Scott (MS) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Scott (MS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Scott (MS)
6,134
Total Investors in Scott (MS)
1,113
Investor Owned SFR in Scott (MS)
1,086(17.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
951
SFR Owned
896
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
162
SFR Owned
215
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,086 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Individual Investors Dominate Scott County's Real Estate Market, Acquiring Properties at a 75% Discount
Investors own 17.7% of the Single-Family Residential market in Scott County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling an overwhelming 95.1% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords were highly active, purchasing 31.2% of all homes sold and paying an average of 74.9% less than traditional homeowners. While small investors are net buyers, institutional firms were net sellers over the past year, indicating a retreat from the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,086 SFR properties in Scott County, with individuals holding 82.5%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (965) versus being financed (121), an 8-to-1 ratio. The portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, with 1,051 of the 1,086 properties (96.8%) being rented out.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 74.9% less than homeowners in Q1, a staggering $93,133 discount per property.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners is highly volatile, having flipped from a 76.9% discount in Q3 2025 to a 9.3% premium paid by landlords in Q2 2025. This quarter's $31,250 average price for landlords represents a significant drop from prior quarters.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 31.2% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 100% of investor acquisitions this quarter, purchasing all 5 properties. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors control 95.1% of Scott County's investor-owned rental housing.
In contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties own just 0.2% of the market, or 2 homes. Single-property landlords are the largest group, holding 72.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners once a portfolio exceeds 10 properties.
While individuals own over 70% of properties in every tier up to 10 units, companies control 60.7% of the 11-20 property tier and 95.0% of the 21-50 property tier. Pricing data comparing the two owner types is not available.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with one zip code, 39074, holding 50% of all investor properties.
The zip code with the most investor-owned homes (39074, with 538) is different from the one with the highest investor penetration rate (39359, at 25.9%). This highlights different types of market concentration.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 5 homes for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This net buyer trend is consistent, with landlords acquiring 44 properties and selling 23 in 2025. In stark contrast, institutional investors were net sellers in 2025, selling 3 properties while acquiring only 1.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors accounted for 31.2% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026.
All 5 of these transactions were completed by mom-and-pop investors, with zero institutional purchases. New single-property landlords paid an average price of $31,250, and 0% of investor purchases came from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,086 SFR properties in Scott County, with individuals holding 82.5%.
Detailed Findings

In Scott County, investors hold a significant 17.7% of the single-family residential market, totaling 1,086 properties out of 6,134 available homes.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by 951 individual investors, who own 896 properties, or 82.5% of the investor-owned housing stock. In contrast, 162 company entities own 215 properties, making up the remaining 19.8%.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for all-cash holdings. Investors own 965 properties outright, compared to just 121 that are financed, signaling a market with low leverage and high equity.

The investor portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to generating rental income. A total of 1,051 properties are classified as rented, which accounts for 96.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.

This composition points to a mature rental market dominated by private individuals rather than large-scale corporate landlords, a key feature for anyone involved in local real estate investing.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 74.9% less than homeowners in Q1, a staggering $93,133 discount per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Scott County demonstrated an ability to secure deep discounts in Q1 2026, paying an average of just $31,250 per property. This was 74.9% less than the $124,383 paid by traditional homeowners, a raw discount of $93,133.

The pricing advantage for landlords has been inconsistent, highlighting market volatility. While landlords achieved a similar 76.9% discount in Q3 2025, they anomalously paid a 9.3% premium in Q2 2025, when their average price was $199,413 versus the homeowner average of $182,387.

This volatility in pricing suggests that a small number of transactions can significantly skew quarterly averages, a common feature in smaller, localized markets.

The significant discounts secured in most quarters indicate that investors are likely targeting distressed, off-market, or value-add properties that are not available or attractive to typical homebuyers.

The average acquisition price for landlords has trended downward recently, from a high of $199,413 in Q2 2025 to the current low of $31,250, signaling a shift in the types of properties being acquired.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 31.2% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a substantial portion of the Scott County market, with landlords acquiring 5 of the 16 total SFRs sold, a market share of 31.2%.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by small-scale mom-and-pop investors. Landlords in the 1-10 property tiers bought 100% of the investor-acquired homes, with zero activity from mid-size or institutional players.

New market entrants were a key driver of activity. Two new single-property landlords entered the market, acquiring 2 homes and representing 40% of all investor purchases for the quarter.

The buying was concentrated at the smallest scale, with landlords owning 1-5 properties making up 80% of the purchasing volume.

This data confirms that market growth is fueled by local, small-scale investors rather than large, out-of-state corporations.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors control 95.1% of Scott County's investor-owned rental housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Scott County is overwhelmingly dominated by small landlords. Those owning between 1 and 10 properties, often called mom-and-pops, control a combined 95.1% of all investor-owned SFR properties.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, owning 814 properties. This single tier accounts for 72.0% of the entire investor-owned housing supply.

The presence of large-scale institutional investors is negligible. The 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) accounts for just 2 properties, or 0.2% of the market, challenging the narrative of widespread corporate ownership in this area.

Mid-size investors also have a limited footprint. Tiers representing portfolios of 11 to 1,000 properties collectively own just 4.8% of the investor-owned homes.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market composed of hundreds of small, independent operators rather than a consolidated group of large players.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners once a portfolio exceeds 10 properties.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Scott County shows a clear divide based on portfolio size. Individual investors are the dominant force in smaller portfolios, owning 85.9% of single-property rentals and over 70% in each tier up to 10 properties.

A distinct crossover point occurs at the 11-20 property tier. At this level, company ownership jumps to a 60.7% majority, indicating that investors who scale beyond 10 properties tend to operate under a corporate structure.

This trend intensifies in larger tiers. For investors holding 21-50 properties, companies own a commanding 95.0% of the homes, solidifying their role as the preferred vehicle for managing larger portfolios.

Even so, individual ownership persists at nearly every level, with individuals owning at least one property even in the 51-100 property tier.

This pattern suggests that while individuals form the base of the market, serious scaling efforts are almost exclusively pursued through formal business entities.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with one zip code, 39074, holding 50% of all investor properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Scott County is not evenly distributed. The zip code 39074 is the clear epicenter of activity, containing 538 investor-owned properties, which is nearly half of the county's total of 1,086.

However, the highest concentration of investors is found elsewhere. Zip code 39359 has the highest ownership rate, where investors own 25.9% of all SFR properties, indicating a denser saturation of rental housing.

The distinction between the leader in raw count (39074) and the leader in percentage rate (39359) suggests different investment dynamics. One area attracts a high volume of investors, while the other has a higher proportion of its housing stock owned by them.

Following the lead of 39074, other key areas for investor ownership by count include 39117 (364 properties) and 39092 (77 properties).

These patterns are crucial for understanding hyper-local market conditions and identifying where rental housing is most prevalent.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 5 homes for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction history shows that landlords in Scott County are consistently in an accumulation phase. In the first quarter of 2026, they were strong net buyers, with 5 purchases against only 1 sale.

This behavior is not a recent development. Throughout 2025, landlords bought 44 properties while selling only 23, and in 2024 they bought 32 and sold 14, reinforcing a long-term strategy of portfolio growth.

A critical divergence appears when comparing small investors to institutional ones. While the overall landlord pool is buying, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) are divesting. In 2025, they were net sellers, with 1 purchase and 3 sales, signaling a strategic retreat from the market.

Overall market liquidity for investors increased from 2024 to 2025. Total transactions (buys and sells) grew from 46 in 2024 to 67 in 2025, indicating a more active trading environment.

The data clearly shows two different stories: small, local investors are actively growing their portfolios while the few large, institutional players are reducing their exposure.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors accounted for 31.2% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were a major force in the Scott County market, participating in 5 of the 16 total transactions for a 31.2% market share.

All of this activity originated from small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of investor-side transactions, while institutional investors made no moves.

The data reveals that investors are acquiring properties from outside the existing landlord community. None of the 5 investor purchases in Q1 were from other landlords, suggesting they are primarily buying from traditional homeowners.

First-time investors entering the market paid an average of $31,250. This price point, far below the typical homeowner price, indicates a focus on acquiring properties with significant potential for value-add or at a deep discount.

The complete absence of institutional transactions reinforces their passive or divesting stance in the current market, leaving the field entirely to smaller players.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Individual Landlords Dominate Scott County with 95% Share as Institutions Remain Absent
Holdings
Investors own 1,086 SFR properties, representing 17.7% of Scott County's market. Individual investors are the primary owners, holding 82.5% of these properties, compared to 19.8% held by companies.
Pricing
Landlords in Q1 2026 paid an average of 74.9% less than traditional homeowners, securing properties for $31,250 compared to the homeowner average of $124,383, a discount of $93,133.
Activity
In Q1, landlords purchased 31.2% of all homes sold (5 properties), with activity driven entirely by small investors. This included 2 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control investor housing with a 95.1% share, while large institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios larger than 10 properties, controlling over 60% of homes in the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are active net buyers with a 5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1. Conversely, institutional investors were net sellers over the last full year, signaling a clear retreat from the market.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Scott County, Mississippi, is fundamentally shaped by small, independent operators. Investors own 1,086 properties, which constitutes 17.7% of the total SFR housing stock. Ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals, who hold 82.5% of these assets. The market structure is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 95.1% of investor-owned homes. In stark contrast, institutional-scale investors have a nearly nonexistent footprint, owning just 0.2% of the portfolio, a finding that runs contrary to national headlines.

Investor behavior in Scott County is characterized by strategic, value-oriented acquisitions. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords were responsible for 31.2% of all home purchases. They demonstrated a keen ability to find deals, paying an average price of $31,250, a 74.9% discount compared to traditional homeowners. Transaction data reveals that while the broader landlord community is in an aggressive accumulation phase, acting as strong net buyers, the few institutional players in the market have been net sellers, divesting their small number of assets.

The key takeaway from this market report is that Scott County is a quintessential mom-and-pop landlord market. Growth is driven by local individuals and small businesses, not by Wall Street firms. This creates a market dynamic where success relies on deep local knowledge and the ability to source off-market or distressed properties. For anyone analyzing this area, the story is not one of corporate consolidation but of a deeply rooted, fragmented, and value-driven investor community that continues to expand its holdings one property at a time.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 09:55 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Scott (MS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Scott (MS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ms-scott/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.