Clayton (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Clayton (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Clayton (IA)
5,058
Total Investors in Clayton (IA)
1,241
Investor Owned SFR in Clayton (IA)
935(18.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,088
SFR Owned
791
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
153
SFR Owned
164
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 935 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Clayton County, Controlling 99% of an Institution-Free Market
Investors own 935 SFR properties in Clayton County (18.5% of the market), with individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a staggering 99.0% of this portfolio. In Q1 2026, these investors were strong net buyers, purchasing 7 properties for every 1 sold, and surprisingly paid a slight 0.8% premium over traditional homeowners, reversing a previous trend of deep discounts.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individuals own 84.6% of the 935 investor-held SFR properties in Clayton County.
Of the 935 properties, 703 were acquired with cash, while 232 are financed. A total of 925 properties in the investor portfolio are classified as rented. Individual landlords (1,088) vastly outnumber company landlords (153) by a ratio of more than 7 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 0.8% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, a sharp reversal from 2025.
This $1,846 premium ($229,083 vs $227,237) contrasts sharply with the deep discounts seen in 2025, which were as high as 18.6% or $36,657 in Q2 2025. This signals a significant shift in market dynamics and increased competition for properties.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 26.8% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 91.7% of all investor purchases, acquiring 11 of the 12 properties. Institutional investors (1000+) made zero purchases, showing no activity in the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence, holding 0.0% of the market. Single-property landlords alone account for 81.2% of all investor-owned properties, making them the backbone of the rental market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals are the majority property owner in every single investor tier in Clayton County.
Even in the largest active tiers, individuals maintain control. In the 6-10 property tier, individuals own 88.2% of homes, and in the 3-5 property tier, they own 78.5%. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip codes 52052 (Mc Gregor) and 52049 (Guttenberg).
The zip code 52052 has the highest count of investor-owned homes at 311, with an ownership rate of 28.0%. However, smaller zip codes like 52066 (Postville) and 52158 (Marquette) show the highest penetration rates, at 35.9% and 30.1% respectively.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This net buying trend has been consistent, with a buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 6:1 in 2025 (65 buys vs 11 sells) and nearly 10:1 in 2024 (67 buys vs 7 sells). Institutional investors recorded no transactions.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 22.2% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026.
Single-property (Tier 01) investors drove this activity, accounting for 12 of the 14 landlord transactions. These small buyers paid an average of $207,083, while a Tier 02 buyer paid $625,000 for a single property.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individuals own 84.6% of the 935 investor-held SFR properties in Clayton County.
Detailed Findings

In Clayton County, real estate investors hold 935 single-family residential properties, accounting for 18.5% of the total 5,058 SFRs in the market. This demonstrates a significant investor presence within the local housing stock.

Individual investors are the overwhelming force, owning 791 properties or 84.6% of the total investor portfolio. Company-owned properties are far less common, comprising just 164 properties (17.5%), highlighting a market dominated by local, small-scale ownership rather than large corporations.

By entity count, the disparity is even more pronounced. There are 1,088 individual landlords compared to only 153 company landlords, a ratio of over 7 to 1. This structure indicates that the typical real estate investing profile in the county is an individual, not a corporate entity.

Cash is the preferred acquisition method for investors in this market. Of the total portfolio, 703 properties are owned outright (cash), while only 232 are financed. This suggests a market with low leverage and high equity among its investor base.

The primary purpose of these holdings is rental income, with 925 of the 935 properties classified as rented. This near-total rental focus underscores the role these investors play in providing housing for the local rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 0.8% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, a sharp reversal from 2025.
Detailed Findings

A surprising pricing reversal occurred in Q1 2026, with landlords paying an average of $229,083, which is $1,846 more than the traditional homeowner price of $227,237. This 0.8% premium marks a significant departure from historical trends where investors typically secured discounts.

This recent premium stands in stark contrast to the preceding year. In 2025, landlords consistently paid less than homeowners, securing discounts of 9.9% in Q3 ($21,756), 18.6% in Q2 ($36,657), and 18.2% in Q1 ($33,135). The shift indicates intensifying competition for available inventory.

The average acquisition price for landlords has shown an upward trend, rising from $164,246 in 2025 to $229,083 in the first quarter of 2026. This reflects broader market appreciation and the increased willingness of investors to pay higher prices to acquire assets.

The pandemic-era (2020-2023) pricing of $160,251 was relatively stable compared to prices in 2024 ($159,552) and 2025 ($164,246). However, the jump to $229,083 in Q1 2026 represents a dramatic acceleration in acquisition costs for investors in Clayton County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 26.8% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors were highly active in the Clayton County market during Q4 2025, purchasing 11 of the 41 total SFRs sold. This represents a significant market share of 26.8%, indicating strong investor demand for local housing.

The market's activity is exclusively driven by smaller investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 91.7% of all landlord acquisitions, totaling 11 properties. A large landlord from the 101-1000 tier purchased the remaining property.

New investors are a key component of market activity. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) made up the vast majority of buyers, acquiring 10 properties (83.3% of the investor total) via 12 different entities. This signals a steady influx of new entrants into the rental market.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) had no presence in the market, making zero purchases in the quarter. This reinforces the local, small-scale character of real estate investing in Clayton County and the absence of large corporate buyers.

The buying activity clearly shows that the growth in investor ownership is fueled from the bottom of the market, with individuals and small entities acquiring one or two properties at a time rather than through large portfolio acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Ownership in Clayton County is overwhelmingly concentrated among small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), collectively control 99.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The market is defined by its smallest participants. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone own 779 properties, which constitutes a remarkable 81.2% of the entire investor-owned housing stock. This highlights the critical role of first-time and small landlords.

There is a complete absence of institutional-scale investment in the county. The 1000+ property tier (Tier 09) holds zero properties, representing 0.0% of the market. This finding directly contradicts the narrative of large corporations dominating smaller housing markets.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) have a minimal footprint, collectively owning just 10 properties or about 1.0% of the investor portfolio. This further emphasizes the market's reliance on landlords with very small portfolios.

The ownership structure is extremely granular, with 74 landlords in the two-property tier (7.7% of properties) and 79 in the 3-5 property tier (8.2%). This distribution underscores a market built on incremental, local investment rather than large, consolidated portfolios.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals are the majority property owner in every single investor tier in Clayton County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority ownership across every single portfolio size tier in Clayton County, a clear sign of a market free from corporate dominance. There is no crossover point where company ownership becomes prevalent.

In the single-property tier, which represents the bulk of the market, individuals own 681 properties (85.8%) compared to just 113 for companies (14.2%). This tier serves as the primary entry point for local landlords.

Even as portfolios grow, individual ownership remains the standard. For landlords with 3-5 properties, individuals own 62 homes (78.5%) versus 17 for companies (21.5%). Similarly, in the 6-10 property tier, individuals own 15 of the 17 properties (88.2%).

Company ownership, while present, is a minority factor across the board. The highest concentration of company-owned properties is in the two-property tier, where they own 22 properties, or 28.9% of that specific tier's holdings.

This data firmly establishes that the investor landscape in Clayton County is defined by individuals building small-to-medium portfolios, without the influence of larger corporate entities that are more common in major metropolitan areas.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip codes 52052 (Mc Gregor) and 52049 (Guttenberg).
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Clayton County is concentrated in a few key areas. The zip code 52052 (Mc Gregor) leads with the highest absolute number of investor-owned properties at 311, representing a 28.0% investor ownership rate.

Following closely in volume is 52049 (Guttenberg), where investors own 124 properties for a 27.4% ownership rate. Together, these two zip codes represent a significant portion of the county's total investor-held real estate.

While larger towns have the highest counts, some smaller communities exhibit the highest investor penetration rates. The zip code 52066 (Postville) has the top rate at 35.9%, followed by 52158 (Marquette) at 30.1%. This indicates that in certain smaller markets, more than one in three homes is investor-owned.

The data highlights a distinction between areas with high investor counts and those with high investor market share. The top regions by count (52052, 52049) are different from the top regions by percentage (52066, 52158), showing varied investment patterns across the county.

The zip code 52043 (Elkader) also shows notable activity, with investors owning 84 properties, translating to a 12.3% ownership rate, rounding out the top areas of concentration.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Clayton County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In the first quarter of 2026, they purchased 14 homes while selling only 2, resulting in a net gain of 12 properties and a 7-to-1 buy/sell ratio.

This pattern of net acquisition has been consistent over the past several years. In 2025, landlords bought 65 properties and sold only 11, for a net gain of 54. The trend was even stronger in 2024, with 67 purchases against just 7 sales, a net increase of 60 properties.

Transaction volume shows robust and sustained activity. The 65 properties purchased in 2025 and 67 in 2024 indicate a stable and active market for real estate investor acquisitions.

There is no transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ tier), confirming their lack of activity in the county's market. All buying and selling is being conducted by small and mid-sized local landlords.

The persistent net buying behavior signals strong confidence in the local rental market and a long-term strategy of portfolio growth among Clayton County's investor base.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 22.2% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 14 of the 63 total SFR transactions, capturing a 22.2% share of all market activity. This demonstrates their continued and significant role as buyers in the Clayton County housing market.

The transaction volume is heavily skewed towards the smallest investors. Landlords in the single-property tier (Tier 01) were responsible for 12 of the 14 investor purchases, reaffirming that market growth comes from new and small-scale entrants.

A notable price disparity exists between tiers. The 12 properties bought by Tier 01 investors had an average price of $207,083. In contrast, the single transaction by a Tier 02 investor was at $625,000, and a large landlord (101-1000 tier) paid $97,158, showing wide variation in acquisition targets.

Inter-landlord trading is present but not dominant. Of the 12 purchases made by single-property investors, 2 were acquired from other landlords, a rate of 16.7%. This indicates that while most inventory comes from the broader market, a secondary market exists between investors.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) made zero transactions, continuing their pattern of non-participation. The transaction data confirms that the market's liquidity and activity are entirely sustained by mom-and-pop and mid-size investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors command 99% of Clayton County's rental market, actively buying with no institutional competition.
Holdings
Landlords own 935 SFR properties, representing 18.5% of Clayton County's market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (84.6%) compared to companies (17.5%).
Pricing
In a notable market shift, landlords paid a 0.8% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026 ($229,083 vs. $227,237), reversing a trend of deep discounts seen throughout 2025.
Activity
Investors purchased 26.8% of all homes sold in the latest quarter, an activity driven almost entirely by mom-and-pop landlords who accounted for 91.7% of investor buys.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) dominate with 99.0% control of all investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own 0.0% of the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, from single-property holders (85.8% individual) to the 6-10 property tier (88.2% individual), with no crossover point to company dominance.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 7x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (14 buys vs 2 sells), a consistent trend of accumulation. Institutional investors remain completely inactive with zero transactions.
Market Narrative

In Clayton County, Iowa, the single-family rental market is fundamentally shaped by local, small-scale investors. Landlords own a significant 935 properties, which accounts for 18.5% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is not controlled by large corporations; instead, individual investors own 84.6% of these homes. The market structure is definitively 'mom-and-pop,' with landlords owning 1-10 properties controlling a staggering 99.0% of all investor-owned real estate, while institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have absolutely no presence.

Investor behavior in Clayton County is characterized by aggressive accumulation and a recent shift in pricing strategy. In Q1 2026, landlords were strong net buyers, acquiring seven properties for every one they sold, continuing a multi-year trend of portfolio growth. These investors were involved in 22.2% of all transactions. In a surprising turn, they paid a slight 0.8% premium over traditional homeowners, reversing a long-standing pattern of securing properties at a discount. This suggests increased competition for a limited supply of homes, forcing investors to bid more competitively.

The key takeaway for Clayton County is that its housing market operates entirely outside the national narrative of institutional consolidation. It is a market defined by individual ambition, where new landlords continually enter at the single-property level and gradually build small portfolios. The absence of institutional capital, combined with strong net buying from local investors, indicates a stable, community-based rental market. This dynamic suggests that housing availability and pricing are influenced by local economic factors and individual investment decisions rather than the strategies of large, publicly-traded companies.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 09:38 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Clayton (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Clayton (IA) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ia-clayton/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.