McPherson (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the McPherson (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in McPherson (KS)
8,640
Total Investors in McPherson (KS)
2,148
Investor Owned SFR in McPherson (KS)
2,149(24.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,843
SFR Owned
1,548
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
305
SFR Owned
628
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,149 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate a Static McPherson County Market with 87% Ownership and Zero Recent Activity
Investors own 2,149 single-family properties in McPherson County, KS, representing 24.9% of the market. The landscape is defined by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 87.1% of the portfolio while institutional ownership is nonexistent. The market showed a complete halt in activity, with zero landlord purchases or transactions recorded in the last quarter, indicating a stable, buy-and-hold environment.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,149 SFR properties in McPherson County, with individuals holding a 72.0% majority.
The entire investor portfolio of 2,149 properties was acquired with cash, as there are zero financed properties recorded. The holdings are heavily focused on rentals, with 2,048 properties actively rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No recent landlord acquisitions were recorded, preventing a price comparison against traditional homeowners.
Data from the past quarter and the 2020-2023 period shows zero landlord purchases. This lack of transactional data makes it impossible to analyze pricing trends or calculate the typical landlord discount.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made zero property purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of market activity.
The complete halt in buying activity was universal across all investor sizes, with both mom-and-pop and institutional tiers recording zero purchases. Consequently, no new single-property landlords entered the market this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command 87.1% of the investor-owned SFR market.
Single-property landlords are the largest group, owning 1,267 properties for a 56.8% share of the total. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence or ownership in the county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies become the majority owners for portfolios of 11-20 properties.
Individuals own 85.1% of single-property rentals, demonstrating their entry-level dominance. The clear crossover point is the 11-20 property tier, where companies hold a 61.9% majority share of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
The 67460 zip code hosts the largest number of investor properties at 1,058, representing 21.9% of its SFRs.
While 67460 leads in volume, smaller zip codes demonstrate much higher saturation. The 67476 and 67416 zip codes have investor ownership rates of 75.0% and 50.0%, respectively.
Historical Transactions
Historical transaction data is unavailable, precluding analysis of landlord buy/sell ratios or net market position.
The lack of historical buy and sell data prevents the calculation of a buy/sell ratio. It is therefore impossible to determine if landlords have been net buyers or sellers over time or to assess inter-landlord trading.
Current Quarter Transactions
No landlord transactions occurred in Q4 2025, resulting in a 0.0% share of market activity.
The market was completely inactive, with zero transactions recorded for any investor tier. This lack of activity means no price comparisons or analysis of inter-landlord trading are possible for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,149 SFR properties in McPherson County, with individuals holding a 72.0% majority.
Detailed Findings

In McPherson County, KS, real estate investors own 2,149 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 24.9% of the total 8,640 SFRs in the market. This significant portion highlights the role of rental properties in the local housing ecosystem.

Ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among individual investors, who control 1,548 properties, or 72.0% of the investor-owned portfolio. Company-owned properties account for the remaining 628 properties (29.2%), underscoring the market's reliance on smaller, non-corporate landlords.

A defining characteristic of this market is its financing structure. All 2,149 investor-owned properties are classified as cash-owned, with zero properties carrying financing. This suggests a fiscally conservative investor base with low leverage.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards generating rental income, with 2,048 properties identified as rented. This high rental penetration rate across the investor-owned stock confirms the primary strategy is long-term holding for cash flow.

The landlord landscape consists of 2,148 distinct entities, with 1,843 being individuals and 305 classified as companies. This ratio of nearly six individual landlords for every one company landlord further cements the 'mom-and-pop' character of the market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No recent landlord acquisitions were recorded, preventing a price comparison against traditional homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Analysis of acquisition pricing in McPherson County, KS is constrained by a lack of recent transactional activity. There were no recorded SFR purchases by landlords in the most recent quarter, making a direct price comparison with traditional homeowners impossible.

Looking at a broader timeframe, the period from 2020 to 2023 also shows zero distinct properties purchased by landlords. This extended period of inactivity prevents any analysis of price appreciation or market trends during the recent housing boom.

The absence of landlord acquisition data suggests a highly stable, buy-and-hold market. Investors in this area appear to hold their properties for the long term, resulting in very low turnover and limited opportunities for new acquisitions.

Without transaction data, it is not possible to determine if a price gap exists between what landlords and homeowners pay. In more active markets, landlords often purchase at a discount, but that trend cannot be verified here.

The static nature of the market, as evidenced by the lack of acquisitions, indicates that growth in investor portfolios is not currently occurring through new purchases. Any portfolio changes would likely come from inheritance or other non-market transactions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made zero property purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of market activity.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, the investor market in McPherson County, KS came to a complete standstill, with landlords purchasing zero of the zero total SFRs sold. This 0.0% market share reflects a total lack of acquisition activity from investors.

The purchasing inactivity was consistent across all tiers. Small, mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) acquired zero properties, mirroring the inactivity of larger investors.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties), which have no existing presence in the county, also made no purchases, continuing their absence from this market.

A key indicator of market growth, the formation of new landlords, was also nonexistent. The data shows zero new single-property (Tier 01) landlords entered the market, signaling a lack of new capital or interest in rental property acquisition.

This lack of activity points to a mature, saturated, or simply dormant investment landscape where current holders are not expanding and new entrants are not appearing.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command 87.1% of the investor-owned SFR market.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in McPherson County, KS is unequivocally dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), collectively control 87.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The most significant segment is the single-property landlord (Tier 01), who alone account for 1,267 properties, representing a majority 56.8% share. This highlights that first-time or small-scale real estate investing is the backbone of the local rental market.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) hold a much smaller but notable share. The 11-20 property tier holds 10.0% of the inventory, while the 21-50 tier holds just 2.5%.

In stark contrast to national headlines, there is zero institutional investor presence in McPherson County. The 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) owns 0.0% of the market, indicating this area is not a target for large-scale corporate landlords.

The distribution is heavily skewed towards the smallest investors, with ownership share declining rapidly as portfolio size increases. This pattern suggests a market characterized by local capital and organic growth rather than large, centralized investment.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies become the majority owners for portfolios of 11-20 properties.
Detailed Findings

A distinct pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type across different portfolio sizes. Individual landlords are the primary force in the smaller tiers, owning 85.1% of single-property holdings and 67.2% of two-property portfolios.

The balance of power shifts decisively as portfolios scale up. The crossover point occurs in the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 138 properties (61.9%) compared to the 85 properties (38.1%) owned by individuals.

This trend continues into the next bracket, with companies holding a 53.6% majority in the 21-50 property tier. This indicates that as investors grow their portfolios beyond 10 properties, they are more likely to operate under a corporate structure for liability and administrative purposes.

Even in tiers where companies are the majority, individual owners maintain a significant presence, holding over a third of the properties in the 11-20 and 21-50 property tiers. This shows that large individual investors continue to operate alongside corporate entities.

The data illustrates a clear lifecycle: investors often start as individuals and incorporate as their holdings become more extensive and complex, typically after crossing the 10-property threshold.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 67460 zip code hosts the largest number of investor properties at 1,058, representing 21.9% of its SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in McPherson County is geographically concentrated. The zip code 67460 is the epicenter of investor ownership by volume, containing 1,058 investor-owned properties, which is 21.9% of its total SFR housing.

However, the highest concentration rates are found in smaller, more rural zip codes. The 67476 zip code stands out with an investor ownership rate of 75.0%, followed by 67416 at 50.0%. These extremely high rates suggest these small communities have a housing stock dominated by rental properties.

Following the lead of 67460 in raw numbers are 67456 with 219 investor properties (17.5% rate) and 67107 with 217 properties (30.0% rate). This shows a clear tiering of investor focus within the county.

The analysis reveals a key distinction between where the most investor properties are (volume) and where investors have the highest market share (penetration). The largest population centers have the most rentals, but smaller towns have a greater proportion of them.

This geographic distribution pattern can help identify different market dynamics, from the high-volume rental hub in 67460 to the rental-heavy small towns where non-investor homeownership is less common.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
Historical transaction data is unavailable, precluding analysis of landlord buy/sell ratios or net market position.
Detailed Findings

A historical view of landlord transactions in McPherson County, KS is not possible due to unavailable data. There are no records of buy and sell transactions across historical timeframes like Q4 2025, the full year 2025, or All Time.

This data gap means that key market liquidity metrics, such as the buy/sell ratio, cannot be calculated. It is not possible to determine whether landlords as a group have been expanding their portfolios (net buyers) or reducing them (net sellers).

Analysis of inter-landlord transactions, or the percentage of properties bought from other landlords, is also not feasible. This metric typically indicates the maturity and efficiency of an investor market, but its status in McPherson County is unknown.

Similarly, institutional transaction patterns cannot be compared against the broader market, as no data exists for either group. The behavior of the 1,000+ tier remains unobserved.

The complete absence of transactional history in the provided data strongly supports the conclusion from other sections: McPherson County is a low-velocity, buy-and-hold market where properties rarely trade hands among investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
No landlord transactions occurred in Q4 2025, resulting in a 0.0% share of market activity.
Detailed Findings

The final quarter of 2025 saw a complete freeze in the McPherson County, KS investor market, with zero transactions involving landlords. This resulted in a 0.0% share of the total market transactions, as there were no transactions overall.

This inactivity was uniform across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) recorded zero transactions, as did their mid-size counterparts.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) also logged zero transactions, consistent with their lack of presence and activity in the county.

With no purchases, a key strategic metric, the average purchase price by tier, cannot be analyzed. It is impossible to determine which tiers might pay more or less for properties in this market.

Furthermore, the percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0.0% for all tiers, as no acquisitions of any kind took place. This reinforces the theme of a dormant market with minimal to no liquidity in the recent period.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small local investors define the McPherson County, KS market, controlling 87.1% of a stable 2,149-property portfolio with no recent sales activity.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,149 SFR properties in McPherson County, KS, representing 24.9% of the market. This portfolio is dominated by individual investors holding 1,548 properties (72.0%) compared to 628 (29.2%) for companies.
Pricing
No landlord acquisition data was available for the recent quarter, preventing a price comparison against traditional homeowners and indicating a market with very low sales velocity.
Activity
Investor acquisition activity was nonexistent in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 0 properties and accounting for 0.0% of all sales. No new single-property landlords entered the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with an 87.1% share of investor housing, while institutional investors (1,000+) have zero presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11-20 properties, where they control 61.9% of the assets.
Transactions
No transactions were recorded in Q4 2025, making it impossible to determine a net buyer or seller status for either the overall landlord market or the non-existent institutional segment.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in McPherson County, KS is a study in local, small-scale ownership. Investors hold a significant 2,149-property portfolio, which accounts for 24.9% of the county's single-family homes. This market is fundamentally shaped by individuals, who own 72.0% of these assets. The structure is heavily weighted toward small operators, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a commanding 87.1% of the investor-owned housing stock. In sharp contrast, institutional-scale investors with over 1,000 properties are entirely absent from this market, underscoring its local character.

Investor behavior in McPherson County is characterized by stability and a lack of transactional activity. The most recent quarter saw zero purchases by landlords, who consequently had a 0.0% share of market sales. This halt in activity suggests a mature, buy-and-hold strategy among the current owner base, rather than an acquisitive or speculative one. Due to this inactivity, typical pricing advantages seen in other markets could not be assessed. The ownership structure evolves with scale; while individuals dominate entry-level investing, companies assume majority control in portfolios larger than 10 properties, signaling a shift toward formal business structures as holdings grow.

The key takeaway from this investor pulse report is that McPherson County operates as a self-contained ecosystem dominated by small, local landlords who hold their assets for the long term. The lack of recent sales, combined with the 100% cash-owned nature of the portfolio, points to a low-risk, low-velocity environment insulated from the broader trends of institutional investment. For those analyzing the housing market, McPherson County serves as a clear example of a stable rental market sustained by local capital, not by large, external firms.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 05:17 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography McPherson (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 McPherson (KS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ks-mcpherson/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.