Slope (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Slope (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Slope (ND)
39
Total Investors in Slope (ND)
18
Investor Owned SFR in Slope (ND)
14(35.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
17
SFR Owned
14
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1
SFR Owned
2
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 14 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Slope County Investor Market Defined by 100% Mom-and-Pop Ownership, High Concentration, and Zero Recent Sales Activity
Investors own a significant 35.9% of the Single-Family Residential market in Slope County, with small, individual landlords controlling 100% of these assets. The market is characterized by extreme geographic concentration and a complete lack of sales activity in Q4 2025, with zero properties purchased by landlords or homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 35.9% of Slope County's SFR market, with individuals holding all 14 investor properties.
The majority of investor properties are owned outright, with 12 held in cash versus only 2 with financing. All 14 investor-owned properties are non-owner-occupied and utilized as rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord acquisitions occurred in Q4 2025, preventing any price comparison to homeowners.
The market remained completely inactive throughout 2024 as well, with zero properties purchased by investors. Historical data from 2020-2023 also shows no recorded acquisition activity, highlighting a prolonged period of market stillness.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made zero purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of a completely inactive market.
Reflecting the market-wide halt, both mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors recorded zero purchases. No new single-property landlords entered the market during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords completely dominate Slope County, controlling 100.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 87.5% of the investor-owned housing stock (14 properties). There is zero ownership by institutional investors (1000+ properties) in the county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors exclusively own all 14 properties held in the single-property tier.
With all properties held by individuals, there is no crossover point where companies become majority owners. The single company landlord in the county does not hold a majority stake in any tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated in zip code 58643, which has an 88.9% investor ownership rate.
The 58643 zip code alone contains 8 of the 14 total investor-owned properties in the county. In contrast, other areas like zip code 58620 have much lower investor penetration at 20.0%.
Historical Transactions
No historical buy or sell transactions were recorded, indicating a highly illiquid or stable rental market.
Without transaction data, it is impossible to determine a buy/sell ratio, the level of inter-landlord trading activity, or average price margins. The market shows no evidence of active trading among investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 0.0% of transactions in Q4 2025, as there were no sales recorded in the county.
No transactions occurred across any investor tier, from mom-and-pop to institutional. Consequently, no purchase price data or inter-landlord activity is available for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 35.9% of Slope County's SFR market, with individuals holding all 14 investor properties.
Detailed Findings

In Slope County, investors hold a significant footprint, owning 14 of the 39 single-family properties, which constitutes 35.9% of the total market. This high penetration rate indicates a market with substantial rental demand relative to its small size.

The ownership landscape is exclusively controlled by small-scale operators. Individual investors own 100% of the 14 rental properties, while only one company landlord is present in the market, co-owning 2 of those properties.

A strong preference for debt-free ownership is clear, as 12 of the 14 investor-owned properties (85.7%) were acquired with cash. Only 2 properties in the investor portfolio carry financing, suggesting a low-risk, long-term holding strategy among local landlords.

The portfolio is entirely focused on rental income, with 100% of the 14 investor-held properties classified as non-owner-occupied. This signals a mature rental market where assets are actively managed for investment returns rather than personal use.

The market consists of 18 distinct landlord entities, with 17 being individuals and only one being a company. This nearly 17-to-1 ratio of individual to company landlords underscores the grassroots nature of real estate investing in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord acquisitions occurred in Q4 2025, preventing any price comparison to homeowners.
Detailed Findings

There was a complete absence of acquisition activity by landlords in Slope County during Q4 2025, with zero properties purchased. This lack of transactions makes it impossible to analyze current pricing trends or compare investor purchase prices to those of traditional homeowners.

The market stagnation extends beyond the recent quarter. Data for the full year of 2024 also shows zero properties were acquired by investors, indicating a sustained period of low liquidity and minimal turnover.

Even looking back at the 2020-2023 timeframe, which saw significant activity in other markets, there were no recorded landlord purchases in Slope County. This suggests the local market is highly stable or operates largely outside of typical real estate cycles.

The absence of sales prevents any analysis of price appreciation. While historical average prices are noted ($74,414 for 2020-2023 and $82,000 for 2024), these are based on zero transactions and do not reflect actual market movement.

Overall, the acquisition pricing data reveals a market defined by buy-and-hold strategies rather than active trading. Investors in this region appear to hold assets for the long term, resulting in very few properties becoming available for purchase.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made zero purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of a completely inactive market.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 was marked by a complete freeze in market activity, with zero total SFR purchases recorded in Slope County. Consequently, landlords accounted for 0.0% of market share, acquiring 0 properties.

Activity was nonexistent across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords, who constitute the entirety of the local market, made no new acquisitions. Similarly, institutional investors had no presence and made no purchases.

A key indicator of market growth, new landlord entry, was also at a standstill. The data shows that zero new single-property landlords (Tier 01) purchased a home in Q4 2025, signaling no new capital flowing into the rental market.

The lack of purchases means there is no change in the distribution of ownership. The existing market structure, dominated by very small landlords, remains unchanged heading into the new year.

This total lack of purchasing volume suggests a highly illiquid market where homeowners and investors are holding onto their properties, with few to no assets being listed for sale.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords completely dominate Slope County, controlling 100.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Slope County is exclusively composed of mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control 100.0% of the 16 investor-owned properties analyzed in this tier breakdown. This indicates a complete absence of mid-size or institutional-scale investment.

First-time or single-holding investors are the foundation of the market. The single-property tier (Tier 01) is the largest segment, comprising 14 properties and accounting for 87.5% of all investor-owned homes.

The next tier, two-property landlords (Tier 02), holds the remaining 2 properties, making up 12.5% of the investor portfolio. There are no landlords in the county who own more than two properties.

In stark contrast to national narratives, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have absolutely no presence in Slope County, owning 0.0% of the market. This is a purely local, small-scale investor environment.

Due to the lack of recent transactions across any tier, it is not possible to compare acquisition prices between small and large investors. The market's ownership structure has remained static.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors exclusively own all 14 properties held in the single-property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the sole owners within the foundational single-property tier, holding all 14 properties. This highlights that the entry point for real estate investment in Slope County is dominated by private individuals, not corporate entities.

The market structure shows no evidence of a crossover point where companies assume majority ownership. In all active tiers (Tier 1 and 2), individuals are the dominant or exclusive owners, reinforcing the local, non-corporate nature of the rental market.

The county's single company landlord operates as a co-owner, not a primary portfolio holder, and has no exclusive ownership in any tier. This differs greatly from larger markets where companies often dominate portfolios of 10 or more properties.

Given the complete lack of sales activity, no pricing analysis between individual and company buyers is possible. The existing ownership patterns have been locked in place over a long period of inactivity.

This data reinforces that the rental housing stock in Slope County is provided by local individuals. The investment strategies are likely driven by personal financial planning rather than corporate acquisition models.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated in zip code 58643, which has an 88.9% investor ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Slope County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in a single area. The zip code 58643 stands out as an investor hotspot, containing 8 properties and boasting an extraordinary 88.9% investor ownership rate.

This intense concentration in one zip code, which holds over half of the county's entire investor portfolio, suggests a small town or specific neighborhood with extremely high rental demand or a unique history of property acquisition.

Other areas show more moderate levels of investor presence. For instance, zip code 58620 has an investor ownership rate of 20.0% (2 properties), and 58647 has a rate of 16.7% (2 properties), which are significantly lower than the concentration seen in 58643.

The data reveals a clear distinction between regions of high and low investor penetration. While one area is almost entirely investor-owned, others maintain a more traditional mix of homeowner and rental properties.

This geographic analysis is critical for understanding the local market dynamics. Any new investment or housing policy would have vastly different impacts in zip code 58643 compared to the rest of the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical buy or sell transactions were recorded, indicating a highly illiquid or stable rental market.
Detailed Findings

The historical transaction data for Slope County is empty, showing a complete lack of both buy and sell activity among landlords in all recorded timeframes. This points to an extremely stable or illiquid market where properties rarely change hands.

As a result, landlords in the county cannot be classified as net buyers or net sellers. The buy-to-sell ratio is indeterminate, reflecting a market in a state of equilibrium where existing owners are holding their assets.

The level of inter-landlord trading is zero. No instances of landlords selling properties to other investors were recorded, suggesting the absence of a secondary market for rental properties in the area.

Similarly, institutional investor activity is nonexistent. The 1000+ property tier recorded no buys or sells, which is consistent with their complete absence from the county's ownership records.

The lack of transactions prevents any analysis of profitability or price spreads between acquisitions and sales. The market is defined by long-term holds, likely for rental income, rather than short-term capital gains through flipping or active portfolio management.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 0.0% of transactions in Q4 2025, as there were no sales recorded in the county.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, the real estate market in Slope County came to a complete standstill, with zero total transactions recorded. This resulted in landlords having a 0.0% share of market activity.

Transactional volume was zero across every investor segment. The smallest single-property landlords (Tier 01) recorded no transactions, and all other tiers were equally inactive.

With no purchases made, there is no data to compare the average purchase prices across different investor tiers. The market's pricing dynamics for the quarter are unknown due to the lack of sales.

Inter-landlord trading was also nonexistent. The data shows that 0.0% of landlord purchases came from other landlords, as no such transactions took place. This indicates a lack of portfolio churn among investors.

The transactional data for Q4 2025 reinforces the broader theme of a dormant market. Investors and homeowners alike were holding their properties, leading to zero sales velocity during the period.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Slope County Investor Market Defined by 100% Mom-and-Pop Ownership and Zero Recent Sales Activity
Holdings
Investors own 14 SFRs, representing a significant 35.9% of the market in Slope County. Ownership is completely dominated by individuals, who hold all 14 of the investor-owned properties.
Pricing
No recent sales activity was recorded in Q4 2025 or the preceding year, preventing any price comparison between landlords and traditional homeowners in Slope County.
Activity
There was a complete absence of market activity in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 0 properties and accounting for 0.0% of all sales.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control 100.0% of investor-owned housing, with single-property owners alone holding 87.5% of the portfolio. There is zero presence from institutional investors.
Ownership Type
Individual investors exclusively control the rental market, holding 100.0% of properties. There is no crossover tier where companies become majority owners, as corporate investment is minimal.
Transactions
No buy or sell transactions were recorded in recent periods, resulting in a static market with no net buyer or seller activity to report for any investor segment.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment market in Slope County, North Dakota, is a unique ecosystem defined by high penetration and small-scale ownership. Investors command a substantial 35.9% of the single-family housing stock, with 14 properties under their control. This entire portfolio is in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' landlords, who represent 100% of investor ownership. Individuals are the exclusive owners, with no properties held solely by companies, and institutional firms are entirely absent from the market.

Investor behavior is characterized by stability and a complete lack of recent transactional activity. During Q4 2025, and indeed for all of 2024, there were zero purchases by investors or homeowners, indicating a highly illiquid or long-term hold market. This absence of sales makes it impossible to analyze pricing advantages or current market values. The portfolio is heavily weighted toward cash ownership, with 12 of 14 properties owned outright, reinforcing the low-risk, long-hold strategy prevalent in the area.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that Slope County's rental market is not driven by large-scale capital but by local individuals. The most significant finding is the hyper-concentration of ownership in zip code 58643, where the investor-owned rate reaches an astonishing 88.9%. This suggests the county’s rental landscape is essentially the story of one small, heavily-invested community, operating independently of broader market trends and characterized by stasis rather than active trading.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:11 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Slope (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Slope (ND) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nd-slope/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.