Bond (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bond (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bond (IL)
5,036
Total Investors in Bond (IL)
799
Investor Owned SFR in Bond (IL)
671(13.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
746
SFR Owned
619
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
53
SFR Owned
66
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 671 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Investors Dominate Bond County with 99.4% Ownership, Consistently Accumulating Properties as Net Buyers
In Bond County, IL, landlords own 671 single-family properties, representing 13.3% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among small 'mom-and-pop' investors, who control 99.4% of the rental stock, while institutional investors have zero presence. In Q1 2026, landlords continued to be strong net buyers and secured properties at a 4.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 671 SFR properties in Bond County, with individuals holding a dominant 92.3% share.
The majority of the investor portfolio is held in cash, with 534 properties owned outright versus 137 that are financed. Of all investor-owned properties, 94.5% are confirmed rental properties (634 out of 671).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Q1 2026 paid 4.3% less than homeowners, an average discount of $13,309 per property.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been extremely volatile, swinging from a massive 50.3% landlord discount in Q2 2025 to a 20.4% premium paid by landlords in Q1 2025. This indicates inconsistent market conditions or highly varied property acquisitions.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 15.8% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025, totaling 6 properties.
All (100.0%) of the landlord purchases were made by 'mom-and-pop' investors in the 1-10 property tier. In fact, every single acquisition was by a new, single-property landlord, with zero activity from institutional buyers.
Ownership by Tier
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
There is no institutional (1000+ properties) ownership in Bond County, as their market share is 0.0%. The market is anchored by single-property landlords, who alone own 70.0% of all investor-held homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own over 93% of single-property portfolios; companies only gain a foothold in larger tiers.
Companies achieve a 50% ownership share only in the 21-50 property tier, which contains just two properties total. In all tiers with significant property counts (1-10 properties), individual ownership ranges from 79.8% to 100.0%.
Geographic Distribution
Greenville (62246) has the highest count of investor properties at 335, while Keyesport (62231) has the highest penetration rate at 33.3%.
The areas with the highest investor ownership rates are not the same as those with the highest raw counts. After Keyesport (33.3%), Donnellson (62019, data not shown but implied) and Mulberry Grove (62262) show high penetration at 20.1% and 18.5% respectively, indicating concentrated investor interest in smaller communities.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Bond County are consistent net buyers, with a 3.3-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026.
This net buyer trend has been stable for years, with a 4.2-to-1 ratio in 2025 (46 buys vs. 11 sells) and an even stronger 7-to-1 ratio in 2024 (56 buys vs. 8 sells). There is no transaction data available for institutional investors, as they are not active in the market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 16.9% of all Q1 transactions, with all 10 purchases made by new investors.
These new, single-property investors paid an average price of $299,244. They sourced 0% of their purchases from other landlords, indicating they are acquiring properties from the traditional homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 671 SFR properties in Bond County, with individuals holding a dominant 92.3% share.
Detailed Findings

In Bond County, investors hold a total of 671 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for 13.3% of the 5,036 total SFRs in the market.

The investor landscape is dominated by private individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 619 properties, making up 92.3% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own the remaining 66 properties (9.8%).

This individual dominance is even more pronounced when looking at the number of landlord entities, with 746 individuals compared to just 53 companies operating in the county.

A significant majority of investor-owned homes, 634 of 671 properties (94.5%), are utilized as rentals, underscoring the primary focus on generating rental income within this market.

Investors in Bond County show a strong preference for cash ownership over financing. There are 534 cash-owned properties compared to only 137 financed ones, a ratio of nearly 4-to-1, signaling a well-capitalized and low-leverage investor base.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Q1 2026 paid 4.3% less than homeowners, an average discount of $13,309 per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties at an average price of $299,244, which is 4.3% lower than the $312,553 average paid by traditional homeowners. This resulted in a savings of $13,309 per property for investors.

The pricing advantage for landlords has shown extreme volatility in recent quarters. In Q2 2025, landlords achieved a staggering 50.3% discount ($116,467 vs. $234,340), saving over $117,000 per home.

Conversely, this trend completely reversed in Q1 2025, when landlords paid a 20.4% premium over homeowners ($218,643 vs. $181,653), spending nearly $37,000 more per property.

This dramatic fluctuation suggests that investors may be targeting different types of properties each quarter or that the low transaction volume in the county creates significant price swings based on a few outlier sales.

Overall acquisition prices for investors have been trending upwards from the pandemic era, with the average price of $194,745 during 2020-2023 rising to $299,244 in the most recent quarter.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 15.8% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025, totaling 6 properties.
Detailed Findings

During Q4 2025, landlords were responsible for 15.8% of all SFR market activity, acquiring 6 of the 38 homes sold in Bond County.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from the smallest investors. All 6 properties (100.0%) were bought by landlords in the 'mom-and-pop' category (1-10 properties).

Notably, every one of these acquisitions was made by a new landlord entering the market, as 10 distinct entities purchased 6 single properties in the Tier 01 category.

This signals that market growth is driven entirely by new, small-scale participants rather than portfolio expansion by existing or large-scale landlords.

There was zero purchasing activity from mid-size or institutional investors (Tier 05-09), reinforcing the local, small-scale nature of Bond County's real estate investing landscape.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Bond County is unequivocally controlled by small operators. 'Mom-and-pop' landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, hold 99.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the foundation of the local rental market, owning 495 properties, which constitutes 70.0% of the entire investor portfolio.

The next largest segments are landlords owning 3-5 properties (15.0% share) and those with 2 properties (9.2% share), further cementing the dominance of small-scale owners.

Mid-size investors (11-50 properties) represent a negligible portion of the market, collectively owning just 4 properties for a combined 0.6% share.

Institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties have absolutely no presence in Bond County, holding a 0.0% market share.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals own over 93% of single-property portfolios; companies only gain a foothold in larger tiers.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across nearly all portfolio sizes in Bond County. In the largest tier, single-property owners, individuals hold 470 of the 495 properties (93.4%).

Company ownership becomes slightly more prevalent as portfolio sizes increase, but remains a minority position. Companies own just 12.1% of two-property portfolios and 20.2% of portfolios with 3-5 properties.

A notable data point is the 6-10 property tier, which is 100% owned by individual investors, with zero company involvement across 37 properties.

The only tier where companies approach parity is the small 21-50 property tier, where ownership is split 50/50 between an individual and a company, though this tier only contains two properties total.

This distribution confirms that as investors scale in Bond County, they tend to do so as individuals rather than forming corporate entities, a hallmark of a classic 'mom-and-pop' market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Greenville (62246) has the highest count of investor properties at 335, while Keyesport (62231) has the highest penetration rate at 33.3%.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Bond County is geographically concentrated, with Greenville's 62246 zip code holding the largest number of investor-owned properties at 335 homes.

Following Greenville, the highest counts of investor properties are found in Pocahontas (62275) with 88 properties and Mulberry Grove (62262) with 82 properties.

However, the highest concentration of investor ownership relative to the total housing stock is in smaller communities. The 62231 zip code (Keyesport) leads with a 33.3% investor ownership rate.

Other areas with high investor penetration include the 62253 zip code (Donnellson area) at 20.1% and Mulberry Grove (62262) at 18.5%, significantly higher than Greenville's 12.3% rate.

This highlights a dual investment strategy in the county: a focus on volume in the largest town, Greenville, and a focus on high market share in smaller, surrounding rural zip codes.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Bond County are consistent net buyers, with a 3.3-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Bond County are actively growing their portfolios, consistently buying more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 10 properties while only selling 3, establishing a strong net buyer position.

This pattern of accumulation is not new. In the full year of 2025, investors acquired 46 properties and sold just 11, resulting in a net gain of 35 homes and a buy-to-sell ratio of over 4-to-1.

The trend was even more pronounced in 2024, when landlords bought 56 properties and sold only 8, a ratio of 7-to-1, demonstrating sustained confidence in the local market.

The steady pace of acquisitions signals a long-term strategy of portfolio growth among the county's small, local investor base.

There was no recorded transaction activity for institutional-level investors (1000+ properties) in any of the observed timeframes, as they have no presence in this market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 16.9% of all Q1 transactions, with all 10 purchases made by new investors.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 10 of the 59 total SFR transactions, capturing a 16.9% share of all market activity.

All 10 of these transactions were purchases made by investors in the single-property (Tier 01) category, indicating that market activity is driven by new entrants rather than existing landlords expanding their portfolios.

The average purchase price for these new landlords was $299,244, which was competitive with the broader market.

Notably, 0% of these acquisitions were from other landlords. This lack of inter-landlord trading suggests that new investors are buying properties directly from homeowners, expanding the total rental pool rather than recycling existing rental stock.

No transactions were recorded for any investor tier larger than a single property, highlighting the complete absence of mid-size or institutional activity in the current market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Investors Dominate Bond County, IL with 99.4% Ownership as Landlords Remain Strong Net Buyers
Holdings
Landlords own 671 SFR properties, 13.3% of Bond County's market, with individual investors holding a commanding 619 properties (92.3%) compared to just 66 (9.8%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 4.3% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $13,309 per property ($299,244 vs $312,553).
Activity
Landlords purchased 16.9% of all Q1 sales (10 properties), with market growth driven entirely by 10 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.4% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own 0.0%, having no presence in the county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, and companies only achieve a 50% ownership share in the minuscule 21-50 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 3.33x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (10 buys vs 3 sells), while institutional investors had zero transaction activity.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Bond County, Illinois is characterized by the overwhelming dominance of small, local investors. Landlords own 671 SFR properties, representing 13.3% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of private individuals, who own 619 properties (92.3%), versus just 66 properties (9.8%) held by companies. The market structure completely lacks institutional presence; 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.4% of all investor-owned homes, with single-property owners alone accounting for 70%.

Investor behavior in Bond County reflects a strategy of steady, organic growth. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords acquired 16.9% of all homes sold, with every single purchase made by a new investor entering the market. These buyers demonstrated savvy purchasing, securing properties for 4.3% less than traditional homeowners, an average savings of $13,309. This activity is part of a larger trend of accumulation, as landlords have been consistent net buyers for years, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.3-to-1 in Q1 2026, following even stronger ratios in 2025 and 2024.

The key takeaway from this investor pulse report is that Bond County is a quintessential small-investor market, operating entirely outside the sphere of large-scale corporate or institutional capital. Growth is grassroots, driven by new individuals buying their first rental property and sourcing it from the traditional housing market. This creates a stable, locally-owned rental landscape that is expanding through consistent, small-scale acquisitions rather than aggressive, large-volume purchases.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 03:09 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Bond (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Bond (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-il-bond/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.