Levy (FL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Levy (FL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Levy (FL)
599
Total Investors in Levy (FL)
153
Investor Owned SFR in Levy (FL)
108(18.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
124
SFR Owned
89
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
29
SFR Owned
27
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 108 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Levy County's investor market is defined by small, individual landlords who are aggressively accumulating properties.
Investors own 18.0% of the SFR market, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 99.1% of that portfolio. In the most recent quarter, landlords bought 25.0% of homes sold and remain strong net buyers, signaling continued confidence in the local market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords hold 108 SFRs in Levy County, with individual investors owning 89 properties.
Cash purchases dominate, with 87 properties (80.6%) owned outright versus just 21 (19.4%) financed. The portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 105 properties (97.2%) classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Q1 2026 pricing data shows an anomaly, with landlords paying $358,000, a 123.8% premium.
This sharply reverses the prior year's trend, where landlords secured a 5.5% discount in Q1 2025 ($294,450 vs $311,667). The Q1 2026 premium represents a $198,000 price difference compared to traditional homeowners, who paid an average of $160,000.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 25.0% of all single-family homes sold in the most recent quarter.
Mom-and-pop investors accounted for 100% of this activity, with a single small landlord (3-5 properties) making the purchase. Institutional investors with 1,000+ properties made zero acquisitions during this period.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, owning 84.8% of the investor portfolio (95 properties). In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) have zero presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own the vast majority of properties across all small portfolio tiers.
Individuals hold 78.4% of single-property portfolios and 85.7% of small (3-5 property) portfolios. There is no crossover point in Levy County where companies become the dominant owner type.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 32696, with 30 investor-owned properties.
However, the highest market penetration is in zip code 34449, where investors own 31.7% of all SFRs. Zip code 32625 also shows a high concentration rate at 31.4%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Levy County are aggressive net buyers with an 8-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in 2025.
In 2025, landlords purchased 16 SFRs while selling only 2, demonstrating a clear accumulation strategy. This continues the trend from 2024, when they purchased 10 properties and sold 3.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 16.7% of all Q1 transactions, with all activity from mom-and-pops.
The entirety of landlord activity came from one transaction in the small landlord tier (3-5 properties) at a price of $358,000. There were no institutional purchases and no landlord-to-landlord sales recorded.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords hold 108 SFRs in Levy County, with individual investors owning 89 properties.
Detailed Findings

In Levy County, FL, the real estate investor landscape is dominated by individuals rather than large corporations. Individual landlords own 89 of the 108 investor-held SFR properties, while companies own 27, highlighting a market driven by smaller-scale participants.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for cash transactions. A substantial 80.6% of the investor portfolio (87 properties) is owned free and clear, compared to only 19.4% (21 properties) that are financed. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base that may be less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is overwhelmingly geared towards generating rental income. Of the 108 investor-owned properties, 105 are designated as rentals, representing a 97.2% rental concentration. This demonstrates a clear focus on buy-and-hold strategies over other forms of investment like flipping.

The ownership structure consists of 153 distinct landlord entities, with individuals making up the vast majority. There are 124 individual landlords compared to just 29 company landlords, a ratio of more than 4-to-1, reinforcing the mom-and-pop character of the local market.

Overall, the holdings data paints a picture of a stable, cash-heavy rental market controlled by a large number of small, individual investors, rather than a few consolidated corporate players.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Q1 2026 pricing data shows an anomaly, with landlords paying $358,000, a 123.8% premium.
Detailed Findings

Recent acquisition pricing in Levy County presents a significant and unusual deviation from historical trends. In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average price of $358,000, which is a staggering 123.8% more than the $160,000 paid by traditional homeowners. This $198,000 premium per property is a stark outlier.

This Q1 2026 result is a dramatic reversal from the same period in 2025. In Q1 2025, investors paid an average of $294,450, representing a 5.5% discount compared to the homeowner average of $311,667. This historical discount is more typical of investor purchasing behavior.

The average acquisition price for investors has shown volatility. The pandemic-era (2020-2023) average price was $291,690, which is comparable to the Q1 2025 price but significantly lower than the anomalous Q1 2026 figure.

Given that the Q1 2026 data is based on a very low transaction volume, the extreme premium may be attributable to a single high-value or unique property purchase rather than a widespread market shift. It should be interpreted with caution as it contradicts the more established pattern of investors purchasing at or below market rates.

Analysis of longer-term pricing, from 2024 to 2025, shows a general upward trend in acquisition costs for investors, moving from a yearly average of $218,400 in 2024 to $237,780 in 2025.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 25.0% of all single-family homes sold in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

In a quarter with low overall sales volume in Levy County, investors captured a significant portion of the market, purchasing 1 out of the 4 total SFRs sold, for a 25.0% market share.

The entirety of investor purchasing activity was driven by small-scale landlords. One hundred percent of the investor-bought properties were acquired by an entity in the 'small landlord' tier (3-5 properties), reinforcing the market's mom-and-pop character.

Large institutional investors were completely absent from the acquisitions market this quarter. The 1,000+ property tier recorded zero purchases, indicating that institutional capital is not a driving force in Levy County's current transaction environment.

No new landlords entered the market this quarter, as there were no purchases from entities in the single-property (Tier 01) category. All activity came from an existing landlord expanding their portfolio.

The limited sample size of just one investor purchase underscores a quiet quarter for acquisitions, yet the fact that it was a small, local investor is consistent with the county's overall ownership structure.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Levy County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, collectively hold 99.1% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

The most significant group within this segment is the single-property landlord. This tier alone accounts for 84.8% of investor-owned properties, with 95 distinct properties held by first-time or single-asset investors.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) have a negligible footprint in the market. The 'small-medium' tier (11-20 properties) holds just one property, representing only 0.9% of the investor portfolio.

There is a complete absence of large-scale institutional ownership. The 1,000+ property tier holds 0.0% of the market, indicating that Wall Street and other large corporate landlords are not active in Levy County.

This granular ownership distribution suggests a highly fragmented market where the typical landlord is an individual or small local business, shaping a unique rental landscape driven by personal investment rather than large-scale corporate strategy.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own the vast majority of properties across all small portfolio tiers.
Detailed Findings

In Levy County, individual investors maintain majority ownership across every active portfolio tier. In the largest tier, single-property owners, individuals hold 80 properties (78.4%) compared to just 22 held by companies (21.6%).

This pattern of individual dominance continues as portfolios grow. For landlords owning two properties, individuals hold 5 properties (55.6%) versus 4 for companies (44.4%). In the 3-5 property tier, individual ownership is even stronger at 85.7% (6 properties).

Unlike in larger metropolitan markets, there is no crossover point where corporate ownership overtakes individual ownership. The data clearly shows that even as landlords expand their portfolios in this region, the owner is most likely to be an individual.

This trend highlights a market where real estate investing remains a pursuit for private citizens rather than a field dominated by corporate entities. This has implications for the types of rental housing available and the nature of landlord-tenant relationships.

The data suggests that the path to portfolio growth in Levy County is primarily paved by individual efforts, without significant consolidation into corporate structures at any tier.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 32696, with 30 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals specific pockets of investor concentration within Levy County. By sheer volume, zip code 32696 in Williston is the leader, with 30 investor-owned SFR properties.

When measured by ownership rate, a different picture emerges. Zip code 34449 in Morriston has the highest investor penetration, with landlords owning 31.7% of the area's single-family housing stock. This is closely followed by zip code 32625 in Bronson at 31.4%.

This distinction between high-volume and high-penetration areas is crucial. While 32696 has the most investor properties, the impact of investors on the local housing market is proportionally greater in areas like 34449 and 32625.

Other notable zip codes for investor presence include 32626 (Chiefland) with 20 properties and an 18.7% ownership rate, and 32618 (Cedar Key) where investors own 18.8% of SFRs.

Data for zip code 32669 in Inglis was incomplete, preventing a full analysis of that area but highlighting where additional data collection could be beneficial for future Investor Pulse reports.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Levy County are aggressive net buyers with an 8-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data shows that landlords in Levy County have been in a strong accumulation phase. In 2025, investors were decisive net buyers, acquiring 16 properties while divesting only 2, resulting in a net gain of 14 properties to their portfolios.

This represents a powerful 8.0x buy-to-sell ratio, indicating overwhelming confidence in the local market and a strategy focused on portfolio growth rather than liquidation.

The net buying trend was also evident in the prior year. In 2024, landlords purchased 10 properties and sold 3, a buy-to-sell ratio of over 3.3x and a net gain of 7 properties.

The data for institutional investors (1,000+ properties) shows no transaction activity, which is consistent with their 0.0% ownership share in the county. All buying and selling activity is driven by the smaller mom-and-pop and mid-size segments.

This sustained period of net acquisition by smaller investors signals a bullish sentiment on the long-term value of single-family rentals in Levy County, a trend that has been consistent over the past two years.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 16.7% of all Q1 transactions, with all activity from mom-and-pops.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords accounted for 16.7% of the total transaction volume in Levy County, participating in 1 of the 6 total SFR sales.

All investor transaction activity was concentrated in the mom-and-pop segment. A single transaction was recorded by a small landlord (3-5 properties), who purchased a property for $358,000.

There was zero transaction activity from institutional investors (1,000+ property tier), reaffirming their absence from both the ownership and transactional landscape of Levy County.

The market also showed no signs of inter-landlord trading this quarter. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0.0%, suggesting that investors are acquiring properties from traditional homeowners or other sources rather than from each other.

The quarter's activity, though limited, is perfectly aligned with the county's broader ownership patterns: a market exclusively driven by small-scale investors expanding their portfolios one property at a time.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, individual landlords dominate Levy County with 99.1% ownership, actively buying while institutions are absent.
Holdings
Investors own 108 SFR properties, representing 18.0% of the Levy County market, with individual investors holding 89 properties (82.4% of the portfolio).
Pricing
Q1 pricing data presents an anomaly, with landlords paying a 123.8% premium ($358,000 vs $160,000), reversing the 5.5% discount seen in the prior year.
Activity
Landlords purchased 25.0% of all properties sold in the last quarter, with 100% of this activity coming from mom-and-pop investors.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 99.1% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have no ownership stake.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios and represent 81.0% of all landlord entities; companies fail to gain a majority in any portfolio tier.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with an 8.0x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (16 buys vs 2 sells), while institutional investors recorded no transactions.
Market Narrative

In Levy County, Florida, the single-family rental market is defined by the overwhelming presence of small, individual investors. Landlords own 108 SFR properties, constituting 18.0% of the county's total housing stock. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control a staggering 99.1% of all investor-owned homes. The market's granular nature is further highlighted by the ownership split, with individual investors holding 89 properties (82.4%) and making up 81.0% of all landlord entities. In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties have zero presence here.

Investor behavior in Levy County signals strong confidence and a clear accumulation strategy. Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 16 properties while selling only 2 in 2025, an 8-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio. This activity continued into the most recent quarter, where investors purchased 25.0% of all homes sold. Pricing behavior showed a notable anomaly in Q1 2026, with a landlord paying a 123.8% premium over a traditional homeowner ($358,000 vs $160,000), a sharp reversal of the 5.5% discount observed in the prior year, likely due to a unique, low-volume transaction.

The key takeaway from this data is that Levy County is a quintessential mom-and-pop investor market, insulated from the influence of large-scale corporate landlords. The market is characterized by a high rate of cash ownership (80.6%), a focus on long-term rentals (97.2% of holdings), and hyperlocal investment pockets, such as in zip code 34449 where investors own 31.7% of homes. This structure suggests a stable, community-integrated rental market where growth is driven by local individuals expanding their portfolios, a core trend for anyone engaged in real estate investing in the region.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:03 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Levy (FL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Levy (FL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-fl-levy/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.