Washburn (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Washburn (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Washburn (WI)
5,509
Total Investors in Washburn (WI)
91
Investor Owned SFR in Washburn (WI)
76(1.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
74
SFR Owned
59
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
17
SFR Owned
17
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 76 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Washburn County's Mom-and-Pop Landlords Halt Activity in All-Cash Market
Investors own just 76 SFR properties in Washburn County, WI (1.4% of the market), with small, individual landlords controlling 93.4% of this inventory. All investor properties are owned free-and-clear with no financing. After a period of net buying, investor activity has completely stalled, with zero purchases recorded in the latest quarter.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 76 properties in Washburn County, with individuals holding 77.6%.
All 76 investor-owned properties are held in cash, with zero properties reported as financed. These holdings are spread across 91 distinct landlords, with 74 being individuals and 17 being companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Historically, Washburn County landlords secured properties at a massive 66.2% discount.
In Q2 2025, landlords paid an average of $110,000 while traditional homeowners paid $325,456, a staggering $215,456 difference. More recently in Q3, the discount was still significant at 31.8% ($124,092). However, there were no recorded landlord purchases in the most recent quarter.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlord purchasing activity came to a complete stop, with 0% of Q4 2025 SFR purchases.
There were zero properties acquired by investors in the last quarter out of a total of zero market purchases. This lack of activity extended across all investor tiers, from mom-and-pop to institutional.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 93.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 76.3% of all investor-owned housing (58 properties). In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just one property, representing a negligible 1.3% share.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Ownership splits evenly between individuals and companies at the 3-5 property tier.
While individuals dominate the single-property tier with 89.7% ownership, companies become equally prevalent for portfolios of 3-5 homes. In this tier, both individuals and companies own 5 properties each.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 54801 with 23 properties.
While 54801 has the highest count, zip code 54813 has the highest investor ownership rate at 5.9%. Investor penetration remains low across the county, with most areas below a 2.0% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were consistent net buyers in recent years, but activity has since halted.
In 2024, landlords were strong net buyers, acquiring 33 properties while selling only 9, a net gain of 24. This trend continued into 2025 with 3 buys and 1 sale before transactions ceased entirely in the most recent quarter.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investor transaction share was 0.0% in Q4 2025, with no landlord activity recorded.
There were zero total transactions in the market during the quarter, meaning landlords did not buy or sell any properties. This inactivity was consistent across all tiers, from single-property owners to the largest portfolios.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 76 properties in Washburn County, with individuals holding 77.6%.
Detailed Findings

Investor presence in Washburn County's SFR market is minimal, with landlords owning just 76 properties, representing 1.4% of the total 5,509 SFRs. This indicates a market dominated by traditional homeowners rather than investment activity.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards small-scale, individual investors. Individuals own 59 of the 76 properties (77.6%), while companies own the remaining 17 (22.4%), a pattern consistent with a classic mom-and-pop landlord market.

A defining characteristic of this market is the complete absence of leverage. All 76 investor-owned properties are classified as cash holdings, with zero recorded as financed. This suggests investors in this area operate without debt, relying entirely on equity for their acquisitions.

The portfolio is clearly rental-focused, with 62 of the 76 properties (81.6%) classified as rented. This demonstrates a clear strategy of buy-and-hold for rental income among local landlords.

The landlord base itself reflects the ownership pattern, with 74 individual landlords compared to just 17 companies. This nearly 4.4-to-1 ratio of individual to company entities further underscores the non-institutional nature of Washburn County's rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Historically, Washburn County landlords secured properties at a massive 66.2% discount.
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition pricing in Washburn County reveals a strategy of purchasing properties at exceptionally steep discounts compared to traditional homeowners. In Q2 2025, investors paid an average of just $110,000, which was 66.2% less than the $325,456 average paid by homeowners.

This deep discount trend, while varying in intensity, persisted across recent quarters with available data. In Q3 2025, the gap narrowed but remained substantial, with landlords paying $266,650 versus the homeowner average of $390,742, a 31.8% discount, or $124,092 less per property.

The magnitude of these discounts suggests that investors are not competing for on-market retail properties. Instead, they are likely targeting distressed sales, off-market deals, or properties requiring significant renovation, allowing them to acquire assets far below the typical market rate.

Analysis of long-term price trends shows significant appreciation in the general market, with average acquisition prices for landlords rising from $215,923 in the 2020-2023 period to higher figures in 2024 and 2025. However, recent activity has completely ceased.

Crucially, there were zero properties purchased by landlords in the most recent timeframes, including Q4 2025. This halt in activity makes recent price trend analysis impossible but highlights a dramatic shift from opportunistic buying to market inaction.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlord purchasing activity came to a complete stop, with 0% of Q4 2025 SFR purchases.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 was marked by a total absence of investor purchasing activity in Washburn County. Landlords acquired zero SFR properties, accounting for 0.0% of all sales in the market.

This inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who form the backbone of the local market, made no purchases. Similarly, mid-size and institutional tiers also recorded zero acquisitions.

The lack of new entrants is particularly notable. The single-property (Tier 01) category, which typically represents new landlords entering the market, saw no activity. This signals a potential lack of confidence or opportunity for new real estate investing in the current climate.

Given that the total market also saw zero purchases, the halt in investor activity reflects a broader market freeze in Washburn County during this period. Investors were not simply outbid; the entire transaction market appears to have been dormant.

This halt in acquisitions contrasts with previous periods of activity, suggesting a significant shift in market conditions. Factors such as interest rates, local economic changes, or a simple lack of desirable inventory could be contributing to this complete pause in investor buying.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 93.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Washburn County is defined by its fragmentation and the dominance of small-scale owners. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a combined 93.4% of all investor-held SFRs.

The single-property tier is the largest segment by a wide margin, with 58 properties accounting for 76.3% of the entire investor portfolio. This underscores that the market is primarily composed of individuals with a single rental property, not large-scale operators.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) have a very small footprint, collectively owning just four properties or 5.2% of the investor market. This further illustrates the lack of portfolio consolidation in the region.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a near-zero presence, with their entire portfolio consisting of a single property. This 1.3% market share challenges any narrative of large corporations controlling the local rental market.

The data reveals a market structure built on small, independent landlords. The vast majority of rental housing provided by investors in Washburn County comes from individuals and small entities, highlighting a highly localized and non-corporate ownership base.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Ownership splits evenly between individuals and companies at the 3-5 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of Washburn County's landlord market, especially at the entry level. In the single-property tier, individuals own 52 of the 58 properties, an overwhelming 89.7% share, while companies own just 10.3%.

The data reveals a distinct crossover point where ownership strategy appears to formalize. In the small landlord tier of 3-5 properties, ownership is split exactly 50/50, with individuals owning 5 properties and companies owning 5 properties. This suggests that as portfolios grow, investors begin to utilize corporate structures.

Even at the two-property level, the move towards incorporation is visible, with ownership split evenly between one individual and one company. This indicates that the decision to form an LLC or other entity happens very early in an investor's growth journey in this market.

Above the crossover point, the data is sparse, but the trend of using corporate entities for even slightly larger portfolios is established. For instance, in the 6-10 property tier, the single holding is by an individual, which is an exception to the observed pattern.

This pattern highlights a clear behavioral shift: initial real estate investor activity is personal, but scaling beyond a couple of properties often corresponds with the adoption of a formal business structure for asset protection and management.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 54801 with 23 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Washburn County is spread thin, with no single area showing heavy concentration. The zip code 54801 holds the highest number of investor-owned properties at 23, but this only represents a 1.2% ownership rate for that area.

The region with the highest rate of investor ownership is zip code 54813, where landlords own 5.9% of the SFR housing stock. This highlights that the areas with the highest counts are not necessarily the ones with the highest market penetration.

Most zip codes in the county have very low investor ownership rates. For example, the top five regions by count all have penetration rates below 2.0%, including 54871 (1.6%), 54870 (1.9%), and 54859 (1.2%).

The geographic distribution confirms the broader finding of a market not targeted by large-scale investment. The low counts and low percentages across the board indicate scattered, small-scale investment rather than a concerted effort to acquire properties in any specific neighborhood.

This low-density ownership pattern suggests that investment decisions are likely driven by individual opportunities rather than a top-down geographic strategy, typical of a market dominated by local mom-and-pop landlords.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords were consistent net buyers in recent years, but activity has since halted.
Detailed Findings

Historically, landlords in Washburn County have been in an accumulation phase, consistently buying more properties than they sold. In 2024, transaction data shows a strong net-buyer position, with 33 acquisitions against only 9 sales.

This net buying trend, with a buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 3.7 to 1 in 2024, indicates a period of portfolio growth and confidence in the local rental market. Investors were actively adding to their holdings throughout the year.

The pattern continued, albeit at a much smaller scale, into 2025, where landlords purchased 3 properties and sold only 1. While the volume was lower, the strategy of net acquisition remained consistent during this timeframe.

However, this historical trend of accumulation has come to an abrupt end. The complete lack of transactions in the most recent quarter signals a dramatic shift from active purchasing to a wait-and-see approach, breaking the established pattern of the last two years.

The absence of institutional transaction data reinforces that the market's dynamics are driven entirely by smaller investors, whose collective sentiment appears to have shifted from growth to pause.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investor transaction share was 0.0% in Q4 2025, with no landlord activity recorded.
Detailed Findings

In the fourth quarter of 2025, landlords played no role in the transaction market, with their share of all deals at 0.0%. This was part of a broader market stall, as there were zero total SFR transactions recorded in Washburn County.

The lack of activity was uniform across all investor sizes. The typically active mom-and-pop tiers (01-04), which constitute the vast majority of local owners, recorded no purchases or sales. This is a significant deviation from their historical buying patterns.

Consequently, there is no pricing data for the quarter, making it impossible to compare acquisition strategies between different tiers. No average purchase price can be calculated for any investor segment due to the complete absence of deals.

Similarly, data on inter-landlord trading is nonexistent for the quarter. With zero transactions, there were no instances of investors buying properties from other landlords, a metric that typically indicates market liquidity and portfolio repositioning.

The data paints a picture of a market in hibernation. The complete cessation of transactions by all investor types in Q4 suggests that both buyers and sellers retreated from the market, waiting for different conditions before re-engaging.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Washburn County's small investor market goes dormant after a period of net buying, with zero recent acquisitions.
Holdings
Landlords own just 76 SFR properties in Washburn County, representing 1.4% of the market, with individual investors holding 59 of these properties (77.6%) compared to 17 for companies (22.4%).
Pricing
While recent data is unavailable due to inactivity, landlords historically secured extreme discounts, paying up to 66.2% less than traditional homeowners in Q2 2025 ($110,000 vs $325,456).
Activity
Investor activity has halted, with landlords making zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of all market sales. No new landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
The market is overwhelmingly dominated by small landlords (1-10 properties), who control 93.4% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just a single property (1.3%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors are dominant, but companies become equally prevalent in portfolios of 3-5 properties, signaling this tier as the common crossover point for incorporating a business.
Transactions
After being strong net buyers in 2024 (33 buys vs 9 sells), investor transactions have completely stopped, with zero buys or sells recorded in the latest quarter.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Washburn County, WI is characterized by a small, highly localized, and non-corporate presence. Landlords control a mere 76 single-family residences, just 1.4% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individuals (77.6%) and dominated by mom-and-pop operators (93.4% of holdings), with institutional investors having a negligible footprint of a single property. A key feature of this market is its reliance on equity, as 100% of these investor-owned properties are held free-and-clear with no financing.

Investor behavior has undergone a dramatic shift. Historically, landlords in the area were adept at securing properties at massive discounts, sometimes over 60% below what traditional homeowners paid, suggesting a focus on off-market or distressed assets. This strategy fueled a period of net accumulation, with investors being strong net buyers through 2024 and early 2025. However, this momentum has completely ceased. In the most recent quarter, investor purchasing activity ground to a halt, with zero acquisitions recorded across all tiers.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that Washburn County represents a microcosm of a hyper-local, equity-driven rental market that is currently dormant. The absence of leverage makes it resilient to interest rate shocks, but the recent freeze in activity suggests a sensitivity to local economic conditions or a lack of viable opportunities. The market's future direction depends entirely on the sentiment of these small, independent landlords, who, for the moment, have collectively pressed pause.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 05:50 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Washburn (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Washburn (WI) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-wi-washburn/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.