Sedgwick (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Sedgwick (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Sedgwick (KS)
155,935
Total Investors in Sedgwick (KS)
27,852
Investor Owned SFR in Sedgwick (KS)
30,347(19.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
24,201
SFR Owned
20,297
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
3,651
SFR Owned
10,315
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 30,347 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Sedgwick County's Investor Market is Dominated by Small Landlords Achieving Record Discounts
Investors own 19.5% of SFRs (30,347 properties) in Sedgwick County, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling 83.6% versus a mere 0.2% for institutions. In Q4, landlords purchased 16.1% of homes sold, paying a remarkable 31.3% less than homeowners, and remain strong net buyers across all portfolio sizes.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 30,347 SFR properties in Sedgwick County, with individuals holding nearly 67% of the portfolio.
Cash is the preferred holding method, with 19,822 properties owned outright versus 10,525 financed. The vast majority of the portfolio (95.9%) is classified as rented, confirming a strong focus on rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 31.3% less than homeowners in Q4, securing an average discount of $89,926 per property.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has widened dramatically throughout the year, from just 2.0% in Q1 to 31.3% in Q4. Landlord acquisition prices in Q4 ($197,375) have still appreciated 11.3% from the 2020-2023 average ($177,298).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 16.1% of all SFR properties sold in Sedgwick County in Q4, purchasing 350 homes.
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) dominated the activity, accounting for 76.3% of all investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) acquired just 7 properties, or 2.0% of the investor total.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 83.6% of all investor-owned SFRs in Sedgwick County.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a minimal footprint, controlling just 0.2% of the market (61 properties). Single-property landlords are the backbone of the market, alone owning 54.6% of all investor-held homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
The crossover from individual to company control is sharp: individuals own 64.3% of properties in the 3-5 tier, but companies own 65.6% in the 6-10 tier. In portfolios with 21-50 properties, company ownership reaches 94.3%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is highly concentrated in zip codes 67213 and 67211, which together contain 4,929 properties.
Certain smaller zip codes show extreme market penetration, with both 67055 and 67031 having 50.0% of their SFRs owned by investors. The areas with the highest counts are not the same as those with the highest rates, indicating different investment strategies.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 1.42 properties for every one they sold in Q4 2025.
This accumulation trend is consistent, with a net gain of 788 properties for the full year 2025. Institutional investors are also expanding, purchasing 8 homes and selling only 5 in the last quarter.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 13.8% of all Q4 transactions, conducting 437 purchases.
A stark pricing difference exists by tier: institutional investors paid 35.6% less than new single-property landlords ($121,240 vs $188,377). Larger investors source more deals from peers, with the 51-100 property tier buying 58.5% of their homes from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 30,347 SFR properties in Sedgwick County, with individuals holding nearly 67% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors own 30,347 Single-Family Residential properties in Sedgwick County, representing a significant 19.5% of the total 155,935 SFRs in the market.

The market is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who own 20,297 properties (66.9%), while companies own the remaining 10,315 (34.0%).

This individual dominance is even more pronounced when looking at entity counts, where 24,201 individual landlords far outnumber the 3,651 company landlords, a ratio of nearly 7-to-1.

Cash holdings substantially outpace financed properties, with 19,822 homes held free-and-clear compared to 10,525 with financing, suggesting a well-capitalized investor base.

The portfolio's primary purpose is clear, as 29,096 properties (95.9%) are classified as rented, indicating a market squarely focused on generating rental income rather than short-term speculation.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 31.3% less than homeowners in Q4, securing an average discount of $89,926 per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Sedgwick County demonstrated a powerful purchasing advantage in Q4 2025, acquiring properties for an average of $197,375 while traditional homeowners paid $287,301.

This represents a staggering 31.3% discount, saving landlords an average of $89,926 on every home purchased compared to the typical buyer.

The landlord discount has exploded over the course of the year, widening from a mere 2.0% ($5,881) in Q1 to 6.6% in Q2, 12.1% in Q3, and its current high of 31.3% in Q4.

This accelerating trend suggests landlords are increasingly adept at finding off-market deals or are targeting a segment of distressed or lower-value properties that homeowners may be avoiding.

Despite securing deep discounts, the prices landlords are paying have still risen. The Q4 average of $197,375 marks an 11.3% increase from the average price of $177,298 paid during the pandemic-era boom from 2020-2023.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 16.1% of all SFR properties sold in Sedgwick County in Q4, purchasing 350 homes.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a significant force in the Q4 2025 housing market, purchasing 350 of the 2,174 total SFRs sold, which translates to a 16.1% market share.

The bulk of this activity was driven by small-scale 'mom-and-pop' landlords. Investors owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively purchased 267 homes, representing 76.3% of all landlord acquisitions.

New entrants flooded the market, with 211 new single-property landlord entities making their first purchase. This group alone was the most active, buying 155 properties and accounting for 44.3% of the investor total.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had a negligible impact on the market, acquiring only 7 properties, a mere 2.0% of the investor purchase volume.

This data highlights a market where growth is fueled from the ground up by new and small investors, rather than being driven by large-scale corporate acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 83.6% of all investor-owned SFRs in Sedgwick County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Sedgwick County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords with portfolios of 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) own 83.6% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the rental market, with this group alone owning 17,265 properties, which accounts for more than half (54.6%) of the entire investor-owned housing stock.

In stark contrast, the narrative of Wall Street dominance does not apply here. Institutional investors in the 1,000+ property tier own only 61 homes, a negligible 0.2% of the market.

The market structure is highly fragmented, with the vast majority of ownership concentrated at the lowest end of the portfolio spectrum.

This distribution reveals that the local rental market is primarily supplied by a large number of small, local business owners rather than a small number of large corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern of professionalization emerges as investors scale their portfolios. While individuals are the dominant owners in smaller tiers, companies take control as portfolio sizes grow.

Individuals own a commanding 88.5% of properties in the single-property tier and maintain a majority through the 3-5 property tier (64.3%).

The critical crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04). At this level, ownership flips, with companies controlling 65.6% of the properties.

Company ownership rapidly solidifies at higher tiers, reaching 76.3% in the 11-20 property tier and a near-total 94.3% in the 21-50 property tier.

This trend suggests that as investors grow beyond a small number of holdings, they increasingly adopt corporate structures for liability protection, financing advantages, and operational efficiency.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is highly concentrated in zip codes 67213 and 67211, which together contain 4,929 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Sedgwick County is not evenly distributed but is instead focused on specific geographic pockets. The zip codes 67213 and 67211 serve as the epicenters, holding 2,587 and 2,342 investor-owned properties, respectively.

Together, these two zip codes contain 4,929 properties, which is 16.2% of the county's entire investor-owned portfolio, demonstrating a significant geographic concentration.

While some areas lead by volume, others lead by market share. The zip codes 67055 and 67031 exhibit the highest investor penetration rates at 50.0%, meaning every other home in those areas is an investment property.

The contrast between high-count areas (like 67213 with a 37.5% rate) and high-rate areas highlights distinct market dynamics, separating larger, more established rental markets from smaller, potentially saturated ones.

This geographic analysis reveals that investors are employing targeted strategies, focusing their capital on specific submarkets within the county rather than a broad, uniform approach.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 1.42 properties for every one they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Sedgwick County are actively growing their portfolios, consistently functioning as net buyers in the market. In Q4 2025, they purchased 437 properties while only selling 308, resulting in a net increase of 129 homes.

This represents a buy-to-sell ratio of 1.42x, signaling strong confidence and a strategy of accumulation rather than liquidation.

This behavior is a sustained trend throughout the year. For all of 2025, landlords acquired 1,928 properties and sold 1,140, for a total net gain of 788 properties and a 1.69x buy-to-sell ratio.

Institutional investors (1,000+ tier) are aligned with this growth trend. They were also net buyers in Q4, with 8 acquisitions against 5 dispositions.

The consistent, positive net acquisition across all investor types points to a bullish sentiment on the future of the Sedgwick County rental market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 13.8% of all Q4 transactions, conducting 437 purchases.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords played a key role in market liquidity, participating in 13.8% of all SFR transactions with 437 total purchases.

A significant pricing advantage is evident for larger investors. Institutional buyers (Tier 09) paid an average of $121,240, a 35.6% discount compared to the $188,377 paid by first-time, single-property landlords (Tier 01).

This price gap suggests that larger, more experienced operators are targeting different assets, possibly distressed or bulk properties, which are not available to smaller buyers.

Transaction activity was heavily weighted toward the small end of the market, with mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) responsible for 335 transactions, whereas institutional investors conducted only 8.

Established investors are more likely to trade amongst themselves. For landlords in the 51-100 property tier, 58.5% of their Q4 acquisitions came from other landlords, indicating a mature secondary market that newer entrants (11.7%) have yet to fully access.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small 'Mom-and-Pop' Landlords Own 83.6% of Investor Housing in Sedgwick County, Institutions Hold Just 0.2%
Holdings
Landlords own 30,347 SFR properties, 19.5% of the market in Sedgwick County, with individual investors holding a 66.9% majority (20,297 homes) over companies at 34.0% (10,315 homes).
Pricing
In Q4, landlords paid an average of $197,375, securing a massive 31.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners, a price gap that widened dramatically throughout the year.
Activity
Investors purchased 16.1% of all homes sold in Q4 (350 properties), a period that also saw an influx of 211 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The market is dominated by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 83.6% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own a mere 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors command portfolios under six properties, but the 6-10 property tier marks the crossover point where companies become the majority owners, with their share reaching 94.3% in larger tiers.
Transactions
All investors are in accumulation mode, with landlords acting as net buyers in Q4 (437 buys vs. 308 sells). Institutional investors mirrored this trend, also ending the quarter as net buyers (8 buys vs. 5 sells).
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Sedgwick County, KS, is defined by the dominance of small, local operators, a direct contradiction to the narrative of a corporate takeover. Investors own 30,347 SFR homes, representing 19.5% of the county's market. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control 83.6% of the housing stock. In contrast, large institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a nearly invisible footprint, owning just 0.2%. Ownership is also tilted toward individuals, who hold 66.9% of properties compared to 34.0% for companies.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by savvy acquisitions and continued growth. Landlords purchased 16.1% of all homes sold, demonstrating a remarkable ability to find value by paying 31.3% less than traditional homeowners—a price gap that widened significantly throughout the year. The market is also growing, with an influx of 211 new single-property landlords. Critically, all investor segments, from the smallest mom-and-pops to the largest institutions, were net buyers, signaling broad confidence in the local rental market's future.

The key takeaway is that the Sedgwick County rental housing market is a fragmented ecosystem powered by thousands of individual investors and small businesses, not a monolith controlled by Wall Street. The primary trends are the increasing financial advantage investors hold over retail buyers and a persistent, market-wide strategy of portfolio accumulation. This suggests a healthy, liquid market where professional operators can find value and continue to expand, shaping the local housing supply for the foreseeable future.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 16, 2026 at 06:21 PM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Sedgwick (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Sedgwick (KS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-ks-sedgwick/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.