Clinton (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Clinton (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Clinton (IN)
9,931
Total Investors in Clinton (IN)
963
Investor Owned SFR in Clinton (IN)
1,032(10.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
801
SFR Owned
762
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
162
SFR Owned
291
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,032 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Clinton County, Paying 22% Premium Over Homeowners in Q1
Investors own 1,032 SFR properties in Clinton County (10.4% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 88.1% of that portfolio. In a significant market reversal, Q1 2026 saw landlords pay a 21.8% premium over traditional homeowners. Investors remain strong net buyers, acquiring 13 properties while only selling 3 in the first quarter.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,032 properties in Clinton County, with individuals holding 73.8%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties, 912 out of 1,032 (88.4%), are held free and clear as cash properties. Individual investors (801 entities) outnumber company investors (162 entities) by nearly five to one.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a surprising 21.8% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, averaging $299,308.
This Q1 premium of $53,535 marks a significant reversal from Q3 2025, when landlords secured a 70.9% discount. Pricing behavior has been highly volatile, with another large premium of 62.6% recorded in Q1 2025, indicating an unpredictable acquisitions market.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 14.1% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, acquiring 12 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove the market, accounting for 66.7% of all investor purchases (8 properties). In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made only a single purchase, representing 8.3% of investor activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a dominant 88.1% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords are the largest group, owning 587 properties, which is 53.9% of the entire investor portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 4 homes, a negligible 0.4% share.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own the majority of properties across all small and mid-size tiers.
Companies fail to gain a majority share in any reported portfolio tier, holding just 13.3% in the single-property tier and peaking at 47.2% in the 11-20 property tier. Individuals maintain control, owning 86.7% of single-property rentals.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in the 46058 zip code, with 56 properties.
While 46058 leads in raw count, the 46067 zip code has the highest investor penetration rate at 11.8%. The top three zip codes by count (46058, 46065, and 46035) contain 132 properties, representing a significant portion of the county's investor-owned inventory.
Historical Transactions
Investors in Clinton County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 13 properties and selling only 3 in Q1 2026.
This trend of net acquisition has been consistent, with investors being net buyers in every period reported, including a net gain of 33 properties in 2025 and 28 in 2024. Institutional activity is minimal, with a net gain of just 2 properties in all of 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord transactions accounted for 13.7% of all market activity in Q1 2026, with 13 total transactions.
Mom-and-pop investors drove this activity, conducting 8 transactions. An extreme price outlier was recorded in the small-medium tier, with one property acquired for $1,168,671, drastically skewing the average price for that segment.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,032 properties in Clinton County, with individuals holding 73.8%.
Detailed Findings

In Clinton County, investors hold 1,032 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for 10.4% of the total 9,931 SFRs in the market. This portfolio demonstrates a clear dominance by small, private owners over corporate entities.

Individual investors own 762 properties, representing 73.8% of the investor-owned housing stock, while companies own the remaining 291 properties (28.2%). This composition underscores the local, small-scale nature of real estate investing in the area.

The ownership structure by entity count further reinforces this trend, with 801 individual landlords compared to just 162 company landlords. This nearly 5-to-1 ratio indicates that the market is primarily driven by local individuals rather than large-scale corporate operations.

A striking feature of the Clinton County investor market is the preference for all-cash ownership. An overwhelming 88.4% of investor properties (912 total) are owned outright without financing, compared to only 120 financed properties. This suggests a fiscally conservative and well-capitalized investor base.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rentals, with 977 of the 1,032 properties identified as rented. This high rental penetration confirms that the primary strategy for investors in this market is generating rental income.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a surprising 21.8% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, averaging $299,308.
Detailed Findings

In a sharp deviation from typical market patterns, landlords in Clinton County paid a significant premium for properties in Q1 2026. The average landlord acquisition price was $299,308, which is 21.8% higher than the $245,773 paid by traditional homeowners, representing a $53,535 price difference.

This pricing behavior is not an isolated event but part of a volatile trend. In Q1 2025, landlords paid an even larger premium of 62.6% ($165,902). Conversely, they achieved massive discounts in other recent quarters, such as a 70.9% discount in Q3 2025 and a 17.2% discount in Q2 2025.

The extreme fluctuation between substantial premiums and deep discounts suggests that the low transaction volume in the county can lead to skewed quarterly averages. Specific high-value or low-value acquisitions can heavily influence the data, making it difficult to establish a stable pricing advantage for investors.

Despite the quarterly volatility, a longer-term view shows significant price appreciation. The average investor acquisition price during the 2020-2023 period was $120,091, climbing to $155,141 in 2024 and $208,029 in 2025, demonstrating strong underlying growth in property values.

The absence of landlord purchases in multiple recent quarters (Q2, Q3, Q4 of 2025 and Q1 2026 having zero recorded properties in one dataset) further highlights the market's thin activity level, where a few transactions can dramatically alter perceived pricing trends.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 14.1% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, acquiring 12 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 14.1% of all SFR sales in Clinton County during Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 12 of the 85 homes sold. This level of market share demonstrates a consistent and material presence of investors in the local housing market.

The acquisition activity was dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who were responsible for 8 of the 12 purchases, or 66.7% of the investor total. This highlights that small-scale investors are the primary drivers of new acquisitions.

Notably, a single landlord in the 6-10 property tier was the most active buyer, purchasing 6 properties and accounting for 50% of all investor acquisitions in the quarter. This single entity's activity demonstrates how individual investor decisions can significantly impact market dynamics in smaller counties.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) had a minimal impact, with only one entity purchasing a single property (8.3% of investor activity). This low volume reinforces that large, national-scale investors have a very limited footprint in Clinton County's acquisition market.

The market also saw the entry of one new landlord, who purchased their first investment property (Tier 01). This steady trickle of new participants contributes to the resilience of the mom-and-pop investor segment.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a dominant 88.1% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Clinton County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), collectively control 88.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The foundation of this market is the single-property landlord (Tier 01). This group alone owns 587 properties, which accounts for 53.9% of the entire investor portfolio. This signifies that the majority of investors are individuals with a single rental property.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) hold a combined 11.5% of the portfolio, indicating a much smaller, though still present, segment of more established local investors.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a near-zero presence in the county, owning just 4 properties, or 0.4% of the investor-held stock. This data decisively refutes any narrative of large corporations controlling the local rental market.

The distribution is heavily skewed towards the smallest investors: landlords with 1-5 properties (Tiers 01-03) own a combined 80.9% of the housing stock, cementing Clinton County as a quintessential mom-and-pop market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own the majority of properties across all small and mid-size tiers.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across every reported portfolio size in Clinton County, with companies playing a secondary role. In the largest segment, single-property landlords, individuals own 516 of the 587 properties (86.7%).

As portfolio sizes increase, company ownership grows but never reaches a majority. In the 6-10 property tier, the split is 55.7% individual (44 properties) to 44.3% company (35 properties). This represents the closest point of parity in the available assessor data.

Even among more established investors in the 11-20 property tier, individuals retain a slight majority with 52.8% of properties (28 total), compared to 47.2% for companies (25 total). There is no crossover point where companies become the dominant owner type in this market.

The data clearly illustrates a market where individuals form the backbone of the rental landscape, from first-time investors to those managing small-to-medium portfolios.

This pattern suggests that the path to scaling in Clinton County is pursued by both individuals and companies, but individuals remain the predominant force at every stage of growth shown in the data.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in the 46058 zip code, with 56 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Clinton County is geographically concentrated, with the 46058 zip code hosting the highest number of investor-owned properties at 56. This area represents the largest hub of rental inventory within the county.

Following closely are the 46065 and 46035 zip codes, with 50 and 26 investor-owned properties, respectively. Together, these top three zip codes account for 132 properties, indicating key sub-markets for rental activity.

When analyzing by ownership rate, a different picture emerges. The 46067 zip code has the highest concentration of investor ownership at 11.8%, despite having only 2 investor-owned properties. This highlights how penetration rates can be highest in smaller property markets.

The areas with the highest property counts also feature significant investor ownership rates. For example, 46035 has an 8.7% ownership rate, and 46058 has an 8.3% rate, showing a strong correlation between high volume and high penetration in the county's core sub-markets.

This geographic distribution provides a clear map for understanding where rental properties are most common in Clinton County, focusing primarily on the 46058, 46065, and 46035 zip codes.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Investors in Clinton County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 13 properties and selling only 3 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Clinton County are firmly in an accumulation phase, consistently buying more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, they demonstrated a strong net buyer position, purchasing 13 SFRs while divesting only 3, for a net gain of 10 properties and a 4.33x buy-to-sell ratio.

This acquisitive behavior is a long-term trend, not a recent development. Throughout 2025, landlords were net buyers of 33 properties (89 buys vs. 56 sells), and in 2024, they added a net of 28 properties (66 buys vs. 38 sells).

The data indicates an accelerating pace of acquisitions in the most recent quarter, with the 4.33x buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 being significantly higher than the 1.59x ratio for the full year of 2025.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) show very little activity, reflecting their minimal presence in the county. They were slight net buyers in 2025 with 6 purchases and 4 sales, but their transaction volume is too low to signal any significant market trend.

Overall, the transaction history paints a picture of a confident and growing local investor base that is actively expanding its portfolio, signaling positive sentiment about the future of the Clinton County rental market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord transactions accounted for 13.7% of all market activity in Q1 2026, with 13 total transactions.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 13 of the 95 total SFR transactions in Clinton County, capturing a 13.7% share of market activity. This demonstrates a steady and significant investor presence on the buy-side of the market.

Activity was concentrated among smaller investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) responsible for 8 of the 13 transactions. This aligns with the overall ownership structure, where small investors dominate the landscape.

A major pricing anomaly occurred in the 11-20 property tier, where a single transaction was recorded at an average price of $1,168,671. This is a significant outlier compared to other tiers, such as the institutional purchase at $149,810 and a large-tier purchase at $94,174, suggesting it may have been a portfolio sale or a non-standard property type.

Inter-landlord trading was minimal. Only one of the 13 investor purchases (7.7%) came from another landlord, indicating that investors are primarily acquiring properties from the traditional homeowner market rather than trading amongst themselves.

The institutional tier (1000+) was involved in just one transaction at a price of $149,810, underscoring their very limited role in the county's transactional market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Individual Landlords Drive Clinton County's Market, Owning 74% of Rentals and Paying Premiums
Holdings
Investors own 1,032 SFR properties in Clinton County, representing 10.4% of the market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 762 properties (73.8%), while companies own the remaining 291 (28.2%).
Pricing
In a surprising reversal, landlords paid a 21.8% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, with an average acquisition price of $299,308 compared to the homeowner price of $245,773, a difference of $53,535.
Activity
Landlords purchased 14.1% of homes sold in the final quarter of 2025 (12 properties), with one new single-property landlord entering the market. Mom-and-pop investors were the most active, making up 66.7% of all landlord purchases.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market, owning 88.1% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.4% of the inventory.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners across all reported tiers, from single-property owners (86.7% individual) to the 11-20 property tier (52.8% individual). Companies increase their share in larger portfolios but do not achieve majority control.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 4.33x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (13 buys vs 3 sells). Institutional investors are minimally active but were slight net buyers over the last full year, with 6 buys and 4 sells in 2025.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Clinton County, Indiana, is defined by the dominance of small, private landlords. Investors currently hold 1,032 single-family properties, making up 10.4% of the county's total SFR market. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of individuals, who own 73.8% (762 properties) compared to 28.2% (291 properties) for companies. The market structure heavily skews small, with 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties) controlling a commanding 88.1% of all investor-owned homes, while large institutional firms have a nearly non-existent share of just 0.4%. This data, detailed in our full market reports dashboard, paints a clear picture of a community-based rental market, not one driven by Wall Street.

Investor behavior in Clinton County reflects confidence and a clear strategy of acquisition. In the first quarter of 2026, investors were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 13 properties while selling only 3. This continues a consistent trend of portfolio growth seen in previous years. On the pricing front, the market showed significant volatility; after several quarters of securing discounts, landlords paid a surprising 21.8% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, with an average purchase price of $299,308. This suggests a competitive environment for desirable properties, forcing investors to bid aggressively to expand their holdings.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that Clinton County's housing market is shaped by local, well-capitalized individuals who are actively growing their portfolios. The negligible presence of institutional investors means that market dynamics are driven by the decisions of hundreds of small players. The high prevalence of all-cash ownership (88.4% of investor properties) indicates a stable, low-leverage investor base, insulating the local rental market from interest rate volatility. For homeowners and renters in Clinton County, this means the rental housing supply is overwhelmingly managed by neighbors, not distant corporations.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:33 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Clinton (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Clinton (IN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-in-clinton/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.