Harvey (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Harvey (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Harvey (KS)
10,725
Total Investors in Harvey (KS)
2,187
Investor Owned SFR in Harvey (KS)
2,680(25.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,819
SFR Owned
1,669
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
368
SFR Owned
1,018
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,680 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate a Static Harvey County Market with 80% Control
Investors own 25.0% of Harvey County's SFR market (2,680 properties), with "mom-and-pop" landlords controlling a staggering 79.7% versus just 0.1% for institutional investors. The market showed zero acquisition activity in Q4 2025, indicating a period of stability or stagnation.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,680 SFR properties in Harvey County, with individuals holding the 62.3% majority.
All 2,680 investor-owned properties are held in cash, with none reported as financed. A significant 95.9% of the investor portfolio (2,570 properties) is designated as rented, confirming a strong rental focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No recent acquisition pricing data is available for landlords or homeowners in Harvey County.
The data indicates zero properties were purchased by landlords between 2020-2023, and no quarterly price comparisons are available to assess market trends or investor discounts.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, reflecting a complete halt in acquisition activity.
With zero total SFR purchases recorded in the market for the quarter, investors' market share was 0.0%. No new mom-and-pop or institutional investors acquired properties during this period.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate Harvey County, controlling 79.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 2 properties, or 0.1% of the investor-owned market. Single-property landlords alone account for 1,260 properties, representing 45.7% of the entire investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property holders starting at the 6-10 property tier, where they own 73.4% of assets.
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, owning 84.8% of single-property holdings. In contrast, companies control nearly all large portfolios, owning 99.2% of properties in the 51-100 unit tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip code 67114, which contains 1,654 investor-owned properties.
The zip code 67020 has the highest investor penetration rate at 50.3%. The top three zip codes by count (67114, 67020, 67135) are the same as the top three by ownership percentage, signaling deep investor focus in these areas.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available, preventing analysis of long-term landlord buy/sell trends.
Without transactional records, it is impossible to determine if landlords have been net buyers or sellers over time. Analysis of inter-landlord trading and historical buy/sell price margins cannot be performed.
Current Quarter Transactions
There were zero landlord transactions in Q4 2025, resulting in a 0.0% share of market activity.
No transactions occurred across any investor tier, from mom-and-pop to institutional. As a result, there was no inter-landlord trading activity or price discovery during the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,680 SFR properties in Harvey County, with individuals holding the 62.3% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a substantial 25.0% share of the single-family residential market in Harvey County, totaling 2,680 properties out of 10,725.

Ownership is primarily in the hands of individuals, who control 1,669 properties (62.3%), while companies own the remaining 1,018 properties (38.0%). This split is mirrored in the entity count, with 1,819 individual landlords compared to 368 company landlords.

A striking financial characteristic of this market is that 100% of the investor-owned portfolio (2,680 properties) is owned outright with cash. The absence of any financed properties indicates a deeply capitalized and low-leverage investor base.

The portfolio is heavily optimized for rental income, with 2,570 properties (95.9%) classified as rented. This demonstrates a clear focus on long-term buy-and-hold strategies rather than speculative flipping.

The combination of high individual ownership, a debt-free portfolio, and a strong rental focus paints a picture of a stable, mature, and community-embedded investor market in Harvey County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No recent acquisition pricing data is available for landlords or homeowners in Harvey County.
Detailed Findings

There is no available acquisition price data for landlords or traditional homeowners in the recent quarters for Harvey County.

Due to the absence of transactional data, a comparative analysis of pricing, such as the typical gap between what investors and homeowners pay, cannot be performed.

While historical data for 2020-2023 lists an average acquisition price of $121,721, it is associated with zero property purchases, suggesting this figure is an anomaly or a placeholder in the dataset.

Without pricing information, it is impossible to determine if landlords are securing properties at a discount, whether prices are appreciating, or what financial strategies are at play in the local market.

This lack of recent pricing data signals an extremely low-velocity market or a potential gap in data collection for this specific geography.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, reflecting a complete halt in acquisition activity.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity in Harvey County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring zero new single-family properties.

This halt in activity was market-wide, as the total number of SFR purchases for all buyer types, including traditional homeowners, was also zero for the quarter.

Consequently, landlords' share of market purchases was 0.0%, and there was no new market entry from any investor tier, from first-time landlords to large institutions.

The data points to a period of profound inactivity or stagnation in the Harvey County real estate market, with no properties changing hands through recorded sales.

This absence of transactions prevents any analysis of which investor tiers were most active or what types of properties were being targeted.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate Harvey County, controlling 79.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Harvey County is overwhelmingly controlled by small-scale operators. Landlords owning 1-10 properties, commonly known as "mom-and-pops," hold a combined 79.7% share of the investor-owned SFR market.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of this market, with their 1,260 properties accounting for 45.7% of all investor holdings. This underscores the decentralized and grassroots nature of real estate investing in the county.

In stark contrast, the narrative of corporate dominance does not apply here. Institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties have a minimal footprint, owning just two properties, which is only 0.1% of the total.

Mid-size landlords, owning between 11 and 100 properties, hold a combined 20.1% of the properties, bridging the gap between the smallest investors and the virtually non-existent large institutions.

This highly fragmented ownership structure indicates that local, small-scale investors are the primary providers of single-family rental housing in Harvey County.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property holders starting at the 6-10 property tier, where they own 73.4% of assets.
Detailed Findings

A distinct pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type: individual investors control the small-scale end of the market, while companies systematically take over as portfolio sizes increase.

Individuals are the dominant owners in the smallest tiers, accounting for 84.8% of single-property portfolios and 74.1% of two-property portfolios.

The strategic shift occurs at the 6-10 property tier. In this category, company ownership surges to 73.4%, marking the clear crossover point where a corporate structure becomes the preferred method for managing a growing portfolio.

This trend accelerates dramatically in higher tiers. Companies own 78.7% of properties in the 21-50 unit tier and achieve near-total control at 99.2% in the 51-100 unit tier.

This data progression suggests a natural investor lifecycle, where individuals may begin their investment journey and then incorporate as their holdings expand in scale and operational complexity.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip code 67114, which contains 1,654 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Harvey County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in a few key zip codes.

The zip code 67114 stands out as the epicenter of investor holdings by sheer volume, containing 1,654 investor-owned SFR properties.

However, for the highest rate of investor penetration, the zip code 67020 leads, where investors own 50.3% of all single-family homes, more than half the market.

A strong correlation exists between the areas with the most investor properties and those with the highest ownership rates. The top three zip codes by property count (67114, 67020, and 67135) are the exact same three with the highest investor ownership percentages.

This geographic clustering indicates that investors are strategically targeting specific neighborhoods within Harvey County, likely driven by factors like strong rental demand, attractive property values, or community characteristics.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available, preventing analysis of long-term landlord buy/sell trends.
Detailed Findings

Comprehensive historical transaction data for landlords in Harvey County is not available. This includes buys, sells, and pricing across all previous timeframes.

The absence of this data prevents any analysis of long-term market dynamics, such as determining whether landlords have been accumulating or divesting properties over time.

It is not possible to calculate a historical buy/sell ratio to gauge the net direction of investor activity.

Furthermore, analysis of inter-landlord transactions, a key indicator of market liquidity and sophistication, cannot be conducted.

Trends in average buy and sell prices, which would reveal historical profit margins and market health, are also unavailable for review.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
There were zero landlord transactions in Q4 2025, resulting in a 0.0% share of market activity.
Detailed Findings

The transaction market for landlords in Harvey County was entirely dormant in Q4 2025, with zero recorded purchases or sales.

This inactivity spanned all investor sizes, from single-property owners to the largest tiers, indicating a market-wide pause.

Consequently, the landlord share of total market transactions was 0.0%, as there were no transactions from any buyer type during the period.

Key metrics like average purchase price by tier and the percentage of properties bought from other landlords cannot be calculated due to the lack of activity.

The data for this quarter reflects a market in a state of stasis, with no assets changing hands among investors.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Harvey County with 79.7% Ownership in a Zero-Transaction Market
Holdings
Landlords own 2,680 SFR properties in Harvey County, representing 25.0% of the market. Individual investors hold the majority with 1,669 properties (62.3%), compared to 1,018 (38.0%) owned by companies.
Pricing
No recent acquisition pricing data is available for Q4 2025, preventing a comparison between landlord and homeowner purchase prices.
Activity
The market was inactive in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing zero properties and accounting for 0.0% of all sales. No new landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
Small "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 79.7% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors have a minimal presence at just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 73.4% of properties in that segment.
Transactions
With zero buy or sell transactions recorded in Q4 2025, landlords were neither net buyers nor net sellers.
Market Narrative

In Harvey County, Kansas, real estate investors own a significant 25.0% of the single-family residential market, totaling 2,680 properties. The ownership landscape is defined by small, independent operators, as individuals own 62.3% of these homes (1,669 properties) compared to companies at 38.0% (1,018 properties). This structure is further emphasized by portfolio size, where "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties) control 79.7% of all investor-owned housing, while large institutional firms have a nearly non-existent footprint at 0.1%.

Investor behavior in the most recent quarter was characterized by a complete lack of activity, with zero properties purchased or sold. This transactional halt prevents analysis of current pricing strategies, such as the typical discount investors achieve compared to traditional homeowners. The existing portfolio is built on a foundation of cash, as 100% of the 2,680 investor-owned properties are held without financing, suggesting a low-risk, long-term holding strategy among the county's landlords.

The key takeaway for the Harvey County housing market is its stability and fragmentation. It is a market dominated by small, local, cash-rich landlords, not large, leveraged institutions. The recent lack of sales activity could signal market equilibrium, a lack of available inventory, or investor hesitation amidst broader economic conditions. Future Investor Pulse reports will be crucial to determine if this is a temporary pause or a new, sustained period of low velocity.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 05:12 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Harvey (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Harvey (KS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ks-harvey/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.