Rutland (VT) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Rutland (VT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Rutland (VT)
20,597
Total Investors in Rutland (VT)
5,584
Investor Owned SFR in Rutland (VT)
3,958(19.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,802
SFR Owned
3,286
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
782
SFR Owned
755
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,958 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Rutland County's Market is Dominated by Mom-and-Pop Investors Who Control 99.7% of Rentals and Pay Premiums
Investors own 3,958 single-family properties in Rutland County, representing 19.2% of the market. The landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (99.7% of holdings), with individuals owning 83.0% of the portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 25.0% of homes sold and paying a surprising 33.4% premium over traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,958 properties in Rutland County, with individuals holding 83.0%.
The entire portfolio of 3,958 properties is held in cash, with no financing recorded. Rented properties account for 3,933 homes, representing a 99.4% rental focus across the investor-owned market.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Rutland County landlords paid a 33.4% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026.
This amounts to paying $104,647 more per property ($417,762 vs $313,115). This premium reverses a 9.9% discount seen in Q2 2025, showing significant price volatility and a departure from typical investor purchasing behavior.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 25.0% of all single-family homes sold in the most recent quarter.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100% of these 37 purchases. The market saw 39 new single-property landlords enter, acquiring 32 of the properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.7% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+) own just two properties, representing 0.0% of the market. Single-property landlords alone account for 90.1% of all investor holdings, with 3,644 properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property holders in portfolios of 6-10 properties.
While individuals own over 82% of single-property portfolios, companies hold a 57.9% majority in the 6-10 property tier. This signals a clear shift in ownership structure as portfolios scale.
Geographic Distribution
The 05701 zip code contains the highest number of investor-owned properties at 628.
While 05701 leads in volume, smaller zip codes like 05731 (71.4%) and 05767 (66.7%) show much higher investor saturation rates. The 05751 zip code has both high count (518) and high rate (59.0%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6.4 times more properties than they sold in Q1 2026.
This net buying trend has been consistent, with landlords accumulating a net 245 properties in 2025 and 289 in 2024. There was no recorded transaction activity for institutional investors, aligning with their minimal holdings.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investor activity accounted for 22.1% of all Q1 single-family home transactions.
New single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $452,950, significantly more than two-property buyers ($170,750). Only 7.7% of their purchases came from other landlords, indicating they are primarily buying from homeowners.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,958 properties in Rutland County, with individuals holding 83.0%.
Detailed Findings

In Rutland County, investors hold a significant 19.2% of the single-family residential market, totaling 3,958 properties out of 20,597. This portfolio shows a clear dominance by individual owners rather than large corporations. Individual landlords own 3,286 properties, which is 83.0% of the investor-owned stock, while companies own the remaining 755 properties (19.1%).

The ownership structure is mirrored in the landlord entity count, where 4,802 of the 5,584 total landlords are individuals (86.0%). This highlights that the local market is primarily driven by small-scale, non-corporate real estate investing.

A notable characteristic of the portfolio, based on available assessor data, is the financing method. All 3,958 investor-owned properties are recorded as cash purchases, with zero properties listed as financed. This suggests a market of well-capitalized investors who are not reliant on leverage.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rentals, with 3,933 properties classified as rented. This accounts for 99.4% of all investor-owned homes, confirming that the vast majority of these properties are actively serving as rental housing for the community.

The data presented in these Investor Pulse reports indicates a market structure far from the institutional takeover narrative. Instead, it reveals a deeply-rooted system of individual ownership and cash-based acquisitions driving the local rental supply.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Rutland County landlords paid a 33.4% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition pricing in Rutland County defies the national trend of purchasing at a discount. In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $417,762, a staggering 33.4% premium over the $313,115 paid by traditional homeowners. This represents an extra $104,647 per property.

This premium-paying behavior was also evident in Q3 2025, when landlords paid $467,909, marking a 37.9% premium ($128,486) over homeowner prices. This pattern suggests investors in this market are targeting specific properties and are willing to pay more to acquire them.

However, this trend is not consistent, indicating market volatility. In Q2 2025, the situation was reversed, with landlords securing a 9.9% discount, paying $320,424 compared to the homeowner average of $355,599. This swing from a discount to a significant premium in just two quarters highlights a rapidly changing competitive landscape.

The data also shows price appreciation over time. The average landlord purchase price in 2024 was $359,705, which rose to $407,902 for the full year of 2025, signaling strong market heating.

The consistent willingness to pay above market rates in recent quarters suggests a highly competitive environment where investors may be competing directly with homeowners for desirable properties, and winning by paying more.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 25.0% of all single-family homes sold in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

In the last reported quarter, landlords were a powerful force in the Rutland County market, purchasing 37 of the 148 total SFRs sold, a market share of 25.0%. This activity demonstrates significant and ongoing demand from investors.

The purchasing activity was exclusively driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100% of all investor acquisitions, with institutional investors making zero purchases.

New entrants are the lifeblood of this investor market. The single-property tier was the most active, with 39 new landlord entities acquiring 32 properties, which represents 84.2% of all investor-bought homes. This signals a healthy and growing base of first-time landlords.

The data shows a clear hierarchy of purchasing volume. After the single-property tier, two-property landlords acquired 4 homes (10.5%), while the 3-5 and 6-10 property tiers each acquired a single property.

The complete absence of institutional buying, combined with the overwhelming dominance of new and small landlords, reinforces that the investment landscape in Rutland County is controlled by local, small-scale operators.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.7% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The distribution of property ownership in Rutland County is exceptionally concentrated among small landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), collectively own 99.7% of all investor-held single-family homes.

This concentration is most pronounced at the smallest scale. Landlords owning just a single property (Tier 01) hold 3,644 homes, which accounts for 90.1% of the entire investor portfolio. This underscores the fragmented nature of the local rental market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a near-zero presence, owning just two properties. This figure, at 0.0% of the market share, definitively shows that large-scale corporate landlords are not a factor in Rutland County's housing market.

Mid-size landlords also represent a tiny fraction of the market. Tiers holding 11 to 1,000 properties combined own just 9 homes, further highlighting the market's reliance on its smallest participants.

This ownership structure challenges the common narrative of corporate consolidation in the rental market. In Rutland County, the landlord is overwhelmingly a local individual with a very small portfolio.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property holders in portfolios of 6-10 properties.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the Rutland County market overall, the role of companies grows significantly as portfolio sizes increase. The crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04), where companies own 11 properties, or 57.9% of that segment's total.

In the smaller tiers, individual ownership is overwhelming. Individuals own 3,071 single-property investments (82.6% of the tier) and 163 two-property investments (79.1% of the tier). This demonstrates that the entry point and early stages of real estate investment are dominated by private individuals.

As investors scale into the 3-5 property range, individual ownership remains the majority at 74.4% (125 properties), but the company share begins to increase to 25.6% (43 properties).

This pattern suggests a strategic shift as landlords grow their portfolios. Incorporating becomes a more common strategy for liability, financing, or operational reasons once an investor surpasses the five-property mark.

The data clearly illustrates a lifecycle of an investor in Rutland County: starting as an individual and potentially transitioning to a corporate structure for portfolios exceeding five properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 05701 zip code contains the highest number of investor-owned properties at 628.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Rutland County is geographically concentrated in a few key zip codes. The 05701 zip code leads by sheer volume, with 628 investor-owned single-family homes, although this represents a relatively modest ownership rate of 10.8%.

In contrast, some zip codes exhibit extremely high investor penetration rates. The 05731 zip code has a 71.4% investor ownership rate, and 05767 follows closely with a 66.7% rate. These areas are heavily defined by rental housing.

The 05751 zip code stands out for having both a high volume and a high concentration of investor ownership. It contains 518 investor properties, which constitutes 59.0% of all single-family homes in that area, indicating it is a primary hub for rental activity.

Another area of significant investor presence is the 05735 zip code, with 361 investor-owned homes, making up 26.7% of its housing stock.

This analysis reveals two different types of investor markets within the county: larger areas with many investor properties but lower overall saturation, and smaller, more niche areas where investors own the majority of the housing stock.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6.4 times more properties than they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals that Rutland County landlords are consistently and aggressively expanding their portfolios. In Q1 2026, they purchased 45 properties while selling only 7, resulting in 38 net acquisitions and a strong buy-to-sell ratio of 6.43 to 1.

This pattern of accumulation is a long-term trend, not a recent anomaly. Throughout 2025, investors bought 267 homes and sold just 22, for a net gain of 245 properties. The trend was even stronger in 2024, with 309 buys versus 20 sells, for a net gain of 289 properties.

The market's momentum remains strong and stable. Purchase volume in Q1 2026 (45 buys) is on pace with quarterly averages from previous years, indicating sustained investor confidence and capital deployment.

In line with ownership data, institutional investors (1000+ tier) were completely inactive in the transaction market. All buying and selling activity is attributable to smaller, mom-and-pop and mid-size landlords.

This consistent net buying behavior shows that local investors are in a phase of portfolio growth, steadily increasing the supply of rental housing in Rutland County by acquiring properties from the existing housing stock.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investor activity accounted for 22.1% of all Q1 single-family home transactions.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords were involved in 45 of the 204 total SFR transactions in Rutland County, capturing a 22.1% share of all market activity. This demonstrates their significant role in market liquidity.

All 45 of these transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), with zero activity from institutional investors. The bulk of the activity came from the single-property tier, which was responsible for 39 transactions.

A surprising pricing pattern emerged among buyers. The smallest investors, those in the single-property tier, paid the highest average price at $452,950. This is substantially more than the $170,750 average paid by two-property landlords, suggesting new entrants are competing fiercely for properties and paying a premium to enter the market.

The market for inter-landlord transactions is small. Only 3 of the 39 purchases made by single-property landlords (7.7%) were from other investors. This indicates that new and small landlords are primarily acquiring homes from the traditional homeowner market rather than from other investors divesting properties.

This combination of high market share, premium pricing by new entrants, and purchasing from the homeowner pool highlights an aggressive growth phase for small, local landlords in Rutland County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Rutland County's Real Estate is Dominated by Mom-and-Pop Landlords Who Control 99.7% of Rentals and Actively Expand Portfolios
Holdings
Landlords own 3,958 single-family properties in Rutland County, representing 19.2% of the total market. Individual investors hold a commanding 83.0% of these properties (3,286 homes), compared to just 19.1% for companies (755 homes).
Pricing
In a notable market exception, landlords paid a 33.4% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, with an average acquisition price of $417,762 versus the homeowner average of $313,115.
Activity
Investors purchased 25.0% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter, an effort driven entirely by mom-and-pop landlords. Activity was fueled by new entrants, with 39 new single-property landlords joining the market.
Market Share
The market is overwhelmingly controlled by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 99.7% of all investor-held SFRs. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority holders in the 6-10 property tier (57.9% share), indicating a structural shift as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 6.43x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (45 buys vs. 7 sells), continuing a multi-year trend of portfolio growth. Institutional investors recorded no transaction activity.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Rutland County, VT is fundamentally a story of the small, local landlord. Investors own 3,958 properties, comprising 19.2% of the county's single-family housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly in the hands of individuals, who own 83.0% (3,286 homes) compared to companies at 19.1% (755 homes). The market structure completely defies the narrative of corporate consolidation; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.7% of all investor-owned homes, while large institutional investors have a virtually nonexistent footprint at 0.0%.

Investor behavior is characterized by aggressive acquisition. In the most recent quarter, landlords purchased 25.0% of all homes sold, with 100% of this activity driven by mom-and-pop buyers. This includes 39 new single-property landlords entering the market. In a striking deviation from national trends, these investors are not securing discounts; in Q1 2026, they paid a 33.4% premium over traditional homeowners. This purchasing is part of a sustained growth trend, as landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 6.4 times more homes than they sold in Q1.

The key takeaway from the Rutland County market is its resilience as a landscape for the individual investor. The data points to a competitive environment where small, well-capitalized (often cash) buyers are actively growing their portfolios by purchasing from the homeowner market, even if it means paying a premium. This dynamic ensures the local rental housing supply remains controlled by a large number of small-scale operators, shaping a unique and highly fragmented market structure.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 09:29 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Rutland (VT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Rutland (VT) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-vt-rutland/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.