%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $170,106, which is 40.8% less than the $287,538 paid by traditional homeowners, a significant discount of $117,432 per property.
Activity
Landlords purchased 23.8% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter, with 100% of this activity from mom-and-pop investors. This included 16 new single-property landlord entities entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with an 88.3% share of investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no presence, owning 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all portfolio sizes, owning 94.0% of single-property rentals. There is no crossover tier where companies become the majority owners in Lewis County.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 17 properties versus selling only 4 in Q1 2026. Institutional investors are not a factor in the transaction market, showing no activity.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Lewis County, TN, is fundamentally shaped and controlled by small, individual investors. Landlords own 923 properties, a significant 26.3% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This ownership is not corporate; individuals hold 83.0% of these assets. The market structure is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 88.3% of the investor portfolio, while institutional firms with over 1,000 properties are entirely absent.

Investor behavior in Lewis County is characterized by opportunistic acquisition and steady accumulation. In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated a remarkable ability to secure value, paying an average of 40.8% less than traditional homeowners. This purchasing advantage fuels their consistent expansion, as they remain strong net buyers, acquiring 17 properties while selling only 4 in the first quarter. All recent purchasing activity has come from mom-and-pop investors, with 16 new single-property landlords entering the market, signaling robust grassroots-level growth.

The key takeaway for Lewis County is that its rental market is a localized, self-contained ecosystem driven by private capital. The absence of institutional players creates a stable environment dominated by long-term strategies and direct landlord-tenant relationships. The high rate of cash ownership (84.4%) further insulates the market from national credit cycle volatility. For participants in this market, success depends not on large-scale financial engineering, but on deep local knowledge and the ability to identify and acquire properties at a discount.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 02:51 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Lewis (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Lewis (TN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tn-lewis/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.