Fremont (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Fremont (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Fremont (IA)
2,271
Total Investors in Fremont (IA)
457
Investor Owned SFR in Fremont (IA)
402(17.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
402
SFR Owned
324
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
55
SFR Owned
83
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 402 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Fremont County, Buying Properties at a 90% Discount
Investors own 17.7% of Fremont County's SFR market (402 properties), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 93.0% of that portfolio. In the last quarter, new investors entered the market paying an average of just $15,000, an 89.7% discount compared to homeowners. Landlords remain strong net buyers, signaling continued accumulation by small, local operators.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 402 SFR properties in Fremont County, with individual investors holding 80.6%.
The local investor market consists of 457 total landlords, of which 402 (88.0%) are individuals. Cash is the preferred acquisition method, with 336 properties owned outright versus just 66 that are financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 387 rented properties.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired Q1 properties for $15,000, an 89.7% discount to homeowners.
The significant landlord discount is not an anomaly; it has consistently exceeded 50% in every recorded quarter of 2025. In Q3 2025, the discount was 54.9% ($133,847), and in Q2 2025, it reached 80.2% ($228,266). This pattern suggests investors are targeting distressed or off-market properties unavailable to typical buyers.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 15.4% of all SFR properties sold in the last quarter.
All landlord purchase activity came from mom-and-pop investors, with 100% of the 2 acquisitions made by new, single-property landlords. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had zero purchasing activity, reinforcing the market's local character.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 93.0% of all investor-owned SFR housing.
Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, owning 277 properties, which represents 66.4% of the entire investor portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero ownership in Fremont County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, holding 70.0%.
Despite company dominance in larger tiers, individuals own the vast majority of smaller portfolios, holding 89.6% of single-property rentals and 87.9% of two-property portfolios. This establishes a clear pattern where individuals start small and companies operate at a slightly larger scale.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 51652 and 51640.
The highest rate of investor ownership is in zip code 51654, where 22.2% of SFRs are investor-owned. This is closely followed by 51652 (21.9%) and 51640 (21.0%), indicating a few key neighborhoods are investor hotspots.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 36 properties while selling only 13 in 2025.
The net buying trend was consistent throughout the year, with a net gain of 9 properties in Q3 (11 buys vs 2 sells) and another 9 in Q2 (15 buys vs 6 sells). There is no transaction data for institutional investors, as they have no presence in the county.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 13.3% of Q1 transactions, all from new single-property investors.
The average purchase price for these new mom-and-pop investors was just $15,000. None of their acquisitions were from other existing landlords, indicating they sourced deals from the open market or from homeowners directly.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 402 SFR properties in Fremont County, with individual investors holding 80.6%.
Detailed Findings

In Fremont County, investors own 402 single-family residential properties, making up 17.7% of the total 2,271 SFRs in the market. This indicates a significant, but not dominant, investor presence in the local housing landscape.

Individual investors are the primary force, owning 324 properties, which accounts for 80.6% of the investor-owned portfolio. Company-owned properties total 83, or 20.6%, highlighting a market structure built on small-scale, local ownership rather than large corporate entities.

The ownership base is composed of 457 distinct landlord entities, with individuals again forming the vast majority at 402 (88.0%) compared to 55 companies (12.0%). This high ratio of individual landlords reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' character of the county's rental market.

Cash transactions are overwhelmingly favored by investors in Fremont County. The portfolio includes 336 properties owned free and clear, more than five times the 66 properties that carry financing. This suggests a fiscally conservative approach to real estate investing in the area.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards generating rental income, with 387 of the 402 investor-owned properties identified as rented. This demonstrates a strong focus on buy-and-hold strategies among local landlords.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired Q1 properties for $15,000, an 89.7% discount to homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Fremont County demonstrated an unparalleled ability to acquire properties at deep discounts in the most recent quarter. In Q1 2026, the average landlord acquisition price was a mere $15,000, which is 89.7% less than the $145,125 paid by traditional homeowners, a staggering price gap of $130,125.

This trend of securing properties far below homeowner market rates is consistent over time. In Q3 2025, landlords paid $109,778 versus the homeowner price of $243,625, a 54.9% discount. The gap was even wider in Q2 2025, when landlords paid 80.2% less ($56,308 vs. $284,574).

The persistence of such a large price discrepancy quarter after quarter indicates a strategic focus on sourcing undervalued assets. These may include properties in need of significant repair, off-market deals, or other distressed situations not typically pursued by traditional homebuyers.

Comparing prices across recent years shows a fluctuating market. The average landlord acquisition price in 2024 was $135,162, significantly higher than the 2025 average of $75,567. This demonstrates that while the discount to homeowners remains, the absolute price point for investors varies substantially based on market conditions.

The low acquisition prices, particularly the $15,000 average in Q1 2026, suggest that recent investor activity is concentrated at the very lowest end of the market, potentially involving land, tear-downs, or properties requiring extensive renovation.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 15.4% of all SFR properties sold in the last quarter.
Detailed Findings

In the final quarter of 2025, landlords acquired 2 of the 13 total SFR properties sold in Fremont County, capturing a 15.4% share of the market's purchase activity. This level of activity is consistent with their overall 17.7% ownership stake in the county.

The entirety of investor purchasing was driven by the smallest players. Both properties were acquired by new, single-property landlords (Tier 01), who alone accounted for 100.0% of landlord acquisitions. This signals that the market's growth is coming from new entrants rather than portfolio expansion by existing investors.

There was a complete absence of activity from larger investors. Mid-size landlords and institutional investors (Tier 09) made zero purchases, underscoring that Fremont County is not a target for large-scale capital deployment.

The data reveals the entry of 2 new landlord entities into the market, each purchasing their first rental property. This grassroots-level growth is the defining characteristic of investor activity in the county.

The concentration of all activity within the single-property tier highlights a market accessible to small, individual investors, likely local residents capitalizing on low-cost opportunities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 93.0% of all investor-owned SFR housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Fremont County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a combined 93.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) forms the largest segment by a wide margin, holding 277 properties. This accounts for 66.4% of all investor-owned housing, demonstrating that the market is primarily composed of individuals with a single rental unit.

Moving up the scale, ownership thins out rapidly. Landlords with 2 properties hold 7.9% of the portfolio, while those with 3-5 properties hold 14.9%. Together, these smallest three tiers control nearly 90% of the rental stock.

Mid-size investors have a very limited footprint. Landlords in the 11-20 and 21-50 property tiers collectively own just 27 properties, or 6.5% of the total. This indicates a significant barrier or lack of interest in scaling portfolios beyond 10 units.

Institutional ownership is non-existent in Fremont County. The 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) holds zero properties, a clear sign that the market operates entirely outside the scope of large, national investment firms.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, holding 70.0%.
Detailed Findings

A distinct crossover point exists in Fremont County where ownership structure shifts from individual to corporate. While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, holding 7 of the 10 properties (70.0%) at that scale.

At the entry level, individual ownership is overwhelming. Individuals own 250 of the 277 single-property rentals (89.6%) and 29 of the 33 two-property portfolios (87.9%). This confirms that the typical path into the rental market is through personal investment.

Companies, while a minority overall, show higher concentration in larger portfolio sizes. In the 3-5 property tier, companies own 30.8% of properties, a share that grows as portfolio sizes increase, culminating in the 70.0% majority stake in the 11-20 property tier.

This trend suggests a strategic difference between owner types. Individuals tend to operate on a smaller scale, while forming a company appears to be a step taken by investors who are building a more substantial, business-oriented portfolio.

Even with this crossover, the absolute numbers remain small. The 7 properties owned by companies in the 11-20 tier represent the peak of corporate ownership concentration, reinforcing the overall small-scale nature of the Fremont County market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 51652 and 51640.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Fremont County is highly concentrated in a few key zip codes. The zip codes 51652 and 51640 contain the highest number of investor-owned properties, with 125 and 117 respectively. Together, these two areas account for over 60% of all investor properties in the county.

When analyzing by ownership rate, a slightly different picture emerges. Zip code 51654 has the highest investor penetration, with 22.2% of its single-family homes owned by investors. This is followed closely by the high-count areas of 51652 (21.9%) and 51640 (21.0%).

The alignment of high-count and high-percentage regions suggests that investors are targeting specific communities rather than spreading their holdings evenly across the county. These areas likely offer the most favorable combination of affordable housing stock and rental demand.

Other areas with notable investor presence include 51653, with 48 investor-owned properties (13.2% rate), and 51650, where investors own 18.8% of the SFRs.

Data for zip code 51551 was not available for comparison. However, the existing data clearly points to Sidney (51652) and Tabor (51653)/Hamburg (51640) as the primary hubs for real estate investment within Fremont County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 36 properties while selling only 13 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Fremont County are in a clear accumulation phase, consistently buying more properties than they sell. Across 2025, investors were strong net buyers, adding 36 properties to their portfolios while divesting only 13, resulting in a net gain of 23 properties.

This aggressive buying pattern held steady throughout the year. In Q3 2025, landlords purchased 11 properties and sold only 2. Similarly, in Q2 2025, they bought 15 properties and sold 6, showing a consistent strategy of portfolio growth.

The buy-to-sell ratio for the full year 2025 was 2.77, meaning landlords bought nearly three properties for every one they sold. This indicates strong confidence in the local rental market and a long-term hold strategy.

The transaction data for 2024 shows an identical pattern, with 36 properties bought and 13 sold. The stability of this trend over a two-year period highlights a persistent and strategic expansion of rental portfolios in the county.

Reflecting their 0% ownership stake, there was no buying or selling activity from institutional (1,000+ tier) investors, confirming that all market dynamism comes from smaller, local players.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 13.3% of Q1 transactions, all from new single-property investors.
Detailed Findings

In the latest quarter, landlords were involved in 2 of the 15 total SFR transactions, capturing a 13.3% share of market activity. This participation rate is slightly below their overall 17.7% ownership stake in Fremont County.

All investor transaction activity was concentrated at the very bottom of the market ladder. The 2 transactions were both conducted by new single-property (Tier 01) landlords, who are just beginning to build their portfolios.

These new entrants acquired their properties at an exceptionally low average price of $15,000. This price point is significantly below the typical market value for a habitable home, suggesting the purchases were likely for land, distressed assets, or properties requiring major investment.

There was zero inter-landlord trading during the quarter. The data shows that 0.0% of these purchases were from other landlords, meaning new investors are finding their deals from traditional sellers or off-market sources rather than acquiring existing rental properties.

No transactions were recorded for any mid-size or institutional tiers, reinforcing that the transactional market, like the ownership landscape, is exclusively driven by small-scale, mom-and-pop investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, Local Landlords Dominate Fremont County, Buying Properties at a 90% Discount
Holdings
Landlords own 402 SFR properties, representing 17.7% of the market in Fremont County, IA. Individual investors overwhelmingly lead, holding 324 properties (80.6%) compared to 83 (20.6%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q1, landlords secured properties at an average price of $15,000, a remarkable 89.7% discount compared to the $145,125 paid by traditional homeowners.
Activity
Landlord activity accounted for 15.4% of Q4 sales (2 properties). All purchases were made by 2 new single-property landlords, signaling fresh, small-scale entry into the market.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 93.0% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence in the county.
Ownership Type
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, controlling 70.0% of properties at that scale.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, with a 2.77x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (36 buys vs 13 sells). There was no transaction activity from institutional investors.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Fremont County, Iowa, is fundamentally shaped by small, local operators. Investors own 402 properties, a 17.7% share of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly in the hands of individuals, who own 80.6% of these properties, compared to just 20.6% for companies. The market structure heavily favors 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 93.0% of all investor-owned homes. In stark contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have absolutely no presence, a key finding detailed in our Investor Pulse reports.

Investor behavior is characterized by strategic acquisition of undervalued assets and steady portfolio growth. In the most recent quarter, new landlords entered the market by purchasing properties at an average price of just $15,000, representing an 89.7% discount compared to what traditional homeowners paid ($145,125). This pattern suggests a focus on distressed or off-market opportunities. Furthermore, landlords are in a clear accumulation phase, consistently acting as net buyers. In 2025, they purchased nearly three homes for every one they sold (a 2.77x buy/sell ratio), indicating strong confidence in the local market.

The key takeaway from Fremont County is the resilience and dominance of the small, independent landlord. The narrative of large corporations buying up housing does not apply here. Instead, the market is defined by local individuals and small companies expanding their holdings one or two properties at a time. This grassroots activity, combined with a keen eye for discounted properties, shapes a unique and highly localized rental landscape. This market's dynamics are driven by accessible entry points for new investors, rather than the large-scale capital deployment seen in major metropolitan areas.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 10:00 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Fremont (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Fremont (IA) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ia-fremont/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.