Robertson (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Robertson (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Robertson (TN)
24,066
Total Investors in Robertson (TN)
4,472
Investor Owned SFR in Robertson (TN)
4,226(17.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,040
SFR Owned
3,389
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
432
SFR Owned
886
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,226 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Robertson County's market, controlling 86.3% of investor properties and buying at a 26.1% discount.
Investors own 4,226 SFR properties in Robertson County, representing 17.6% of the market, with individual investors holding a commanding 80.2% of that portfolio. In Q1, landlords purchased homes for 26.1% less than traditional homeowners. Both small and institutional investors are in an accumulation phase, acting as strong net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 4,226 properties in Robertson County, with individual investors holding 80.2%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (3,306) compared to financed (920). The portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, with 4,141 of the 4,226 properties classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors paid 26.1% less than homeowners in Q1, a significant discount of $112,190 per property.
The landlord discount has fluctuated significantly over the past year, ranging from a low of 15.1% to a high of 31.5%, demonstrating investors' opportunistic buying strategies. The latest Q1 discount of 26.1% is a sharp increase from 16.3% in the prior quarter.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 22.4% of all SFR properties sold in the last quarter, totaling 47 purchases.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 77.1% of all investor acquisitions. In comparison, institutional investors (1000+ properties) were responsible for just 6.2% of landlord purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 86.3% of investor-owned SFRs.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties own just 4.4% of the local rental stock. Landlords with a single rental property make up the largest individual segment, holding 66.7% of all investor properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owners once a portfolio exceeds 10 properties, controlling 79.0% of homes in the 11-20 property tier.
Individual investors are the vast majority in smaller tiers, owning 91.7% of all single-property landlord portfolios. The shift to a corporate structure is a clear trend as investors scale their operations.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 37172 zip code, home to 2,096 investor properties.
The 37152 zip code has the highest possible investor penetration at a 100.0% ownership rate. The 37172 zip code is unique for having both the highest count of investor properties and one of the highest ownership rates at 21.9%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 2.1x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1, acquiring 63 properties and selling 30.
This net buying trend is consistent, as landlords have been net accumulators of property in every recent period, adding a net 225 properties in 2025. Institutional investors are also in an expansion mode, operating as net buyers in Q1.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors participated in 20.4% of all Q1 transactions, purchasing 63 of the 309 homes sold.
Institutional investors paid 5.2% more than new mom-and-pop buyers in Q1 ($327,093 vs $311,054). Mid-size investors in the 2-property and 21-50 property tiers sourced two-thirds of their acquisitions from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 4,226 properties in Robertson County, with individual investors holding 80.2%.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a substantial presence in the Robertson County market, owning 4,226 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 17.6% of the total 24,066 SFRs.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly characterized by individual investors, who own 3,389 properties, or 80.2% of the investor-owned portfolio. This is in sharp contrast to companies, which own the remaining 886 properties (21.0%).

The landlord entity count further solidifies this trend, with 4,040 individual landlords compared to just 432 company landlords, highlighting the grassroots nature of the local rental market.

Financial strategies among these investors heavily favor liquidity and low leverage. A remarkable 3,306 properties are owned outright with cash, more than three times the 920 properties that carry financing.

The primary strategy for these holdings is generating rental income, as demonstrated by the 4,141 properties identified as rented, representing the vast majority of the total investor portfolio.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors paid 26.1% less than homeowners in Q1, a significant discount of $112,190 per property.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, investors in Robertson County demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $317,867. This price is 26.1% lower than the $430,057 paid by traditional homeowners, translating to a substantial $112,190 discount on each purchase.

This price gap between landlords and homeowners is not static but fluctuates quarterly, indicating that investors are adept at adjusting their strategies to market conditions. The discount widened dramatically from 15.1% in Q1 2025 to 31.5% in Q2 2025, before settling at the current 26.1%.

The consistent ability to purchase properties well below the average homeowner price suggests that investors are successfully targeting off-market deals, distressed properties, or leveraging superior negotiation tactics to secure favorable terms.

While prices can vary quarterly, the long-term trend shows appreciation. The current average acquisition price of $317,867 is a 12.0% increase over the average of $283,742 seen during the 2020-2023 period.

The sharp increase in the investor discount from 16.3% in Q3 2025 to 26.1% in Q1 2026 signals a potential shift in the market, providing investors with even greater opportunities for value.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 22.4% of all SFR properties sold in the last quarter, totaling 47 purchases.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a primary driver of market activity in the most recent quarter, purchasing 47 of the 210 total SFRs sold and capturing a 22.4% share of the Robertson County market.

The backbone of this acquisition activity is small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between one and ten properties, were responsible for 37 of these purchases, representing 77.1% of all landlord buying.

A wave of new entrants is fueling market growth, with 35 new single-property landlord entities making their first purchase. These new investors acquired 27 properties, accounting for 56.2% of all homes bought by landlords this quarter.

Institutional investors had a much smaller impact on the acquisitions market, purchasing only 3 properties. This 6.2% share of landlord activity underscores a market dominated by smaller, local operators rather than large corporations.

This quarter's buying patterns confirm that the local real estate investing scene is highly accessible, with the vast majority of activity originating from individuals and small businesses expanding their portfolios one or two properties at a time.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 86.3% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Robertson County is fundamentally shaped by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) collectively control 86.3% of all investor-owned single-family homes, demonstrating a highly decentralized market structure.

Challenging the narrative of a corporate takeover, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a limited footprint. They own 193 properties, which amounts to just 4.4% of the total investor portfolio in the county.

The single-property landlord is the cornerstone of the rental market. This tier alone, comprising 2,924 properties, accounts for 66.7% of the entire investor-owned inventory, highlighting the importance of first-time and small-scale investors.

Mid-size investors, who own between 11 and 1,000 properties, hold a combined 9.3% share, serving as a bridge between the thousands of small landlords and the few large institutional firms.

This distribution reveals a market where local dynamics and the decisions of numerous small owners, rather than a handful of large entities, have the greatest influence on the rental housing supply.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owners once a portfolio exceeds 10 properties, controlling 79.0% of homes in the 11-20 property tier.
Detailed Findings

A distinct crossover point in ownership structure emerges as portfolios grow. While individuals overwhelmingly own smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, holding 79.0% of the assets in that segment.

Individual investors are the foundation of the market, accounting for 91.7% of single-property portfolios and 85.2% of two-property portfolios. Their dominance continues up to the 10-property threshold.

The transition to a corporate entity is a clear pattern of professionalization as investors scale. Company ownership jumps from 37.8% in the 6-10 property tier to a majority position in nearly all subsequent, larger tiers.

An interesting anomaly exists in the 51-100 property tier, where ownership reverts to a majority of individuals (65.5%). This could indicate a cluster of high-net-worth individuals who prefer to hold substantial assets directly.

This data illustrates a common investor journey: starting as an individual and then incorporating into a business entity to manage a larger, more complex portfolio of rental properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 37172 zip code, home to 2,096 investor properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Robertson County is highly concentrated, with the 37172 (Springfield) zip code serving as the clear epicenter. This area alone contains 2,096 investor-owned properties, nearly half of the county's total.

The top three zip codes by investor property count are 37172 (2,096), 37073 (746), and 37188 (520). Together, these areas represent the core of the county's single-family rental market.

When measured by ownership rate, the 37152 zip code shows complete saturation with a 100.0% investor ownership rate, indicating it may be a unique area comprised entirely of rental homes or a small area with a few key holdings. It is followed by 37010 at 26.5%.

The 37172 zip code stands out for its combination of high volume and high density. It not only has the most investor-owned homes but also features a 21.9% investor ownership rate, making it a critical hub for rental housing.

These patterns highlight distinct investment strategies across the county, with some areas attracting a large volume of investors while others exhibit a high concentration of rental properties relative to their overall housing stock.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 2.1x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1, acquiring 63 properties and selling 30.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Robertson County are actively expanding their portfolios, acting as decisive net buyers in the first quarter of 2026. With 63 properties purchased and only 30 sold, their 2.1-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio signals strong confidence in the local market's future.

This accumulation strategy is a continuation of a long-term trend. In 2025, landlords added a net of 225 properties to their holdings (358 buys vs. 133 sells), and in 2024, they added a net of 197 properties.

Institutional investors (1,000+ tier), while smaller in number, are following the same bullish pattern. They were also net buyers in Q1 with 4 purchases and 2 sales, continuing their net accumulation of 17 properties throughout 2025.

The consistent net buying across all investor types, from small landlords to large institutions, points to a widespread positive outlook on the Robertson County single-family rental market.

Sustained high transaction volume on the acquisition side indicates a liquid and dynamic market where investors are continuously deploying capital to grow their rental housing portfolios.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors participated in 20.4% of all Q1 transactions, purchasing 63 of the 309 homes sold.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a crucial role in Q1 market liquidity, participating in 20.4% of all single-family residential transactions. Their 63 purchases out of a total of 309 sales highlight their sustained buying pressure.

New and small-scale investors were the most active buyers, with those in the single-property tier conducting 36 of the 63 total investor transactions, reinforcing that market entry is robust.

In a reversal of typical patterns, institutional investors paid a premium this quarter. Their average purchase price of $327,093 was 5.2% higher than the $311,054 average paid by first-time single-property landlords, suggesting a focus on higher-quality or turnkey assets.

An active secondary market exists among investors. Landlords in the two-property and 21-50 property tiers were the most likely to acquire properties from their peers, with 66.7% of their purchases coming from other investors.

In contrast, institutional buyers were less reliant on this channel, sourcing only 25.0% of their acquisitions from other landlords. This suggests larger firms may be more focused on purchasing from homeowners or developers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 86.3% of Robertson County's investor market and are buying at a 26.1% discount.
Holdings
Landlords own 4,226 SFR properties, 17.6% of Robertson County's market, with individual investors holding 3,389 (80.2%) and companies owning 886 (21.0%).
Pricing
Landlords paid 26.1% less than homeowners in Q1, securing an average discount of $112,190 per property ($317,867 vs $430,057).
Activity
In the last quarter, landlords purchased 22.4% of all homes sold (47 properties), with 35 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control 86.3% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 4.4%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies take majority control in portfolios starting at the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 2.1x buy/sell ratio in Q1 (63 buys vs 30 sells), and institutional investors are also net buyers (4 buys vs 2 sells).
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Robertson County, TN, is characterized by the overwhelming dominance of local, small-scale investors. Landlords own 4,226 properties, representing 17.6% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of individuals, who own 80.2% of these homes, compared to just 21.0% owned by companies. The market structure heavily favors mom-and-pop operators (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 86.3% of all investor-owned properties, while large institutional firms (1000+ properties) hold a minor 4.4% share.

Investor behavior in the current market is defined by strategic acquisitions and portfolio growth. In the most recent quarter, landlords captured 22.4% of all home purchases and demonstrated a significant pricing advantage, paying an average of 26.1% less than traditional homeowners. This trend of accumulation is widespread, with landlords across all tiers acting as net buyers. In Q1, the overall buy-to-sell ratio was a strong 2.1-to-1, with even the largest institutional players expanding their local footprint, signaling broad confidence in the market.

The key takeaway from this data is that the Robertson County rental market is not being consolidated by large corporations but is instead expanding through the activity of thousands of individual investors. These landlords are skilled at finding value, consistently purchasing below market rates, and are in a clear phase of portfolio growth. This decentralized ownership structure suggests a resilient and competitive rental market driven by local expertise rather than institutional capital, shaping the housing landscape from the ground up.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 02:59 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Robertson (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Robertson (TN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tn-robertson/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.