Rockingham (NH) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Rockingham (NH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Rockingham (NH)
83,177
Total Investors in Rockingham (NH)
17,300
Investor Owned SFR in Rockingham (NH)
11,633(14.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
14,998
SFR Owned
10,123
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
2,302
SFR Owned
2,391
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 11,633 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Rockingham County, Buying 43% of Homes and Paying a 7.1% Premium
In Rockingham County, landlords own 14.0% of all single-family homes, a segment overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop investors (99.8%). In Q1 2026, landlords were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 43.3% of homes sold and, contrary to national trends, paying a 7.1% premium over traditional homeowners. Institutional investors have zero presence in this market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords hold 11,633 SFR properties in Rockingham, with individuals owning 87.0% of the portfolio.
The investor portfolio is slightly more cash-based, with 6,294 properties owned outright versus 5,339 that are financed. An overwhelming 98.5% of all investor-owned properties (11,459) are classified as rented, indicating a strong focus on generating rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors in Rockingham paid a 7.1% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $694,692 per purchase.
This trend of paying more than homeowners is consistent, with landlords paying premiums of 2.9% in Q3 2025 and 8.1% in Q2 2025. Prices have appreciated significantly, with the Q1 2026 average price of $694,692 representing a 19.8% increase over the 2020-2023 average of $579,904.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured an impressive 43.3% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, acquiring 156 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 98.7% of these purchases, buying 155 homes. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) made zero acquisitions, showing their complete absence from the market's buying activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 91.9% of the investor-owned housing stock, owning 10,878 properties. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have no discernible footprint, holding 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property holders at the 3-5 property tier, owning 51.6% of homes in that segment.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, with an 83.4% share in the single-property tier, their control wanes as portfolio sizes increase. At the 6-10 property tier, companies own a commanding 81.5% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
The 03842 zip code leads Rockingham County with 1,122 investor-owned properties.
However, the highest concentration of investors is in the 03825 zip code, where they own 83.3% of the housing. This contrasts with 03842, where the large number of investor properties only constitutes a 24.5% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Rockingham landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring nearly 8 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
This accumulation trend is long-standing, with landlords buying 2,369 properties and selling only 181 throughout 2025, a 13x buy-to-sell ratio. Institutional investors recorded no transactions, remaining completely dormant.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 41.8% of all Rockingham County property transactions in Q1 2026.
Single-property investors dominated this activity, conducting 220 transactions and paying the highest average price at $701,843. Only 8.6% of these entry-level purchases were sourced from other landlords, indicating they are buying primarily from the homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords hold 11,633 SFR properties in Rockingham, with individuals owning 87.0% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Rockingham County, investors own 11,633 single-family residential properties, accounting for 14.0% of the total 83,177 SFRs in the market. This demonstrates a significant, established presence of real estate investing in the local housing ecosystem.

Individual investors are the definitive force in the market, holding 10,123 properties, or 87.0% of the investor-owned portfolio. Company-owned properties total 2,391, representing 20.6% of holdings, highlighting the prevalence of smaller-scale, personal ownership over corporate entities.

An analysis of financing reveals a slight preference for cash acquisitions, with 6,294 properties (54.1%) owned free and clear, compared to 5,339 properties (45.9%) that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base in the region.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 11,459 properties (98.5%) listed as rented. This near-total focus on non-owner-occupied properties underscores the business-oriented nature of SFR ownership in the county.

The market is composed of 17,300 distinct landlord entities. Of these, 14,998 are individual landlords while 2,302 are company landlords, a ratio of more than six individuals for every one company, reinforcing the mom-and-pop character of the market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors in Rockingham paid a 7.1% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $694,692 per purchase.
Detailed Findings

Contrary to the common narrative of investors securing discounts, landlords in Rockingham County paid a significant premium for properties in the first quarter. The average landlord acquisition price was $694,692, which is $46,183, or 7.1%, higher than the $648,509 paid by traditional homeowners.

This pattern of paying a premium is not an anomaly. It has been a consistent trend over the past year, with investors paying 2.9% more in Q3 2025 ($722,619 vs $702,173) and 8.1% more in Q2 2025 ($738,776 vs $683,529), signaling intense competition for available housing stock.

The market has seen substantial price appreciation since the pandemic-era boom. The average Q1 2026 landlord purchase price of $694,692 marks a 19.8% increase from the 2020-2023 average of $579,904, highlighting strong and sustained value growth in the region.

While prices fluctuate quarterly, the overall trend points to a competitive environment where investors are willing to pay above market rates to acquire properties, likely driven by strong rental demand and appreciation expectations.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured an impressive 43.3% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, acquiring 156 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 156 of the 360 total SFR properties sold in Rockingham County. This represents a commanding 43.3% market share, indicating that investors were a primary driver of housing transactions during the quarter.

The market's activity is almost exclusively fueled by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, owning between 1 and 10 properties, accounted for 155 of the 156 investor purchases, a staggering 98.7% of the total.

New entrants are the lifeblood of this market. Single-property landlords made up the vast majority of buyers, acquiring 147 properties (93.6%) through 218 different entities. This signals a wave of new individuals beginning their investment journeys in Rockingham.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios over 1,000 properties made zero purchases in Q4. This highlights a market structure completely devoid of large-scale corporate buying, driven instead by local and small-scale capital.

The data reveals a highly concentrated buying pattern, with the smallest investor tier not only being the most active but practically the only active segment, shaping the competitive landscape for all buyers.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Rockingham County is defined by the absolute dominance of small landlords. Investors with portfolios of 1-10 properties, often called mom-and-pops, own 99.8% of all investor-held SFRs, a level of concentration that firmly places market control in the hands of small-scale operators.

The foundation of this market is the single-property landlord. This tier alone controls 10,878 properties, which constitutes 91.9% of the entire investor-owned housing supply. This signifies that the typical landlord is not a large corporation but an individual with a single rental home.

Further up the scale, ownership drops off precipitously. Two-property landlords hold 3.8% (453 properties), and those with 3-5 properties hold 3.6% (426 properties). Combined, the top three smallest tiers control 99.3% of the market.

In a direct challenge to the narrative of Wall Street buying up homes, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a 0.0% share in Rockingham County. Their absence is total, ceding the entire market to smaller, local players.

This ownership structure, based on detailed assessor data, suggests that housing policies and market analysis should focus on the behavior and needs of individual investors rather than large corporations, as they are the ones shaping the rental market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property holders at the 3-5 property tier, owning 51.6% of homes in that segment.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure shows a clear evolution as portfolios grow. While individual investors form the bedrock of the market, companies become the majority owners starting at the 3-5 property tier, where they hold 226 properties for a 51.6% share.

Individuals overwhelmingly dominate the entry-level tiers. They own 9,685 properties (83.4%) in the single-property segment and 308 properties (64.7%) in the two-property segment, showing that most investors start their journey as individuals.

The transition to corporate ownership accelerates significantly in larger portfolios. In the 6-10 property tier, companies own 44 of the 54 properties, an 81.5% share. This suggests that scaling an investment portfolio in Rockingham is strongly correlated with incorporation for liability and operational purposes.

This crossover point at the 3-5 property level is a key structural feature of the market. It indicates the threshold where the complexity and financial scale of a portfolio often necessitate a formal business structure over individual ownership.

The data illustrates two distinct investor paths: a massive base of individuals with one or two properties, and a smaller, more concentrated group that uses corporate entities to manage and grow larger portfolios.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 03842 zip code leads Rockingham County with 1,122 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals specific pockets of high investor concentration within Rockingham County. The zip code 03842 is the volume leader, with 1,122 investor-owned SFR properties located within its boundaries.

Following 03842, other areas with high counts of investor properties include 03038 (774 properties), 03079 (739 properties), and 03801 (738 properties). These five areas represent the core of investor holdings in the county.

A different story emerges when looking at ownership rates. The 03825 zip code has the highest investor penetration, with 83.3% of its SFRs owned by investors. This indicates a market that is almost entirely composed of rental or investment properties.

Other areas with high investor ownership percentages include 03871 (78.2%) and 03854 (50.6%), showing that in certain smaller communities, investors are the majority owners. This highlights the importance of distinguishing between high-volume and high-penetration submarkets.

The divergence between volume leaders like 03842 (24.5% rate) and rate leaders like 03825 (83.3% rate) is crucial. It shows that investor impact is not uniform; some large suburban areas absorb many rentals, while some smaller towns are fundamentally rental communities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Rockingham landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring nearly 8 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transactional data shows landlords are in a strong accumulation phase. In Q1 2026, they purchased 231 properties while selling only 29, resulting in a net gain of 202 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 7.97 to 1.

This behavior is not a recent development but a sustained trend. Throughout 2025, landlords were even more aggressive net buyers, with 2,369 purchases against just 181 sales. This equates to a net acquisition of 2,188 properties and a ratio of over 13 properties bought for every one sold.

The acquisition momentum has remained robust over the last two full years. In 2024, investors added a net of 2,054 properties to their portfolios (2,226 buys vs. 172 sells), indicating a consistent, long-term strategy of portfolio growth across the county.

Institutional investors with 1,000+ properties were entirely absent from the transaction market. They recorded zero buys and zero sells in all recent timeframes, reinforcing that the market's transactional velocity is driven exclusively by smaller investors.

The high net-buyer status across the board signals strong confidence in the Rockingham rental market, with existing landlords expanding their holdings and new entrants joining at a rapid pace.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 41.8% of all Rockingham County property transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were a major force in the market, participating in 231 of the 553 total SFR transactions. This 41.8% share underscores their significant role in driving market liquidity and setting pricing trends.

Activity was heavily concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum. The single-property (Tier 01) landlords alone accounted for 220 of the 231 investor transactions, demonstrating that new and first-time investors are fueling the market.

These entry-level investors are paying top dollar to enter the market. The average purchase price for single-property landlords in Q1 was $701,843, substantially higher than the prices paid by more experienced investors in larger tiers, such as the $451,311 average for the 3-5 property tier.

Most new investors are not buying from their peers. Of the 220 properties purchased by Tier 01 landlords, only 19 (8.6%) were acquired from another landlord. This suggests that the vast majority of their acquisitions are from the traditional homeowner market.

Institutional investors logged zero transactions in Q1, once again highlighting that the transactional landscape of Rockingham County is exclusively a playground for mom-and-pop investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Rockingham, buying 43% of homes at a 7.1% premium with zero institutional competition.
Holdings
Landlords own 11,633 single-family homes in Rockingham County, representing 14.0% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (87.0%) compared to companies (20.6%).
Pricing
In a striking reversal of typical market dynamics, landlords paid 7.1% more than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, with an average acquisition price of $694,692 creating a $46,183 premium.
Activity
Investors were highly active, purchasing 43.3% of all homes sold in the latest quarter. This activity was driven by new entrants, with 218 new single-property landlord entities buying 147 homes.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have absolute control of the market, owning 99.8% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a 0.0% market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners of smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 3-5 property tier, indicating a clear trend of incorporation as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Investors are aggressive net buyers with a 7.97x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (231 buys vs 29 sells). Institutional investors are entirely inactive, recording zero transactions.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Rockingham County, NH, is fundamentally a story of the small, individual investor. Landlords own 11,633 properties, comprising 14.0% of the county's single-family housing stock. This segment is not driven by distant corporations but by local individuals, who own 87.0% of these homes. The market structure is definitively bottom-heavy: mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control an unparalleled 99.8% of investor-owned homes, while institutional investors have zero presence. This complete absence of large-scale players makes Rockingham a distinct market shaped entirely by smaller operators.

Investor behavior in Rockingham defies national trends. Rather than seeking discounts, landlords are paying a premium to acquire property, signaling intense competition. In Q1 2026, they paid an average of $694,692, a 7.1% premium over what traditional homeowners paid. This aggression is fueled by a desire to enter and expand within the market, as evidenced by their 43.3% share of all Q4 2025 purchases. Transaction data confirms a strong accumulation phase, with landlords buying nearly eight homes for every one they sold in the first quarter of 2026. This activity is led by new entrants, with 218 new single-property landlord entities joining the market in a single quarter.

The key takeaway from these Investor Pulse reports is that Rockingham County represents a microcosm of a hyper-competitive, small-investor-driven market. The willingness to pay a premium, combined with a high net-buyer ratio, suggests strong confidence in future rental income and appreciation. The market's dynamics are dictated by the financial capacity and strategic goals of thousands of individuals, not a handful of institutions. This creates a resilient but highly competitive environment for both new investors and prospective homeowners trying to purchase a home in the county. For more detailed local analysis, see other available market reports.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:45 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Rockingham (NH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Rockingham (NH) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nh-rockingham/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.