Kosciusko (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Kosciusko (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Kosciusko (IN)
25,906
Total Investors in Kosciusko (IN)
5,439
Investor Owned SFR in Kosciusko (IN)
4,309(16.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,659
SFR Owned
3,397
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
780
SFR Owned
972
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,309 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Kosciusko County, Controlling 97% of Rentals as Institutions Retreat
In Kosciusko County, investors own 4,309 single-family properties (16.6% of the market), with small mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 96.8% of this portfolio versus a mere 0.1% for institutional firms. In Q1 2026, landlords were active net buyers, though they paid a surprising 3.9% premium over traditional homeowners, while institutional investors were net sellers, signaling a clear divergence in strategy.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 4,309 SFR properties in Kosciusko County, with individuals holding 78.8%.
The majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (3,131) rather than financed (1,178). A total of 4,190 properties are classified as rented, representing the core of the local rental housing stock. Individual landlords (4,659) outnumber company landlords (780) by nearly 6 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In a surprising reversal, Q1 landlords paid a 3.9% premium over homeowners, at $340,151.
This Q1 premium of $12,652 contrasts sharply with wild swings in previous quarters, including a massive 61.1% premium in Q3 2025 and a deep 35.6% discount in Q1 2025. This volatility indicates an unpredictable and highly competitive acquisition environment for investors in the county.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 18.0% of all single-family homes sold in Kosciusko County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 94.7% of all investor purchases, buying 36 of the 38 properties. New single-property landlords were the most active group, with 38 new entities acquiring 29 homes.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 96.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 0.1% of the investor-held housing stock, totaling only 6 properties. Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, owning 3,348 properties or 74.8% of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Company ownership becomes dominant at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 63.4% of homes.
While individuals own the vast majority of smaller portfolios (82.9% of single-property holdings), companies scale more effectively into larger tiers. The crossover point where companies become the majority owner is between the 6-10 property tier (34.2% company) and the 11-20 tier (63.4% company).
Geographic Distribution
The 46567 zip code is Kosciusko County's top investor hub, with 1,206 properties and a 27.8% ownership rate.
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the top three zip codes by count (46567, 46580, and 46538) containing the majority of investor-owned properties. Zip codes 46555 (27.2%) and 46538 (26.4%) also show extremely high investor ownership rates, well above the county average of 16.6%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 3.27 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1, while institutional investors are neutral.
In Q1 2026, all landlords collectively bought 49 properties and sold only 15. In contrast, institutional investors bought 1 property and sold 1, continuing a trend of divestment or neutrality seen over the past two years, where they were net sellers.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord-involved transactions made up 16.8% of all market activity in Q1 2026.
A massive price gap exists between tiers: institutional investors paid 53.9% less than new mom-and-pop buyers in Q1 ($178,565 vs $387,495). Small landlords in the 3-5 property tier were the most active in inter-landlord trading, with 85.7% of their purchases coming from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 4,309 SFR properties in Kosciusko County, with individuals holding 78.8%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 16.6% share of the single-family residential market in Kosciusko County, amounting to 4,309 properties out of a total of 25,906. This level of ownership highlights the critical role investors play in the local housing ecosystem, particularly in providing rental options.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 3,397 properties, or 78.8% of the investor-owned portfolio. Company-owned properties account for the remaining 22.6% (972 properties), underscoring that the market is primarily driven by small-scale, local participants rather than large corporations.

A strong preference for cash ownership is evident, with 3,131 properties owned outright compared to 1,178 that are financed. This suggests that many local investors have significant capital and may be less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations than leveraged buyers.

The entity count further reinforces the individual-investor narrative. There are 4,659 individual landlords compared to just 780 company landlords. This nearly 6-to-1 ratio indicates a broad base of small investors is the backbone of the county's rental market.

The vast majority of the portfolio, 4,190 properties, are designated as rented. This demonstrates a clear focus on generating rental income, solidifying the role of these investors as primary providers of housing for tenants in Kosciusko County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In a surprising reversal, Q1 landlords paid a 3.9% premium over homeowners, at $340,151.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords in Kosciusko County acquired properties at an average price of $340,151, which was surprisingly 3.9% higher than the $327,499 paid by traditional homeowners. This represents a $12,652 premium per property, challenging the common assumption that investors always secure discounts.

The pricing dynamic has been extremely volatile over the past year. The Q1 premium follows a period of massive fluctuations, from a staggering 61.1% premium ($215,318) in Q3 2025 to a significant 35.6% discount ($105,150) in Q1 2025. This suggests that market conditions, inventory levels, and competition can dramatically alter investor purchasing power on a quarterly basis.

The recent trend of paying at or above homeowner prices may signal intense competition for limited inventory, forcing investors to bid aggressively to secure properties. This behavior is more common in markets where rental demand is high and appreciation is expected.

Comparing prices over a longer horizon, the average acquisition price has shown significant appreciation. The pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $336,367 is similar to the Q1 2026 price, but a notable increase from prices seen in parts of 2025, indicating a rebound in market values.

This pricing behavior suggests that investors in Kosciusko County are not solely focused on deep-value acquisitions. Instead, they appear willing to pay market rates or higher to expand their portfolios, likely driven by strong local rental market fundamentals.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 18.0% of all single-family homes sold in Kosciusko County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

During the fourth quarter of 2025, landlords were a formidable presence in the Kosciusko County market, acquiring 38 of the 211 total SFR properties sold. This represents an 18.0% market share of all purchases, demonstrating sustained investor demand for local housing.

The activity was almost entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, were responsible for 94.7% of all investor acquisitions, purchasing 36 homes. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made only a single purchase.

New market entrants were a significant force, with 38 new single-property landlords acquiring 29 properties. This high level of activity in the smallest tier (76.3% of all investor purchases) signals a healthy and accessible market for first-time investors.

The data clearly shows that growth in the investor market is happening at the grassroots level. The dominance of the single-property and small-landlord tiers in recent acquisitions reinforces the idea that the local rental market is expanding through small, incremental investments by many individuals rather than large-scale corporate acquisitions.

The minimal presence of institutional buyers, with just one entity making a single purchase (2.6% of investor activity), suggests that Kosciusko County is not a primary target for large-scale corporate real estate investing, leaving the field open for local players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 96.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership landscape in Kosciusko County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04, owning 1-10 properties) control a massive 96.8% of all investor-owned single-family homes, shaping the character and dynamics of the local rental market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the single largest group, holding 3,348 properties. This accounts for 74.8% of the entire investor portfolio, highlighting the profound impact of first-time and small-scale investors on the availability of rental housing in the county.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) represent a very small fraction of the market, collectively owning just 3.1% of investor-held SFRs. This indicates a steep drop-off in scale after the 10-property mark, with few investors growing into larger-scale operations locally.

The presence of institutional capital (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) is negligible. These large firms own just 6 properties, which amounts to a mere 0.1% of the investor-owned market. This finding directly counters the narrative of a corporate takeover of housing in Kosciusko County.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market structure, where the collective decisions of thousands of small landlords, rather than a few large corporations, dictate rental prices, property maintenance standards, and housing availability. This structure has significant implications for local housing policy and market stability.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Company ownership becomes dominant at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 63.4% of homes.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type across portfolio sizes: individuals build small portfolios, while companies are structured for larger scale. Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the entry-level tiers, owning 82.9% of single-property portfolios and 66.1% of two-property portfolios.

The operational crossover point occurs once a portfolio exceeds 10 properties. In the 11-20 property tier, companies become the majority owners for the first time, holding 45 properties (63.4%) compared to individuals' 26 properties (36.6%).

This trend intensifies in larger tiers. For portfolios of 21-50 properties, company ownership is even more pronounced at 87.2% (34 properties). This indicates that as investors scale their operations, they are more likely to adopt a formal corporate structure for liability, financing, and management purposes.

Even so, individual ownership persists even at a moderate scale. Individuals still own 34.2% of properties in the 6-10 unit tier, demonstrating that a significant number of mom-and-pop investors manage sizable portfolios without incorporating.

This data suggests a natural lifecycle for a real estate investor in Kosciusko County: start as an individual, and if growth continues beyond 10 properties, formalize into a company structure to support a larger, more complex operation.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 46567 zip code is Kosciusko County's top investor hub, with 1,206 properties and a 27.8% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Kosciusko County is not evenly distributed, with activity concentrated in specific zip codes. The 46567 area is the primary hotspot, containing 1,206 investor-owned properties, which translates to a high ownership rate of 27.8%.

High penetration rates are also seen in other areas, including 46555 (27.2%) and 46538 (26.4%). These rates are significantly above the county-wide average of 16.6%, indicating these zip codes are highly attractive targets for rental property investment.

The top regions by sheer volume of investor properties are 46567 (1,206), 46580 (624), and 46538 (564). These three areas alone account for a substantial portion of the county's total rental stock, making them critical sub-markets to monitor.

The correlation between high property counts and high ownership percentages in areas like 46567 and 46538 suggests these are mature investment markets. Investors have not only acquired many properties there but have also achieved a high density of ownership relative to the total housing stock.

Understanding these geographic concentrations is key for anyone analyzing the local market. For renters, it indicates areas with more housing options. For other investors, it points to proven markets, though it may also signal higher competition. The assessor data for these zip codes would provide deeper property-level insights.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 3.27 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1, while institutional investors are neutral.
Detailed Findings

The transaction data reveals a clear divergence in strategy between small and large investors in Kosciusko County. Overall, landlords are aggressive accumulators of property, consistently buying more than they sell. In Q1 2026, they purchased 49 homes while selling only 15, resulting in a net gain of 34 properties and a strong 3.27-to-1 buy/sell ratio.

This net buyer behavior has been consistent over time. In 2025, landlords added a net 125 properties to their portfolios, and in 2024, they added a net 243. This trend points to long-term confidence in the local rental market among the broader investor community.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) are not in an accumulation phase. In Q1 2026, they were neutral, with one purchase and one sale. This follows a pattern of being net sellers in previous periods, such as in 2024 when they sold 9 properties and bought only 5.

This dynamic indicates that the growth in investor ownership is being fueled entirely by mom-and-pop and mid-size landlords. While smaller investors are expanding their footprint, the largest players are either trimming their portfolios or holding steady, choosing not to expand in this particular market.

The data suggests two separate markets are at play: one where local investors see opportunity and are actively buying, and another where institutional capital is either reallocating elsewhere or has already reached its desired exposure in the county. These market reports can reveal underlying factors driving these disparate strategies.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord-involved transactions made up 16.8% of all market activity in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords participated in 49 of the 292 total SFR transactions in Kosciusko County, representing a 16.8% share of all market activity. This solidifies their position as a consistent and active segment of the local real estate market.

Transaction volume was, unsurprisingly, concentrated at the smaller end of the spectrum. New, single-property landlords were the most active, conducting 38 transactions. This aligns with the broader theme of grassroots growth in the county's investor landscape.

A striking pricing disparity emerged between investor tiers in Q1. First-time landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $387,495. In dramatic contrast, the single institutional purchase (Tier 09) was for just $178,565. This 53.9% price difference suggests institutional buyers target a completely different asset class, likely lower-cost or distressed properties, compared to mom-and-pop investors who may be buying more turnkey homes.

Inter-landlord activity is a key feature of the market for established small investors. Landlords in the 3-5 property tier sourced 85.7% of their new acquisitions from other landlords. This indicates a liquid secondary market where investors trade assets among themselves, often off-market.

Conversely, new investors are buying from the general public, with only 13.2% of their purchases coming from other landlords. This shows a clear divide: new entrants buy from homeowners, while experienced investors often trade within their own network.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Kosciusko County's rental market is controlled by small investors, who own 97% of stock while institutions sell.
Holdings
Investors own 4,309 SFR properties, representing 16.6% of Kosciusko County's market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 3,397 properties (78.8%), while companies own the remaining 972 (22.6%).
Pricing
In a notable Q1 2026 market shift, landlords paid an average of $340,151, a 3.9% premium over the $327,499 paid by traditional homeowners, bucking typical discount trends.
Activity
Landlords purchased 18.0% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter, with activity led by 38 new single-property investors entering the market for the first time.
Market Share
Small, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 96.8% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold a mere 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the backbone of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios larger than 10 properties, controlling 63.4% of homes in the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in Q1 with a 3.27-to-1 buy/sell ratio (49 buys vs 15 sells), whereas institutional investors were neutral, continuing their multi-year trend of net selling or divestment.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Kosciusko County, Indiana, is fundamentally a story of the small, local investor. Landlords own 4,309 properties, a 16.6% share of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 78.8% of these homes (3,397 properties). The market structure analysis reveals an extreme concentration among mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who command a 96.8% share of all investor-owned properties. In stark contrast, institutional firms with portfolios exceeding 1,000 homes have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of the local investor-held inventory.

Investor behavior in Q1 2026 highlights a dynamic and competitive environment. Landlords were active participants, accounting for 18.0% of all home purchases. In a surprising departure from national trends, they paid a 3.9% premium over traditional homeowners, suggesting intense competition for available properties. Transaction data shows two diverging paths: mom-and-pop landlords are in a clear accumulation phase, acting as strong net buyers with a 3.27-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1. Conversely, institutional players are either neutral or net sellers, signaling a strategic retreat or reallocation of capital away from the county.

The key takeaway from this data is that Kosciusko County's housing market is not undergoing a corporate takeover. Instead, its stability and the availability of rental housing are dependent on a large, fragmented base of individual and small-business owners. While this insulates the market from the shocks of large-scale institutional divestment, it also means that local economic conditions directly impacting small investors will have an outsized effect on the rental landscape. The clear geographic concentrations in zip codes like 46567, where investors own 27.8% of homes, point to sub-markets that are heavily reliant on the health of these small-scale real estate operations.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:43 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Kosciusko (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Kosciusko (IN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-in-kosciusko/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.